What is Sexual Dimorphism and why does it trigger sociologists?
>>69629586
It's where a species has different physiologies (of course exlucing sex organs) between the sexes. A species with sexual dimorphism generally has larger males and smaller females and the roles are decided as such.
Males typically take a dominant role and are providers where the females are usually mothers and caretakers.
This angers feminists and (((sociologists))) because the biological reality of the sexual dynamic is something they are in denial of.
They don't want the sexes to be different but they are forced to recognize it because of the phenomenon of sexual dimorphism.
Pic unrelated but it explains the asian-white achievement gap.
>>69629833
You're name sounds like a teen girl who solved mysteries back in the 50's
>>69629833
You dumbass that is a hypothetical IQ graph...
>>69630081
No, it was confirmed by Richard Lynn about a year after his Italian studies.
>>69630043
You could be my sidekick.
>SJW log
>We're all unique but also all the same
>>69630176
It literally asks "can different st'd deviations account for poor East Asian performance?"
>>69630176
Faith Riddle and Della Stone.
Please make America great again.
>>69630347
Yes, showing a difference in the widths of bell-curves does not definitively prove it. It is offering the difference in bell curve as an answer to the question. Just like, "Can race be a factor in crime?" However, after Lynn's confirmation of that being the bell curve we saw Charles Murray publish his book, "Human Accomplishment," which further proves the phenomenon and answers the question.
I've included a link for you below.
https://www.gwern.net/docs/2003-murray-human-accomplishment.pdf
Have a good day and a good read, friend.
Pic unrelated, but it proves humans are polytypic.
>>69629586
>why does it trigger socialists
Because socialists cannot into genetics or biology, otherwise they would know there are only 2 sexes
>>69629586
because it's a social construct
>>69629833
Fuck that graph, it's pretty obvious that it's all down to chinks and gooks being soulless ant people that cheat on everything for the glory of the hive.
>>69629586
It defies a central tenant of Communism and gender roles help reinforce Western Culture.
Therefore gender roles and distinctions must be erased.
>>69630664
I see your flag but I want to respond so people better understand by reading.
Sexual dimorphism is the *completely natural* difference in development between the sexes.
This shows itself neurologically, in the HPTA system, in the size difference between the sexes, the behaviour differences (as a result of neocortical development and personality traits that are genetic). It justifies all of the differences between sexes and traditional roles as the best so they hate that.
>>69630875
If you're trying to say chinks are dimmer than it shows then you'd do well to note that it only includes three specific types of East Asians - Chinese, Koreans, and Japanese. The rest are very largely less intelligent. Indochinese (because I know someone will notice this) are marginally less intelligent and increasingly so as you go into the more insular regions of Indochina where they had less Han admixture.
Chinks have a very narrow but high bell-curve. This means that while they may not be innovators they are good mimicks and are suited to follow whites, not lead.
Whites lead because they have a greater spread of IQs and thus have the vast majority of geniuses and other innovators.
>>69630875
>soulless
Thats why you are dying and they are winning your moralfaggotry will be your demise white man.
>>69629586
Sociology and Political Science has for generations been pretty much CultMarx-type pseudo-intellectuals wanting to do History but realizing that History makes nonsense of Marx.
*Yes yes I know. Not talking about at the beginning, at all times, notable exceptions, Protestant Work Ethic etc. I'm talking abput how pretty much 99% of everyone else in that field is a lying Red. However it started, it has been corrupted.
>>69631249
The reason for the decline in the West is because we have a subversive facsimile population that can blend in and act like us while subverting our values and brainwashing our youth.
They will infiltrate the Chinese as well. It has already begun where at HUJI they've begun teaching Asian-only classes in feminism, sociology, and there are now Asian Mossadi.
I'm Israeli, btw but I'm an anti-semite.
>>69630565
What's your opinion on Pygmys?
>>69631598
Pygmies are inhuman.
http://myers.hudsonalpha.org/documents/LiAbsher-SOM-HGDP.pdf
They weren't able to feature them because they existed over 1% away from the rest of homo sapiens.
When exploring the issue of human polytopic status it's good to note how different we are but when the facts show we're *so* different that there's more neurological difference than pigment difference between the races the (((people))) like to run and cry racist.
http://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-11-16
Here's a source on that btw.
