Listen. Trump's not the new Reagan taking us back to the cuckservative 80s.
He's a badass Nixon taking us back to the glorious 70s.
LISTEN! Trump's not the new Reagan taking us back to the cuckservative 80s.
He's a badass Nixon taking us back to the glorious 70s.
Vigilantism
Nixon made mistakes but at least he wasn't a neocon or neolib piece of shit
also this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TivVcfSBVSM
>>73452485
He's a rich New York progressive.
Not much better than the rich New York ex-Senator.
Flushing the filth down the fucking toilet
Crooked Hillary Clinton, do you know where you are? You're in the Trump Jungle Baby!
Watch
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=x4n3Dgi5d0M
>>73452485
i wonder how scandalous something must be to force trump to resign
>>73452665
He's a Moderate with a far right view on war.
Restoring law and order
Tough on crime
>>73452485
yes nigger, this
>>73452485
Reagan is actually the most progressive president we had.
Making deals we can't refuse
70s was not glorious
pic related however was
>>73452783
"You talk about things that have happened in history; this could be one of the worst. Now we should go in, we should stop this guy, which would be very easy and very quick. We could do it surgically, stop him from doing it, and save these lives. This is absolutely nuts. We don’t want to get involved and you’re gonna end up with something like you’ve never seen before. . . .
We should do on a humanitarian basis, immediately go into Libya, knock this guy out very quickly, very surgically, very effectively, and save the lives.”
-Trump
He's a naive moron on war.
>>73452485
>a kid who should have been swallowed in the late 90s telling conservatives that they are cucks
>doesnt know what cucks are
>doesnt even know how we havent had any conservative president let alone candidate be the nominee since Reagan
>b-b-but Milo said it and it must be true that conservatives are c-c-cucks
Go believe the nigger fucker if you want
/pol/ is dead
>>73452651
His voice is oddly soothing tbhwy
>>73453255
Nixon was more redpilled than Reagan.
>>73453255
Nobody said anything about Milo, grandpa. Sorry some people don't like Reagan but he wasn't exactly the best president.
>>73453434
Yet you think Trump will save you when he allows transgenders in the bathroom of their choosing....
Movies under Trump are gonna be so amazing. All the blacks, minorities, and women will be so disillusioned they will go on a spiritual/artistic "strike" and they won't flood the market with their menstrual bullshit. Our movies are going to be high brow psychological thrillers and philosophical explorations akin to Kubrick's time and James Cameron will finally release his Avatar sequels. It will be amazing. Every protagonist will be a believable strong white male and there won't even be a strong woman in the movie wasting our times.
God I can't wait for movies under the Trump administration.
>>73453255
>>73453434
Even Carter was more redpilled than Reagan:
>He used it three days ago saying there was nothing wrong with city neighborhoods trying to maintain ethnic purity, he specifically mentioned groups like Poles, Czechs, French Canadians, as well as blacks, and the controversy flared, and Carter, campaigning in Pennsylvania, has been hit with the question time and time again. Robert Hager reports.
>Carter said what he does mean is that the government shouldn’t actively try to force changes in neighborhoods with their own ethnic character.
>https://archives.nbclearn.com/portal/site/k-12/flatview?cuecard=33592
>>73453050
Pre-60s AZ was the best
>>73453634
Transgenders have been allowed into bathrooms for thousands of years you fucking idiot. It's a made up issue.
>>73452485
Yes but Nixon had Kissinger....who is Trump's Kissinger ?
Reagan stole full auto weapons from the American public. Fuck Reagan.
>>73453634
He's probably going to go the libertarian (based) route and say its up to the business and bar states from intervening.
>>73453653
This is actually something I look forward to. Movies in the 70s were a reaction to the hippie bullshit of the 60s, so you had tough, everyman white guys battling black crime in the cities, like Death Wish, Taxi Driver, Dirty Harry, The French Connection. You had great horror films like The Exorcist and Halloween. If you extend the 70s a bit, you have Kubrick's high point from 2001 (1968) to The Shining (1980). It was the best era for film.
Straight film without any PC propaganda.
>>73453255
Reagan was a liberal. Nixon was the last conservative.
>>73453999
mah nigga
>>73452651
>>73453949
Nixon was also redpilled about jews, even close ones like Kissinger and Rumsfeld.
>>73453949
Not sure, but he's going to need one. He's smart as fuck and great with people and leadership, but he has a lot to learn about foreign policy.
>>73453653
>>73454119
Also, Kubrick, though Jewish, was also redpilled:
>Kubrick once remarked that "Hitler was right about almost everything,"
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_and_religious_beliefs_of_Stanley_Kubrick
>>73454020
>Trump
>libertarian route
>>73454195
We'll get them back. Hughes is gonna die.
>>73452618
Based movie
His tax cuts are far too extreme. It's like regan to the second power.
>>73454301
He's got some libertarian tinge to him. He has been consistent on the BIG issue for them: auditing the Fed, and some legit property rights stances. Also the ego.
I'm not deluded though, I don't think this is a good replacement for HAPPENING man.
