>why the hell is this a general?
Many people have had complaints about /co/'s mods over the years and none of them have ever been answered for. The only thing that seems to help is having a thread up on /qa/ as it causes the staff to back off. This general is an attempt to maintain relative peace on /co/ and catalog all the issues that Anons have had.
>/q/ and /qa/ threads (some of these have been put on autosage)
https://desustorage.org/q/thread/446375/
https://desustorage.org/q/thread/453237/
https://desustorage.org/qa/thread/491372/
https://desustorage.org/qa/thread/493386/
https://desustorage.org/qa/thread/497718/
>/co/ threads that contain deleted content
https://desustorage.org/co/thread/81593576/
https://desustorage.org/co/thread/81652644/
>/co/ threads that have been deleted entirely or autosaged
https://desustorage.org/co/thread/81696636/
Please contribute any links you have to discussion that is relevant and/or content that you believe was unfairly deleted. This general will receive a new thread when it hits page 10 normally or when it hits page 6 if it's autosaged.
>no link to the last thread that was complaining about liberal autosage that ended up getting autosaged
>>493386
>>498855
>/co/ threads that have been deleted entirely or autosaged
That list is stupidly small, janitor does this far too often and for little reason. It pisses me off. The /co/ janitor is complete shit, but I've complained about him quite a bit now. It's all warranted but it's not like shit actually gets done here. It's moaning central
He's shit and doesn't seem to understand the board. He deletes fun threads that people are enjoying, or that have gone on to discuss things regardless of the OP, all the while leaving other trash up. What kind of faggot deletes a /co//ck/ thread ffs
Rulefags in general are also killing the site, the rules have always been guidelines with immense leeway, but recently every faggot is just reporting because they don't like the post. This place is generally meant for fun, but it's like people seem to think of it as some sort of completely serious discussion forum. If you followed the rules to the letter, most boards wouldn't be anything like what they are currently, but janitors seem to randomly think they can do exactly that and seemingly at random. It's killing the board and by extension the site, but really what can we do.
I mean, even this is just going to be dismissed as either another whiney shitpost in the sea of /qa/, complete hyperbole, or just sour apples on my part.
I hope it gets better, /co/'s one of my main boards.
>>492360
>>498484
>>498689
>>498855
No one cares
>>498884
thanks for bumping
>>498892
Your welcome desu~!
*kisses*
>>498897
>tfw that reply would be deleted on /co/ for being too lewd, but only if posted in certain threads
>>498900
>mfw you enjoyed the kiss regardless
>mfw you have no face
Please report more
>>499003
You realize the issue here is that they delete too much, yeah?
Since this is a general, does anyone here want their dick sucked? That's what we do in generals, after all.
>>499025
No, half of the issue is that they delete too much. The other half is that they're playing favorites to a ridiculous extreme. Get it straight fgt.
>>499025
I think they should delete more. There are very few staff members according to Moot's final release. Removal of low quality posts depends on the users' ability to report. Without reports, the moderation would have to manually comb through every single post on the board.
>>499308
No, mainly for indie comics.
>>499310
I'd take the time to read through some of the linked threads if I were you. Mods are severely twisting vague rules or ignoring them outright to delete content that doesn't deserve it. It's to the point where a Fairly Oddparents thread gets deleted far faster than prolapsed cow anus - and yes, I reported the latter.
I don't understand how "no anthros" means "nothing with fur even if it's goddamn Looney Tunes". Especially when this applies at completely random times. It's like you're handling a live bomb posting anything that's part animal
>>499782
Usually mods look at people who post the same style post they got banned for.
/co/ drawthread is back to mass deletions.
>>>/co/81932084
https://desustorage.org/co/thread/81932084/#81932084
Recent bans page
http://www.4chan.org/bans
has not been updated since mass deletions began, so cannot be sure if bans are following the deletions like last time.
Though looking at it now, there are two 30 day bans for evasions on the drawthread. Both posts mention Addy. As always, cannot be sure on this end of things if they were actually evading or not.
Bans page should update soon, we'll see what the damage is then, but also be aware that the recent bans page is NOT complete, many bans made recently are not listed on that page.
Suggesting that we NOT freak out just yet. It might only be a janitor, not a mod. If that's the case it's not really worth freaking out too much about, but again, we'll have to wait and see.
>/co/ so autistic they bring their general-faggotry here
>>499858
This.
Get over yourselves, you children. It's cartoons; The audio-visual equivalent of toys. For children. Oh no, the moderator followed the letter of the law! OH NO THE MODERATOR SHOWED DISCRETION!!!
Who cares?
Why the fuck is this a general?
>Because if we CONSTANTLY COMPLAIN the moderators sit back, shake their heads and leave the place to wallow in its shit, exactly as we want it!
Okay. Great. Great thread. Top-tier thread. You've really helped the cause.
>>499860
Dunno why you felt the need to rant if you're not invested in the board. These threads are popping up very often now and they turn into the same demands for links every time. A general actually helps keep multiple /co/ threads from being in the catalog.
I don't really care if the mods (officially) respond, I know they won't. But as long as a thread is up, they don't fuck the board as hard. That's all that really matters.
>>499892
I can't wait to see how Juan twists this into /co/ being literally tumblr crybabie newfags.
By the way, why is he referred to as "Juan"?
>>499857
Checked the updated ban page; 7 30 day bans for ban evasion from the /co/ drawthread are listed.
Wew-fucking-lad.
So drawthreads are being hit the hardest.
OPs for drawthreads have a ton of relevant links, the next really should link to this thread.
Linking to /qa/ threads is something that's beeing proposed and discussed-propositions and discussions that were promptly deleted and 30-day-banned, of course-last time shit went down, but no one ever actually did it.
At the very least some brave soul should link to this thread in a post over there.
>>499905
Just updated again
There are now 5 more 30-day bans for ban evasions from /co/.
One of them is not from the drawthread, though, and looks like a legitimate evader.
But still, 4 more, and that's just whatever fraction of recent bans the bans page lists.
Last week, when the first wave of shit was finally over, people on the old /qa/ thread were upset at themselves for not screencapping all the false bans when they had the chance. Let's remember to do it now.
Also, is there a better way to archive this? Because I just know that regardless of amount of evidence people will always stick to photoshop claims.
I came to laugh
>/co/ - Comics & Cartoons
>>500047
Last false ban evasion ban occurred a while ago and is near bottom of list.
An Addy request posted an hour and a half ago is still up.
Is it over already? For the drawthreads, at least?
