Hiro can you do something about the /v/ mods?
We're having a sort of big issue right now and they keep deleting every thread about it.
Pic related.
>>359132
take it to shitchan, there's a whole containment site for you subhumans
Agreed.
Janitors are deleting any thread about the new Dead or Alive Xtreme 3 video game because it's triggering their delicate sensibilities.
oh look /v/ is crying about sjws again
FUCK THESE SJW CUNT MODS THEY ARE ASTROTURFING THREADS
HIRO SEND THEM BACK TO TUMBLR PLEASE
>>359137
Your next post will be $10 deposited
>>359137
>you ain't on my side so you against me
are you some kind of dumb nigger?
>muh sjw boogeyman
top kek, no one is taking away your precious vidya games nerds.
SJWs aren't videogames.
>>>/cripplechan/
>>359137
>shill
oh boy here we go
>>359143
Did you even see the pic?
hiro needs to fire all the current mods and janitors tbhq
what kind of autistic loser works for free anyway?
>>359143
Except when the people who created the game actually explain the reason why they aren't bringing it over is because they fear said SJWs.
>>359143
>literally game isn't being released because of SJWs
>B-B-BUT NO ONE IS TAKING YOUR GAMES
Jesus how fucking delusional and cognitively dissonant can SJWs get?
>>359143
except they literally are doing exactly that.
DOAX3 never.
>>359150
no one gives a shit about your literal porn game. xvideos has plenty of cartoons you can go jack off to if you want.
>>359134
/pol/ tears detected
>>359137
>shills
This is why no one likes you, /v/. This is why no one wants to fix your awful board.
Couldn't they slap on some clothes and publish it anyway?
>>359151
the mods are handpicked from tumblr's finest.
thanks moot
>>359154
I prefer the term Goblin Giver thanks
>>359157
Hello Gawker Goonies
>>359157
/v/ is awful because of gawker astroturfers like yourself.
Fuck off and slit your wrists.
Seriously. can we have a bit of communication and get a mod to tell us WHY they're deleting these threads without any apparent reason to?
MUH CULTURE OF SCHLOCKY VIDEOGAMES
>>359158
>>359159
do you see how childish and stupid you look when you're posting shit like this? just because we don't care about your stupid porn games doesn't mean we care about social justice either. both sides are completely fucking retarded. I think it's time to grow the fuck up and stop acting like you have autism.
>>359143
In this case, that is literally what is happening. The company made a conscious decision to not bring the game over because of the political gaming atmosphere in the West.
>>359157
You see this autism? This is a literal /v/ thread on /qa/ because the mods banned it from there. Last year left v/ in shambles.
It doesn't matter if you don't want to fix /v/ because it'll fuck every other board over until something is done. You can't leave it alone in this state and think making it a de-facto containment board is a solution, because it contains nothing. It just rages outward.
>>359169
Hello Astroturfing Janitor
>>359169
>calling out gawker is childish
>"goobergoyim" is perfectly acceptable and mature
Get out, retard.
we can't talk about this.
>>359169
It's always a sign of a moron when they assume your disagreement means they're working for the other side.
4chan has always had these kinds of reactionary morons.
>>359169
10 dollars has been deposited into your account
Thank you for making the world a more safe space with gawker!
>>359169
>both sides are completely fucking retarded
>one side wants a game banned
>the other doesn't
ok sjw-kun
http://strawpoll.me/2597355
>>359169
Gawker at its finest
>>359174
When did he say that, /v/ermin?
MAKE ME A JANNY I WILL LITERALLY DO IT FOR FREE
I ALSO ACTUALLY LIKE VIDEO GAMES AND MY ASS IS HERE BORDERLINE 24/7 ANYWAY SO YEAH
>>359187
lol tbhFAM
Even /v/ is falling to the censorship police. It's over mate.
>>359185
10 dollars has been deposited into your account for this post!
>>359167
It's literally because they don't want another Gamergate on their hands. They don't want people to band together and fight some virtual war because that is exactly the kind of shit that put moot on a first name basis with the feds, and they don't want to deal with that shit. 4chan is a place for discussion, but when that discussion turns to actual action it gets really complicated really fast. Just start up an IRC or some shit, and accept that 4chan requires too much favor in the eyes of advertisers to host any anti-progressivism movements.
>>359188
I'm serious.
FIRE ALL THE CURRENT MODS
SEND THEM BACK TO TUMBLR
>>359190
>linking an article
>advertising
HAHA WHAT
[img]https://36.media.tumblr.com/b54034a578be8f73b73fd827a0cee949/tumblr_ny9zaweWut1qa70eyo1_540.jpg[/img]
wow. just wow.
