Not sure if I buy what this guy is saying, what does /pol/ think?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxpVwBzFAkw
bullshit
>>69745099
ah yes, very good point, thanks for helping me to understand!
Men are to blame for being weak and giving in to the Jew and pussy instead of leading with will and power
>>69744990
women have never created societies or protected societies, so generally they have no clue what the fuck they are talking about
>>69744990
>civilization not possible without childbirth
>>69745099
>>69745263
R O A S T I E S
O
A
S
T
I
E
S
>>69745257
try to figure it out on your own without falling for any boogie men
>>69744990
Quit shilling your defeatist videos.
I haven't watched it, but I already know that the facts are all or almost all correct, but the speakers draws a slightly misguided conclusion which amounts to "Nothing you do can reverse this trend, goyim. The future is hopeless."
Then you'll make a thread asking people for their thoughts, change IDs and admit that it's your video "but I'm totally not the OP". You will then deny being funded by anyone despite the obvious high production quality and regular output.
You will most likely delete this thread after seeing this post. And you make a thread every other day but don't keep it bumped to avoid detection.
>>69745922
that's not just one guy behind those videos. did Soros change the side?
Women are retarded.
Weak men put women in charge.
Fix your own life; let the rest of the world fix theirs.
Do not take unnecessary risks.
>>69745263
this
>>69744990
Yall need to watch this. This video is spot on.
>>69745922
>I haven't watched it, but I already know that the facts are all or almost all correct, but the speakers draws a slightly misguided conclusion which amounts to "Nothing you do can reverse this trend, goyim. The future is hopeless."
I Can't Into Psychology: The Post
I just want to fuck
>>69745099
Oh look, it's that Swiss cunt.
To put the blame solely on men would be to absolve women from any kind of responsibility (in essence covert white knighting) and agency.
>BRO ITS UR FAULT IF SHES ACTING LIKE A CUNT JUST USE UR ALFALFALFA SUPERPOWERS AND CHANGE HER VERY NATURE
>>69745470
ditto
>>69744990
Even the fucking ancients knew this shit.
Feminism = Death by constant Nagging
>>69747566
God damn. Sweden getting it right for once.
>>69746001
Not sure how many are claimed to be behind it, I've seen in almost every thread about Black Pigeon the person who supposedly makes the videos appears from nowhere in the first 50 posts with an ID different from the OP. I don't pay them much attention but I don't recall him mentioning others. He denied being a professional.
The pendulum is swinging hard right and everyone can see this - it's been doing so since around 2010-12 with the MRA faggot NEETs being the first to stand up against feminism and grown from just /pol/ and /r9k/ to all of 4chan by 2013, then started spreading to other parts of the internet with Gamergate in lesser amounts - most notably twitter,which is now in some regards /pol/'s mouthpiece.
Since the start of the year /pol/'s influence has exploded massively - the second-most active subreddit is made up entirely of our OC and is committed to electing /pol/ personified. We're heavily involved in the stuff trending on Twitter every week. We have the ear of a candidate for POTUS with more name recognition than Jesus Christ and he even retweets our memes. Breitbart, the second-most popular news source on Facebook (after HuffPo, which recently ran its first pro-Trump article) is essentially a mix of /pol/ and RT, dumbed down for the masses.
Clearly /pol/ has much more control of the narrative than even we give ourselves credit for, and at the same time most of us are pretty firm in our beliefs - the reason why there are so many shills here then becomes obvious: the intent is to disrupt and prevent /pol/ from organizing, rather than to sway US on any position.
On the other hand, the alt-right is still a growing movement and ridiculously easy to infiltrate. The easiest method for the left is to establish the voices of the new Right and use them to sow dissent or defeatism, to either crush the movement early on or to neuter them if they ever do take control. See: Ben Shapiro, a failed attempt.
Black Pigeon is a kike.
>>69745099
go back to /r9k/
>>69745922
>"lets defeat the goyim by actually telling the truth for once"
>literal retardation: the post
He is 100% right.