>>73454119
Agreed. 70s (extending to late 60s and early 80s) is my favourite decade in film. I would say they were more experimental and more daring than even today's avant garde films. Some of the Italian risqué movies like Blow Up or Zabriskie Point you'd never be able to make in this day and age. So many good movies you can list and it's all because people weren't afraid to go out there and explore manly topics. Fuck I'm getting so hyped for Trump era cinema now.
>>73452485
>glorious 70's
how's being white goin for ya?
in what decade has it ever not been good to you?
>>73454423
He already said they're ideal to his overall scheme and it allows for negotiating room well. It gives me some concrete reason to support him as a legitimately good President and not just a legitimately good platform desu.
Trump's gonna infiltrate the leftwing agitators that stir up all the unrest with cointelpro
>>73454583
>in what decade has it ever not been good to you?
post-2008. Hillary would've been better off winning in 08.
>>73454488
>consistent on auditing the Fed
Can you post links to examples of this? Something that goes back years to show it's more than just campaign pandering?
>>73454583
We make all the decades great! Shame things are getting shit on by shit skins nowadays.
>>73454488
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/08/19/donald-trumps-abuse-of-eminent-domain/
Also, not very impressed with his libertarian property rights stances...
>>73454551
Bringing up Italy, I also have a thing for Giallo films. Argento, Bava, Fulci, etc.
>Trump era cinema
Please let this happen
>>73453740
>Carter said what he does mean is that the government shouldn’t actively try to force changes in neighborhoods with their own ethnic character.
>this was controversial 30 odd years ago.
We lost a long time back, didn't we?
>>73454687
>>73454609
We need the revenue train going. We have a massive national debt to fill.
I'd prefer the 30s or 50s
>>73454989
Well that's conveniently vague.
>>73454687
http://www.infowars.com/trump-it-is-important-to-audit-the-federal-reserve/
http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/24/news/economy/donald-trump-federal-reserve-audit-the-fed/
http://theweek.com/articles/620637/donald-trump-shockingly-sane-federal-reserve
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-24/donald-trump-right-here-are-100-reasons-why-we-need-audit-federal-reserve
He's said a lot on the subject and you haven't heard about it because
a) it doesn't stroke alt-right
b) it doesn't trigger women/degenerates
He is more of a legit candidate than Hillary "I'm totally legit" Clinton.
>>73454905
>washingtonpost
Found your problem desu f.a.m.alam
>>73453434
Imagine if /pol/ was around during his presidency.
>>73452618
>>73452702
>>73452799
>>73452896
Ruining tourism.
>>73455037
The thing is, though, that Trump really evokes the 70s at its core.
>his hair
>his "don't tell me what to do" attitude
>the decade of insult humor (Rodney Dangerfield)
>the decade of un-PC humor (early SNL, Animal House, Blazing Saddles, Airplane)
>the decade of "Battle of the Sexes"
>the decade of grindhouse theaters, theatrical porn, and gory slashers
>the decade of glorified vigilantism and people fed up with black crime
Trump is the 70s, and he's taking us back. It's like how Reagan embodied the 50s in many ways.
Reagan was more social conservative/christian, while Trump is more 70s-style un-PC and rebellious.
>>73455379
ayyy Cuck Redleaf is here to offer inane non-observations. Finally! Yes!
>>73452783
No he has a left view on war
>>73454020
Don't delude yourself, he doesn't give a shit about your God (the free market).
That's like 80% of the reason the neocucks hate him, because he's basically big government when it comes to economics.
His only right-wing stances are the nationalism and support of mighty whitey. Social issues he's all over the place but likely more liberal at heart.
If you drink the full cuckservative/lolbertarian kool-aid you should by all means hate him.
>>73455219
Sure
>>73455379
It's all part of the plan since there are too many minorities in the waterparks.
>>73454989
If he tries to audit the FED he's going to JFK
>>73455487
Id look back further. Trump is more like mckinley who was shot and killed by a communist anarchist czech arriviste. Similar demographics voted. American history is a lot longrr than 60 years kids. Read about the times before the pozzing.
>>73455605
t. Jamal Meyer
If its Kool-aid then its sad your country can't afford it. Sad!
>>73455219
Okay, so he's talked of auditing the fed while running for the nomination....
But does he have a history of wanting to audit the Fed?
How do we know this isn't just another campaign promise, but something he legitimately believes and has worked towards?
>>73455582
Fixing the banks.
>>73455343
Would you rather the raw links to the court cases on the matter? They're in the article if you'd read it.
For example:
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/nj-superior-court/1349001.html
Or are you suggesting that the Superior Court of New Jersey just made all this shit up?
>>73455809
That is "undecided voter" level retarded.
The thing that keeps politicians dishonest is politics, the act of making deals with other people in power from places different from the place that put you there. There's no such thing as a campaign promise or a failed promise, there's the race and then implementation which are different in as much as the political community is corrupt. Its entirely up to how much he wants to ignore or work with congress as to whether he keeps "promises".
>>73455794
People embody an era that they actually lived through and that shapes them. Reagan lived through the 50s, and it was the decade that had the greatest influence on him.
Trump was a young man in the 70s, so it goes to reason that the era would influence him and that he would embody many of its traits.