>>359190
holy shit, the mods actually ban people for posting advertisments?
How does GameRampage keep slipping through the cracks?
There is an active thread on this now.
>>317781665
AND an active thread on the game without the censorship stuff.
>>317781720
Happy to help.
>>359181
> Overwhelming majority hate SJW
> things still get banned
hmmmm
>>359192
Did they literally learn NOTHING from Gamergate's inception? The whole thing started BECAUSE of censorship. The Streisand effect is in full effect right now thanks to them deleting these threads.
>>359199
>>359201
Shit, forgot I wasn't on /v/.
>>>/v/317781665
>>>/v/317781720
>>359205
LEL
Well looky there
>>359200
The advertising thing is just a cover, they only use it to ban links to right wing sites.
Look at all the constant Indivisible threads that are allowed because they want their Tumblr game to make money.
>>359205
First thread is dead mate
>>359202
the majority of people aren't mods or janitors though and it only takes ONE mod or janitor to delete a thread
>>359209
So use the second I guess.
>>359169
>censoring discussion
>protecting people from reality
>>359205
>half the posts in the second thread are [Deleted]
Why don't you just get it over with and delete the thread mods, huh? Do it.
>>359199
I don't understand.
Should 4chan be a safe space, (You) this post if you agree.
>>359217
HATE SAFE SPACES
topkek
>>359205
based mods taking out the garbage
Meh, you guys deserve it for browsing /v/.
>>359208
They banned it obviously because there's a legion of /pol/tard /v/tards who have been suckered in by the Breitbart pandering. They post this shit like 9/11 conspiracy theories.
>>359223
The mods are cancer.
moots gone, now they need to get the fuck out.
>>359229
Why don't YOU leave?
>>359226
So we're allowed to get blue pilled but not red pilled?
The shilling is hard today...
Just like my dick
>>359192
It's not anti-progressive to want freedom from oppression based on censorship.
>>359203
It's either censorship or the site. Advertisers can't be seen around a place as racist, sexist, hateful, and just plain angry as this; that would be social suicide, and as long as society pays the bills, that means that it's financial suicide as well. That's really just the world we live in until we find some way for the site to make money other than ads. So if it really matters to you that much that 4chan be a bastion of free speech, you'll need to tackle the rent first.
>>359192
>when that discussion turns to actual action
Holy shit my sides.
Chanology was the only real "action". It's looked back on with embarrassment, even by the most fervent of those originally supporting it.
>>359132
This is a non issue seeing as you can easily import it.
You guys really need to stop acting as if you have legitimate problems with these specific occurrences. You want to argue social bullshit, which is another thing entirely. Just be honest.
>>359240
>Advertisers can't be seen around a place as racist, sexist, hateful, and just plain angry as this
Yes, they can, and it's very easy. You pose as a normal user of this site. Post the link and await the clicks to roll in.
They hire advertising agencies who specialize in social media marketing and stealth marketing
>So if it really matters to you that much that 4chan be a bastion of free speech
It's literally not, you fucking retard.
>>359247
You do realize importing costs like 2-3x more?
>>359248
forgot my pic
>>359235
Progressivism (at least as far as society at large is concerned) is looping back to the point where censorship is seen as a necessary and even good thing, as long as the only people being censored are "the bad guys."
>>359242
GG raised a shitload of real-ass money. 4channers are not a 1337 haxor force, but there are a few anons that have pull in the real world that can get money moving and people talking.
>>359242
you and the sj crowd defend men that wear dresses and pretend to be women.
nothing anybody on /v/ can do will be as embarrassing as what you support.
>>359249
No because I have a proxy buyer.
Did moot hire swedish mods on /v/ or something? Why even his decisions are still upheld if that kike doesn't even own 4chan anymore?
Doing it for free is one thing, but being so progressive? Smells like mental illness.
Good luck with these faggots, /v/.
>>359255
>you and the sj crowd
Don't associate me with those imbeciles.
>>359260
>Why even his decisions are still upheld if that kike doesn't even own 4chan anymore?
moot and his mods lost the war but even though their glorious leader was ass raped and murdered they keep fighting.
>>359260
Is this really being progressive to you? Or is it keeping SJW bullshit off tumblr.
I didn't agree with the initial push to have GG off of /v/, but it proved right in the long run. It's fucking annoying to have every instance of censored content and things like this equated to some higher social issue. Nobody comes to /v/ for that and none of you are equipped to talk about it coherently.
>>359270
*off 4chan, lel
/v/ May as well be tumblr, though right? It's just as shit.
