Does anyone else think that all boards should have flags?
It would make the site immeasurably better. Being able to quickly identify nationalities improves any conversation. With flags, for example, you can instantaneously disregard all American posts without wasting your time getting involved in circuitous, pointless arguments with people who have the intelligence of 5-year-olds
>>341590
Dumb frogposter.
>>341590
>likes flags
>is a frogposting cancer
Makes sense.
>>342133
POO
IN
LOO
Yeah no, I don't really enjoy being associated with fucking feminism and mass immigration that my country is all about. And whenever there's flags there's these goddamn faggots having to disregard everything I say to talk about my goddamn country
>>341590
No.
Its fine on /int/ and borderline on /pol/.
Keep it that way.
>>342152
Sweden?
>it's a frogpost
>>342287
yiff in hell
>>342152
>dignifies those low-effort posts with replies
>doesn't put up a fight
neck yourself ya poof
I, too, post under a flag that doesn't get taken seriously because the overwhelming majority of my compatriots here are underage hicks with no semblance of wit (not Clapistan). I only reply to the ones that stick to the points I make. The ones who care enough to have a real discussion will discuss things with you anyway, regardless of how many "Sweden! Yes!" replies you rack up.
>>341590
All threads w/ flags are reddit-tier attention-whoring "look at me look at me" garbage.
>>342288
Make me, kid.
>>341590
>we need flags because they let me be more racist!
Pepe is a good enough flag for faggots already.
