Summarize the following boards:
pol
s4s
r9k
qa
v
b
>/pol/ = Racism
>[s4s] = Pure Quality
>/r9k/ = One third porn, one third frogs
>/qa/ = Submit your thoughts on 4chan here
>/v/ = Hey guys guess what's anime?
>/b/ = Porn and other nonsense
/pol/: Trolls trolling trolls
/s4s/: What the fuck even is this shit
/r9k/: Echo chamber for depressed autists
/qa/: Complaining about things you don't like
/v/: Worksafe /b/ where people sometimes pretend to talk about videogames
/b/: Porn and reposts
/pol/ - true free speech
[s4s] - forced memes
/r9k/ - crybabies who refuse to better themselves and blame everyone else for their own shortcomings
/qa/ - people asking for some changes for legit reasons and filled with shitty trolls who fall flat from the idea of trolling
/v/ - board FULL of real company shills, trolls, underage kids who gargle with the troll and meme stupidity, and some people who legitimately want to talk about video games
/b/ - a place where someone who takes shit all day can sit down and give it right back to everyone else who enjoys the taste of shit
>>366996
lol i'd agree with that lol
pretty much on spot
I just got trips or dubs
/pol/: Everyone is a Jew on there including you and I
/s4s/: Ironic garbage
/r9k/: Makes me want to commit suicide everytime I go there
/qa/: People who have zero logical input that has no basis in reality (I.E. Delete /pol/, create shitty pointless boards, etc etc)
/v/: Literally reddit
/b/: Just there to troll
>>367000
THE GLORY
>/pol/ = Newfag's and Outsider's boogeyman, they spend all their time and energy complaining about this one thing
>[s4s] = epic
>/r9k/ = Reddit: the board
>/qa/ = Bitching and moaning over ridiculous things before actually trying to help the site feature and quality wise, has have been responsible for a cool new features and boards
>/v/ = It's great once in a blue moon, the quality thread-wise depends if It's been released on a console or not, was it a hyped release, is it a FIGHTAN
>/b/ = Garbage
>>367002
>Literally reddit
That's every board anon.
/pol/: Worthless now that /his/ and /news/ were added.
[s4s]: The heart and soul of 4chan. Fucking impossible for an outsider to understand any of it without dedication.
/r9k/: Used to be a nice place to post greentext stories, became shit after they attracted reddit with their rare pepe garbage and the news got a hold of it.
/qa/: Whining and shitposting. Incredibly easy to bait.
/v/: Replaced /b/ as the site's gatekeeper. Filled with underage. Unusable.
/b/: Once the best board on 4chan, around 2009 it started to downspiral and became nothing but generic porn dumps and roll threads. How this happened I still don't know.
/s4s/: Fetus
/b/: Nursery
/v/: Middle School
/pol/: High School
/qa/: Senior citizen
/r9k/: Death
>>367016
if your a really oldfag you would know about /b/ day which was the very begging of /b/ and the site as a whole turning to complete utter shit.
>>367018
LOL
/pol/ - Jew memes
/b/ - Facebook memes
/v/ - Reddit memes
/s4s/ - Ironic memes
/r9k/ - Frog memes
/qa/ - Angry memes
>>366990
/pol/: bastion of free speech
/s4/: meme factory
/r9k/: beta uprising
/qa/: "delete /pol/"
/v/: tumblr
/b/: no longer good.
/pol/ - shit board but i like it because it makes redditors and /qa/ babies mad
/s4s/ - pure reddit tier garbage with stolen ylilauta memes under the guise of "irony"
/r9k/ - le epic frog meme xd
/qa/ - "ban what i don't like!"
/v/ - shit
/b/ - see above
/pol/ - People that pretend to know about politics.
[s4s] - Stupid people pretending to be smart people pretending to be stupid.
[r9k] - People that have poor foresight, self-esteem, and sense of what is socially acceptable outside of the internet. Far more normal than they will admit.
/qa/ - People that think they know what they're talking about. Sometimes they're right, but slightly more often than not, they aren't.
/v/ - People (seemingly, mainly, underaged users) with very low standards and little to no self control. At least half of all discussion on the board at any given time is only slightly related to video games.
/b/ - A place that has far more porn and pointless posts than is good for it. Not all that different from /v/.
Bonus opinions:
/a/ - People with double standards. Pompous, pretentious, supercilious, and condescending. A bit like /v/ with an overdose of arrogance, and anime/manga in place of a video game theme.
