It's forbidden to have a different opinion on /pol/ now. Everything that doesn't fit their fedora core alt-right narrative gets deleted.
For a bunch who constantly cry about censorship in their e-lives this is certainly ironic.
Just wanted to bring this to your attention
dumb /pol/ack.
>>556825
This thread would have failed the quality test on every board other than the designated shitting boards.
>>556843
You mean dead boards? Because you see this shit all the time on /v/, /b/, /tv/, /sp/, /co/, /int/, /his/, /pol/... and yes even your beloved /a/ you fucking weeb.
>>556825
You are lucky you didn't get banned for violating >>>/pol/rules/2
>>556825
>leaf poster
be happy it isnt a permaban
>>556850
All of those, other than /co/ and /a/, are designated shitting boards by virtue of the fact that they have no mods.
>>556859
OP pic clearly proves otherwise.
>>556859
>other than /co/ and /a/
/int/ and /pol/ are the only dedicated shitposting boards you listed
>>556852
>this rule
>ever enforced
>>556864
>4chan rules
>ever enforeced
>>556850
>you see this shit all the time on x board
Seeing a 30 second low effort bait post is not really a good measure of board quality, considering even crossboarders can do that shit
I usually follow those kind of threads and report every dumb reply until the thread gets deleted
>>556871
>so butthurt he stays in the thread to report every replies
>>556875
Eh, I don't have anything better to do with my life, so why not embrace the autism
>>556878
can't argue with that.
>>556825
Low quality thread, intentional shitposting. A worthy deletion
Not a /pol/ guy, I'm a bernie kinda fella.
/pol/ is made for politically incorrect discussion. The left does not belong there. I do wish there was a board for those of us with a left outlook on things, though.
>>556946
It's /pol/, not /rightpol/ or /leftpol/
>>556947
There is no such thing as "leftpol"
>>556825
Yeah your post was truly a work of art.
How dare they censor such a revolutionary masterpiece of a post.
Jesus.
>>556825
Getting your shitty b8 thread deleted isn't censorship, faggot.
Your low-effort trolling is fucking cancer. If you had half a brain, which you clearly don't, you would provide some points of debate, at the very minimum, supporting your anti-right position. If you can't even do that, but merely post a tired, overposted image with a single line of invective, you deserve a heavy ban.
We had a little campaign to fight against you mindless plebbitor invaders, and it looks like some of the mods are starting to realize the source of the cancer. Namely, you and your idiotic, sliding waves of sourceless stupidity.
However, I'm curious about why pic related thread was deleted an hour ago after I posted this....
/pol/ is a safe space now, if you make any of the /pol/tards upset they will get triggered and call the janitor because you hurt their feelings
>>556970
>Anyone who enjoys trolling me and making me upset is a redditor and/or a leftist!
lmao you are such a massive fucking cringeworthy faggot. pic related, its you!
>>556949
>There is no such thing as "leftpol"
There is, in fact, a board called /leftypol/.
But not on 4chan. We actually used to have interesting debates here before the commies and anarchists all ran away to make their little snugglebubble. Of course, /pol/ did the same thing, unfortunately.
This is why we must fight for 4chan /pol/. It may be the only heterogeneous bastion of free speech left.
>>556975
>if you make any of the /pol/tards upset they will get triggered and call the janitor because you hurt their feelings
You didn't hurt our feelings, you moron. You pissed us off with your mindless shitposting.
That's all you retards can ever do against us. It's like you're all reading a script.
Step 1: Call us stupid.
Step 2: Other adhominems
Step 3: MEMES
Step 4: RUN AWAY!
Why the fuck would any intelligent person bother debating or even posting in a 7gag-tier thread like yours?
Step up, faggot.
>>556982
>types mini essays on how angry he is
>thinks he's not upset
>thinks he's not getting triggered
>thinks he's not having an emotional reaction
its like pottery
A
FUCKING
LEAF
>>557057
Yes, I'm angry. Where did I say that I'm not?
I'm angry at the increasingly dumbed down culture here, the lack of critical thought in posts, and the silencing tactics that are starting to infect 4chan.