Racemixing a nord with a pygmy would make such a genetically ill being it would be *hilarious*, really.
>>69629833
>males and smaller females and the roles are decided as such.
You should have said thats only typically for mammals
For every other domain of life, males are often just a disposable pair of gonads (or no dimorphism exists at all)
>>69632352
I know, but we're discussing animals that display sexual dimorphism.
This is also a good point to note that in some cases the reverse is true and the female is larger - like spotted hyenas where the males are smaller and the women are larger and have a vaginal canal that is shaped exactly like a giant penis that they use to rape the male and hold the male penis inside it. They then give birth through their penises.
>>69629833
That's not necessarily true. Look at sea horses and many types of penguins. The gender roles are reversed from time to time in such species.
Also humans have relatively low sexual dimorphism.
>>69630565
Most subspecies of those animals don't interbreed.
>>69629586
Because sociology is for people who suck at actual science but still want a piece of paper to show for their 4 years of adult daycare.
>>69632910
As I've already posted, I know it can work in reverse and we're discussing the physiological differences between the sexes (of humans).
>>69632997
They don't interbreed but they can. There's not an austere heterozygosity and misnumbered chromosome factor like with horses and donkeys so it can still produce fertile offspring but *as you should know* this produces outbreeding depression and creates a weaker organism, which explains why mixed-race individuals are weaker on average.
>>69633086
(((People)))
>>69630589
>hey guise let's blame socialism
You're an idiot. Marx and other founders of socialism didn't pay much attention to identity politics or other such unscientific disciplines.
>>69633198
You do know they're not talking about specifically Marxism when this is mentioned, yes?
They're talking about Boas-esque Cultural Marxism, Relativism, Anti-Empericism, and Positivism.
It's generally understood but I just wanted to clarify this board dislikes Frankfurt era social theory.
>>69632058
Pygmies of tropical Africa are different from both Bantu peoples and from Europeans, but designating them a separate subspecies is jumping to conclusions. Even if there was enough evidence to draw such a conclusion, it would be rather shaky, as the qualifying factors of species and subspecies aren't exactly well-defined.
>>69630565
>7 different subspecies of elk
>far less genetic differentiation compared to humans
>>69632633
Haha nobody commented on your name? This board is officially cancer
>>69629586
It's made up bullshit and it triggers them because so is their so-called "science".
>>69633543
I didn't say they're a different subspecies - I said they're different species.
Look across the globe at other animals and you;'ll see that most genus containing a good number of species can have outbreeding between species within that generate fertile (but weaker) offspring.
They're a separate species and the definition of species only change in 1955 thanks to some lovely (((people))).
>>69633615
Exactly.
>>69633914
>the differences in development between the sexes of a vast number of animals is, 'made up bullshit.'
Kill yourself, my man.
>>69634122
Neanderthals and denisovans are considered subspecies. What's your basis for considering a living sapien that diverged genetically 60,000 years ago a different species?
>>69629586
It's when species have drastic changes in their form based on their sex. It has many evolutionary reasons, some for survival, others for harder to explain reasons, like those pheasants.
>>69635027
Genetic variation among the races.
There's vastly more differentiation between Africans and Europeans than between Elk *species* yet we are not separate and we can observe outbreeding depression.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19695787
>>69629833
>A species with sexual dimorphism generally has larger males and smaller females
When the opposite is true, such as in arachnids and insects, the female of the species exhibits traits of Sexual cannibalism, Infanticide and extreme Promiscuity.
When Males are dominant, such characteristics disappear from the female member of the species or are atleast suppressed in the presence of a male.
>>69629586
YO THAT'S MY STATE'S BIRD
>>69635648
Do you consider neanderthals and denisovans subspecies?
>>69635027
Also, European intermixing with Neanderthals occurred between 135,000 and 60,000 years ago.
Humans are very different within each other.
Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, *species*, *subpecies*.
Homo Neanderthalensis is a different species, not subspecies. Before 1955 when some (((people))) changed the definition Hamitic Negroes and Nordic Europeans used to be different species (Hans Guenther).
>>69635817
Notice which is objectively better.
