Why is this a rule?
Do you really want threads devoted to stalking, gossiping, and shitposting about actors and actresses? The entire board would be personal life generals.
There are actresses who are under the legal age of consent in every state in the union.
Have 500+ reply Generals for each one, where the content of the thread is pictures of them in skimpy clothes (those exist, in day-to-day life AS WELL AS set-pictures of them dressed up for their various acting roles), suggestive poses, their naked feet AND text replies, each about one sentence long, talking about how they want to cum on/in/near these girls, or lick their feet. Or cumming on their feet and licking it off.
These threads DID exist. I am not speaking hyperbolicly. These were a real thing, and were real cancer. The rule exists for this reason.
This is also why topics about male actors go unnoticed by the moderators; They're tasteful. Generally.
>>437177
Yes he does. It's why he's asking.
Notice how it's 'actress and actor.' That's for a reason, bub. I'd advise you to avoid celebrity worship for your own good.
>>437209
Davey was a sick fuck.
>>437174
It's supposed to keep people from posting paparazzi bullshit.
Instead the mods abuse the rule and ban people from talking about the actors at all.
>>437592
RIP in peace Davey
>>437209
So when Ariel Winters is 18 can people finally make fun of how stupid she is for cutting her tits off and it will go unnoticed?
Why would insecure 4chan mods remove threads about obsessing over beautiful people? Hmm.
>>437619
Just ones they like
