>need TV licenses
>can't use weapons to defend themselves
>will get v& for using weapons in self defense
Is the United Kingdom literally the most cucked nation on Earth? It's literally more cucked than Sweden.
Pic unrelated.
>>69959207
whats the problem with the picture?
>>69959431
Murrican education at its finest.
>>69959431
It isn't specified what Object A is.
Also the dimensions are impossible assuming those are meant to be right triangles.
>>69959730
It doesn't fucking say anything about "Object A" dumbass. A means area, it isn't a label for the object, fucktard. Yet again,
>Murrican education at its finest
If A=Area then A=80
>>69959903
Are you fucking retarded?
>>69959207
Lets not forget that their state broadcasting company is literally called BBC
>>69960066
>>69959990
You sound like Carl...
>>69959431
They're giving too many variables.
They could take away the height=5 and kids can still solve it
What's the problem with the picture?
>>69959683
>>69959730
>>69959903
if it's not specified, assume its the entire object
How thick are you people?
>>69959730
I can't wait for the day of the rope
>>69960066
>>69960283
>>69959431
Impossible dimensions. You can't have a right triangle with sides of 2, 5 & 8.
>>69959730
>It isn't specified what Object A is.
In this question, A = Area. The sentence should read like this: "Find the area of the object; A = __" it was just written with poor grammar. A fucking child can easily deduce the meaning of "object" in this context, which is the only shape present in this question. Christ.
>Also the dimensions are impossible assuming those are meant to be right triangles.
Even in fucking middle school we are taught that drawings are never to scale, and shouldn't be used to scale. All that matters are the numbers.
>>69960514
This. Clearly /pol/ needs to review the Pythagorean theorem.
>>69959730
Even worse than the first guy.
>>69960236
Not sure who Carl is, sorry.
>>69960283
The problem is that you're a fucking dumbass American.
>>69960347
Some fucktard thinks that "A" is the label of the object rather than an abbreviation of the word "area".
>>69960514
No one said it's a trapezium though. There isn't enough information to solve.
>>69960514
This.
Also the picture is confusing because it makes the middle dimension look like a square when clearly under the dimensions given it is not,
>>69960660
>trapezium
Britbong posing as American in a British hate thread confirmed.
>>69960588
>Even in fucking middle school we are taught that drawings are never to scale, and shouldn't be used to scale. All that matters are the numbers.
How fucking fucktarded are you, you absolute fucking american fucktard? If you assume the object is a fucking trapezium then the numbers DON'T FUCKING WORK WHETHER OR FUCKING NOT IT'S TO SCALE, and if it's not a fucking trapezium then there's not fucking enough information to solve (Brahmagupta's formula only works for CYCLIC quadrilaterals).
>>69959207
>Is the United Kingdom literally the most cucked nation on Earth?
Literally programmed since their youth by the BBC.
>>69959730
A = Area = 80 units^2
congratulations you are dumber than a middleschooler.
>>69960775
Problem? Enjoy that cancer and obesity from all those lard burgers, Amerifat.
>>69960782
Holy shit. OP did it twice.
Check your Britishisms before starting these shit threads.
>>69960820
>80
>implying
>>69960892
It doesn't fucking change the truth that I'm right you stupid American.
>>69959207
A = 112, what's the issue?
How do you do this math problem? Haven't taken a math class since college, and I cheated through that. Just realized how useless math really is. No one would need to use this and if they did a computer could do it for them
76 square units
do i have to fucking get a ruler out and measure out the dimensions to show you morons what's wrong with the question?
>>69959207
It is the most cucked nation on earth. And it used to be the most badass culture with all the british old style gentleman bullshit. They got jewed hard.
i got 65
why do they even give the hypotenuses?
you dont need those to solve it
>>69961072
They think that A is a symbol that they forgot to mention not the abbreviation for Area.
>>69961082
It's impossible. Either it's a trapezoid and the dimensions are impossible for it to have or it's not a trapezoid and you don't have enough information to find the area
>>69961082
If we assume the object is a trapezium/trapezoid, then the numbers don't work, they contradict each other. But if they were consistent, then there would be several ways to solve it. Basically you can split it into a rectangle and two triangles and add the areas. However, the numbers are wrong if it is indeed a trapezium/trapezoid, and if it's not then there is insufficient information to solve.