4chan.org - Immature. Very little thought put into half of the things said here. Critical thinking skills and reading comprehension are too often thrown to the floor in favour of shallow thrills. A few worthwhile people can be found here. Anonymity can help people say what they truly think of something because they have no name tied to them. Unfortunately, it usually just spurs fools into saying the dumbest things possible just because they can.
>/pol/
Like that bit in Die Hard With A Vengeance where Bruce Willis is wearing the "I Hate Niggers" sign. Edgy, offensive, and kind of interesting, but not sincere in any way.
>/s4s/
Memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes nice
>/r9k/
r/mensrights
>/qa/
A superior board for insufferably superior people
>/v/
Reddit: The Board
>/b/
hay guise i'm so high asks me anything :^) pls halp me trole a gurl who won't cum to my 13th birthday party ask her for battletoads lel
>>367041
>/a/
Awful snobs who do admittedly make decent posts
>/sp/
>"Waaah it's all generals now"
>All the non-general threads are shitposting or ded
>>366990
S4s - this guy GETS IT, the board
/pol/: a right-winged Tumblr but without all the artists
[s4s]: The property of /jp/
/r9k/: Depression and social anxiety
/qa/: Where pajeet tries to pretend it's /q/
/v/: like /b/ but with less porn and roll threads. Same amount of traps though
/b/: the beginner's board with an occasional diamond hidden among the porn and traps
>>366990
>/pol/ - stop fucking turning everything into something political
>/s4s/ - stop dubposting everywhere
>/r9k/ - dump fucking redditfrogposter
>/qa/ - the place i go to to tell people to stop fucking demanding change from a newfag
>/v/ - why havent you guys killed yourselves yet
>/b/ - rip
>pol
Edgy young Republican Amerifat highschoolers who pretend to be hardcore racists but would run and hide from any IRL nigger that might make a passing remark at them. Essential board for containing the edgier and more cancerous "racists".
>s4s
One of the few remaining good boards that has remained true to its roots and not become another hive of edgy teens.
>r9k
Wizardchan Jr.
>qa
For making fun of boards and the faggots who post on them
>v
Cancer. Pure cancer
>b
Normalfags thinking they're being super edgy but are just cringy closeted faggots. One of the worst boards, if not THE worst board (yes b was always shit but it wasn't always PAINFUL to browse
/pol/ - 70% genuine
[s4s] - 100% genuine
/r9k/ - 40% genuine
/qa/ - 50% genuine
/v/ - 60% genuine
/b/ - 90% genuine
>>366990
/pol/: WE
[s4s]: The definition of quality
/r9k/: Frogs 'n feels
/qa/: DELETE THIS BOARD MAKE THIS BOARD :((((
/v/: If it's popular it's shit
/b/: newfags
>>367575
I know I know, RIP /b/.
When do you think /b/ died though. It was kinda gradual I mean, I remember in 2011 even, there were still some okay threads but most of it was cringe-worthy crap.
A lot of times I couldn't scroll through the entire first page without seeing something cringe-worthy >imb4 no catalog
>>367600
Nice dubs - [s4s]
>>367604
nice singles
>>367162
What's an "yli fig"?
>>367630
It refers to the image board that invented Wojak and shit. They are pretty good I don't even know what the full name of the imageboard is or what country it's from i think sweden or something
/pol/: Idiots and government shills and disinformations agents
/s4s/: Unfunny forced ironic meme "humor"
/r9k/: Board that somehow got worse over time
/qa/: WAHH HIRO CHANGE THIS BECAUSE IT TRIGGERS ME
/v/: 1 half it's a bunch of underage kids thinking it's cool to be retarded. Other half are people who want to talk about games and stuff
/b/: Porn and reposts, the board.
>>366990
>/pol/
nazi faggot kids
>[s4s]
Forcing shit too hard.
>/r9k/
Depri blogshitters and normalfags.
>/qa/
Formerly a nice place now mostly /q/2.0
>/v/
Too many kids fishing for the next epic r/4chan screenshot collage
>/b/
100% offtopic, ever changing, always the same
/pol/ - shit
[s4s] - fun
/r9k/ - MRA
/qa/ - oldfags
/v/ - shit
/b/ - same
Can't get more summarized than one word.
>>367738
>/qa/
>oldfags
Lmao
StormShit
Ironic shit
Pathetic shit
Whiny shit
faggot children shit
shit shit
>>367600
/b/ was certainly dying circa 2010, it was a slow pathetic crawl to the bottom after that but when the great kekening happened and moot got a taste of big black cock the Tumblr mods really kicked the carcass off the cliff. I'd say /b/ offically died the moment that gamergate bullshit started. If everyone just shut the fuck up and ignored it, 4chan might have been a different place. Who really gave a fuck about gaming journalism anyway? eh
>>367811
There are a couple tripfags on /qa/ that have been on 4chan since, like, 2005, and that's the only thing I find memorable about it. So yeah, oldfags.