That's what I mean. He might fit into a larger pattern that goes farther back, but he embodies the values and culture of the 1970s, when he was in his late 20s.
I don't kid myself into thinking we can have a president take us back culturally as far as the 50s at this point--too much has changed. The 70s are doable.
>>73452665
What the hell's wrong with being rich, almost like you wanna elect someone who isn't successful.
>>73455997
He runs a big business in property and its purpose is to make money; ethics are lost with more business being done under the same branding.
I do not worship Trump, I like what he has to offer me as a citizen and am impressed with his personal abilities, not the conduct of his enormous corporation where he is mostly image and soul.
>>73456134
That's an evasion.
The man has no history, that I can find, of calling for the auditing of the Fed, outside of his run for the Republican nomination.
And throwing the idea around on Infowars is just red meat for the audience.
It doesn't appear to be an issue he takes to heart or believes in because of some explicit principles he can articulate.
So all signs point to election year pandering and not a genuine belief at all.
People should be dubious.
>>73456275
Nothing.
But being rich in New York/New Jersey real estate is far different from being rich in Dakota oil.
There is a certain culture in the city he calls home. Politically it is left and the rich there tend to be very politically connected and progressive in ideology, unlike many of the working class.
It is a valid component of his ideological character.
>>73456401
But back to the point about his libertarian leanings on property rights, would you not agree that this information casts some doubt that he has such leanings?
>>73456743
No, because i doubt his personal input at that level. He has said himself he focuses on "flagship" projects, which is very easy to believe given the amount of business "he" does. Do you think Bill Gates decides what games go on each Windows version, or where outsourced coding is contracted? No, not since before Windows 95.
>>73456988
That's a fairly weak argument.
His name, not just his company, is all over the legal documents.
Are you implying that he's just some idle rich playboy that doesn't actually have any knowledge or decision making concerning his major development projects?
>>73457364
In a world where Clinton's personal negligence of duty killed a US ambassador, which since WWII kinda doesn't happen, Bernie signs over his -$60k assets to his wife in order to fit a different tax bracket and Ted Cruz is a fucking leaf, its a very, very relatively strong argument.
>>73453740
>>73454988
To be fair I can understand not wanting neighbourhoods to have their own ethnic character so that people assimilate into our culture more instead of having this shit where Hispanics might as well be Mexicans instead of being Americans in some places. You could also argue that it caused a lot of gangs in the past 60 or so years.
>>73456988
Also, he has publicly come out in favor of the use of eminent domain for 'economic' purposes.
“I happen to agree with it 100%. if you have a person living in an area that’s not even necessarily a good area, and … government wants to build a tremendous economic development, where a lot of people are going to be put to work and … create thousands upon thousands of jobs and beautification and lots of other things, I think it happens to be good.”
And he has spoken publicly about the very case I cited:
Mr. Trump also appeared on ''20/ 20'' last month to discuss the case. ''In life you have a thing called condemnation,'' he said on the show. ''And cities have the right to condemn for the good of a city -- whether it's New York, whether it's Los Angeles, whether it's any other place. Atlantic City is one of those cities, and it's got the right to condemn.'' He added that he thought Mrs. Coking's house was ugly.
>>73457551
Nice completely irrelevant evasion.
You sure showed me.
MAGA
60 of Trumps twitter followers can't vote. I'd wager that 90% of his 4chan supporters can't vote.
>>73457633
I remember that actually and didn't at time of posting. I guess its not solid that there is no personal zeal to work against expanded use. I'd like to see him say something under criticism on the subject to gauge it before it becomes a real problem for me, who owns about an acre that probably doesn't have oil.
>>73452485
Actually, Trump will take us to the American Empire.
>>73458176
Don't know if we're quite there yet.
Worst case, Trump would be as Sulla was to Rome, not Caesar.
>>73455349
Imagine a JFK assassination sticky...
>>73458556
More like Marius
>>73455697
>disgusting fat minorities wearing shirts into the pool
Holy shit it's so accurate.
>>73455349
The board didn't exist, but the mentality certainly did.
Oy Vey! Shut off this nasty hate speech! I didn't know we still allowed goyim to talk like this. When will Hillary be elected? We need the court to ban all this hate!
>>73455724
Which is why he needs to invoke the spirit of Jackson.
>>73458902
Fair point, I can see that.
>>73452485
No, he's a badass Eisenhower taking us back to the glorious 50s.
>>73455349
We'd probably call him a pinko for his SALT, Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, EPA, Clean Air Act, OSHA, Opening up China, Suing for peace in Vietnam over total victory (biggest retreat in US history), pulling us off the Gold Standard, helping Israel during the Yom Kippur War, and large-scale integration of public schools in the South.
He was the original cuckservative.
Reagan was the original Neo-cuckservative.
Ford was a dipshit who played too much football without a helmet.
Carter was a impotent liberal.
Bush the First was alright. He just botched it with his tax hike 'after he said otherwise' but hey what could he do? The Cold War was over, and the US had to start cutting back.
The 70s kind of sucked domestically though. But if Trump can bring about a 70s hard edge a 80s boom I'd be okay.
Time for some music.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1U1Ue_5kq8