>>69961072
Nope
>>69961095
Nope
>>69961145
Apparently you do because of all the stupid Americans ITT
>>69961189
Faggot American idiot
>>69961284
That's not the only issue idiot
>>69961300
WOW! A SMART AMERICAN! You should probably go in the world records book for smartest American to ever live.
>>69961072
The issue is you're retarded. You cannot work out the area, it's not possible.
A right-angled triangle of sides 5, 8, and 2, cannot exist.
>>69961300
Well, how do you find area? Why is it impossible? I am 34 so I haven't used math in a decade
>>69960811
What Americans do not understand is that Pakis and Blacks have infiltrated every level of our society.
From our police forces to our courtrooms.
From our schools down to our universities
From our radios to our television channels.
Literally, all you hear and see is how that white English are the problem and are scum, how the working class are the problem whilst ethnics and minorities are fed endless amounts of cash and advantages.
They were raping our children, selling them into sex slavery gangs and the POLICE were HELPING AND COVERING UP FOR THEM.
Meanwhile we have the filthy lefty scum that help and enable these cunts and should be the first on the chopping block.
>>69961284
Oh, didn't even notice
Also, changing my answer to 49
>>69959903
This is the correct answer you idiots.
>>69961568
If you ignore the hypotenuse figure, the answer is 70 (16-12/2 = 2, (2*5/2)*2 = 10, 12*5 = 60, 60+10=70) but because the hypotenuse is 8 the unlabeled length must be 6.244 but then that makes the other lengths invalid so the whole thing is wrong and If you think otherwise you're a moron.
>>69961371
Break what into a triangle? What do you mean? How would you do that?
![VIIVtoC[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/LhSc9ON.png "VIIVtoC[1].png")
>>69960588
Jesus christ it's not to scale guys it totally works, all that matters is numbers
>>69961650
I think otherwise. I think no one confirmed that the shape is a trapezium so therefore the numbers do add up but there is insufficient information to solve.
>>69961652
If it's indeed a trapezium that means that the top and bottom side are parallel so you can make imaginary lines (like the one labeled 5 in the pic, and an equivilent one on the other side) then add the areas. But of course it doesn't work in this case, partly because it's not stated to be a trapezium, and partly because it can't be a trapezium because the numbers don't add up if it is.
>>69961719
Correct but there is insufficient information to solve.
>>69961818
That's so confusing
>>69961881
Confirmed 11 year old and/or average American.
>>69961818
>autism
>>69959207
Who else got 70
>>69959207
>common core trapezoid2.jpg
>trapezoid
Nowhere in the question does it state that the object is a trapezoid. The object itself does not necessarily convey the correct properties to be a trapezoid; the lines of length 12 and 16 are not parallel. The distance of length 5 may not intersect with the line of length 16 at a right angle; you can't assume it is. It's impossible to conclude that this object is a trapezoid.
>>69961958
Do you realize what autism is you absolute fucktard? Autists are incompetent, have short attention spans and can't into math or attention to detail. My post is the exact fucking opposite of autism. Fuck off and die.
>>69962036
The other retarded Americans.
jesus fucking christ it's scary how dumb some of you are
>>69962069
Correct but there is not sufficient information to solve.
>>69960820
You retard
See>>69960514
>>69961867
you could solve it with some DANK calculus
>>69961948
I dunno, I literally cheated through every math class I ever took. Multiplication is the hardest math I can do. I'm an attorney so math is useless to me.
All teaching math beyond a certain levels does is drag down test scores, algebra should be an elective considering its uselessness and ability of computers to do it for us.
>>69961818
>I think otherwise. I think no one confirmed that the shape is a trapezium so therefore the numbers do add up but there is insufficient information to solve
No
It is definitely an isosceles trapezium
There is a difference between not drawing to scale and not drawing the correct shape
We weren't given enough information, we were given contradictory information. If you took away the Height or the Hypotenuse figure, you can work out the answer (Although the answer will be different, 70 if you took away the Hypotenuse, 108.42 If you took away the Height)
>>69962230
Go on then, solve it.