Also, nice dubs. Checked.
>>366990
10% actual politics, 90% shitty memes that /v/ and /tv/ take seriously
People who thought meme-factory was a good idea
Underage faggots imitating the long gone wizards who ruined the board so hard they actually removed the filter it's named after
Improvised metaposting + /q/ bullshit
Occasionally entertaining garbage
Previously entertaining broken garbage disposal
>/pol/
zealots who want the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth
>[s4s]
social psychologists who excel in creating mental viruses
>/r9k/
the end of the road, where the disillusioned and the dead try to convince each other to cross over
>/qa/
philosophers trying to make sense of hindu goat scratching imageboards
>/v/
genuine people with genuine opinions lamenting the death of their hobby
>/b/
normal people skirting the edge of insanity
>/pol/
/b/ with politics.
>[s4s]
Incredibly difficult to comprehend humor due to the tons of layers of irony.
>/r9k/
Manchildren, NEETs, Redditors and elitist /b/tards, mostly the latter. Thanks to the prior deactivation of the robot, the board's culture has turned into an absolute trainwreck which may take a very long time of the robot's activity to finally go away. "Robots" basically think they're too good for /b/, when all the content their post is literally /b/ quality.
>/qa/
Actually an okay board, with the occasional /b/tard shitposting here, but other than that it's a good place to discuss the website.
>/v/
/b/ with videogames.
>/b/
Containment board for troglodytes.
>>367575
>/pol/
Yeah pretty much. That is where the original of this came from.
>>368080
>tripfags
>oldfags
...
>>368173
Crying about trip users is as childish as it gets. Having a trip does not influence the quality of a post's content. Anyone with a hint of common sense can deduce this.
By extension, that means anyone who has an issue with tripcodes is immature, and you can be sure that no pre-teen or manchild could ever be a fabled oldfig.
>>368178
>you can be sure that no pre-teen or manchild could ever be a fabled oldfig.
Maybe it's just because it seems to me that it's always the alleged oldfags who loudly drag down threads and hamper discussion by bitching and whining about people having badwrongfun, but I somehow doubt that.
>>368180
Those aren't oldfags either. They're people who started posting 2 years ago, and are angry that 4chan actively changes, but the notion of having been a part of 4chan for over 700 days apparently creates the delusion of oldfaggotry. They will call everything they don't agree with "newfaggotry", "reddit", "tumblr" or "sjw".
Basically they're just trying too hard without having the brains to make it believable.
>>368178
>Having a trip does not influence the quality of a post's content
Except, that's the exact reason people don't like tripfags. Whether you like it or not, having a name attached to your post causes to people to judge it not by its contents, but by the name. A lot of people, myself included, come here to escape that retardation. Unless your name has importance or you are actually contributing something, tripfagging is nothing more than attention whoring. The only people who can tripfag that aren't in those things, are people who have been here from close to the very beginning and that's because they're from a different time before anon culture was heavily encouraged and have probably been tripfagging since day one
>>368185
>having a name attached to your post causes to people to judge it not by its contents, but by the name
How is this not immature?
>The only people who can tripfag that aren't in those things, are people who have been here from close to the very beginning and that's because they're from a different time before anon culture was heavily encouraged and have probably been tripfagging since day one
And how is this magically an excuse for tripfagging to be okay? They're still using a trip, and by your words, they're still "attentionwhoring". You're a little retard with double standards.
>>63301523
[hidden]test [/hidden]
>>368190
[hide]test [/hide]
>>368178
Tripping shows ignorance to the purpose of this site being an anonymous image board and 4chans general structure. Once you start posting a bit of with a name of any sort you start building a reputation it subconsciously effects what your going to post regardless of how sure you are in yourself. By extension it make other people treat your post differently on a subconscious level making the conversation no longer about what ever the post was but about destroying/appeasing someones ego.
There is a reason why the really moot when he was still around and the really fucking old trips rare use their trip outside of joking/shock value even in the early days because doing so inherently weakens the conversations. Makes it less about the content (especially the case with moot) and more about them.
4chan was made to be different from other sites in that regard by tripfagging you show that you do not understand that and by extension are either slow or a newfag. By calling you a newfag people are giving the benefit of the doubt.
>>368188
>How is this not immature?