You morons are seriously getting suckered in by reactionary right-wing tripe trying to pander to your insecurities.
If people are insulting you and telling you to get lost, it isn't actually because they're shills, Jews, SJW, cccks, feminazis, beta males, bluepilled, etc.
They're doing it because you're buying into this fake manufactured outrage peddled by people who are trying to manipulate you.
This right wing Breitbart shit is for sixty year old men with sexual inadequacies. If you buy into this shit as a young man you definitely have hangups.
You wouldn't fling around words about sexual prowess or domination (ccck, alpha, beta) if you weren't severely lacking in that department.
Do you guys get it now? The things you buy into say a lot about you. People are calling you out because you are putting your hangups on display.
>>359255
>not wanting to defend men that wear dresses and pretend to be women
Traps are pure.
>>359265
>Advertising does literally nothing for the site if all the money goes to the stealth advertisers.
It's not advertising for 4chan, and it doesn't require 4chans permission to advertise either. It's an open forum, of course there's GR11.
>>359276
>fake manufactured outrage
But it's not fake, they're succeeding at censoring video games, and you're saying we should just let things be censored?
>>359255
>>359276
Where's my SJW bingo card? I'm sure this posts gets at least 1 line.
>>359276
SJW hambeasts are getting our games taken away
How the fuck do we not have a reason to be upset
>>359284
Not even going to argue the point, I just have to point out how flawed this image is.
Who gives a shit what a game is rated? 1.) It's not the same as censoring it. and 2.) You're a fucking adult, it LITERALLY makes zero difference to you.
I refuse to believe some of you are as serious as you try to make everyone believe.
>>359276
I saw the videos from Yale, SJW are real and not figment of the rights imagination
Video for reference
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IEFD_JVYd0
>>359254
>Progressivism (at least as far as society at large is concerned) is looping back to the point where censorship is seen as a necessary and even good thing, as long as the only people being censored are "the bad guys."
That's only relevant if you didn't learn anything from the history of progressivism which is the entire point of why we learn history in the first place. They learned first hand it was wrong because it backfired (see current situation) which caused the repeal of prohibition for instance.
What the fuck is there to discuss? You can still buy the international version. The discussion in these type of threads is never video-games. It's just political-activism, which does not belong here, because it's cancerous. It shouldn't even be on the website, but if you really wanna talk about it, go to /pol/.
Play asia protects the lolis
>>359284
99% of the "censorship" you cite is just publishers voluntarily changing something for commercial reasons. If they feel like it would hurt sales, they'll change it. They do it with plenty of things.
Why is this not ok? This is literally the free market and consumer advocacy at work. You're free to start your own game company that makes whatever content you want.
>>359288
>Who gives a shit what a game is rated?
The joke is the game is rated M and they're arguing how the game's content is inappropriate for the 18+ year old gamers who the game is made for.
>It's not the same as censoring it.
Attempted censorship is just as bad a successful censorship.
>It LITERALLY makes zero difference to you.
Yeah, people trying to take my games away makes zero difference to me. Good one.
You fucked it up once already, /v/.
You don't get the chance to fuck it up a second time.
>>359290
Prohibition made alcohol illegal. It's still perfectly legal for you to play your bouncing titties volleyball game.
>>359289
I don't think that's what he was arguing.
Real problems can be used to manipulate a group of people. In this case, some are jumping out the window on a relatively benign problem.
For example, a DLC outfit being removed from a game. Some immediately relate it to SJWs and go berserk when in reality, something so pointless wouldn't have phased them otherwise. They're being led to believe that each and every instance is an assault on their liberties. People who think like this are usually on FOX and CNN panels arguing in 30 second bursts. These aren't people we generally take seriously but we're being asked to now.
>>359297
The reason why it's not ok, is because it allows external special interests to control products and deliver whatever they decide, thereby removing your right to decide for yourself. But you're absolutely right. People are free to create their own companies to make whatever they want until they take that from them too.
>>359297
You say the publishers are voluntarily changing things for commercial reasons. They're not.
Publishers are being systematically harassed into changing things that a vocal minority find "problematic."
These changes to games did not exist a few years ago. Nintendo of America was fine with bikinis and partial nudity in kids games like Tales of Symphonia and Gun.
>>359307
NoA has been censoring shit since the NES.
>>359307
It's voluntary. Whatever you think of Israel, Boycott-Divest-Sanctions does not involuntarily compel companies to withdraw from Israel. They don't. They merely add pressure that some companies bow to and some companies don't.
>>359301
>Prohibition made alcohol illegal.
They didn't call it the progressive era for nothing.