>>500092
Janitor's back in the drawthread
When does that one guy who always white knights for the /co/ mod(s) get here?
>>500797
And in case anyone was wondering, yes, false bans for evasion are following every deletion.
I'd rather have a tyrannical mod than a board full of shit posting.
>>499857
>Ban evasion
Why is this even a thing? It affects 0 of the quality of the site, unlike other rules, all it does is hurt mod e-feelings cause someone evaded their ban.
So I have to ask, why did a mod just go and axe every PPG thread on /co/?
I'm glad there's finally a push back against /co/'s moderation. /co/ has the most ban-happy mods on the site.
There are threads filled with people calling everyone DCucks, but if you say the word "Marveldrone" you eat a ban instantly.
>>501053
Yep, just saw that happen.
It's because people don't like PPG, and the threads aren't "positive" enough.
People will inevitably say "because /pol/" but the attitudes the showrunners are displaying can't be stripped from that discussion. It'd be like trying to discuss Steven Universe without mentioning lesbians.
>>500803
Anytime ANYONE defends the mods here, always assume they're a mod. Back on/q/ the mods used to actively defend themselves anonymously until they got outed for leaving their trip.
>>501053
The mod clearly told you to "post in the general."
>>501066
>until they got outed for leaving their trip.
Oh shit. Does that ever happen anymore? Could it happen here? That would be something to fucking see.
>>500983
>all it does is hurt mod e-feelings cause someone evaded their ban.
That's why. They assume that if people knew they have no real power they'd not respect them. Of course, nobody respects them anyway because they act like petulant children.
I wouldn't hate the mods if they'd just ban, and didn't also delete every post/thread that triggers them. If it's porn on a blue board? Sure, delete it. Links to CP? Absolutely.
But somebody saying a word you don't like or having an unpopular opinion? Fuck off.
>>500978
I'd rather have a board full of shitposting where you could still post what you want instead of just having a board full of shitposting where all legitimate posters have to live in fear of a shithead triggernigger mod
>>501067
Didn't tell me shit. I was reading two threads one minute, one of which was the fucking general itself. And then it was axed for no reason.
https://desustorage.org/co/thread/81966723
Here it is, there is that general I should be posting in. You might notice the little garbage can at the top, indicating that it was deleted. No new one was posted, but someone else did make another unrelated thread because the mod decided to axe the place we should be posting in.
Again, mods making a bad problem even worse.
Anything with this still getting deleted on there?
>>500978
If they got rid of more shitposting and rule-breaking bull-shit, that argument would carry some weight. One of the things that pisses me off most with mods is when they signifigantly fuck around with things before the job is done.
Odds are you're lying, too. If it wasn't pro-SJW shit, you'd be complaining, too.
>>501079
>Didn't tell me shit
This is why I hate talking to /co/mblr. He spoke to you through his actions. His stance is pretty clear, though his actions; Keep it in one thread.
And I hate generals as a concept. You SHOULD be allowed to have your own thread if a topic that already has one. But the janitor in question thinks you should self-segregate. For civility sake, I guess.
The drawthread's getting fucked again.
>>501089
>This is why I hate talking to /co/mblr. He spoke to you through his actions.
Fucking lol, bloody idiot.
I don't even know if it's the same guy as earlier. I can't even tell if it was on the request of a janitor or not. All I know is that thread was there one moment, thread was gone the next. Don't defend your spastic moddy team because they can't keep their stories straight.
>Keep it in one thread.
IT WAS IN ONE THREAD. That was the thread that was deleted. Every thread was deleted.
What 'master message' is the mod trying to send when he deletes every thread regarding a cartoon show from the board about cartoon boards, mister wizard mindreader? Even the thread that was established as being the general thread for that cartoon.
>But the janitor in question thinks you should self-segregate
To some other website, apparently.
Holy shit.
>>501089
>He spoke to you through his actions.
Anybody who thinks the mods' "Wall of Silence" schtick is good deserves to be strung up like a nigger.
If the mods can't talk like adults and prefer to hide behind bans, then they shouldn't be surprised when the whole site is full of shitposting and people hating them.
Every mod on this site is a fucking retard. Yes, ESPECIALLY you.
>>501103
>Everyone who isn't screaming ADMIN ABUSE is a mod doing damage control
Okay Sling Blade, you can calm down now. I hope you've noticed that /co/ is the only board that's getting raped by the mods this hard. You all fostered a culture of selfish biased ignorant users, and that's the exact same shit pot that your mod crawled out of. Garbage in, garbage out.
And by the way, you guys forgot to plug your nightly PPG hate thread on /v/ tonight. You may want to get on it before midnight, considering that you can't get away with that shit on /co/ any more.
>>501089
>He spoke to you through his actions.
Hey check out this post.
https://desustorage.org/co/thread/81535292/#81546781
This is from the thread where Juan first started shitting the bed. He deleted posts with no explanation, no pattern.
Only deletions, no bans-yet. This was before whichever mod handing out 30 day bans like candy today saw the piss and shit stained mattress that Juan turned the drawthreads into, said "this is definitely on the right track but it could use some more feces" and proceeded put the banhammer on automatic.
Anyway.
At this point the only way to communicate with the moderation, "with actions", was to systematically post requests of varying content, seeing which ones got deleted and which were left alone, and then knowing to only make posts like the ones left alone.
It is insane and stupid and very close to just shitposting, but when the moderation only speaks through actions, and in topics that are NOT clean cut, black and white like "no more SU threads" or "every PPG thread gets deleted except general", simple messages like that, but a matter of "which characters of the fucking thousands of non-furry /co/ related characters are we allowed to post", a nice and clear method of communication is just not a fucking option when it has to be done 'through actions".
You probably already guessed this, but yes, this is my post. And yes, I was banned for it. But only for a day. The 15 minute ban I got from Juan's requesting I be banned stated that I got a request to be banned 30 days for ban evasion, although I had of course not been banned before, and Juan was actually tolerant of my speaking with him "through actions" up until that point. Fortunately the mod who responded to his request wasn't an absolute madman, and they only gave me a 24 hour ban. Just more evidence Juan's policies are NOT approved by mods as a whole.
By the way, if that mod is reading this, thanks for being reasonable with my ban.
>>501121
>/co/ is the only board that's getting raped by the mods this hard
that's fucking objectively false, though. /tg/ is well known for having been totally eviscerated by the mods, /asp/ has been raped by wrestling being moved there, people on /d/ have been complaining about the mods nearly killing their board since August, /tv/ is moderated by Swaglord who intentionally makes the shitposting worse...