>protip: you can't
>>69962151
>Presuming the lines are straight and not curved
this is the kind of in-the-box thinking common core was created to educate you out of
>>69962217
yes but the triangle is 4 5 8
am i being trolled
>>69962151
>a^2 + b^2 = c^2
>a^2 + 5^2 = 8^2
>a^2 + 25 = 64
>a^2 = 39
>a = 6.245
you're making this too complicated
>>69962231
>I literally cheated through every math class I ever took.
>Multiplication is the hardest math I can do.
>I'm an attorney
>>69962347
holy fucking christ you are retarded
>>69962151
>the sides with length 12 and 16 are parallel
>>69962275
>It is definitely an isosceles trapezium
Prove it.
>There is a difference between not drawing to scale and not drawing the correct shape
You are trying to imply that angles have to be drawn to scale. Protip: They don't.
>We weren't given enough information, we were given contradictory information. If you took away the Height or the Hypotenuse figure, you can work out the answer (Although the answer will be different, 70 if you took away the Hypotenuse, 108.42 If you took away the Height)
Correct if the object is a trapezium.
>>69962231
# of hours
* fee per hour
I suppose there was a reason you didn't say "division"
>>69961082
Americans can literally take college math classes and never learn how to solve an 8th grade level problem.
>mericunt education
>>69962357
No math required to practice law. Further proving how useless math is u unless you are paid to be good at it.
>>69962325
>4^2+5^2=8^2
And no it would be 2 not 4
>>69962402
/sci/ one was better, it had only half coconut
>>69962036
jesus christ this thread is full of tards. About time i found the correct answer.
Formula for fucktards 1/2(b1 +b2)xh
>>69962402
a=2
![2000px-Circle_-_black_simple.svg[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/ycljE9y.png "2000px-Circle_-_black_simple.svg[1].png")
>>69962402
16
Do I get a golden star
>>69962466
>Prove it.
While I prove that this is an isoceles trapezium I want you to prove that this is a square
>Oh okay I'll just find the last line of the triangle, simple enough
>6.25
what
>>69962596
Are you legitimately this fucking retarded?
>>69962633
But that's impossible you fucking idiot. It's not an isosoles trapezium and it's not a square.
>>69962643
Thanks, Common Core!
>>69962151
>because two of the sides are the same length
I swear, fucking american education
It's beacuse they have the same internal angle with the superior line you fucking amerilard
>>69962417
no, I just solved it with no effort
that's the opposite of retarded
>>69962755
yes
>>69961719
>>69961719
>>69961719
>>69961719
>>69961719
this is how the shape HAS to look if we accept the numbers as valid, and the area of the shape CAN be solved with trig and caluclus, as i said before
>mfw this thread.
I knew I was stupid but now my brain really hurts.
Germany is more cucked than us now.
Over the past months it's been official in a large nr of threads.
>>69962755
>. It's not an isosoles trapezium
Yes it is, that is exactly how it is drawn on the paper
This is not some trick question where they've drawn isosoles trapezium but given you figures that aren't possible for an isosoles trapezium and you're expected to say "Well, obviously this isn't actually what it's drawn as, you can't solve this because there isn't enough information". The retard who wrote the question simply fucked up the values.
>>69962867
i got an 800 on my SAT math, what did you get?
>>69959207
The answer is 70.
>>69960514
That's not a right triangle you fucking idiot.
>>69963000
a job for my dad at Ninendo
>>69963086
*Nintedo
>>69962955
well, the degree of bending of the lines would cause the area to come out different, meaning there are multiple solutions. Which line is bent where matters.
>>69963120
that video game company
>>69959730
I've not taken geometry in years, but its missing the little L thingy so that doesn't mean its a right triangle.
>>69959207
Australia is way worse it's illegal to defend yourself period even if someone is trying to rape/murder you.
>>69959207
The problem is that the height of the trapezoid is unrealistic and would not form a right angle, but I guess there's no reason to assume it would make a right angle. If it did make a right angle, the trapezoid has an area of [(16+12)/2] x 8
>>69963079
uhhhh
>>69959207
No, America is the most cucked place on Earth. I don't know why you Americucks are so obvious to the fact that you spawned the sjw movement, main country where cuckolding takes place, your country is only 60% white and you are slaves to practically every country on Earth.