>>359313
>They merely add pressure that some companies bow to and some companies don't.
Sort of like how Nazis merely added pressure to the Jews?
>>359317
Stellar comparison.
>>359317
You're fucking dumb, and you're underage.
Die.
>>359321
I don't even know what to say to this.
I'll just pat myself on the back for triggering you that hard.
>>359304
>>359307
I'd love to know which videogames that have apparently been "censored" you were even interested in. The "controversies" I hear about are usually shit games looking for some notoriety.
Companies do this stuff voluntarily all the time, it's just now there's this angle that the "SJW's made them do it!" Even if that's not true.
You guys are getting fucking manipulated and lecturing others about being manipulated. Tell me you're really not this furrowed-brow about schlocky doa beach volleyball. If you are, you should move out of home and get a job.
>>359324
Xenoblade X
Bravely Default
Bravely Second
>>359325
Is there any proof that "SJW"s are the reason it was altered?
Many games in the past got altered for puritanical americans. Didn't need SJW's for that.
>>359324
Fake controversy is generally pretty easy to spot, like with Her Story and Gen 60. These are "controversies" that came and went in a day because there was no controversy to begin with.
But when you have every SJW on the net decrying cleavage in perfect synchronization, demanding that game developers be shut down, calling for boycotts, calling people honest-to-god Nazis in attempt to assassinate their reputation, this doesn't benefit anyone.
Do you think the /v/ janitors were deleting threads as an elaborate marketing ploy for DOAX3? Or is it easier to accept that maybe they're just super butthurt?
>>359330
Take a guess who the modern day puritanical americans are...
>>359324
Just now this is happening? I wish that were true. Let me point you to Mortal Kombat (heavily censored on the SNES) and the congressional hearings lead by two democratic senators (Joeseph Lieberman and Herb Kohl) in an effort to censor video games due to "moral panic" that ultimately resulted in the creation of the ESRB. Joeseph Liberman also supported the Communications Decency Act for instance (aka the great internet sex panic of 1995)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortal_Kombat_controversies
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_Entertainment_Protection_Act
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Decency_Act
>>359333
They do that shit because you morons get baited out the ass by it. You're literally advertising for them by passing around that infographic.
For all the claims of censorship and whatnot, there doesn't seem to be much actual censorship going on - just companies making decisions that are best for the bottom line. 90% of the claims are just "booga booga SJW's!" But then you read further and they are just making a decision for a localized market and the decision came first - not the supposed SJW outrage.
Face it, you guys are getting manipulated by an outrage machine. You're literally lionizing schlock bullshit like DOA beach volleyball out of a misplaced sense of ideological loyalty.
It's dumb and shameful and mods banning it is totally justified. Stop being such a tool.
>>359336
American censorship like the Comics Code puts anything modern SJWs have come up with to shame (there are people who claim that to this day animation is not taken seriously in America because of it). Dunno why people talk about it like a new thing.
>>359336
And Mortal Kombat is still with us, more violent than ever. Lieberman was made a laughingstock for his tipper gore-like Puritanism. That was the peak of his political influence.
Why so terrified of such an idiot?
>>359132
But it's the community manager that said this shit.
Not the company officially itself.
Arika's CM said something that hinted at an Arika character appearing in SF5 and the company corrected his statements that clarified "Fuck no".
+ Tecmo is using that as an excuse and you should know that OP.
>>359341
>You're literally advertising for them by passing around that infographic.
No shit. I think they deserve it after the way their game got pulled from Steam.
If being against censorship makes me a tool then god dammit, I'm a tool.
>>359345
That's the point. They're all idiots and they're growing in number.
>>359341
>No, no, no. SJWs aren't the one's manipulating you! It's the Anti-SJWs!
>Yes! They're pretending to be harassed by the SJWs! The SJWs aren't hurting anybody!
I see you're trying to turn the tables on me.
>>359348
No I'm saying you're advertising for Polygon and those game media agencies.
>piss off gamers with this ONE WEIRD TRICK!
>>359354
So what? Don't read their shit if you don't like what they're saying.
The mods are buddies with Kotaku journalists.
This isn't surprising. I just wish Hiro would do something about it, I don't like posting on that cripple's chan.
>>359357
>Don't read their shit if you don't like what they're saying.
I wish I could, believe me. Unfortunately, their little clique gets the first and final say on all matters pertaining to video games. Their agenda is inescapable.
Which brings us back to our main topic, the discussion that kept getting deleted: they have literally embargoed DOAX3. This isn't a simple "out of sight, out of mind" matter, where if I ignore it it'll just go away. If I ignored what those retards said I would have no clue that they're the reason why DOAX3 isn't coming the US.