I mean, if you pay even a bit of attention to this site you'd know that you were spouting bullshit, but I'm sure you know that and are just trying to spin the narrative into something you prefer.
>You all fostered a culture of selfish biased ignorant users, and that's the exact same shit pot that your mod crawled out of.
you do realize that mods are global, right? Although your idea would certainly explain /a/.
>>501121
>Okay Sling Blade, you can calm down now. I hope you've noticed that /co/ is the only board that's getting raped by the mods this hard. You all fostered a culture of selfish biased ignorant users, and that's the exact same shit pot that your mod crawled out of. Garbage in, garbage out.
Yes, I remember the great Mod election of 2012 where we selected complete half-witted retards to moderate /co/.
Face facts, dolt: You can't fucking say "Mods speak through their actions" when none of their actions are consistent. They want us to post in a single thread? Then fucking don't delete the general thread at random. Randomly deleting every PPG thread only sends the message "I don't want you on my site anymore."
>PPG hate thread
So let's delete them then because they don't agree with my opinion!
Wouldn't be surprised is the mod is just an angry idiot flustered that no one likes his new favorite show.
The best things we can do are
a) make a separate thread pushing for reforming the mods and their powers globally. Something has to be done, because the mods are completely out of control on this site.
b) hit the IRC channel, and demand explanations. You'll be banned but just go back.
c)tweet Hiro and ask him to come back. He's gone radio silent and it's almost certainly because the mods convinced him to. Tell him about all the issues with the mod team.
Something has to be done, and at this point I think it's clear that ALL the mods have to go.
>>501134
>Randomly deleting every PPG thread only sends the message "I don't want you on my site anymore."
So, I've had arguments with people like >>501121 many times. His argument will be something like
>Good, 4chan doesn't need more people. Either fall in line or go to [insert hyperbolic name for 8ch.] Moot always said he didn't care if people left and that's good!
Which is stupid, because people like him praise the mods for chasing everyone off, then act surprised when nobody is left but shitposters.
>>501143
Oh, I know. That's pretty much the only argument the apologists ever have is "If you don't like it, Leave!"
Of course, then, with the other side of their mouth, say retarded shit like:
>You all fostered a culture of selfish biased ignorant users, and that's the exact same shit pot that your mod crawled out of. Garbage in, garbage out.
As if this is somehow the fault of the people who decided to stay around and make their shitholes slightly more tolerable.
>>501092
Good. I hate the attitudes on there.
If you just think with your dick the whole time then wonder why things were deleted and banned over for being inappropriate, you're an idiot.
>Those two images are deleted already
Must be a moderator watching this thread veeeeeeerrrrrrry closely.
How goes that veil of silence?
>>501165
I'm guessing you posted this opinion without bothering to check what's being deleted at all.
Even if it were all waifu requests (it's not), "this doesn't break the rules but I don't like it" isn't an excuse to delete something.
>>501168
It's pretty pointless when the images are archived already. I wasn't too interested in reading through them before but the deletions kind of legitimize them so I guess I will now.
>>501160
>>501162
Mods equals fags
>>501170
Pfft, I don't care.
I'm to the point now where I'm tired in living in fear from a moderation force which refuses to talk or me and rather just strike things down from above because it's easier than being consistent. Deleting images that reaffirm that they're dirtbags is just business as usual. At least if the /co/ mod is busy hyperventilating over this thread, then he isn't shitting up /co/.
It's funny to delete images against MQr when even mot called him a fag
http://desustorage.org/_/search/text/mqr/capcode/admin/
>>501165
>hey what's going on in-nevermind
>we're back to 100+ deleted posts a thread. Welcome to the 9th layer of hell folks
>Do u guys get sad when your request gets a WIP but it's never finished
>Draw another character realizing that they GOTTA get SpongeBob back!
>/r/ing that you draw the Invisible Man, but you cannot reply with a blank image
>How do you guys feel when someone gets two cakes?
>image.jpg getting pruned fuuuuck this
>How about someone draws a hyper realistic Master Shake
>Requesting Joy singing Blue by Eiffel 65
Juan just fuck off; is one general really not enough to sate your bloodlust?
Also
>Any non-waifu requests?
Was another one that got deleted. Just one line, no image, no reply. A drawfriend asking for something NOT waifu, not lewd, not spam, to draw. This is intentionally killing the purest most original form of the drawthreads.
>>501182
I mostly agree but "taking x requests" is one of the oldest forms of drawthread bait. Still didn't warrant a deletion and on the off chance it was actually a drawfag I pray to Gos that he wasn't banned.
>>501170
Never been accused of being a mod before. Not sure how to feel.
>>501169
Went by how I've seen them act on there over 90% of the time. Some of the non-nude stuff on there is so pointless it easily falls under
>quality of posts
and others still manage to be lewd or inappropriate enough that it can still count as nsfw.
>>501190
>Went by how I've seen them act on there over 90% of the time.
Not him, but this "<board> is one person" meme needs to fucking stop.
I've seen people use it as part of their argument before like it's REALLY the reason people should shit all over the userbase, but it only makes you look like a simplistic asshole.
>>501190
There's no point continuing the discussion if you aren't going to bother checking the links ITT to see what's being deleted because you're creating hypotheticals that don't apply here.
^interesting
what do you guys think about /co/ mods banning generals for cartoons? It makes sense for shit like frozen and gravity falls because they ended, but i honestly don't see the problem with keeping generals around for shows that are on hiatus like steven universe. The mods say it's because "quality of posts go to shit" but honestly, generals are always garbage. Generals are meant to be containment threads for waifufags and tripfags, so considering that generals were never quality in the first place, that excuse doesn't really have much support
>>501168
Jesus, yeah, that's pretty ridiculous. It's as if the mods don't know that things exist offsite.
They also delete links to the Janitor Logs because they make them look like shit. Plus every thread that posts the logs then gets inundated with "Th...they're fake!" posts, which is disgustingly transparent on their part.
>>501121
>Everyone who isn't screaming ADMIN ABUSE is a mod doing damage control
I'm glad we agree
>>501190
>and others still manage to be lewd or inappropriate enough that it can still count as nsfw.
4chan is not a SFW website. You can post lewd content as long as it's spoilered.
See: /a/
>>501229
In my opinion, it's their own fault. They should have to suffer the consequences for being so easily doxable. Other jannies didn't get affected, cause when you search their handles on google it doesn't come up with social media shit. If you get links to MAL and tumblr when you search their irc handle, they shouldn't have been made janitors, cause it means they're basically namefags to each other. Only the ones who weren't namefags should be allowed to be janitors.