>>69747921
Actually it's a great subterfuge tactic to tell half-truths as whole truths.
>>69747763
>>69747859
The Gamergate thing cracks me up.
Some slut slept around and good scores were given. People didn't like it. And thats pretty much where it ended.
But now everthing SJWs don't agree with is some undefinable nebulous concerted effort known as "Gamergate".
![[Hadena]_Seinfeld_-_The_Animated_Series_03_[A0AC2044].avi_snapshot_07.28_[2013.02.20_08.25.36].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/nr9FQvo.jpg "[Hadena]_Seinfeld_-_The_Animated_Series_03_[A0AC2044].avi_snapshot_07.28_[2013.02.20_08.25.36].jpg")
>>69744990
Think about it pragmatically.
Even if it's true it's political suicide to attempt to disenfranchise anyone, let alone more than half of the voting population. How the hell would you even attempt to get something like that made into law?
>>69748197
>How the hell would you even attempt to get something like that made into law?
start by adopting shariah law
>>69748081
its also a great tactic to use something call reverse psychology where you tell someone something cannot be done in order to give them a reason to prove you wrong.
the fact that these neet autists think its a bad thing that the word is getting out there because of 1 or two sentences in a 15 minute long video is beyond fucking pathetic.
you can throw the messenger in the over but it doesnt make what he said any less valid.
tell me: exactly what is he saying thats so wrong, the fact that we cant just take womens rights away from them? do you know of ANY politician or general or public figure that has stood up said "back to the kitchen ladies"?
The only thing that can save us now is either massive global war coupled with totalitarianism and genocide of non whites, potentially a reversion back to fundamentalist christianity (it got us here once before) or if somehow women were to wake up.
which of these three events is likely to happen? protip the fucking answer is none,
for black pigeon to come out and say "taking womens rights away is easy" would be completely laughable.
you aspy neets need to check your autism its fucken off the charts
>>69744990
I really like BPS's videos. Well made, properly referenced, engaging, etc. They're definitely a great introduction to the red pill for all the normies out there, especially when combined with things like "With Open Gates".
However, I honestly have to wonder who this guy is and where he comes from. He exploded onto the scene in no time flat and amassed a sizable following already. His channel basically came out of nowhere, pumping out really high quality stuff weekly that looks professionally put together and edited and such. It's not exactly just a couple of guys collaborating on a video in their free time like when fuIIchan made With Open Gates. Especially when you consider the frequency that these videos are being made. Each of these videos would require a ton of time researching, producing, editing, etc.
So my conclusion is that there's someone with money behind this who's having them professionally made. But then the question is who? I'm not saying there's some shadowy ulterior motive by any means, but I am curious who these backers are. We'll likely never find out (everyone on the alt right remains anonymous for a very good reason) but it's still something to discuss.
>>69745922
>I haven't watched it
Then why the fuck are you posting?
>>69748562
raging autism
>>69745922
Wait, so he's a shill because he's not laying down a 5 point plan on how to fix cultural marxism? Are you fucking joking?
I guess the TRS goys are also shills because they haven't talked about how to give helicopter rides to all the leftists.
>>69747859
>Black Pigeon is a kike
I dont know. I'd rather think some conservative "soros" is establishing a voice in the fast growing alt-right. now is the time to get in and take control of the narrative, because there is still a long way to go. Amateurs like cuckadon of akkad and his friends are only touching alt-right and don't have the means to actually control any narratives. honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if we see a rise of such channels in the future.
>>69748170
That's actually just the narrative the SJWS present. The main point behind GG was that gaming journalism is corrupt as fuck, literally offering awards and news coverage in exchange for blowjobs.
Is there a woman's response or view of videos like this? In curious about their point of view.
>>69748197
>How the hell would you even attempt to get something like that made into law?
Make it so only one vote can be collected per household.
>MFW this also gets niggers and white trash out of the voting pool because now only homeowners can vote
I think you're a MGTOW divide and conquer Jew shill
sage
>>69749177
so if you live in apartment you can't vote? Or if you live in an apartment with a roommate(not a gf/bf/wife/husband) only one of you gets a vote, or only your landlord can vote?