You might as well tell me:
>If you don't like America you can just giiiiiiit out!
>>359363
You are literally being a martyr for fucking doa beach volleyball.
And you know what? It's fucking adolescent shite that you should be ashamed for defending. And you're kidding if you think I believe you're really interested in playing it.
Furthermore this was a company decision - it wasn't in response to SJW targeting the company.
If the mods insist on keeping discussion of self-censorship off /v/, they should at least move it to /pol/, or to /trash/ if the mechanism to move it to /pol/ isn't ready. Because this is clearly something people want to talk about, and there's no reason to keep it off the site. If people start suggesting harassment campaigns, that's a different matter.
But really, this looks pretty legitimate compared to most of the clickbait identity politics threads on /v/.
>>359366
this quite frankly.
>>359367
It's just KT making up a bullshit excuse or rather adding a new excuse to the wheel of reasons why the west ain't getting it.
Because if the stuff the CM said which you can't take as word of God is true then there is a huge fucking discrepancy since Doa5 is a thing with it's skimpy as fuck costumes.
There's a difference between saying you won't fuck a person you just got in bed because they are bleeding/ didn't clean their dick properly comapred saying they just aren't your type because if they weren't your tye they wouldn't even BE THERE!
>>359132
Man, I'm actually on Magneto's side, though. Comparing a good guy like Magneto to someone lame like Anita Sarkeesian is just wrong.
>>359366
Please explain how martyrdom "literally" comes into play here.
>>359377
I mean, whether the reason given is legit or not, at least the thread is about the release of a video game and not, say, Anita's views on the ads run by torrent trackers.
>>359132
When you stop bringing /pol/ shit into your video games, the mods might let you post it
The guys who get triggered by Anita and SJW critics are the biggest spergos. Regular normal people do see the fanservice and cliched tropes of videogames as a bit tawdry and immature. So when regular people hear Anita say that videogames have a lot of sexism in them, their reaction is "Well, yeah." They're not in it for that stuff - not primarily, anyway. So they just admit it and move on - why put up a fight?
Spergloafs though, they can't put it away because it's the only thing in their lives. That's the take I have of people who are into gamergate. They have no friends, have little social interaction even with their family, they have no hobbies, are not in education, have a menial job (if at all), and they aspire to no greater heights. If they had anything else they wouldn't engage in this charade of social activism.
>>359416
>pretending he's better than those Spergloafs and Spergos while typing out paragraphs on a Cantonese cutting board
They targeted gamers.
Gamers.
We're a group of people who will sit for hours, days, even weeks on end performing some of the hardest, most mentally demanding tasks. Over, and over, and over all for nothing more than a little digital token saying we did.
We'll punish our selfs doing things others would consider torture, because we think it's fun.
Many of us have made careers out of doing just these things: slogging through the grind, all day, the same quests over and over, hundreds of times to the point where we know evety little detail such that some have attained such gamer nirvana that they can literally play these games blindfolded.
Do these people have any idea how many controllers have been smashed, systems over heated, disks and carts destroyed 8n frustration? All to latter be referred to as bragging rights?
These people honestly think this is a battle they can win? They take our media? We're already building a new one without them. They take our devs? Gamers aren't shy about throwing their money else where, or even making the games our selves. They think calling us racist, mysoginistic, rape apologists is going to change us? We've been called worse things by prepubescent 10 year olds with a shitty head set. They picked a fight against a group that's already grown desensitized to their strategies and methods. Who enjoy the battle of attrition they've threatened us with. Who take it as a challange when they tell us we no longer matter. Our obsession with proving we can after being told we can't is so deeply ingrained from years of dealing with big brothers/sisters and friends laughing at how pathetic we used to be that proving you people wrong has become a very real need; a honed reflex.
Gamers are competative, hard core, by nature. We love a challange. The worst thing you did in all of this was to challange us. You're not special, you're not original, you're not the first; this is just another boss fight.
>>359367
>Because this is clearly something people want to talk about, and there's no reason to keep it off the site.
4chan doesn't need to allow discussion on every topic. Anyway, the more likely case is simply, the mods were told by moot to remove anything that could be or could start any activism like shit. In which case, they are doing their job well, because we don't fucking need any more of activism here. Each time it occurs, it only helps shit the place up more
>>359422
Could a pasta be anymore reddit
Gamergate remains a banned topic on /v/, any thread that gets deleted is more than likely deleted because discussion derails in that direction.
can you faGGots go back to 8gag?
thx lads
>>359289
God what happened to society are we really this big of faggots now.
