>>71454559
Bump

>>71454559
Why do people want her impeached?
I'm hearing something about corruption or communist but I've yet to read any examples why she needs to go?

And isn't the next up guy trying to push for a dictatorship?

>>71454559
There is no legal reason for coup d'etat at the moment, but bear in mind this: socialists are raising Brazilian kids as teachers since the end of the military dictatorship (1986). Since 2002, we finance several socialist countries like Cuba, Venezuela, Mozambique and Angola with public money. And finally, in 2011 she made a huge credit expansion to please poor people and now it's time to pay (pretty much what happened in 2008 in the USA). We are a socialist country, just like Scandinavian ones, but we have no money at all.

So 90% of the population want her out to make our economics right-winged again and get better.

All I know is that I had to go to New York city to vote in the Brazilian election and there was no way to write in a candidate so I just had to pick the least communist of all the communists and closet communists.

I hate all the nigger and half-nigger trash voting for handouts in Brazil and I'm terrified of it happening here in the states since I consider myself American first, Brazilian second.

I hope this cunt gets impeached and thrown into Rio Doce for a mercury mud treatment.

>>71455372
>http://economia.uol.com.br/empregos-e-carreiras/noticias/redacao/2016/03/24/pnad.htm
>http://g1.globo.com/economia/noticia/2016/02/pib-do-brasil-tera-2-pior-desempenho-do-mundo-em-2016-aponta-fmi.html
>http://www.valor.com.br/brasil/4529011/meirelles-diz-que-brasil-vai-precisar-de-aumento-de-impostos

Raise of taxation, unemployment and still our economy is shrinking, I wonder why.

>>71455616
there is legal reason. she broke the budgetary law

>>71456177
You know this is bullshit, she has got to go because she can't even handle that ugly cunt of hers, what about a continental country like Brazil.

>>71456294
it's not bullshit. it's an actual law.

just beacause she and her party don't think it's a law, it doesn't mean it isn't

she also signed executive orders without congress permission. that is also illegal

>>71456652
>>71456177
>>71456104
Ok thank you
I read some more in other threads and she was apparently trying to hide her shitty job of managing the economy by using banks money instead of the legal ways
What about Petrobras?
What did she do with that I know Lula got kickbacks and a house

>>71456870
she is not beign impeached for that. the suit is only about the illegal executive orders and the breaking of the budgetary law

she made the federal government take credit with federal owned banks, something that is highly illegal in brazil

back in the 80's many public banks went bankrupt because of the government borrowing from them (wich they couldn't deny since the government owned them). since the REal plan, such opperation is forbidden