No, you will never be able to use your 'democratic' up and down boats here, you outsiders. We are all equal in our anonymity.
This is the greatness of the image board format, that the users cannot interfere in the visibility of any post they may disagree with.
Moderation is necessary, but they should have clearly defined lines of action.
The line should never be drawn along the perimeter of goodthink or wrongthink. This is a concern for quite a few of us that still care.
The line should be drawn at the point where mindless shitposting interferes with rational debate. And in the case of OP, making an unoriginal thread with no thought and only accusations has the effect of filling the catalog with threads that push the few interesting threads to page 10 faster.
>>556825
And here we go. Legitimate discussion shut down by a mod for no other reason than the pic he didn't like.
This is /pol/. Where users spam 50 replies of POO IN LOO, HEIL HITLER and make the baitest, dumbest threads. Don't fucking kid us about your hotpockety standards.
>>557131
I wonder if you're trying to push a narrative.
I wouldn't put it past you desperate, degenerate faggots to actually learn something from /pol/ and try to use it to push you agenda. What I'm talking about here is what we commonly refer to as the false flag.
We can play that game as well. It wouldn’t be hard to get a small group of anons together to make some shitty ‘HURR DURR, LEFTISTS ARE ALL NECKBEARDS’ threads and then flag the shit out of them to create some kind of narrative to bring back to /qa/ to then scream about the ‘anti-white’ slant of /pol/?
Do you dare me to do it? I assure you that I can.
What I suggest to you, is perhaps elucidate your ‘anti-/pol/’ position a little in the OP.
If you can.
Also, you flag yourself with your lack of original thought and anti-4chan accusations.
*as a side note, you might be right, but I'm american, so I don't give a fuck
>>556825
>>556825
>There's something wrong involving /pol/ for the billionth time this week
Why does 4chan even have a politics board, let alone three of them? Who the fuck thinks the internet is a good place to talk about politics? G00k should just delete all of them, they all suck.
>>557195
>Who the fuck thinks the internet is a good place to talk about politics?
Where the fuck else would we talk about it?
In coffee houses?
>>557195
>let alone three of them?
/pol/, /new/, what's the third one?
Also, I would like an answer as to why this thread was deleted.
Is it because we were joking about 'invading' /v/?
How can we invade a website that we have been posting on for years and years?
Does this indicate some kind of SJW mod takeover?
pic related
>>557217
part 2
Wtf happened here?
Are you not supposed to talk about meta issues in /pol/?
Or did we trigger some faggot?
>>557221
part 3
Did we make someone cry?
Oh no, better stop that big mean boogieman /pol/!
>>556982
fuck 8(notspam)chan and their stupid /leftypol/
>>557217
>thread about /v/ on the politics board
Gee, I wonder.
>>557114
Your opinion is poo-poo.
>>557217
>its a capitalist revolution THROUGHOUT THE WORLD
wew
>not browsing /pol/ in 2016
>unironically bein a goy
>>557131
And of course, it goes without saying a 1 day ban followed his hotpocketedness's power trip.
I enjoyed life for one day while he kept filling his piss bottle, deleting threads that hits too close to home. For free. For free.
>>557973
Hey retard you got 2 warnings in the form of those threads being deleted. What did you expect to happen?
also
>Legitimate discussion
lmao
>>558157
>Your post clearly was trying to incite an angry reaction
Just open /pol/ for 2 seconds, you colossal retard.
>>557158
>We can play that game as well. It wouldn’t be hard to get a small group of anons together to make some shitty ‘HURR DURR, LEFTISTS ARE ALL NECKBEARDS’ threads and then flag the shit out of them to create some kind of narrative to bring back to /qa/ to then scream about the ‘anti-white’ slant of /pol/?
You can flag them but it's up to the mods to delete them.
And mods here aren't supposed to have an agenda as far as on topic discussions are concerned.
>>556970
>screenshot
Pro-tip: Anyone that repeatedly says 'we" when referring to anything on imageboards is blatantly new and has no one idea what they're talking about.
Id that post didn't get a flood of posts containing only
>we
then /pol/ is truly lost forever