Because its not? Its not something you do consciously. You see a name, you memorize the posts contents and connect it to the name, then you see the name again and go oh shit he said x, what a fucking retard. You then subconsciously think his post is retarded, even if its not. It goes both ways as well, someone tripfagging says something good, you see them post again, you judge the post off of that previous one and even if they are being totally retarded, you thin good of them. This is simple shit and people do it whether they want to or not. There's a reason a good portion of anons really don't like non-anon sites
>And how is this magically an excuse for tripfagging to be okay? They're still using a trip, and by your words, they're still "attentionwhoring". You're a little retard with double standards.
Because I just fucking explained it retard.
>that's because they're from a different time before anon culture was heavily encouraged
They are old farts set in their ways and where here long before me, so I don't have the right to complain about them. For them, anon posting is retarded, as when the site was first made, anon culture wasn't a thing and most people tripfagged
>>368185
While I agree that there's an argument to be made for attention whoring, from my experience being anonymous doesn't stop posters on 4chan from pre-judging you. There are people who'll dismiss your posts because you repost an image, re-use a filename, or have a "suspicious" posting style. So I would argue that 4chan is the wrong place to come to if you really don't want to be judged for your history.
>>368188
>How is this not immature?
That's not immature its basic psychology.
People behave differently if they know there will be no consequence for what they do. If you use a name that you intend to use as your identity suddenly there is a consequence.
>>368197
>So I would argue that 4chan is the wrong place to come to if you really don't want to be judged for your history.
Except there is no history recorded what so ever for the anonymous users. Well nothing that can be link to them. People who often accuse others of samefagging or using the same file names are usually called out for their faggotry unless it is someone known for spamming the same shit over and over. I mean even really infamous people like barneyfag could freely go /mlp/ and talk about horsecocks and as long as he didn't use any of his copy pasta speeches or images (hell he could probably even use the images) no one would be the wiser.
>>368192
The tag is [spoiler], but it isn't enabled on this board.
>>368195
>Search Results
> 4chan
> www.4chan.org/
>4chan is a simple image-based bulletin board where anyone can post comments and share images anonymously.
>can
It's not must, or should, it's can. It's not even suggested to post anonymous. It's a user's choice whether they want to post anonymously or not. Absolutely nothing on this website suggests you to post anonymously. The last time the idea of anonimity was praises so highly, resulted in Chanology, which resulted in a gigantic influx of the worst scum you can imagine; generally those people who prefer 9gag and facebook over everything else. If you praise this, you are part of this incurable cancer.
>the conversation no longer about what ever the post was but about destroying/appeasing someones ego.
Are you actually implying that, when two anonymous posters talk to each other, they aren't just throwing shitty accusations and defamations around? You joker. There is no difference between anonymous conversation and named conversation, except that the anonymous person may have a grudge against the named person, and if he applies that to the conversation, he is quite simply being a child. There are no excuses or explanations for this. Grow up.
>4chan was made
10 years ago. Things have changed. Back then, calling someone a nigger was fine on other boards as well. It isn't anymore, neither is anonymous culture as respectable as it once was, neither are you fooling anyone with half a brain that you are anywhere close to being right on this.
>>368196
>>368199
>It's not immature
I have absolutely no issues treating a trip or name user as an anonymous poster, and neither should you, if you were self aware. If you're incapable of consentingly altering any form of prejudice you may have towards someone for the sake of having a neutral conversation, you are a mindless, immature drone.
/pol/: trolls, shills, and schadenfreude
/s4s/: avant guarde shitposting
/r9k/: losers fighting over who has it the worst
/qa/: meta board
/v/: feminism & shitposting
/b/: dick pics and reposts
>>368207
>Are you actually implying that, when two anonymous posters talk to each other, they aren't just throwing shitty accusations and defamations around?
Ignorance to actual disscussions that happen on the site
>There is no difference between anonymous conversation and named conversation
Denial of basic psychology
>Back then, calling someone a nigger was fine on other boards as well. It isn't anymore
You know that thing on /co/ didn't actually happen? Right? It was some nigger trying to stir up shit.
Regardless why things have changed the basic heart of 4chan is still anonymous culture. Its the point, the reason its different from other sites and the reason it produces different content and discussions. If you so easily dismiss what is and has been the core of this site. Well. I don't think you should post here. Its clearly not what you want.
>>368207
>It's not even suggested to post anonymous
The website is a anon image board. Even if its not suggested to, the USERS will suggest and force you to, because of the culture here
>The last time the idea of anonimity was praises so highly, resulted in Chanology, which resulted in a gigantic influx of the worst scum you can imagine; generally those people who prefer 9gag and facebook over everything else. If you praise this, you are part of this incurable cancer.
