>>368703
Creation Date.

Last reply instead of bump order because sometimes the faggot mods autosage threads and expect no one to notice. Creation date for finding shit threads to report. I alternate between these two.

Reply Count seems useless

Bump order index on slow boards, creation date catalog on fast boards

>Choose creation date
>See the thread that has more replies per minute
>shitpost there

>>368723
It's for if you only want to go to the most popular threads.

Last reply, always.
There's a lot of active threads that had passed the bump limit on not so fast boards

>>368949
If everybody did this though then no new threads would ever get bumped.

Creation date.

Bump Order by default.
Reply Count on boards like /wg/ where it's preferable to see the largest threads.
Creation Date on /qa/ because most threads aren't worth staying in for more than a few replies.

Last reply to plan out my doubles

>>368833
I'm trying to imagine a situation where someone would want to do that, and I'm coming up short.

>>369433
Sick skills bro.

>>368703
What's the differnce between bump order and last reply

>>369841
Sages

>>369841
last reply = ordered by when the last reply was posted
bump order = ordered by when the last reply that wasn't a sage and wasn't when the thread was autosaging and wasn't when the thread was past the bump limit was posted

>>369699
Maybe to bask in a glorious shitstorm? To know which thread to shitpost in to get attention? Maybe to join in on a get or witness something noteworthy?

>>369904
>To know which thread to shitpost in to get attention

You won't get attention for shitposting in a 200+ post thread. The topic has more than likely steered off course by that point.

>>368703
Bump
But doesn't matter when one use the catalog.

>>368833
yes, idiot, we know. He said going for the most popular threads was useless