>>359421
>making a snarky greentext because it hit home
oh wait, shit
>another SJW-drama on /v/
Please don't spill on /a/ this time
>>359132
>>>/8gag/
Stay there if you want to cry about tumblr sjws or whatever your diaper gets wet. Your are welcome back when you can manage to talk about videogames for more than 10minutes without going into full /pol/ oversperg mode.
>>359151
You can import you retard. With the current yen exchange rate you even get it wax cheaper that way. We knew since its announcement that the game would not come to the west but here we are again thanjs to twitter drama.
Would be great if all doa image dumbs gets moved to another board because of this too.
Now stop pretending you ever enjoyed videogames and fuck off to redditchan.
>>359157
Please these people are not /v/ but obvious stir up shitters from 8gag.
>SJWs have nothing to do with the original statement
>People still goes apeshit over "SJW BANING VIDYA!!!1!
if you dont bring up sjw shit it would have still been a civil discussion of /v/
Forget ISIS, North Korea and Al Qaeda. We need to go to war against the SJW plague.
Do you motherfuckers understand now? DO YOU? Let me spell it out one more time for the densest among you.
This. Is. Not. Just. About. Video games.
These people want to destroy those of you who speak out and control the rest. You've seen them talk on twitter and tumblr, they will happily put you to death if they could and drink your tears while doing so. Video games is one front of a much larger war. It does not begin or end with video games and if you don't fight you are going to lose so much more than just a hobby. This is the end of the war, they have been winning it for years. Gamergate was a surprise resistance that popped up after our "forces" had been routed and slaughtered on the altar of social justice for decades. If you want to live in a world where some histrionic pampered brat and her sniveling cohorts can cry harassment and shut down entire websites then yeah sure do nothing just protect the vidya I guess. If that idea disgusts you then it is time to stand up if you haven't already and fight them on every level. Remember Shirtgate? Remember how they made a motherfucking scientist cry on what should have been the best day of his life? Over a shirt? It's not just about video games these people are monsters in human skin. Fight them!
Welp looks like /qa/ and /v/ are once again the epicentrum of redpill forums.
Time to play more videogames instead of talking about them again.
>>359492
It's going to. Marie Rose is /a/'s waifu. This is Dead or Alive, one of the biggest anime video games out there.
>>359492
We already had at least three different Xythar twitter screencaps threads this morning.
Why can't 8gaggers stay in their containment-chan
baka desu senpai, baka
>>359192
If Gamergate was doing shit that bad we'd have known by now. It's extremely demonized, but it's actual threat is laughably small. The only people who think otherwise are those who have a vested interest in either talking about it or hindering that discussion.
The Fappening and passed issues of cheese pizza is what put Moot on the FBI's friend's list.
>>359342
The existence of the Comics Code Authority is proof that manufactured consensus among private institutions can be as bad as, if not worse, than state-sanctioned censorship.
>>359366
>it wasn't in response to SJW targeting the company.
That's kind of what they want. A culture where people are afraid to do anything they don't like.
If someone smashes you in the nose every time you say a particular phrase, you're going to stop saying it eventually just to avoid the reaction you know is coming. You're not doing it out of your own will, you're not doing it because you realized whatever the hypothetical negatives of your actions were, you're doing it because you were coerced and bullied into it.
That's how self-censorship works. It's what the term "chilling effect," refers to. It's a lot more subtle than overt censorship, but it's just as, if not more, insidious.
>>359416
>why put up a fight?
Maybe because the person who you're nodding along to in agreement to has other motives that can be discerned by paying more attention to who they are and what they've said in the past?
Maybe because people like Anita take your recognition of their watered down points and well-meaning platitudes as political capital to push their very specific goals?
>>359603
To be fair we have Gamerghazi shills regularly popping up here, if one side has to go the other has to go with it.
Fucking pedophile weebs don't realize their are being played with
first two games sold like SHIT
now they are doing publicity stunts
Look at this shit
>>>/v/317808039
>>>/v/317808039
>>359342
American animation isn't taken seriously because of Disney's influence and how people would rather watch live action drama the animated drama.
>>359728
I wish we lived in alternate universe where Titan AE was a smash hit and helped kickstart a Western animation renaissance and we lived in an age where America produced at least as much decent cartoons as Japan does.
/pol/ threads aren't being deleted:
>>>/pol/56642647
>>>/pol/56716543
Why are people so mad at gamergate in the first place? I don't really care enough about ethics in journalism but the idea that videos games are sexist and that women don't get fairly represented is absolutely delusional and I've seen the crap that 3rd wave feminists complain about.
