Is this you?
>>571698
Is this you?
>>571698
bro-- you're a fucking fool. you're the joke. a successful businessman running for president and captivating the nation is not a joke. a prominent individual that calls for strong borders, putting an end to the ridiculous illegal influx of ugly uneducated criminal shitbags pouring into our country, for more competent international dealmaking, for measures that protect us from the deluded fools that blow themselves up on trains, kill gays and beat their shawled slavelike wives so they can become shawled slavelike wives under their violent rules, all to enjoy supposed carnal pleasures (sins) in heaven, is NOT a fool. it's unbridled courage and unapologetic executive decision making. it's a joke that we would have a man and later, his son in office. it's a joke that we would have a man and later, his fake wife in office. it's a joke that people continue to support the globalist clinton political machine. those are the demons. those are the devil. you've got to step back and wonder why the media doesn't have it in for these criminals like they do trump. but you don't. you take it at face value. hating trump is cool among the know-nothing leftist legion, and you haven't thought into why that is at all. you're just buying into the narrative, wholesale. and it's honestly disgusting. pissant
>>571801
BlackPigeonSpeaks
>>571698
Shitpost all you want
Trump is getting in office and there is literally nothing that can stop it
t. Grand Kek inquisitor
>>571796
you are a trumpcuck who willingly participates in a cult-of-personality for a billionaire who doesn't know you exist and would likely not give a single fuck about you if he did. you spend your free time on anonymous imageboard defending his honor because you have nothing else going for you in life. you're a loser, a straight up NEET loser. nobody would care if you killed yourself and your mother would probably be happy to be rid of the burden.
>>571698
that's not anyone. It's a bunch of shitty memes slapped together with a fedora added.
No one has all of those opinions.
>>571913
Obviously, not all altists have all of those opinions, but many do. They're the ones posting twitter caps on /pol/ and /v/.
>>571916
no, this is a strawman attempt to turn people against /pol/. It's part of an SRS shitpost campaign.
Same with black dick spam on all the boards.
There are a lot of faggots who drop into threads and casually try to mention that anyone to the right of Mao is /pol/ and needs to leave 4chan.
>>571876
>trump
>winning
kek
Literally me. I regularly use all of those "weapons" and that's a picture of me. I even said all of those things.
>>571955
that's what you said about the Brexit lmao
>>571886
>not recognizing pasta
Hellooooooo reddit
>>572086
The irony of this post.
>>572084
There literally aren't enough straight racist white dudes in America to win the general for him.
>>572084
Remember when /pol/ was saying Romney would win
>>572185
>4 years ago is more relevant than last week
>>572171
luckily numales and illegals dont vote.
>>572192
>come on it's 2016
>>571796
>>571876
>>571913
>>571919
>>572084
don't care about US politics but just so you know every evidence shows he will lose
the aggregate of polls of RealClearPOlitics has accurately predicted every American election since it started in 2004 and it shows a landslide victory for Clinton
>>572198
>every evidence shows he will lose
every poll also showed that Jeb would get the nomination. Then Rubio, then Cruz.
Trump hasnt even started on Hillary yet.
and neither has the FBI.
>>572201
nope
RealClearPolitics showed that Trump was gonna win the nomination as early as August 2015
>>572198
It's still 4 months you goof. We'll know more after the convention.
>>572205
>>572201
see link: http://dyn.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_republican_presidential_nomination-3823.html#!
my bad, the predicted he will win the nomination since JULY 2015.
i don't care who wins either way, it won't affect my country, evidence all points to a Clinton victory
>>571698
No, but Is this you?
>>572207
you just picked a random poll (gallup) in a random year (1988) that was wrong.
pick ANY poll aggregator in the last 15 years and you'll see they accurately predicted the winner in the last 8 months
>>572212
Don't pretend you're smarter than Nate Silver, because even he still thinks Trump can win. This has been an unprecedented and unpredictable election year.
>>572214
of course he CAN win
it's just very unlikely
>>572212
>pick ANY poll aggregator in the last 15 years and you'll see they accurately predicted the winner in the last 8 months
you mean 3 elections? wow.
Trump has defied all expectations so far, so there's no reason to think he won't continue to do so.
Hillary isnt going to win over any more moderates with her abysmal record. Trump has no skeletons in his closet. The media spammed "racist" for months because they have NOTHING on him. If he were racist, there would be a single instance from his very public career of him doing or saying something racist, but there wasnt a peep until he called himself a republican.
He has already ended one political dynasty this election cycle. When he starts on Hillary and we get to see them debate, he will wipe the floor with her.
>>572218
again you think trump will win because of your own political opinions.
I'll just pointing out statistically a Trump victory is very unlikely
>>572217
It's likely that the polls are off, because individual battleground states show a much closer race. The general consensus was that a Brexit was unlikely too.
>>572219
moderates determine the election.
If I were a betting man, I'd go with Trump winning them over.
>>572218
>trump
>no skeletons
kek
>>572226
If he had any, the media would have found them.
Instead nothing. But nice argument, John Oliver.
>>572220
>The general consensus was that a Brexit was unlikely too.
poll aggregators showed they were close
>It's likely that the polls are off, because individual battleground states show a much closer race.
they accurately predicted the last 4 elections
>>572221
moderates appear to like clinton more according to RealClearPolitics
>If I were a betting man, I'd go with Trump winning them over.
you will make a lot of money if he does win and you bet on him
here you go:
http://www.oddschecker.com/politics/us-politics/us-presidential-election-2016/winner
>>572227
The only reason the media has been so soft in him is because the giant baby banned any organization that was too mean to him. Once the GE starts and Hillary starts running attack ads he's fucked even harder than he is now.
>>572233
the media has been nothing but attack ads.
but sure, keep trying.
>>572231
>they accurately predicted the last 4 elections
This race is very unusual compared to the last 4 elections too. Both candidates are historically unpopular, Trump dominated the media for over a year while Clinton barely got any media attention at all, and Trump is overall a very unusual candidate. I'm not sure you can infer anything from those polls with a high certainty cf. the Bradly effect or Shy Tory Factor. People don't want to be branded a racist for supporting Trump. When you break down Trump's plans, you'd find that the silent majority actually supports them, except maybe his most controversial proposals like a Muslim ban. States like Pennsylvania and Ohio are in play according to polls, so I wouldn't cheer yet.
>>572261
>except maybe his most controversial proposals like a Muslim ban
They apparently do:
https://today.yougov.com/news/2016/03/28/divide-muslim-neighborhood-patrols/
