Why the sudden rise in threads on /qa/ demanding that /pol/ be deleted? Is it because of the American election? Is there some group that doesn't like /pol/'s political leanings? Has /pol/ stirred up some hornet's nest or other?
>>527686
tis but a meme I have reason to believe
>>527686
One fucking guy says "delete pol lol" and the board gets flooded with poltards for two weeks.
This is /qa/; it literally can be just one guy spamming threads trying to astroturf.
It seems there is always some super triggered autist (or two max who share the same convictions) waging one-man wars here against whatever shit that triggers their tiggers. /pol/, anime, ponies etc.
I agree, we need to delete /pol/
>>527686
cute awoo poster
>>527704
~awoo
>>527686
You'll notice half of them are intentionally written in reddit style and are simply /pol/ bait. The other half, I think people are getting annoyed at Trump posting leaking, because for many a year now, the standard response has been ignore them and let /pol/ have their way rather than fight them off to keep shit on topic, as that would be feeding the troll. So as it it, you have Trump posting, people Trump posting in response to Trump posting, and other anons getting mad if you tell Trump posters to fuck off.
>>527686
Newcunts to 4chan who are fresh off the boat from facebook and reddit who don't understand that the views expressed on /pol/ are the same views 4chan has always had.
These facebookers and redditors get triggered when they see anything that conflicts with their narrow world view, and rather than engage in intelligent discussion they proceed to whinge and cry to get their way.
They have no understanding of the history and culture of 4chan and try to make this website into a hugbox for their safe, crowd pleasing PC views.
Most of the people getting told to "go back to /pol/" have likely never been there, but facebookers get triggered when someone makes an offhand, throwaway comment they may not like.
For example, I saw in a thread specifically about London someone post "I still can't believe London has a muslim mayor". An quick, inoffensive and relevant post that triggered the facebookers so hard they bombarded this person with "le back to le pole xdxd" posts until the janny (who is a redditor) came to delete the "offending" post and ban the poster.
These redditors and facebookers are likely the same people who want strict moderation and everything pigeon-holed into generals.
>>527789
>who don't understand that the views expressed on /pol/ are the same views 4chan has always had.
Revisionist history at its finest.
>>527790
Spotted the facebooker.
>>527790
I've only been here since 2012: The Post
>>527795
Haha, got him!
I wish these newfags who weren't here back in the good old days of 2012 would just leave.
Keep fighting the good fight /b/rother.
>>527797
And ironic shitposting completes the unholy trinity. Your certificate is in the mail.
>>527792
>mittposting since 2012
>>527790
This is the face of true racism
>>527765
I want to stick my dick in the awoo
>>527810
Awoo is not for lewds...
>>527790
>>527791
>>527809
big lie. 4chan does stuff that's offensive for the lulz. everyone hated stormfront and conservicucks. most of 4chan is so contrarian as to not even have a political opinion except "not the one mommy and daddy like' anyway. pol is full of degenerate edgetards who can't tell the difference between their political views and taking a knife to the raft that keeps them afloat.
>>528034
awoo is practically made for sex, anon
>>528039
Spotted the facebooker
>>528039
/pol/ is like /b/ and will jump at any chance to get some lulz even when they know it would hurt the reputation of their candidate.
>>528070
Unless it's Trump.
This is really the one thing I hate about /pol/. The idiocy of Trump and Trump supports is a goldmines of memes. Except /pol/ unironically supports him and gets personally offended if it doesn't paint Trump in a slightly positive light.
Yes, I'm aware some memes may have an overall negative effect, but they shill have a positive attitude on Trump.
>>527686
I don't see why Hiro shouldn't delete /pol/
>>528076
>This is really the one thing I hate about /pol/. The idiocy of Trump and Trump supports is a goldmines of memes. Except /pol/ unironically supports him
asshurt liberal detected
>>528082
Fuck off Ameritard.
>>528084
Spotted the redditor
>>528082
This is what I mean. We could have 3 times the memes if people actually
> jump at any chance to get some lulz even when they know it would hurt the reputation of their candidate.
Instead we just get rehashes of emperor trump pictures.
>>528084
lol, I'm not even a burger. It's literally 4-6am or some shit there.
>>528090
trump has been a powerhouse for meme production and dank oc, fampai. Do you really expect /pol/ not to latch onto and generally support a particular candidate during an election?
>>528098
I'm saying
>> jump at any chance to get some lulz even when they know it would hurt the reputation of their candidate.
is blatantly false.
>>527686
It's almost as if people are sick of /pol/ dominating their home boards, stifling any opinions that aren't /pol/ approved anjd overall forcing a "/pol/ law zone" on other boards, completely destroying their culture and putting /pol/ approved ones up in place while telling all the original inhabitants to "go to (place I hate)"