Are you fucking retarded?
>if you praise or like anonymity you are no different to those little kiddies who did the exact opposite of anonymity!
>Are you actually implying that, when two anonymous posters talk to each other, they aren't just throwing shitty accusations and defamations around? You joker. There is no difference between anonymous conversation and named conversation
Except, there is a massive difference. One has a name and the other is nameless. This is basic psychology shit and you will naturally treat it differently. And you have clearly never seen a actual conversation or discussion here, it happens quite often, without any form of insults or stupid accusations
> Things have changed. Back then, calling someone a nigger was fine on other boards as well
Not much has really changed. You also can still call people niggers on non-/pol/ boards, you stupid nigger. There's a difference between going 'lol niggers eat watermelons' and 'KILL ALL THE NIGGERS THEY ARE DISGUSTING HUMANBEANS'.
> neither is anonymous culture as respectable as it once was
You're an idiot
> if you were self aware. If you're incapable of consentingly altering any form of prejudice you may have towards someone for the sake of having a neutral conversation, you are a mindless, immature drone.
Again, you seem to be not understanding basic psychology. Going 'oh shit im fucking selfaware' won't just suddenly change how you treat tripfags or prejudice
>im tripfagging because i said i can and you cant complain about that
>>368207
>I have absolutely no issues treating a trip or name user as an anonymous poster
Even being consciously aware of something doesn't prevent your subconscious from modifying your thoughts. If you got in an argument with some other namefag over I don't know say politics and then found him over in the anime section talking about magical girl show of the year. It doesn't matter what he says is really insightful or funny your thoughts on whatever he just posted are either effected by your early conversation no matter how hard you try to put the other off topic conversation aside. That's human nature. That's how your brain treats identities on a very basic level its a survival instinct [spoiler]Its also the foundation of racism and why it will always exist so long as we are human but that's another thing[/spoiler]. So no you would have problems treating a named user the same. Assuming you are a human with a human brain posting with a name and responding to someone with a name effects the post and on 4chan that change is for the worst.
>>368207
>neither is anonymous culture as respectable as it once was
Nigger listen. The site IS anonymous culture. The fun shit that happens, the feels, the stories, the autism, the banter, the ceaseless bitching, and the constant changing of culture itself as you just pointed out happens BECAUSE its anonymous. Because there is no base line or held standard of users. It doesn't need to be respected because it is the site and the reason this site has anything fun on it. Hell its probably responsible for the reason YOU came on here.
By the way telling people to grow up repeatedly in short burst doesn't make the person your talking too seem like a stubborn child it make you look like one you double nigger.
>>368213
>the basic heart of 4chan is still anonymous culture
Sorry, but it's not. What really is the core of this website is being able to speak your opinion about literally anything without getting punished for it, as long as you formulate your opinions like a somewhat intelligent person; you could even make an elaborate post about why you think you should be allowed to call others niggers without getting banned for it, but the general kind of people who use this word aren't very bright, with a lack of attention span, so don't actually expect such a post to ever surface.
Back to the point at hand, though. The core is free speech, as long as you abide by a humane level of communication. There is a reason, after all, why using a trip is not against the rules, and that's simply because trips are part of "4chan culture". Cheerio.
>>368220
>the users will suggest and force you to
This site doesn't belong to its users. It belongs to Hiroshimoot and the rest of the staff. Go to $hitchan if you want a users-dictated culture and system.
>who did the exact opposite of anonymity
But they didn't. Where did you get that from?
>muh this is basic psychology
You keep saying this, but you never explain what part of psychology you even be. This is not an argument and never will be.
>you can also still call people niggers on non-/pol/ boards
Nope. There's never a real reason to do it, therefore it's shitposting and in violation of global rules 3 and 6.
>u idiote!!11
Great argument, weirdo. (spoiler: that wasn't actually an argument)
Cont.
>>368316
>muh basic psychology again
Let's talk about basic logical procession, instead, Nietzsche. If one would be mature, they would not form prejudice against anyone, and would understand that every single person in the world regardless of skin color, religion, age, sexuality, nationality, behavior or disability has the capability of having something worthwhile to say. Using a trip is no different. Being a nazi is no different. Having Apple hardware is no different. There are always exceptions to generalizations, and if you don't realize this, you are simply too inexperienced in social matters to behave acceptingly towards a trip user (read: immaturity).
>im tripfagging because i said i can and you cant complain about that
Never said this. I tripfag because the most braindead of manchildren instantly filter me, meaning they don't end up ruining any other conversation I may have. I'm basically making my own hugbox free of flaming/shitposting subhumans. It's ideal. I've also seen trip users who want to be able to look at their past posts in the archives and reminiscent.