>>501222
generals are fine. they exist to keep all relevant discussion in one place rather than scattering it out.
anti-generalfags are cancer
>>501222
It's fair, and it's for your own good if they allow you have threads sometimes.
>>501222
Depends on the general.
I think SU is probably okay in terms of general material, as long as it doesn't get out of hand. I've never been in an SU thread, but from what I saw: It wasn't any worse than the shitslinging that exists elsewhere.
Then you accidentally click on the rwby thread one day and it's 500 posts of "I wonder what Ruby's shit tastes like today?" "I bet Neo's penis spurts ice cream". Those people, or the subset which has nothing better to do than post fanart and fetishization, need to fuck off to /trash/ where they belong.
>>501243
anti-generalfaggotry is dumb on /a/, where people complain about currently airing shows having generals, but on slower boards generals can be a lot more cancerous. It should be a case by case basis thing.
>>501222
there really isn't a good reason to do it in the first place
The only people that actually defend banning generals either hate the series that had its general banned, or are a mod/janitor
>>501179
>a moderation force which refuses to talk or me and rather just strike things down from above because it's easier than being consistent
It's not hard to see why, I don't want to talk to you either. I bluntly say earlier in this thread that mods are fags and I get multiple thumbs up, but I then say that there's more to the story than just mods being fags, and suddenly I'm an undercover mod doing damage control and getting entirely different loaded arguments shoved into my mouth.
And you can do it again, you may as well. You can keep fighting over the remains of a hollowed out tree that was sold out, uprooted and sent down shit's creek years ago, I'm not going to pretend that I have any personal stake in it.
>>501252
but then it's not anti-generalfaggotry. It's just being anti-single general.
Another board where it's important to have generals is /tg/, where generals gather all the regulars who play single games so that individual rule/mechanics questions can be answered by people who know it without wasting an entire thread.
Or /tv/, where in an ideal world Generals would exist to keep all discussion of something like Star Wars contained (but of course the mods hate that because lol shitposting so funneh,) or /v/ where popular new releases flood the board (remember MGS5 or Fallout?)
>>501255
>It's not hard to see why, I don't want to talk to you either.
Mods deserve to be gassed like kikes.
>>501262
If something is popular on the board it's fine to see multiple threads of it. It would be boring if everything were generals.
>>501222
Most generals on /co/ are pretty normal, with image dumpers, write/drawfags, some decent discussion, and a few autists that usually get banned or have their posts deleted. Banning generals doesn't do anything helpful in any way, because they'll just move to /trash/.
>>501255
>It's not hard to see why, I don't want to talk to you either.
So you must be a moderator. Hello moderator.
If you're not, there's a distinct different there friend: You're not the one in charge of regulating how and what I post. Therefore your opinion on if you want to talk to me is meaningless because you can just hide my posts.
But if you expect me to change my behavior, you're going to have to give me more cues than just "You posted this thing I don't like. THIRTY DAY BAN".
>I bluntly say earlier in this thread that mods are fags and I get multiple thumbs up, but I then say that there's more to the story than just mods being fags, and suddenly I'm an undercover mod doing damage control and getting entirely different loaded arguments shoved into my mouth.
And there you go with the "Everyone who thinks I'm stupid must be the same person" logic again.
You can't look at this thread, the numerous deleted posts, and say "I think mods are doing a great job." You just fucking can't without either looking delusional or like someone who really wants damage control.
Same goes with some of the shit that happens on /co/. PPG threads suddenly, and all at once, get deleted for no reason. What do people take away from this? Nothing, just shitty mods wanting to wave their dicks around because they have this power and we don't.
I imagine that if you feel that is acceptable or even expected behavior from figures of authority, then there's probably a lot of people who don't want to talk to you. Your friends, maybe even your parents.
>And you can do it again, you may as well. You > I'm not going to pretend that I have any personal stake in it.
Then why did you post?
Oh, no, don't answer. We know why you post. You have an ego to defend which has been solemnly bruised by the massive upsurge of mod hate in a thread about the poor decisions of the moderation staff. If you really didn't have a personal stake, you would just leave the thread.
>>501254
Not him but I hate generals because they breed circlejerking of the worst variety.
>>501222
have you been in both a SUG and a non general Steven Universe thread?
The difference is night and day. I wish the general never came back
>>501262
generals killed /tg/ fuck off
>>501275
You apparently have a problem retaining information that doesn't align with your insatiable lust for mod blood, so I'm going to take this one line at a time.
I. Have. Never. Said. Once. That I support the mods' decisions.
>>501323
No, the mods and quests killed /tg/. The generals are fine.
There is literally nothing an anti-generalsfag can say against generals that isn't "muh site culture" or "it causes shitposts because if I see one, I shitpost in it!"
>>501330
Mods deserve to be flayed alive
>>501330
Not him, but you still found it in your heart to reply to him again. Despite saying you had no personal stake in it, despite saying you didn't want to talk to him when you were the one that replied to him.
If you're trying to prove to the thread that you really don't care and are impartial, you're doing a surprisingly bad job at it.
Sorry for your ego, I hope it recovers quickly
>>501331
The generals in /tg/ killed discussion and any help to newbies.
Now it's all just "READ THE OP AND PASTEBIN!!1!" and then inside the thread "ugh... I wish we had something to talk about, when is the game being updated"
>>501336
I've given up on /co/ entirely, so I "don't care" about which political side of the mod abuse I'm being accused of.
I remain here to challenge what guys like him say, because to ignore it or get filtered is the behavior that I despise and that he is angry at the mods for doing to begin with.
That was two lines, but we should be able to work our way up.
>>501344
>The generals in /tg/ killed discussion and any help to newbies.
but they didnt. I'm a regular in several /tg/ generals, and that's literally false
>>501348
>I remain here to challenge what guys like him say
So you DO have a personal stake in it. And the reason you are staying is because you feel like you have to be a crusader of justice on our korean sentai usegroup.
>because to ignore it or get filtered is the behavior that I despise and that he is angry at the mods for doing to begin with.
And you DO also have a bias toward accepting mod decisions, because you feel they're doing their job perfectly despite all the counter-evidence provided which you seemingly disagree with. Despite saying that you never said one way or the other that you support mod decisions, this statement is surprisingly pro-mod.
Thanks for playing, have a nice day.