You can act like you're not the most cucked place on Earth if it helps you sleep at night but everyone knows that you people are.
>>69959207
>all these posters saying the question is impossible
>>69963120
Holy shit batman, it's Nintendo
>>69963251
HOW DID NONE OF US SEE THIS?
IT'S 85 YOU DUMBASSES
JESUS CHRIST YOU DUMB FUCKING CUNTS GOOGLE "AREA OF A TRAPEZOID" FOR FUCK'S SAKE REEEEEEEEEEEE
>>69962633
It's 15 you fucking idiot, one of the bananas is missing.
>>69963149
no i think the 16 side has to bend, but it can bend in a million ways
it's an impossible figure given the measurements, and if you believe otherwise you are wrong, sorry try again
>>69963222
But if it also made a right angle, the bottom value for the triangles would be sqrt 39 so clearly there is a conflict of the lengths given.
>>69963308
America SAYS it's multicultural to keep the juden off our backs
In reality we're a predominantly white, christian nation with laws based off of western cultural values.
Go fuck a roo, m8
>>69963354
Then give us the area you absolute genius, you.
>>69963166
What did I tell about posting on common core origami bulletin! Time for your punishment!
>>69959207
1/2h(b1+b2) is still possible, so I don't know what's wrong.
>>69963374
Yes, taken with the values you need to solve the area 70 is correct, but the question also gives you the values for (c) and (d), and they can't possibly be 8 otherwise the shape is wrong. This means you either fall into two camps
a) The shape is not a trapezoid, and is in fact something completely different - It is not as It appears and therefore we can't answer it
or
b) The shape is a trapezoid, but the figures of the hypotenuses are invalid and should be ignored
>>69962596
There is no height given, sir.
>>69963553
Shouldn't it be 70?
>>69963701
literally go get a ruler and try to construct this shape with paper and pen with the given measurements, then realize you are bad at math and go to bed
>>69963251
How did I miss that one!? Thanks Australia.
>>69959207
This is like high school geometry you nigger how can you not solve that??
>>69963735
What's your definition of a height? There's no reason to assume that the line given doesn't form a right angle, and definition of height is something like from top of figure to base that forms a perpendicular.
>>69963795
if you set c=d=8 there the object is overdefined and doesn't make sense
>>69963847
That's not how math or geometry works.
You idiots bitching about common core are literally retarded. Common core is a good educational structure to each children that numbers are fluid and built from other numbers.
Maybe after a generation of common core we have so many stupid fucking supply side retarded cucks that believe in trickle down.
if the top and bottom lines are parallel, then the angle formed from each of the "8" lines is the same, therefore making it the right triangle of 2, 5 ,8 impossible
>>69964126
>Nothing is how it seems! This shape is not actually this shape! You are bath at Maths if you question the fact that this shape can not possibly exist with these dimensions!
>>69959207
Okay idiots, because apparently you all got <200 on the math section of the SAT.
If the shape is a trapezoid, the top is 12, the bottom in 16, the sides are 8 and the height is 16, then the shape can't exist. Here's why.
The shortest side of each right triangle with side 8 and height 5 has to be 2, because (16-12)/2=2.
We all remember our pythagorean theorem? A^2 + B^2 = C^2?
However, 5^2 + 2^2 =/= 8^2.
29 =/= 64.
I'd say common core BTFO, but there's no actual evidence that this is from common core. Most math books have mistake somewhere, anyway.
Common core is retarded, but it isn't so retarded we have to make up shit to make it seem worse than it actually is...
>>69959207
>need TV licenses
>can't use weapons to defend themselves
>will get v& for using weapons in self defense
We have all of those things here in Sweden, thank-you-very-much.
>>69959903
The answer they're looking for is 80 but I think they didn't notice they have an impossible right triangle.
The problem with the question is the hypotenuses are wrong, they should be sqrt(2^2 + 5^2) i.e. sqrt(4+25), so not 5 but = 5.38516481
/thread
>>69963847
It can't have been to long since you've been in school, right? Sure the measurements might be off, but the problem can still be solved and it gets the point of how to find the area of a trapezoid across. That's all that matters with worksheets.
