Why is rule 3 still a thing? It's such a stupid rule, especially the dubs part
>>390741
Because it's 2015.
>>390741
Subs are better than dubs anyway. Dubs invariably feature obnoxious squeaky voices from inexperienced VAs.
>>390741
We're going to attempt to have a calm and reasonable conversation as to why dubs should never come back. I don't know who is
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
lobbying for this, but I guess it's the kind of person who gets off on
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
paired numbers. I mean, I've met a few in my time, and it turns out they almost always tortured
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
animals as a child. If
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
they achieve any sense of nor
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
malcy into adulthood, t
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
hey often have gilfriend
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
s who died in mysterious accidents.
Those are the most func
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
tional cases and can go undetected in eve
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
n the smallest community. The sad r
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
emainder, are loners who keep to them selves
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
and subsist entirely on the cash, j
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
ewelry, and gold fillings taken from the
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
ir hundreds of victims. In man
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
y cases, they have a chest freezer ful
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
l of body parts, packed up to the to
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
p and overflowing, sometimes weighed down wit
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
h a cinder block to contain the putrefi
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
ed contents. There usually isn't a s
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
ingle vagrant within six mile
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
s of monsters like t
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
hese. Murder to them is a meaningless ge
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
sture, a task wi
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
th al
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
l the weight of the morning ple
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
asantries they exchange with thos
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
e they have decide
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
d not to murder because the c
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
rawlspace is presently full. I
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
f you suspect someon
>DUBS CHECK 'EM
e is getting kicks with “DUBS CHECK 'EM”, report them to the authorites at once!
SERIOUSLY, SHIT WAS NEVER FUNNY AND IT RUINED EVERYTHING