>>501348
nobody cares, modcuck. we're not buying it
I'm sure you'll get frustrated and start banning us again though. You should really just do everyone a favor and kill yourself
>>501357
Okay, so the limit was two lines. I'll shrink it back down to one.
The mods are adamantly keeping us in the dark (ignoring it) and sniping posts that have evidence of mod abuse (filtering it), two things I just said that I despise and would not do.
I don't like what's happening on /co/ at all but we don't have to go full "gas the mods" mode, I'd rather there were less posts if it meant more good and rational arguments. Honestly if I didn't know better I'd call false flagging
>>501403
You're not going to get more "good and rational arguments" if the mods just keep deleting threads and never really nailing down what they expect of the userbase. If the current trends keep up, you'll just get more shitflinging as the rational people who want dialogue get frustrated and leave /co/. Which means only the shitflingers who will never stay banned remain.
The fact we're to the point where /co/ has segregated discussion into generals while the rest of the board is a chaotic nightmare should be a sign.
>>501403
it is falseflagging. One or two evaders or maybe more going nuts to get OC's and characters they don't like banned
>>501415
You realize that if it was all evaders then this thread wouldn't exist? Not to mention the three+ threads before it in just the last week?
>>501427
unless all the deleted posts from this thread is exactly evader(s) and you're falling for it
>>501430
That leaves 30 people who aren't and 100 more from previous threads. You solved it, Sherlock.
11 false 30 day bans for ban evasion in the /co/ drawthread in the past couple hours. And those are just the ones listed.
>>501415
Lol hold up, do you know what a false flag is? They support the opposite of what they're supposedly advocating. That anon was saying that the man calling for the execution of the mods could be a mod supporter trying to make the other side look like they're overly mad.
>>501458
how do you know false?
It's pretty easy for one evader to make 11 posts
>>501409
>erest of the board is a chaotic nightmare
No it isn't
>>501473
Mostly based on the fact that this has happened to a number of drawfags with distinct styles, plus others have testified to the janitor submitting a false ban evasion request for them (one of whom is in this thread). You should check out some of the links in the OP as it has even more anons reporting on this behavior.
>>501477
>He says as people are submitting actual proof that janitors are filing false bad evasion reports, spamming is rampant, and mods continue to clear-cut threads they don't like
>>501481
I see 0 posts with images even, 0 drawfags.
What I do see is a lot of short shitty requests with no image for reference.
Seems like a single person quickly typing things to spam to me. Even happens to have a ironic greeting as if he suddenly came into the thread.
>>501486
Linking years old /q/ threads? Really?
I don't go to drawthreads since they're shit, so the idea of "shitposting in drawthreads" eludes me.
This has gone from annoying to frightening.
>>501490
The drawfags getting eviscerated was last week friend. None of them have come back. You ignored the rest of his post quite well too.
>shitty requests without reference
Except all the ones that have a reference.
>>501493
The years-old threads are just proof that /co/'s mods have always been problematic and that these issues come and go in cycles. If anything, it should tell you that there's a clear pattern that legitimizes the claim that many of the evasion bans are false.
What he's referring to has also happened very recently and there are links in the OP to show that.
>>501371
kill you are self
there isn't a powerpuff girls thread up at all. the mods are intentionally shutting down any and all discussion of it.
https://desustorage.org/qa/thread/498855/#q501160
https://desustorage.org/qa/thread/498855/#q501162
Most of that
>evidence
I see why the mod deleted it, I don't like being lied about either.
I'm not happy with the mods, but I wish you guys could see how you look trying to deceive people into a bunch of extra hate, calling everyone who disagrees with you at all a mod, calling them mod fanbitches who couldn't POSSIBLY be arguing with you because they're bored and feel like calling you on your shit and how immature you're acting in general. What do you think the users are even going to really do with the extra anger you're trying to generate, anyway?
>>501577
>>>/co/81962795
>Since 9 AM
Seriously, what do you think you're doing?
>>501583
>muh mod wuz a good boy!
>he dindu nuttin!
also
>What do you think the users are even going to really do with the extra anger you're trying to generate, anyway?
Gotta love when the mods pull the ol' "Well you can't do anything about it anyway."
Hiro has seen since he got here that every user on this site outside the severely brain-damaged users of /a/ hate you fuckers. He knows we want you gone. Don't think we haven't noticed the huge uptick in mod action after he came in, like putting filters in place he didn't know about.
Huge chunks of actual posters have already left this site, and only use it for mobilizing movements or publicity. The mods have turned 4chan into a glorified bulletin board and stripped away any relevance it once had. Those of us still left who care will keep calling for all you fucks to be removed, and the more you shit yourselves the more we'll be able to get other users to pull their heads out of the sand.
So please, keep behaving like children and pretending you're just "bored and feel like calling you on your shit" and totally don't have any investment in protecting yourself, because you're not fooling anyone.
>>501621
The biggest problem here is ACK.
Just look at https://desustorage.org/a/thread/140322511/#q140367298_2
>>501653
Jesus, and people dare to complain about mods.
>>501657
ACk is a scumbag, everyone knows that.
Juan is back in drawthread
can anybody tell me why Dewd isn't banned on sight?
>>502116
He doesn't post from his phone.
>>502075
more like evader is back in the thread and shitposting all these scribbles
>>502121
>>>/co/82011223
>Would this include the hair clipping through the shoulder?
Juan you banned a drawfriend asking for details on a request; you're not going to be able to spin this in a positive light.
>>501089
you are a mong
or you are a mod
Fuck I knew I'd eventually find this image and I'm glad I capped it.
Look, I totally get people not being fans of modern Fairly Oddparents but this is just fucking shit man.
https://desustorage.org/co/thread/82004917/
This thread got deleted. Look, it isn't strictly within the rules, I get that. It's more vidya than /co/, I get that. But bloody hell this shit used to fly just fine and we got good stuff from it. People enjoyed the threads. Hobbies can combine. These boards are for meeting like minded people and then discussing shit you like with them. OP didn't want to discuss comic vidya with /v/, he wanted to discuss it with /co/, where he browses and where people are quite into their comics. They're different crowds and the threads will therefore be different.
It used to be common to say that topics are somehow generally better discussed outside their home board, (e.g. /co/ is better at discussing vidya than /v/), but now that shit simply isn't possible because this turbo faggot goes and deletes anything that doesn't fall within the posting guidelines. What really pisses me off is that most of these threads are threads people are enjoying and not having an issue with and Hiro literally said the rules are just guidelines and if no one on the board has an issue with a post that breaks them, then it's fine.