>>69959730
>>69963795
c&d do not equal 8 tho
>>69964328
If you ignore the hypotenuses then the question is fine. I think they're included because the testgivers like to give extra information to people who don't know how to actually solve the area
>>69960066
>forced to pay television license so they can stare at BBC all day
>>69963374
If we assume the top line is parallel to the bottom line, the dotted dimension is impossible.
If we don't assume it, the polygon is under-defined.
The most the area can be is 82.6821 square units.
>>69964442
Its useless extra information that the teacher, I'm assuming, just wrote down literally whatever for without thinking too hard on it. Maybe even wrong on purpose to help guide the students to the answer.
this is the reason we have problems in the world, people thinking they are smart and know better than others when they should just shut the fuck up and listen actually intelligent people
everyone saying that this is "easy" or "solvable," what was the highest level of math you've taken? there is no fucking way you do even basic calculus if you don't see how this problem is impossible.
You guys are literally retarded. It's:
12+16 = 28
then multiple 28 by the height (5)
28x5 = 140, then divide by 1/2
A=70
>>69959207
duh answer is 42 boss
>>69964458
The problem with that Is It's not "extra" information, It's "wrong" information.
where are you getting 2 from
>>69959207
I have ADHD and holy shit working this out is making me sweat.
>>69964568
what is the highest level of math you've taken
>>69964550
Wait is that common core?
>>69963722
You could also assume c&d are correct and h is wrong to get a legit trapezoid and solvable trapezoid.
>>69964568
Formula for area of a trapezoid is
A= (base 1 + base 2) x height, divided by half.
Literally you all need common core badly so you aren't fucking morons.
>>69964722
Yea, the answer would be 108.42
>>69964550
21 lel
>>69964652
never mind I get it now the base of the two triangles are each 2
>>69964719
No, that's algebra. The question comes down to if the bananas is supposed to be 3x or x.
>>69959730
Please be Australian proxy please be Australian proxy please be Austr...
I hope I'm not being retarded.
>>69960782
You do realize that there are metrics where the problem makes perfect sense, right? It's probably non-Eucledian geometry. The author needs to provide the metric for the corresponding geometry. You can pretty much make any problem like this work if you have a correct metric.
>>69959431
Nothing.
>>69959730
"A=" is nothing more than "Area =". The fuck is wrong with you?
>>69964560
They're all in the same font. Depending on which information you trust, you get different answers.
Either A=70
Or A = 14*sqrt(8^2-2^2)=108
In math, the answer to such a problem is "undefined"
Which, I guess is the only correct answer to the question.
>>69965156
I rounded, 108.4435....
The better way to write it is 14*sqrt(60)
>>69964639
ik the extra information is wrong. but you can ignore it and get the answer. The formula for finding the area of a trapezoid (that the kids who take this test will probably use) doesn't include the hypotenuse length anyway
>STEM neckbeards this mad people don't know the area of a shape
>>69965262
There is no way to tell whether the height or the hypotenuse is wrong from the problem. The only correct answer is undefined.
turning it up a notch
>>69959207
This is more of a clerical error than anything to do with common core.
>>69963523
No you're not. Keep believing it dude, it is fine. If you knew how cucked you really were, I doubt many Americans would continue living.
It is like cuckolding is a norm in America.
>>69964606
>>69964738
>>69964799
>>69964837
>>69965015
Wrong idiots its 25.
The apple is worth 7. The Grapes 12. The Banana is 6.
7+12+6 = 25.
>>69964980
that's the formmula for a quadrilateral in a given space, you kinda fucked up on that one
>>69959207
>>69963196
You cannot have a right triangle with these dimensions
>>69959207
this is why we need trump
https://soundcloud.com/couchtruthing/emperor-trump
>>69965411
16.
Apple=10
Banana=4
Coconut=2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overdetermined_system
There might be a solution if the trapezoid isn't euclidiean though.
>>69965486
3 bananas is 6
there was only 1 banana
which is 2
lrn2read
>>69965486
A bunch of Bananas is worth 6
1 Banana is worth 2
>>69965156
What in the nine does font have to do with anything? It was extra information, albeit wrong, that was thrown in to throw off people who don't know what they are doing. Like with word problems:
>Jack and Jill go up a hill to fetch a pail of water weighing 8 lbs. Its a mile up hill one way to get the water. If Jack started at home, how far did he go down hill to get water and come back home?
