>Statistics say that 98% of terrorists in the US aren't Muslim
What's the answer to this? Is it true, or Jewery?
maybe because
>only 1% of the population is muslim
>anything over 2-4 killings at once is considered a mass shooting which is lumped in as a terrorist attack
They probably include a christian bakery not baking a cake for a gay wedding as terrorism.
>>77173672
This 100%.
>>77173577
>>77173672
this
Plus any vandalism for political purposes or lighting trashcans on fire is considered terror
>>77173672
>a child making a clock is terrorism
>>77173577
They are using a bullshit definition of terrorism that includes autistic kids shooting schools. Terrorism is the use of violence to achieve political, religious or ideological aims. That is Islam by far.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_January–June_2016
Spot the non Muslim ones
>>77173577
every person getting pissed and throwing a piece of garbage at a government building is considered terrorism
>>77173577
If you fuck with the statistics enough, you can get any result you want. Anyone who has taken a high school stats class can tell you that.
>>77173577
They consider white Christians as the 98%
>>77173577
Because comically enough, most domestic terrorism (around 90 to 98 percent) is liberal tree huggers. They kill, arson, and destroy a lot of property.
Will the liberal media report that though? Nope.
>>77173577
Another tip - when someone says some bullshit about muslims being lone-wolves while whites are not, remember that the odds of a white person committing a terrorist attack in the USA is 1/250,000,000 (unadjusted for anything), and a muslim is 1/3,300,000. Yet, when you look at statistics, Muslims make up the majority of all terrorist attacks. Even if you look at distorted liberal statistics and find that whites and muslims split terrorist attacks , say, 50/50, you can clearly see that Muslims are STILL more predisposed to commit terrorist attacks relative to the population size. Whites are lone wolves because there are fewer attacks by them relative to the population size. When you only look at the numbers, unadjusted for population, obviously you will get all sorts of retarded liberal assertions. Stay smart, next time some kike liberal gives you shit, shove it up his ass.
And what the fuck is a "lone wolf" anyway?
Check out pic related, a Palestinian sniper shooting an Israeli soldier is considered a "lone wolf" attack. Why, because there was only one assailant involved? By that logic the Pulse shooter was also a lone wolf, but he's fucking affiliated with ISIS.
The lines between lone-wolf and not are becoming increasingly blurred as well. Basically statistics and "research studies" don't mean anything anymore because they can be manipulated verbally and quantitatively to show anything.
>>77174706
Reading a book on statistics right now, it's pretty interesting.
