Why not allow to attach multiple images to your post. One image per post is totally obsolete.
>>385461
>lemmee just ahve erything!!
Who the fuck is going to pay for the server, retard?
Then how would you explain the image limits, and that a single poster could then hoard the entire thread? They'd have to keep the image limit to 150 posts with images, and even if they start allowing three pictures per image, it will invent so many new fucking memes and cancer, and not to mention that the server load will be almost tripled, and ALL THE CURRENT ARCHIVES WILL HAVE TO BE RECTIFIED ACCORDINGLY.
It's not a one-button push decision.
>>385473
new memes are always good
>>385461
Because images are an extension of a post and you only need 1 picture for that. We don't need the entire site to become an actual image dumping ground. Instead of asking for a retarded pointless feature, instead ask for maybe higher file limits instead. I'd rather be able to post higher image sizes, then using 2 images in a post
Also this >>385473
This would actually be a decent feature on some boards if it applied to the OP only.
>>385461
Proof of the usefulness of this feature:
https://8ch
.net/tech/res/471220.html#471340
>>387349
Site is losing traffic so they've got to shill it again. The same thing as always with these '4chan replacement' sites. They'll die within a year or so