Instead we get deletions everywhere because this piece of shit doesn't want fun on what's essentially his safe space /co/.
jesus christ, Dewd threw a fucking tantrum
>>502376
and now Juan is deleting posts critical of him
>>502379
well you better shit up the whole drawthread with meta then
>>502121
What you don't seem to realize is that drawfag didn't get banned until he posted a character shitting yogurt. He wasn't the evader. It's also pretty hilarious that you'd trash his art and not mention dewd who is worse despite five years of constant drawing.
>>502376
He always does, he just usually has the sense to drop his trip for it.
Really trying not to lose my cool here. Any post I make trying to discuss one of our new drawfags gets deleted apparently because I have the gall to state that he's a better artist than dewd (which is true) and he shouldn't have been deleted from the Booru (which is true).
>>502420
You're lucky you weren't banned for evasion.
>>502426
Yeah I'm only getting temporarily blocked for "not /co/ related" every time. All I want to do is discuss a fucking drawthread-related drawfag. I'm going to channel my inner peace and try to make a post that's more than reasonable about it.
>>502420
somebody suggested dewd might be friends with a janitor, or that the janitor thinks dewds gimmick is funny
i mean we can just report dewd when he posts, I guess. I've heard posts get automatically deleted if they hit enough reports
Just got blocked for posting in the Flash thread for "Off-Topic Garbage," with no post linked to it
I was just talking about the show. How am I supposed to know what was off topic?
>>502437
Well, I made extremely clear in my post that it concerned a /co/ related delivery. And it got deleted again. But any post that contends mine even if it's way less /co/ related is left up.
>>502452
>>502461
Welcome to /co/ where the staff doesn't a fuck and your posts don't matter.
Tonights game: Scenes from Juans basement
since when was fanfiction banned?
>>502951
Since 09
As a drawfag I've stopped posting my art here and no longer participate in the drawthreads.
Not really just because of high ban rate, but I've learned that the anonymity here is something of an illusion.
A few months ago someone put me on blast for /d/ related stuff and I wasn't even posting art at the time, nor do I ever use a name or trip. Looking back, I think it might've been a janny or mod with access to my post history.
>>503066
Drawthreads are for practice and experimenting with ideas.
Your could be making money off of your drawings instead of giving people free shit for no reason.
>>>/co/82061432
Oh look another Steven Universe thread deleted
What kind of shitty excuse is "no generals" when there RWB, Homestuck, and Star Wars generals that are always getting 500+ posts?
DESU, "no generals" is just a shitty rule used by autistic mods to delete threads they don't like
>>499715
Anthro is fine until lewds come in, then its furshit
>tfw janitor ban requests me
>tfw global rule 3
>tfw it's rejected
>tfw picturing janitor trembling like blancmange, tears streaming down his corpulent cheeks as he begs mods to ban
But for real why are the janitors on /co/ so bad at their jobs
>>503066
It sucks that we're losing drawfriends but thats about par the course for 4chan. The mods despise this site.
>say that you don't like Daredevil
>get banned
Bravo /co/mods
>>503874
They also deleted the Legends of Tomorrow thread. It's so transparent that they're shilling it's ridiculous
>>498855
>any people have had complaints about /co/'s mods over the years
Honestly, I'm more concerned about how it's been for the last few weeks.
>>503696
I never knew what blancmange was, thanks for expanding my desert knowledge!
>>502236
>mafia 3 thread not exclusively full of edgy /pol/shit
Always good to remind myself why I don't go to /v/ anymore.
The DoA threads are getting fucking absurd. Fill the thread with accusations of being Willis and expounding on trannies? ALL GOOD.
Mock regular site commenters, which are almost as entertaining as the comic itself? BALEETED and YOU'RE BANNED. For going "off-topic."
The janitor fucking sucks and I'm convinced there's like one guy reporting every single interesting comment in those threads.
>>501403
I try to keep my cool when it comes to mods, but they single out any and every entertaining post in every fucking DoA thread without fail and leave in all the shitposting; they randomly nuke on-topic discussion in artfag threads; hell, I see them ban SFW /l/ threads but let through countless /ss/ posts. And never with any reason beyond "off topic."
>>501621
>like putting filters in place he didn't know about.
I don't even care about filters, that shit ranges from benign to outright hilarious. And petty bans have ALWAYS been a thing, but back in the day they weren't as rampant and they were generally better-explained than they are these days.
>>502236
>if no one on the board has an issue with a post that breaks them, then it's fine.
I'm convinced we have a couple vindictive faggots who have nothing better to do than waste their time reporting benign posts on a Hmong graffiti wall in the middle of the afternoon.
Wish we could get Hiro's response on all this
>>502236
I'm seriously getting fucking pissed at these mods who are constantly going behind Hiro's back. They have no respect for him as well and clearly dislike him
So, BvS shitposting with laughing Chris Evans /tv/ bullshit is allowed to thrive, but DCfriends can't fire back because that would be "trolling."
Nice to see janny keeping shit equal
>>502236
/co/'s issues highlight a major issue with 4chan: The mods going rouge constantly. The mods are still deathly loyal to moot and they always will be. They don't like Hiro probably because isn't their "buddy" like moot was. They simply do not respect him at all, and thus refuse to listen to anything he says.
What also annoys me more is that Hiro always sidesteps the issues of moderation on this site, which baffles me
>>500980
>Here is an Anita thread in 2014
>an Anita thread
>in 2014
If this is the kind of thread you're bitching about, I am glad it's been deleted.
>>504426
Proofs?
https://twitter.com/hiroyuki_ni
Tweet at Hiro already if you want something done
>>504437
You can tell they go behind his back. The word filtering for baka desu senpai was done by the mods without Hiro's knowledge, the Nipplemod incident on /a/ in which the mod went against everything Hiro said and started making up his own rules, Hiro telling people to go talk to the mods on the IRC room to complain about issues, and the mods will ban you for that, the mod on /mlp/ deleting random threads he doesn't like that don't even break the rules.
The list goes on and on
>>504416
Jesus, I love laughing Chris Evans and hate DC's film output but that is just infuriating.
Why allow one form of shitposting and not another?
Oh, wait, because the janitors and mods are fucking dicks.
>go talk to the mods on the IRC room to complain about issues, and the mods will ban you for that
THIN-SKINNED dicks.
>>504438
>Howdy?
Hiro confirmed Undertale fan?
GEE WHIZ WHAT A SURPRISE
>>504453
no hes a confirmed faggot like you
>>504440
It's more like mods doing what they've always done because hiro does not use the website and is incapable of knowing or caring what happens to it on a daily basis.
