I got bored at work and decided to download Clover and browse 4chan on my phone. When I went to post, it said I was banned for this post a few weeks ago.
Serious question: why was that post bannable? I mean, every point seems to be factually accurate.
>>536254
/v/ moderation is wildly inconsistent. I've been banned for making positive threads on games I liked and have been banned for making threads critical of devs and games I don't like. At the same time, the mods let a Brianna Wu and porn thread get hundreds of replies.
But as to the post in question, nothing is factually wrong. A well equipped PC will have superior capabilities to a console although at a higher cost. Also factor in exclusives so it just comes down to a personal decision.
Still, mods are sometimes insane. I don't think a mod on /o/ would ban someone who said that a current Corvette has faster acceleration, faster top speed, and is better handling than a current Toyota Corolla. Yet facts can get you banned on /v/.
>>536254
"Flagrant fanboyism threads are not allowed."
That is why. The fuck dude, he gives you a personalized ban reason and you still create a whine thread about it? Considering you felt the need to say "every point seems to be factually accurate" are you trying to start an argument about it here on /qa/? This is EXACTLY the shit we're trying to do away with on /v/. Just tired old attempts to start the next shitstorm..
>>536254
>fanboyism isn't allowed
So it's officially in the rules of /v/ that you can only shitpost and hate video games?
>>536263
Yes, except for Nintendo.
Mods can't enforce rules properly.
>>536270
That one is legitimately hilarious, at least.
>>536270
>Redditumblr mods can't tell the difference between Twilight Sparkle and Stocking.
Embarrassing.