With the answer being one mile and 3/4 of the paragraph being useless.
>>69959207
>A= (a + b/2)h
I don't see whats wrong with this picture....
>>69965411
3x = 30, x = 10
10 + 8y = 18, y = 1
4 - 2z = 2, z = 1
1 + 1 + 3 = 5
>>69965486
:^) how many bananas you see on the picture, Cletus?
>>69964550
there's 3 bananas and then there's 1 banana
>>69965486
>The Banana is 6.
No, the Banana (singular) is 2. The Bananas (multiples) is 6.
>>69965411
A = 10
3A = 30
B = 4
A + 2B = 18
18 - A = 8 = 2B
C = 2
B - C = 2
C + B + A = 16
>>69960782
Jesus kid, try counting to ten
>>69961493
I hope that you guys figure it out. Please, please, figure this shit out.
>>69965562
15
theres only 3 bananas in the last one
>>69965673
so i think that makes it 21
>>69965486
The banana is 2. In the 3rd row, there are three bananas, in the 4th row there is one
a=7
b=5+a=12
a=1+3c=7 => c=2
a+b+c=21
>>69965262
There is a huge difference between trick questions giving you superfluous info you don't need, and one giving you information that breaks the question.
This is the type of question in elementary school I would go back and check my work on at the end of the test by adding the area of the triangles to the rectangle then spend the next 15 minutes writing why the question you asked me is stupid and how I deserve extra points for finding your stupidity
>>69965613
If they're all written the same way, there is no way to know which information is correct or incorrect. Depending on which numbers you trust you get different answers.
In real math it is called an overconstrained system and the solution is undefined.
>>69965584
There is definitely a solution on a manifold. You need metric or something said about the manifold. There is not sufficient information for a unique solution.
>>69965840
Missed it. You gotta look close to see it.
>>69965510
I'll just state that you can't find the area of a quadrilateral if you know all of the sides but don't know any of the angles.
>>69964568
That's exactly what I did but some fuck tard on here said I'm retarded, like he never seen an isoceles trapazoid you still solve it like a a trapazoid
The main takeaway from this thread is if you post any kind of Common Core image or brain teaser on 4chan, you'll most likely get 300 replies or more.
>>69965751
>>69965562
Half a coconut, and 3/4 of a banana
Try again
>>69964980
thanks mike
I only got to the halfway and my head is hurting because of this amount of stupidity. The answer is 154. First you get the area of square (12x12). Then you get those triangles (5x2). And it's not a fucking trapezoid if it's not specified there.
>>69966092
wait, those are angles? I thought they were coordinates. Well, it is true then.
>>69966057
Indeed. The problem itself should admit an infinite but describable set of spaces.
>>69964529
Here's my work. The right angle is there because I'm finding the largest possible area.
>>69965988
And this isn't real math they are doing.
Well, rather I should say they're not expected to at this point.
>>69965411
It's 15 famalam.
>>69966284
/thread
praise anon.
>>69966240
Okay. I'm not sure how you learned your math over there, but for us, letters in the corner usually denote angles when speaking of shapes.
>>69962101
Actually some autistic kind are unbelievable at maths it's ridiculous. Because their brain is wired differently some will be good at maths. Doesn't take away the fact that their fucking incompetent.
>>69965411
16?
>>69959207
the area of that object is 70 square units
>>69966385
We always draw a little semi circunference and use greek leters to denote the angles, just a misscomunication.
>>69959207
Easy. Assuming height 5 is perpendicular with length 12 and 16 (which are parallel due to the sides being equal), the area is average lengths X height, in this case being 5[(12+16)/2]=70 square units.
The main issue with the picture is that fucking triangle. In order for the hypotenuse to be 8, again assuming it is a right triangle, the leg with the length of 5 is actually the short leg of the triangle. The other leg (depicted as the short one) is actually about 6.24 by using the Pythagorean theorem, thus rendering the lengths of 12 and 16 geometrically impossible.
Of course, images are NEVER to scale unless explicitly stated but this one is exceptionally bad. In order to maintain the triangle, the trapezoid would have lengths of 8, 12, 8, and 24.5.
Source: graduated just before Core was implemented at my school.
>>69966488
none, they're too big.