>>359764
/pol/ literally is the old /b/, they usually get shit done
You guys know that this game will have English support right? PS4 isn't region locked. Thank Britain for taking over Hong Kong and import.
>>359550
>he actually plays video games
I thought I was the only one
Mods autosaged yet another DOA X3 thread. Its bad enough we got people from Reddit and Neogaf infesting /v/, but now we got SJW mods who are abusing the rules. Hiro where the fuck are you man? Get your internet fixed already
Can mods please stop auto-saging, deleting and banning users? This shit is controversial. People want to talk about it. Stop damage controlling.
>>359366
>I don't like this game, therefore it's perfectly okay to censor it
Fuck off kike.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KC-g2d-tGvA
They won.
>>359799
>>>/8gag/
>>359334
/pol/tards and 8gaGGers.
>>359733
French animation you doofus.
Too bad
>>359881
There are shittons of naked grill games not-coming-the-USA that /v/ isn't throwing a spergfit about.
>>359190
Are you shitting me? You can't even link a news site because "advertising"? So yeah posting CNN will get me banned to I bet. I really hope someone is saving these for Hiro to see, I know I am
>>359914
>You can't even link a news site because "advertising"?
Probably because posting a link to a "news" site has been used as advertising. And Breitbart is one of those sites that advertises here.
Hiro has said on record it is very hard to find new mods. But he is looking for new ones
>>359924
Breitbart isn't Kotaku though. They're simply a right-wing plitical news website, much like Huffington Post, Vox, Salon, Vanity Fair, Rolling Stone, and Esquire, all notorious left wing site that never have gotten banned.
Mods are known left wing liberals
>>359276
Fuck off Salon. Stop trying to shill your click bait site that defends pedos, which you legit did
>>359203
moot started with the feds over The Fappening you idiot. Gamergate was about him trying to impress his girlfriend who happened to be cheating on him
>>359927
You're really grasping at straws to look for something that isn't there. There's no conspiracy against YOUR favorite websites.
You dont' even know who gets banned and who doesn't, so why you're trying to claim that these "left wing sites" never get banned is ridiculous.
The fact of the matter is that out there are people paid to make these threads because it generates ad revenue and click counts for the website. That's a violation of GR11
>>>/global/rules/11
You know complaining about SJWs just makes their case stronger. All you do is help them stop stuff you like.
>>359935
Have you considered it's just a really pathetic neckbeard paying himself in cheetohs?
>>359938
Sure, some may be, but it doesn't change the fact that companies hire ad agencies to literally PR for them on social media websites like Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, 4chan, and Reddit.
>>359939
Fuck me, picked the wrong image but it's still related.
>>359284
>Slave Leia
You are aware that it was Carrie Fisher who asked for removing this outfit from any future products? You cry about feminists but you do a goddamn by yourself to convince me that what they do is actually right. Oh and for Bayonetta, it's more complicated, not every single feminist was against it because the main character is maybe sexy, but at least she is herself and not another generic bimbo.
>>359699
Go home Neogaf
>>359416
I am against censorship 100%. But going after Anita was the worst thing that happened. We have her unneeded attentin and look at what happeneed.
Also GamerGate itself is literally dying on Twitter and Reddit. Too much infighting is killing the movement
![[Glass Him].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/GkLWgro.jpg "[Glass Him].jpg")
Sometime, I wonder why I go to /v/, I fucking love video games a lot, but the board is more and more about reactionary geeks complaining about geek stuff every day...
>>359944
There's a reason why ther's threads up on here right now asking about a split from /v/, a western gaming board and an eastern gaming board.
Originally it was going to increase moderation and enforce rules. People now realize its not going to work since the mods are too lazy and incompetent.
>>359935
>his includes any type of referral linking, "offers", soliciting, begging, stream threads, etc
So if I was to say go to CNN and see this major breaking news story I could get banned for an entire week because of the shitty global rule moot the kek put in. He's also the faggot that said you can't complain about mods
>>359946
>wow I have to follow the rules set in place by the creator of this website????
Yes, you fucking mongoloid.
I think SJWs exist either as trolls, or are deluded and supported by people who think having them as trolls is good.
These SJW trolls stir up controversy, because reactionaries like gamergate (the part not actually about journalism, which was pretty much a non-story anyways) make it easier to push the middle, which is probably already left leaning, into siding with the extreme left because the extreme right is even more revolting.
If there was no extreme right, the slightly left center would just tell the extreme left too fuck off, but SJWs trolling and getting a response from reactionaries causes partisanism, and forces those in the middle to chose the extreme left or the extreme right.