Again, you're prematurely judging intentions.
>>368221
>Even being consciously aware of something doesn't prevent your subconscious from modifying your thoughts.
Blatant lie. If this was true, you'd always be a subconscious racist because we're biologically wired to be aggressive towards people of other color, simply because, in the far past, we'd naturally avoid those with a different skin color because they couldn't possibly be part of your own tribe.
cont.
>>368316
>If you got in an argument with some other namefag over I don't know say politics and then found him over in the anime section talking about magical girl show of the year. It doesn't matter what he says is really insightful or funny your thoughts on whatever he just posted are either effected by your early conversation no matter how hard you try to put the other off topic conversation aside.
Nope. It's a hobby. Everyone has hobbies. Hitler was a genius, yet he also was a vegetarian. I hate vegetarians, and I would never be convinced of vegetarianism being a good thing even if the genius that is Hitler would speak highly of it. You are literally glorifying ad hominem and claiming it's "human nature", you actual savage. It's not. It's instinctual, perhaps, but being unable to control your instincts means you're a troglodyte. Get the fuck out.
>>368225
>the site IS anonymous culture
No, it's not. It just allows anonymity, which is a nice thing to have, but it also allows trip and name using. It has a name field on almost every board. Go to /b/ if you like anonymous culture so much, because it's forced there.
>happens because it's anonymous
Indeed. Now look at /pol/, /his/, /vg/ and /r9k/. This kind of cancerous boards come to being because of rampant anonymity. There's nothing positive about it.
>there is no base line or held standard of users
Then why are you bitching about trips?
>telling people to grow up repeatedly in short burst doesn't make the person your talking too seem like a stubborn child it make you look like one you double nigger.
>"no you, nigger"
Great argument once again, kiddo. You have yet to show any indication of maturity, therefore I reserve the right to tell you to grow up, manchild. Behave accordingly if you don't want to be told this.
>>368316
>What really is the core of this website is being able to speak your opinion about literally anything without getting punished for it,
Are you retarded? You only proved that anons point, thats ANON CULTURE. You literally just said anon culture is the heart of the site
>This site doesn't belong to its users.
The users make up the community, not the administration, retard. Just because its allowed, doesn't mean its going to be approved by the users. For many years posting Naruto on /a/ would get you banned because the community didn't want it, despite the fact it was allowed by the rules
>But they didn't. Where did you get that from?
The instant they left their house and grouped together in reality, they were no longer anon
>There's never a real reason to do it, therefore it's shitposting and in violation of global rules 3 and 6.
I call people jews and niggers on other boards all the time, for years and not once have I been banned. Stop spreading falsehoods. There's also no reason to call people insults like faggot, buts its not against the rules. Calling someone a nigger is no different, you stupid fucking monkey
>Indeed. Now look at /pol/, /his/, /vg/ and /r9k/. This kind of cancerous boards come to being because of rampant anonymity. There's nothing positive about it.
Again, are you retarded? All of those examples have nothing to do with anon. Sure, it encourages shitposting, but its not the cause. All of hose lack decent moderation, the loudest posters are retards, and have a constant insane influx of regular new posters. If you want to fucking do this, what does having a fucking name do? Nothing. It gives you a identity to punish, but nothing else. It contributes nothing and every forum has proven that your name will always be more important then the post. Almost every forum and site that requires you to hold a identity to post are some of the biggest cesspools in existence, because of that fact. I can make retarded points just like you!
>>366990
/pol/ = Justice
/s4s/ = Kindness
/r9k/ = Perseverance
/qa/ = Patience
/v/ = Integrity
/b/ = Bravery
>>368333
Nice hijack dumbass
This is exactly what's wrong with tripfags. Whenever you like it or not, or if it's rational or not or whatever, you're gonna stir shit up in this site by the sole reason of using a trip when it's not completely necessary.
If you support free speech and rational discussion so much, your own arguments should be able to stand on their own and not by your name and the reputation you will inevitably get. There are many other places on the internet for you to stroke you e-peen if you want to do it so much, but the fact is that this is not such a place. I don't even care if you're new or old, this is simply not going to change, even if you were to argue all day about how you're right and everybody else is wrong.
Not the guy you're arguing with btw, but I shouldn't need to tell you this. To begin with, I shouldn't even reply you at all.
>>368347
You couldn't be more wrong about /v/.
>>368343
I can voice my opinion without getting punished by it. I don't see how I prove anything he said wrong. Everyone can use a name and voice their opinion here without punishment, unless you're an insecure child who can't deal with having a (negative) reputation. My point is; you don't get punished by the staff.