>>69966244
You can have an elliptical bump on a hypotenuse, and find the parameters for a bump. The other side doesn't have to be symmetric, though. The bump would extend the length of a hypotenuse.
>>69964550
21
I know I have ADHD but holy shit working this out made me fucking sweat
>>69966488
>Using windows
Why?
>>69966284
For the minimum area, one of the sides of length 8 is parallel to the base. It has the same area as a triangle with sides 12, 8, and 8. The minimum area is 42.3320 square units.
>>69963438
wrong, it's unknown because just because it's missing one banana does not mean it's 3. Each banana could be .5 and the stem could be 2. We don't know therefore is 12+x...
u fucking retard
>>69964550
Not enough information. single banan is undefined.
>>69966666
Nice quints. You're just getting freaked out from seeing fruits instead of letters for variables. Just assign a letter to each fruit while being aware that the clump of 3 bananas is 3 times a variable.
>>69966538
This anon gets it perfectly. Please stop bumping this thread now.
>>69964550
Apple + berries + one berry?
>>69962402
It's 15
I know I have ADHD but holy shit working this out made me fucking sweat.
>>69964563
I'm in Calc II
What's the problem?
>>69966666
checked
>>69966284
GG assuming that angle is right.
>>69959207
Hey OP, here is a Pro tip. Don't post a image more interesting then your topic.
>>69964550
Incomplete expression but 21
>>69966488
1 pineapple fits in one black box.
>this huge fucking thread full of math for one common core question
this is why it's so shitty
>>69959903
>>69959730
70 units ^2 fuckin negroid
>>69967754
c and d are equal to 8 in the picture. that's the issue
>>69959730
>>69968167
Its irrelevant
>>69968454
Your retarded opinions are irrelevant
>>69968167
if c and d both are 8 that IMPLIEs that a and b are parallel.. its a simple problem/ area of axh plus area of (b-a)xh
>>69968528
fuck off back to >>>/r9k/ autist
>>69968706
>if c and d both are 8 that IMPLIEs that a and b are parallel
I'm sure you just made that up.
>>69959207
OP why are you so retarded. you knew this thread would get derailed into your pic cause you know /pol/ is filled with sperglord NEETs who want to show off their 5th grade education to the world.
>>69968787
lrn2math little babby
>>69968706
>if c and d both are 8 that IMPLIEs that a and b are parallel
see:
>>69966284
>>69965122
Nigger you are retarded. The trapezoid has impossible dimensions. For this to be real based on the triangle shown, the third side of the triangle would need to be sqrt(39)
>people getting this butthurt over a middle school math practice problem
It's more important that they know how to solve it, they can be autistic about it later.
>>69963171
If its a trapezoid those have to be right triangles.
>>69968868
makes sense to me without pthagorean theory. im thinking this question was meant for 4th graders finding are of rectangula shapes... making a recrangular shape from each of the triangles, calculating the area and adding it to the area of the cantral 12x5. I get it. is it possible, fuck no
>>69968454
are you actually stupid enough to state that charactheristiscs of the object whose area you have to determine are irrelevant
kek all the math 'experts' ITT 'solving' impossible problems.
>>69962402
No solution: 3 bananas is undefined.
>>69964550
No solution: 1 banana is undefined.
>>69965411
No solution: 3 bananas and 1 coconut are undefined.
>>69959207
No solution to OP's ceaseless cock addiction.
>>69968998
good way to weed out they tpye a geniuses from a 4th grade pool tho... and the "pragmatists" too on the other side of the coin... i doubt this is the intention
>>69967075
I hope this is bait.
>>69967754
fuck. I forgot to divide the last two triangles by 2
>>69964550
An apple (7) plus 5 equals berries. Berries equals 12. Three bananas plus one equals 7. Each banana equals 2. One banana (2) plus one berries (12) plus one apple (7).
Final answer is 21.
>>69965411
Each apple is equal to each apple, and three apples makes 30, so each apple is 10. One apple (10) plus 8 bananas is 18, so each banana is 1. Four bananas (4) minus 2 coconut halves is 2, so each coconut half is worth 1 also.
1 coconut half (1) plus one apple (10) plus three bananas (3) is the final equation.
The answer is 14.
>>69965486
kill yourself man