>>69748449
building women as the boogieman and letting someone divide us from them is fucking retarded. you should know better.
furthermore, look around you. there are plenty of women who are doing as a great job as any man. I bet even you know some.
secondly, yes most women follow the current Zeitgeist because being a social outcast for a woman was a death sentence until recently. this might be true but no reason to regress like a fucking mudshit. in contrary, what we need is people finally taking over their rights and responsibilities. what we need is direct democracy and not some 19th century republic.
>men comprehending women
>>69749535
Rather than that, I'd simply suggest strengthening religion and removing bias from media, or establishing media that is unbiased in presentation. Make women into good voters (or non-voters) rather than simply bemoaning that they vote poorly.
Married women voter right more than left, it's single women that are the issue. Strengthen marriage and the family unit and the divide becomes irrelevant.
>>69744990
Some of this shit is good, others is pure nonsense don't trust this video blogger, he came up from nowhere has a good effects and podcasts but something isn't right.
99.9% certain this is some sort of shill game or agency plot to discredit us. Spread it, this pigeon series is an attempt at smearing alt right.
>>69745263
This
>>69749535
This this a million times this.
Everything about this podcaster seems like a disinfo plant.
>>69749535
>building women as the boogieman and letting someone divide us from them is fucking retarded. you should know better.
dismissing facts because they hurt your feefees is far more retarded.
>furthermore, look around you. there are plenty of women who are doing as a great job as any man
at what retard? dont speak in vague terms if you want to make a point. Good at doing work? nobody is arguing that. We are arguing that since women have been given the right to vote/work and control their own reproduction, fertility rates have collapsed and white western nations are shrinking, those same women are also socialists, they vote for socialist governments and socialist governments cannot have shrinking tax bases, they need more money coming in for mo programs.
whats the solution? to import millions of shitskins that will pay the taxes and keep the socialist system going.
its not fucking rocket science.
giving women rights has fucked western fertility rates.
>this might be true but no reason to regress like a fucking mudshit
we tried progress. it led to women not wanting babies. thats not our fucking fault but we are to blame for giving them that opportunity.
>, what we need is people finally taking over their rights and responsibilities. what we need is direct democracy and not some 19th century republic.
so many words yet so little fucking substance
you are pathetic
just TRY to actually disprove ONE SINGLE argument being brought forth by me or the video
>>69744990
>"How whiny male bitches blame everything on women"
FTFY
>>69750293
you take all those highly complex interlinked problems and societal dynamics and blame them all on women. toppest of keks, you are a lost case.
>>69750587
You haven't provided a single counter argument against him.
>>69750743
I dont get paid to educate idiots.
>>69750587
you constantly post dismissing everyones argument but completely fail to produce any counter arugment or evidence
>them all on women
who else takes birth control pills? who else gets abortions? who else is fucking niggers till 40 then looking for a beta to bankrupt?
men are not perfect, men do share blame, but since you are a fucking woman, you cannot wrap your head around THIS thread being directed SOLELY at women, you think that we think that men are innocent here, thats not hte case cunt, I have stated several times that men share some of the blame. just not the majority of it
women disproportionately vote left
women DISPROPORTIONATELY prevent pregnancies (intentionally)
again, im still waiting for 1 single counter argument
you cant do it though can you, all you have is "MUH FEEFEES"
>>69750843
>not my job to educate you
>>69750843
Okay, so no arguments then.
Keep white-knighting for women if you wish. But you're not convincing anyone of your point of view by not saying anything but "hurr durr you're wrong get fucked retard"
>>69748535
Curious about this too, you're not the only one who spotted this
>>69750986
it's really simple: you fail to understand societies as a complex system and just single out one aspect (women in this case), and just put all the blame on them. you could the same with men, niggers, jews and so on.
>hurr who invented birth control??
>durr who gave women voting rights??