>>69635891
I was answering that. They're not subspecies. Subspecies are things like canis lupus familiaris and then dog breeds.
>>69629833
Not true.
https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2010/05/29/do-asians-have-a-short-bell-curve/
http://infoproc.blogspot.hk/2008/06/asian-white-iq-variance-from-pisa.html
>>69635986
>Before 1955 when some (((people))) changed the definition Hamitic Negroes and Nordic Europeans used to be different species (Hans Guenther).
Sauce plz?
>>69636330
>Blogs
https://www.gwern.net/docs/2003-murray-human-accomplishment.pdf
>>69636524
It was one of the Frankfurt school theorists addendum to the book, "Traditional and Critical Theory."
But I'm posting from my phone so my ebooks are all on my comp :^(
>>69636330
http://ttu . ee/public/m/mart-murdvee/EconPsy/2/Lynn_2008_The_Global_Bell_Curve_-_Race_IQ_and_Inequality_Worldwide.pdf
meant to link that woops. on my phone
>>69636759
What's your opinion on the out of Africa theory?
>>69637057
Humanity may have come out of Africa but we had an incredibly long period to differentiate into separate species.
Why do we not recognize this when we recognize dogs as different species despite 1/3 the time spent separate?
>>69637210
Breeds?
>>69632910
Human males on average are still 25% larger and less fattier than females, which is still pretty dimorphic.
>>69629586
Males look good. Women look like shit. Men are keys. Women are locks
>>69637492
No, I'm talking about Canus species like an. ad. au. lu.
In my bioinformatics classes in grad school we used to look at the percent similarity between classmates and then compare to animal species and that's when my belief in race realism legitimized. I always thought it and I had read some studies but seeing it before my eyes made me know it.
>>69629586
They refuse to accept the provable scientific evidence of inequality between groups of people and autisticly attribute it solely to environmental factors.
Then they blame the results of these differences in outcome on "racism" or "oppression."
It's how they can refuse to believe that starving niggers in Africa are too stupid to plan ahead or adopt technology to feed themselves. They can perform mental gymnastics to blame this on a colonial presence that hasn't existed for 100 years.
And all they have to do is accept that these niggers have 75 IQs and everything is explained.
>>69637210
That's the argument that gives me doubts about the whole every human is the same lollllll school of thought. If dog breeds are subspecies why not humans? Especially since the difference between some dogs is unbelievably drastic
>>69637492
HOLY SHIT ITS MICHEAL ROOKER
>>69638079
Nigga I've only seen one person with that name spelled that way, RARE
>>69637778
And in this way I can address OP's question. Male and female humans are "dimorphic" because they are suited for fulfilling different roles. And each of these roles contributes to the survival of the tribe and family unit while increasing the chances of reproductive success. Stuffing men an women autisticly into "equality" is forcing a round peg into a square hole and will only result in the dissolution of society.
>>69638079
MERL
>>69638036
Every human is clearly not the same.
I'll point you to this picture again so you can see the hypocrisy in the scientific community that shuts out taboo since 1955.
We're not even related as a species.
>>69630565
>>69629586
mfw i have a masters degree in socioloogy
mfw when i told the gender studies professor that that gender facism is not science and hatespeech
mfw girls in class said the same and said as scientists they dispise feminism
mfw when i have choosen city development and health sociology as major
mfw i should have become electrical engineer or carpenter
>>69639082
Chemist here. You should have chosen my job.
I work as a physical chemist and only have to publish 3 papers a year for a 6 figure salary. (After 3 years of work)
I understand the sociologist hate in this thread as the field is chock-full of fucking degenerates just like psychology.As a sociologist myself i am completely disgusted at the state of the "social sciences", but know that if the circumstances allowed me, the intensity and scale of the purges i would conduct would put most of you faggots to shame.The wonders social engineering could produce if only they were used properly and not to extinguish the white race are beyond comprehension to most people currently alive simply because it's only been used against them so far.
>>69640989
Man, if you end up being the next Alfred Rosenberg and purge all Cultural Marxists I'll call it a proud field again.
Until then it remains a cucked Jew field in my mind.
>sociology
>a legit science
Daily reminder that sociology is pseudoscience