>>504429
The issue is it wasn't deleted until 12 hours later, the mods used it as a honeypot. I have no idea if the issue was fixed though. I sent an e-mail to moot and have mentioned it other times.
>>504512
You can see other posts got banned here for calling out the moderation, or simply posting kill yourself to OP
http://desustorage.org/co/thread/63965669/#63965851
http://desustorage.org/co/thread/63965669/#63966049
http://desustorage.org/co/thread/63965669/#63966059
http://desustorage.org/co/thread/63965669/#63966306
(yes technically criticizing 4chan is a ban but it's pretty gay in this case)
When will Hiro range ban all of canada?
>>504442
I saw a screencap in the last thread here that showed someone getting publicly banned for posting that laughing Chris Evans and Sad Affleck image, just so they could get a bit of ass kissing sent their way.
So it does happen both ways, and I don't really have an attachment to either company, so I find the /tv/ posting funny, at least better than the gulag of dead post links the /co/ threads are.
>>504503
He does though. He's a lurker mostly but he has said he does use 4chan
>>504546
Hiro cares about the money he can earn from 4chan, he will never range ban all of Canada. We are the ones who buy the 4chan pass in order to shitpost faster than the Australians by skipping the Captcha.
>>504706
You fucking ice gooks need to leave forever.
>>499715
that's why I think the "No Anthro/Furry" rule needs to be abolished, or at least be made into something that is handled on a board by board basis(cause obviously posting something of that nature on say /ck/ or /k/ shouldn't be allowed, but it should be allowed on /co/, /aco/, and /tg/ as long as it doesn't break a board specific rule like posting porn on a blueboard)
to be frank at this point I feel we'd be better off with no moderation/janitorial staff at all, and just make the filtering and hide tools be on by default
>>501089
if we're going to keep mods/janitors they really need to change it so all actions by either need to leave a text response explaining their actions, it would probably cut down on the abuse by a lot
>>504765
Just like Americans at all-you-can-eat buffets, we will never leave until we have scourged the earth, and leave nothing but misery for those who are left in our wake!
>>502441
>I've heard posts get automatically deleted if they hit enough reports
That's a myth. What happens is a mod or jannie sees a high report number for something and knee-jerk-reacts.
>>501590
A good chunk of those pics doesn't seem like it proves shit, though.
>>505890
Why do you think so?
>>504799
It's still odd how furry is treated as 10 times worse than pedo on here.
Mods deserve to die.
>>504416
Mods also delete any criticism of Marvel movies. Marveldrones are so used to not seeing criticism that they freak out when the mods don't delete threads they don't like.
/co/ is a disney board. At this point we need a DC board and a Marvel Board. End this bullshit.
>>504799
The no furry rule is insane. It's predicated on not allowing furries from the late 90's to "invade," even though furries like that barely exist. It's a holdover from the SA days. Practically nobody gets autistically worked up over furries anymore.
>>504799
>to be frank at this point I feel we'd be better off with no moderation/janitorial staff at all, and just make the filtering and hide tools be on by default
Agreed.
>if we're going to keep mods/janitors they really need to change it so all actions by either need to leave a text response explaining their actions, it would probably cut down on the abuse by a lot
the best solution I've seen has been:
>assign every mod a global ID number
>all deleted posts are flagged with a reason for deletion and that mod's ID number, and is publicly visible
>bans are the same
Then people can find patterns in mod deletions and id mod abuse easier.
>>506593
>>506733
yeah I've never understood it either, admittedly that's partially cause I only started coming here around 2008, by which point Furry stuff had become completely harmless, and AnonTalk had become the new Boogieman around here(and unlike Furries was an actual threat to the site)
>>506737
I'm glad to see someone agrees, hopefully Hiro will see these posts and maybe we can get some change
>>506737
>assign every mod a global ID number
>all deleted posts are flagged with a reason for deletion and that mod's ID number, and is publicly visible
>bans are the same
simple, ingenious way to have mod accountability.
They'll never, ever do it.
>>498855
I haven't been on /co/ in a while, but you still can't post lolis there, right?
Why was the swat katz thread deleted?
>>>/co/82166187
Alright but like seriously why.
And "furshit doesn't belong" isn't a valid arguement on a board based on a form of media that has furshit in it's roots.
>>508016
For the lulz, obviously.
>>507440
Pretty much. /ss/, on the other hand...
>>508618
Well /ss/ isn't pedophilic at all. Lolicon about men wanting to be with a child (or something that looks like one), /ss/ is about man wanting to BE a child. One is predatory, other isn't. Both are male fantasies. One is boring crap for normies, other is a patrician fetish. But lolis are getting scorned everywhere, i can see /co/ has bigger problems that anti-loli stuff these days, judging by this thread.
Look at this shit.
A blatantly obvious MLP thread as clear as day.
>>>/co/82245772
Now look at the archive.
http://desustorage.org/co/thread/82245772
I point out that it breaks GR15, post gets deleted.
I point out that OP has already made this same thread with this same image before, it gets deleted.
Someone realizes that this could be stopped if they just deleted the thread instead of simply deleting my posts, AND THAT gets deleted as well.
The fuck is with this shit.
>>509144
Oh come on, how is that blatantly obvious?
This post >>>/co/82242768 from the /co/ drawthread >>>/co/82196875 was not only deleted but the poster banned for 3 days http://www.4chan.org/bans
The post can be seen here https://desustorage.org/co/thread/82196875/#q82242768
>>509147
it's as blartantly obvious as it can get man
>>509144
HEY BARNEYFAG LOOK A TWILIGHT SPARKLE >>509149 !!!!!!!
>>504706
You're right about that.
I never pay for anything.
mods = clods
>>510505
>Looks like those clowns on the mod team did it again. What a bunch of clowns.
I used to praise /co/ janitors for deleting blatant gamergate threads really quickly. Now the number of threads they delete for seemingly no reason at all has started to outnumber the legitimate ones. By a lot.
We had a thread about Lauren Faust that got deleted suddenly the other day. The woman is a living legend in animation and all I can imagine is some newfag janitor doesn't know she's done anything other than MLP and dubbed it a pony thread.
Why don't you just leave judgement calls like that up to us. There was some smart discussion in that thread behind the standard background noise that's been on 4chan from the start.
>>510674
>Why don't you just leave judgement calls like that up to us
This is not going to happen.
Ever.
Unless you're /a/.
May i ask, what do you guys think of the /co/ hunger games if you guys ever visit them ?