If you wanted fairness, you should just try to ban ripped men in video games because that would require a hambeast to go to the gym, just like getting thin would require a SJW hambeast going to the gym.
Instead you come up with even more assinine arguments, giving them more fuel. It's a losing game, being extreme right only pushes people to the extreme left.
>>359949
He's probably an angoloid, because mongoloids tend to be smarter than that
>>359949
Expect he doesn't OWN the site anymore. Hiro can do whatever he wants and moot can do nothing about it
Good. I hope they keep deleting them and you guys will fuck off.
>>359954
But the rules are still in place, you dumbass.
>>>/global/rules/8
>>359957
Again another stupid rule put in by moot because he didn't like it when people criticized his dumb moves
>>359958
Who cares if it's stupid or not, it's a rule and you have to follow it if you want to post.
>>359958
If the rule wasn't in place, almost every second post would probably be someone complaining about administration
>>359936
That's bullshit. They have the influence they do in the first place because people ignored what they were really saying behind all the well-meaning platitudes.
>>359941
Not every feminist cried about Bayonetta being sexist, but everyone crying about Bayonetta being sexist was a feminist.
>>359943
What do you mean? Anita has largely been completely discredited due to how pants on head retarded the cyberviolence report she tried to sell was. Nobody takes her seriously anymore except those who already treat her words as gospel.
>>359950
I think you have it backwards. If you were saying this in 2005 you'd be spot on, but these days it's the extreme Left pushing people to the Right. Why else would we be seeing a shit load of people suddenly take Breitbart seriously when just a year or two ago they'd have laughed at that idea? Have you seen the reaction to what's happening in North American universities lately? This is just the pendulum swinging all over again, the danger is it'll of course over correct and go too far to the Right and we'll just keep this cycle going.
Talking about video game news/journalism should be bannable on /v/ It's off topic garbage where nobody discusses videogames.
...why don't you guys just make a new community if /v/ is so broken?
Worked for several of my home boards.
>>359944
>reactionary geeks complaining about geek stuff every day
/v/ was always bickering about meta game-related topics, it's been that way since the time of Jack Thompson.
The fact that you complain about "reactionaries" or even use geek to describe /v/ speaks volumes.
>>359181
Seriously though, I give absolutely 0 fucks about gamergate and related but they should absolutely be allowed to have their own threads and talk about it if they want. There's not a single logical reason why they shouldn't.
>>361560
>related but they should absolutely be allowed to have their own threads and talk about it if they want. There's not a single logical reason why they shouldn't.
Putting aside the fact the site doesn't need to cater to every topic, it's activism. Something that should be a permaban and not allowed
I can't think of any activism that has occurred on this site thats good in anyway and hasn't shat on the website and they always cause tons of undesirables to come here
>>361564
The problem is that shuts down merely talking about this shit. The mods can see a thread complaining about something and get rid of it because the "it's activism," excuse is extremely vague and we all know how much people love using GG as a boogeyman, even if the people doing said complaining hate it as much as the SJWs they're bitching about.
>>361582
There is a clear difference between activism and complaining about something
>>361560
>totally not faGGot here btw
Fuck off back to >>>/8gag/
>>361585
And yet all the threads doing the latter get deleted anyway.
Please ban all SJWS
>>359161
god moot was suck a çūçk
>>359175
SJWs deserve death
>>361564
Bullshit. Activism is an important part of culture.
You literally just don't want 4chan to be able to voice opinions because they disagree with yours.
Fuck you people.
>>361564
Because you're from /a/. Your board has never done anything but be a bunch of irrelevant neets
>>362053
>Activism is an important part of culture.
Anonymous leejun garbage is an important part of 4chan history but it's still fucking retarded.
>>362053
>Bullshit. Activism is an important part of culture.
AHAHAHAHAHA
It's fucking apart of its history, but fucking no one think its an important part of culture. Fucking no one wants its here, nor should it be here. Every time a group has used 4chan as a activist hub it has never done the site any good and has only caused trouble, whether that trouble be for the users or the admin. Don't delude yourself, you aren't wanted here
>>361585
Probably because thats all your doing
>>362371
>Don't delude yourself, you aren't wanted here
says the SJW
>>362884
>claim that activism is stupid and cancerous
>no shut up u sjw
Ironic to say, considering sjw do nothing but activist garbage
All this arguing over what activism is and whether it's welcome or not would be worthwhile if that wasn't just a vague qualifier and convenient excuse for the mods to delete whatever they want anyway. It's not supposed to be a concrete rule, it's there to give the powers that be a semblance of legitimacy when they get shitcan stuff based on their personal whims.