>derp who doesnt want to get married anymore
>herp who votes for batshit insane lefties parties all over Europe and leafistan?
>>69751096
mgtow pls
>>69745099
not an argument
>>69748092
Men invented shopping lists. Women just go to stores and leave with things.
>>69750843
ad hominem, you lose
>>69751645
I can't. it's 2016!
>>69751329
>just put all the blame on them
i have state
ON.
NUMEROUS.
OCCASIONS.
that men also deserve blame
YOU DUMB CUNT
you cant even provide the most BASIC examples of mens fault (hedonism through video games or materialism through houses/cars/iphones).
once more incase you missed it the first time: DUMB CUNT
>>69751329
>if you think women have shit-tier political opinions and don't make good leaders, then you must be a sexless foreveralone beta!
Yeah, okay famalam. Once again, you haven't stated a single argument. You know there are options other than being a cuck vs hiding from women, right?
>>69750293
Fuckin leaves, trying to simplify a complex problem.
>>69745263
This essentially. None of this could happen if the men of society were just and strong.
>>69751818
you can find stats on everything you stupid sperg. just look at all the "jew are behind everything" pics circulating here.
>>69751842
nice projecting. you should go back to "american discussions" that consists making monkey and pig noise
Anyone else annoyed yet fascinated with the still photo head turning effect in all of his videos?
>>69751329
>in a complex system all components are equally influential
>>69752026
>can't into epistemology
>>69744990
Arguments that you need to control women makes feminism legitimate.
>>69752233
thanks, vlad.
>>69752026
You don't even have good banter to make up for the lack of an argument.
>>69749108
>women
>have a point of view
>logical thinking
No. Women have one mind: the mind that media tells them.
>>69752403
>expecting a woman to provide comedic relief
jejs
>>69744990
If you watch this guys videos, there's no going back from the cynical world you'll live in. I've watched two, and honestly fuck this guy.
>>69745263
>>69747108
>>69752020
This presents a causality dilemma whereby we cannot be certain whether it was women's destructive nature that caused men to become weak or whether women were allowed to destroy due to the men being weak.
That said, the basis of the argument that states the latter of the two concepts above is built on our perception of men in from history. More specifically, the strong "model man" concept comes from our perception of men during times when women had little to no influence on the higher echelons of society, for example Ancient Rome or Greece and in periods of feudalism. Our perception of the weak male is mostly derived from much more recent times, possibly the 60s onwards, wherein womens' influence on higher society has increased consistently. This then would lead us to arrive at the conclusion that, when given sufficient influence, women do destroy civilisations, cultures and indentities.
>>69753138
>Shaggy
>Not Raggy
0/10
>>69753138
It isn't that bad - I think it's a great breakdown of the jewish plan for NWO.
Really, great video - VERY ILLUMINATING.
>>69752057
not sure i follow what you mean?
>>69753417
well said, ty fish n' chips
>>69748535
He uses references to /pol/ used memes. He doesn't mention it, but he uses images. For example, the "sweden yes" video.
>>69750843
>>69745099
Are you kidding me?
After watching this video, you did not lean shit.
>>69744990
got 2 seconds in and dropped those fucking titlecards make me cringe hard
>>69753469
>Implying I made this
inb4 modify it yourself
>>69753564
Still don't want to live in such a cynical world. I'm already mad at /pol/ for red pilling me. But also I can't imagine all the assumptions that had to be made in the study he referenced where the 86 feminized societies were destroyed by rampant savages. What makes a feminized society? How did the collection of people who studied these societies coordinate? What era did these societies exist in? It all just seems like fear mongering, and his frequently anguished tone adds credibility to the possibility that it IS just fear mongering. After all, the dude gets subscribers and channel views from people binge watching his channel. Just not enough certainty in the channel to justify the negative outlook on society that watching it produces.
>>69753417
If men are weak it is because their power has been taken away.
The church could once exert extensive political power and influence social discourse over the issues that nations. The church was very much control by men. The bible preaches that women obey and submit to their husbands.