I know that the games were cool when everybody were doing it but it continued until december of last year with at least 80 poster in the best of times and I found funny and was an interesting way of lose some time, now the threads get deleted as fast as they are created.
>>511195
I thought they were ongoing in /trash/
>I used to praise /co/ janitors for deleting blatant gamergate threads really quickly.
When in the living fuck were their threads about Gamergate on /co/? What does /co/ have to do with the VIDEO GAME PRESS at all?
Why are you going on the internet just to tell lies? For fucks sake, are you some kind of methhead faggot? jesus christ.
>>508635
>/ss/ is about man wanting to BE a child
A lot of fujos like it too though
>>511195
I just don't know why they ended up having very high priority for deletion, especially after being around for months with relatively few deletions and then being away for a few months. "It's off-topic" doesn't even say much when /co/ has off-topic threads all the time.
hmmmm
Why are homestuck threads getting deleted?
>>513319
Yuropoors hate them.
They just straight up delete threads about Homestuck at specific times of the day no matter how well-mannered. It's retarded, people obviously want to talk about it, stick to one thread until it falls off page 10, and only start threads when the last is completely dead.
There's NO rule being violated, blatant fetish threads stay up for ages, this moderator is out of line plain and simple and needs to be axed if they refuse to cooperate with the site's rules.
>>513319
general is still banned, try again after giving it a moment, last thread was full of shit and then some idiot posted a /hsg/
>>507440
Pretty much. Not even perfectly SFW material. If you post anything that could be interpreted as sexualising a fictional underage girl, you can expect the banhammer.
>>513319
because a yuropoor janny hates the sight of them apparently.
Threads go by fine without incident during standard americlap hours, only making a new one when the current fallls off at page 10, but soon as it hits midnight, everything hussie related; MSPA, sweet bro and hella jeff, problem sleuth, Aids, Whistles, etc are pruned on sight.
There isn't any communication about why they get deleted and there aren't any bans given to the people who foolishly try to make a new thread since conversation doesn't just end when a thread dies.
Its absurd that the threads get deleted yet there are usually 6 other webcomic generals up or multiple fetish/ppg/fotm waifu threads still lingering around.
>>513321
Homosuck a shit
>>513341
"don't like thing" is not a moderation issue and should never EVER be one.
>>513341
>STOP LIKING WHAT I DON'T LIKE
Glad to know our mods have the mentality of literal children.
>>513341
That's cool and all, but its still a webcomic and discussion of it belongs on /co/ and not fucking trash of all places. If homestuck can't stay why they fuck is ava's demon? or QC? or Menage a Tres? or any other fucking webcomic for that matter?
>>513364
Why not just add a board rule about /hsg/? At least then newfags won't get confused and mods will actually be able to cite a rule for violations.
>>513375
do mods ever create rules? No, they make one modpost and it works forever.
Toonami is on /co/ because of a mod post on /q/ years ago, no rule was created, the rule page is as few as they can. There tons of examples.
>>513381
Where can I go to see the rules that I'm supposed to be following but aren't listed anywhere
I am honestly curious
>>513385
you dont, that's the point I guess.
You just are there at the time and be okay with whatever happens
>>513387
There sure isn't anything in there about generals or toonami anon
>>513392
>rules that I'm supposed to be following but aren't listed anywhere
misread initial message, excuse me
>>513393
Its all good anon, I'm just booty blasted about the situation at hand when I'm trying to talk about a comic I enjoyed while also trying to restart being a writefag.
/co/ mods are lazy as shit and only do things when it's convenient or go out of their way to do things out of spite or habit.
twice now i've been banned across all boards for 3 days for even the smallest of shitposts. genuine questions about the comic but in eridan's quirk. how the fuck does that warrant that? never even a warning either.
i can't believe people are actually against generals in the first place, something that keeps itself CONTAINED and never leaks out of its own thread on purpose with the worst thing happening being two people create a new thread at the same time when the old one is over and minorly inconveniences the front page for two whole minutes.
>>513378
I know, I agree with you, but I still think it should be clear about what mods have decided is/isn't allowed.
>>513381
Some boards have pinned threads at the top with general guides for acceptable board content. Why not fucking make one for /co/?
If they're going to prohibit certain discussion, that banned content should be stated somewhere on the board. New board users shouldn't be expected to know about a mod post that was made several years ago.
>>513401
I agree wholeheartedly.
See shit like this is unacceptable
>>>/co/82313484
Over 40 post in and pruned for no reason whatsoever, not even a post saying why.
There wasn't a single broken rule
Where the fuck is the accountability for this kind of shit?
>one of the longest works of fiction, updated for over seven years, ends and we only get two weeks to discuss it
Is it because we're the most active? We stay on topic.
>>513404
What website do you think you're on
Homestuck's over so we can't discuss it? Does that mean we can no longer discuss any cartoons or comics on /co/ that aren't currently still in production?
>>513413
One where I thought I could escape dickhead mods who delete threads because they disagree with it
Where the fuck do you think you are?
>>513419
Not on reddit
They're deleting the threads on /trash/ now and any criticism currently in the /co/ thread
christ
>>513418
the homestuck general is still banned, not allowed to come back. Maybe just keep some down time between threads, and don't back them back to back and DONT call them homestuck general
>>513427
>the homestuck general is still banned
And how are people supposed to know this if they weren't there like 2 fucking years ago? Why is that rule still in effect now that the comic is ending and people are talking about/creating content for it?
What the fuck, how did the Loud House thread randomly get a loud blatant porn poster that pops up in every thread now, only appeared a few days ago and happens to popu up right before the show premiered?
And he popped up AFTER a /trash/ general was made and he'd have a place to post that shit and not get banned.
It's obviously the Loud House version of the FoP thread made up ban evader from mods to give them a reason to delete the threads. Or some guy that hates the general and wanted them off /co/ and knew that'd be an easy way to do it.
Either way, the mods have allowed one or two people to successfully troll them, and a whole show's fan base.
How can 4chan have been along for so long and get we're still at the point where the best way to get rid of one or two shitposters is deleting the whole thread?
>>513430
LURK
MOAR
>>513398
>i can't believe people are actually against generals
I was with you until this point. Holy shit how do you people exist. Not even trying to be a dick, are you relatively new here? ~1 year?
>>513640
Go on and name what's wrong with generals. /vg/ works and has been around for years now, no one ever stepping out of their little containment areas aside from /s2g/ on occasion.
The post with proof that /trash/ threads were also being deleted was deleted. Why?