>posting Naruto on /a/
/a/ is very special exception. I can't tell you much about it. Sorry. But please don't use it as an argument.
>The instant they left their house and grouped together in reality, they were no longer anon
In that sense, you're not anon either because your IP gets left behind. Chanology anons wore masks to cloud their own identities, which worked out fine for them. Still don't see your point.
>its not against the rules
It is.
>all those examples have nothing to do with anon
Yes they do. They're all child boards of /b/, which is forced anonymous, and essentially just /b/ boards with a theme. They're also about the only boards who bitch this much about having a name or trip. There's clear correlation here. Try using a trip on /d/, /diy/, /sci/, /ck/, /g/, /vp/, /aco/, /lgbt/. Noone bitches about trips there, and these boards happen to actually be nearly devoid of shitposters. This isn't coincidence, this is correlation.
>>368351
>your own arguments should be able to stand on their own and not by your name and the reputation
They still do, I simply don't want manchildren ruining my discussions with memespouting, flaming and shitposting.
>There are many other places on the internet for you to stroke you e-peen if you want to do it so much
Not my intention of having a trip. I already explained my reasoning.
>>368402
>/a/ is very special exception. I can't tell you much about it. Sorry. But please don't use it as an argument.
>this proves my argument wrong so its a special exception please dont use it!!
Are you fucking retarded, /a/ isn't a special exception just because you don't want to admit you are wrong. This is another reason people don't like tripfags. The majority of you guys refuse to admit you are wrong, no matter how many people fucking prove you are
>I can voice my opinion without getting punished by it. I don't see how I prove anything he said wrong
Because the only reason you can do that is because of the anon culture, you moron. If everyone was forced to use names tomorrow to post, you would get repercussions for being retarded and having retarded opinions. Just like every other forum. 4chan has nothing to do with free speech and the mods can ban you for whatever fucking reason they want. The reason you can post your retarded opinions is because thats a core part of anon culture
>It is.
Its not. Calling you a stupid monkey nigger isn't racism nor is it against the rules
>They're all child boards of /b/
All boards are child boards of /b/ and /b/ with a theme. Every fucking board originated from /b/.
>Try using a trip on /d/, /diy/, /sci/, /ck/, /g/, /vp/, /aco/, /lgbt/. Noone bitches about trips there, and these boards happen to actually be nearly devoid of shitposters.
>nd these boards happen to actually be nearly devoid of shitposters
You have to be fucking joking? /g/ /vp/ are both fucking shitposting full, lets not fucking go into /lgbt/, /diy/ /sci/ /ck/ from what I know are slow boards and as a result there are reasons people don't complain about trips and /d/ and /aco/ are fucking image dumping grounds not discussion grounds. All of those except those 3 slow boards are full of shitposting and the slow boards are also almost shitposting free because slow boards are naturally like that as they are closer to forums and are mostly generals normally
>>368347
>/v/
>integrity
>>368449
It's common knowledge that moderation on /a/ goes to extreme lengths in order to punish posters. Spend a few minutes every hour lurking the http://4chan.org/bans page and you'll understand. There must be a good reason for this, because this has been a thing for years.
>If everyone was forced to use names tomorrow
Not going to happen, ever, therefore it's choice, and has no grounds as an argument on this subject.
>Calling you a stupid monkey nigger isn't against the rules
On its own, it is, but since your majority of your post are actually (somewhat) constructive, it's not really grounds for punishment. If you would reply to me now with nothing but "you're a dumb nigger, kill yourself", you'd definitely be breaking rules, however. The fact that this kind of content warrants a ban means it's obviously not quality content and should be avoided.
>All boards are child boards of /b/
I was referring to userbase when calling them child boards.
>/g/ is shitposting full
Not from what I've seen, unless you try to stick to flamewarbait threads.
>/vp/
Smogon shitposters are rare, and pretty much the only thing there, good enough reason to call it devoid of shitposters.
>slow boards
They're slow because they don't have shitposters, and only quality content, mate.
>/d/ is not discussion grounds
You've never been to any generals there, then. Generals, which are normally breeding grounds for shitposting.
Never been to /aco/, but it's a split from /d/, so it probably has the exact same kind of users as /d/.
>3 slow boards
4.
>closer to forums
You're kidding, right?
>>367634
I believe you're thinking of the Finish imageboard ylilauta, which has invented spurdo
Wojak and "that feel" come from Vichan, which is a Polish imageboard
>>368476
That doesn't suddenly make my point somehow invalid because /a/ actually gets fucking moderated and because the mods actually listen to the community.