We have long since abandoned christianity but at one point it was a piller of white western society.
women are not entirely to blame, but they still deserve a large portion of it
He has to win
>>69754372
>Implying I made this
>Implying I care
Post shit images get shit on
In general women are more indecisive than men and should not decide a nations fate. They are generally better at supporting strong men.
This shit is incredibly simple if you just ignore the jew pushed feminist propaganda and stop being a fucking cuckold
>>69750843
>I dont get paid to educate idiots.
I know this word gets thrown around a lot on /pol/, but you are a literal shill, and it shows. Your argument is that we should disregard BPS because you're right and hes wrong and we're idiots.
And you don't want to enact the labor of explaining why he is wrong. And yet you keep posting in the thread.
Fuck off, and work on your shill game, because this is sad.
>>69754412
While I'm not religious myself and do not believe in a God, I think that the abandonment of the Christian Church has had catastrophic effects on society. Interesting to me is the shift in morals where many more people nowadays would agree that morals are relative, which by the way completely dismantles the concept of justice. Keeping the moral absolutism without the God-revering cultishness is something that Western Civilisation has been struggling with for a long time now, and it's having a huge impact.
>>69749108
Yes there is on YouTube . She calls the guy everything you could imagine. Even a pedophile.
but seriously who the fuck is this guy? the production value is through the fucking roof.
have we started the fire?
>>69747566
Of course is men's fault.
Having daughters and leaving them alone with her whore of a mother while he goes chasing some other whore.
Then she grows up to be a whore and the cycle continues.
>>69754700
>>Implying I care
>Post shit images get shit on
So the image has 0 value out of 10? Seems unreasonable
0/10 to your rating
>>69750843
>I dont get paid to educate idiots
"I don't have a proper argument, nor any sort of evidence or empirical data to prove my point, thus I will simply make it seem like I can not be intellectually bothered to make a compelling argument through insulting the other person"
I'm jewish you stupid goy, those tricks dont work on me
Either make a statement or get the fuck out, or I'll shut you down.
>>69755030
>While I'm not religious myself and do not believe in a God, I think that the abandonment of the Christian Church has had catastrophic effects on society.
I completely agree, that is why we are struggling with islam so much at the moment, it is highly politicized, cannot be changed and creates people who would die to carry out "its will". the average western cuck cares more about the latest fucking iphone, how can he even compete?
I have made this argument several times on this board but nobody ever buys into it:
We cannot rally behind the swastika: that makes us nazis
we cannot rally behind our national flag: that makes us racist nationalists
But we can rally behind the cross, religious freedom is the one single loophole that can get western society out of this fucking mess, if everyone just start supporting the church again, it would regain so much political influence and control over society, women would stop whoring for fear of being ostracized by their church and community, men would care more about biblical values and moral absolutes.
it could help us tremendously with our current set of problems. but fedora tippers are too fucking autistic to see hte benefits of just pretending to believe in the magical sky fairy, even though its such a big reason for why got this far
>>69755223
Not sure but all of his videos are solid. The recent videos on transgenderism as a mental disorder and on IQ are less divisive (at least as far as /pol/ is concerned).
I at least understand why some people are concerned about this particular video, but most of his videos are 100% spot on and irrefutable red pills. If this guy is being funded, then all I can say is more power to him.
>>69752273
you should know that women are property and must be treated as such
>>69744990
Adam & Eve is a story for a reason.
>>69755223
Its gotten cheaper and cheaper to do decent vids.
So long as their arguments can be nothing more than "That's racist!" etc., I think we always have a chance of pulling ourselves out of the cesspit. The issue is that things will have to get so much worse before anything action will be taken. I think is the epitomical cancer of Western culture it it's current state.
>>69744990
I don't watch gay and stupid youtube videos, sorry.
>>69756077
>>69755640
Forgot to link your post
>>69755831
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z35bbBBwQHQ
Like watch this for example, its incredible.
This guy is fucking serious, the tidal wave of the Alt-Right is coming.
