Do you think the leftist encouragement of anarchical, try-hard individualism and aggressive-passive, sassy black girl political aesthetic is hurting liberals? Why would anyone want to be involved with these types of people?
The other day some faggot on here tried to make fun of Trump voters by calling them methhead rednecks and seconds later I had to google this article for a screenshot and found this by coincidence.
>Doing meth with my stepmom
Instead of becoming free spirits (or whatever the fuck) are liberals just becoming the new rednecks?
You could mirror your post and ask if right wing conservatives that fight tooth and nail against individuality and freedom of expression are hurting their own reputation.
They have become so accustomed to referring to blacks as niggers and Hispanics as illegals and invaders of the US (even legal ones it seems) that they seem just as pompous.
>>69850410
>They have become so accustomed to referring to blacks as niggers and Hispanics as illegals and invaders of the US (even legal ones it seems) that they seem just as pompous.
Which is why the GOP is trying to hard to pander to minorities? Which is why they hate Trump so bad?
>You could mirror your post and ask if right wing conservatives that fight tooth and nail against individuality and freedom of expression are hurting their own reputation.
If SJW special-snowflakism is the fruit of freedom of expression and individuality don't you think maybe conservatives had a point?
>>69851334
>Which is why the GOP is trying to hard to pander to minorities? Which is why they hate Trump so bad?
I haven't seen proof of that. The front runners for the GOP party haven't really attacked any minorities as far as I can tell except for "illegals" with the wall (mainly Trump). I can't blame him for that. Illegals shouldn't be here but here's the thing.
From what I can tell tell most right-wing/conservatives do enough attacking of blacks and Hispanics (with the examples I stated in my first post) that it doesn't set them much apart from some of the most extreme liberals. That being said I do understand there is a "nigger" population and I realize there are a lot of degenerate blacks and gays out there but in my opinion they express themselves way too often without clarifying that they acknowledge a population of blacks to be perfectly fine and civilized. They do the same with Hispanics.
>If SJW special-snowflakism is the fruit of freedom of expression and individuality don't you think maybe conservatives had a point?
Continued...
...I think open mouth tongue kissing shit by men are disgusting and women should be a bit more cautious of where they display their romance between they may influence kids in one way or another or just annoy a population that isn't quite ready for full blown demonstration of same sex couples out in public. I'm not saying I want it to ever get there but I don't think it's right to suppress the emotions and feelings of a human being. Their freedom of happiness is what the constitution stands for. Bottom line is yeah people of both parties that are TOO far left or right are annoying but I think accepting it for now as a path to understanding and possibly smoothing out laws and public acceptance as to how people can and should act and express themselves is worth it. In the picture OP posted I would take that as just regular straight guys making a point (maybe a stupid one but still a point). It's not that they're gay and it's not for shits and giggle. It's to help the females that supposedly need help being stood up for.
Well, I'm sure there will be no more raping after this.
I mean, how can rape even exist after men put on mini-skirts in protest?
It just can't!
Rape is officially over with.
>>69849757
>Read This Next
>Doing Meth with My Stepmom
>>69849757
>Do you think the leftist encouragement of anarchical, try-hard individualism and aggressive-passive, sassy black girl political aesthetic is hurting liberals? Why would anyone want to be involved with these types of people?
yes.
>leftist.
>>69849757
wtf
>>69849757
>are liberals just becoming the new rednecks?
What you know as a "liberal" is for all intents and purposes the lack-of-intelligence part of the "left wing" (if "the left wing" even exists as a single political grouping at all).
I am a socialist and believe in the ideals of the enlightment, and thus consider myself a progressive. However, I almost never find myself agreeing with the so called "left wing liberals" on social issues. That's because they lack the mental capacity to make real decisions. They were always rednecks, just city-dwelling dressed up ones.
>>69852434
I think Muslims got the point. They will probably think twice before raping again
>>69852572
What are you, a shitlord?
I mean, come on! 2016
So progressive.
>>69853073
>lack-of-intelligence part
From what I can tell you're the typical conservative that just throws all uneducated, idiotic, extremely different and anyone else you hate into the "liberal" group because you find it convenient to have a group to direct your hatred to. You might as well call them non-conservatives or non-socialist or whatever you aren't idiots. Long story short, anyone that doesn't agree with you is stupid.
In a serious conversation with someone with a brain (even a liberal), it could get agreed on that right-wing conservatives aren't rednecks. Rednecks are the real degenerate scum of white people, but for conservatives to admit liberals are anything other than total degenerates is unheard of.
>>69849757
kek
>>69853702
>From what I can tell you're the typical conservative
You didn't read the rest of the post did you?
> You might as well call them non-conservatives or non-socialist or whatever you aren't idiots.
I have no idea what the fuck you just said.
> just throws all uneducated, idiotic, extremely different and anyone else you hate into the "liberal" group because you find it convenient to have a group to direct your hatred to.
What does that have to do with what I just said? Do you even read? What are you even doing?
>>69849757
Guys wearing skirts r cute