>. If you would reply to me now with nothing but "you're a dumb nigger, kill yourself", you'd definitely be breaking rules, however. The fact that this kind of content warrants a ban means it's obviously not quality content and should be avoided.
Except, that's not going to get banned because of racism like you were claiming faggot. It'll be banned for shitposting because there is nothing to it, but even then it probably wouldn't be removed its very rare for mods to remove those sorts of comments
>/g/
Last I went there, it was nothing but apple shilling, microsoft shitposting, shilling, help beg threads, haha linux suckz peniz windows 10 for the winz shit, anti-anime posters and just genuine fucking faggotry. This was what the majority of the threads were, that makes it mostly shitposting.
>/vp/
I honestly know fucking nothing about this other than the few checks I've done on it. It looked like genuine faggotry to me, like it lacked moderation and was mostly disgusting circlejerking generals. If it lacks shitposting, its because of the latter
>slow boards
No, they are slow because they aren't popular boards, you fucking moron. Slow boards and sites are ALWAYS almost shitposting free, because no one wants to fucking shitpost when they probably won't get replies for hours and are more likely to get banned long before that
>/d/
Its technically a image dumping ground, it doesn't matter how its treated. Most of its users seem to be tumblrtards as well. Chances are as well, the people tripping on it actually draw art
>Never been to /aco/, but it's a split from /d/, so it probably has the exact same kind of users as /d/.
Oh man, please post a new thread with this comment. It'll really upset the /d/ickfags. /aco/ is a porn board for /co/, so no its not the same users and probably fucking horrible
>Pol: Degenerates calling other people degenrates
>s4s: forced memes, actually having the etiquette of debate
>r9k: People sharing stories that never happened to them
>qa: "Question" """""Answer"""""
>v: Every videogame is shit
>b: Cancer
>>368541
>qa: "Question" """""Answer"""""
>/pol/ = Reddit
>[s4s] = Reddit
>/r9k/ = Reddit
>/qa/ = Meta
>/v/ = Reddit
>/b/ = Reddit
The sad truth. How the mighty have fallen.
>>368782
family come on you're deceiving yourself
/qa/ has shown to have literal come here in attempt to make the site more habitual for their type.
>>366990
>pol -dunno
>s4s -unfunny memesters
>r9k -ironic self pity board
>qa -the topic most whined about will make hiro change 4chan
>v - endless arguments on quality vs fun
>b - loli,traps,gore and regular porn. 0 new OC
>/pol/
Reddit's/ / Tumblr's boogeyman
>[s4s]
Nice board .^)
>/r9k/
Failed normalfags
>/qa/
WAAAAAAAAAAH DELETE /POL/
>/v/
le vidya culture
>/b/
Shit
/pol/ = always right yet always wrong
[s4s] = people browse this place?
/r9k/ = second reddit board
/qa/ = please delete /v/
/v/ = please delete /v/
/b/ = hiros favorite normalfag circlejerk
>>368090
edgy memes
>>367162
I'm going with this one
>/pol/
Edgy faggots talking about "politics"
>[s4s]
Elite funposting
>/r9k/
Suicidal frogposter containment board
>/qa/
Can be good sometimes but mostly just "HIRO DELETE THIS, ADD THIS
>/v/
Another /b/ without porn and a little bit of vidya
>/b/
Porn dump board that used to be tolerable but now serves as a containment board for shitposting edgy kids
>>367634
fuck off retard
it's a finnish forum
le feelsguy is from krautchan or some shit, don't associate us with your shitty reddit memes
>>369601
>feelsguy
>krautchan
No sir, you fuck off.
>/pol/
Far right-wing circlejerking and bitching about minorities while doing nothing about it in real life
>[s4s]
Shitposting on steroids
>/r9k/
NEETS shitposting how bad their lives are
>/qa/
Mostly complaining
>/v/
SJW threads get more attention than actual video game discussion threads and shitposting
>/b/
For underage newfags that don't realize there's already porn boards and cancer
/pol/ - nazis
[s4s] - this is a nice board (only board ive actually laughed at)
/r9k/ - /adv/ gone terrible
/qa/= not that terrible
/v/= /vg/ is better
/b/= 14 year olds
>>369732
>sir
*tips*
i only know that it's definitely kc-tier
>>369780
>/vg/ is better
Exactly! There really is no reason for /v/ to exist other than threads complaining about SJW's and off-topic non-vidya shit.
>>369783
*grabs you by the leg and spins you around in the air before slamming you down on the ground*
Don't fuck with me.
