Get up to speed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dhTKbOTTDQ
Get up to speed: [YouTube] DC Madam Lawyer: Files Would Alter 2016 Race | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC
Here are the DC Madam's lawyer's registered domains in which the list may be hidden:
bienvenidosmiami.com
civilforfeiture.com
coinodyssey.com
dailyshowwithtrevornoah.com
deborahjeanepalfrey.com
domsubmatch.com
medicinal-marijuana-company.com
miamilyft.com
montgomeryblairsibley.com
privacycomplianceconsulting.com
sashaworkx.com
sibleyinvestments.com
whyjusther.com
[YouTube] DC Madam Lawyer: Files Would Alter 2016 Race | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC
Here are the DC Madam's lawyer's registered domains in which the list may be hidden:
bienvenidosmiami.com
civilforfeiture.com
coinodyssey.com
dailyshowwithtrevornoah.com
deborahjeanepalfrey.com
domsubmatch.com
medicinal-marijuana-company.com
miamilyft.com
montgomeryblairsibley.com
privacycomplianceconsulting.com
sashaworkx.com
sibleyinvestments.com
whyjusther.com
Also bumping before Schlomo catches wind
Why are they archiving these so much now. Fuck
Now, someone is obviously paying him well to release this information. If we can dig up recent financial info regarding Sibley, we can find out who is greasing him off. That way, we could find out who would stand to lose from the info being released.
>>69674886
Might be on to something anon
>>69673828
>SHILLS KEEP SLIDING
More like the last 2 threads sputtered and died while people kept posting "bump". I think it's pretty obvious where we're at now:
>nothing left to dig for
>the only thing left is bruteforcing one of the services or something risky like DDoS in the hopes of preventing anyone stopping the release
Look, I won't tell anyone what they should do. I will say this -- if you go the blackhat route, you're stepping into felony territory. If you're going to go there, find some encrypted, private, secure means of communication OFF THIS SITE, and go do it there. Posting here hoping for some blackhat anon to take up the cause and do this for you is inviting disaster and mishandling.
>A WARNING:
IF YOU TRY TO GET THIS INFO BY STEALING IT you break the "chain of custody". That means, if the lawyer, who everyone knows (due to court order) has the LEGIT COPIES, is not the person to release them, then any copies you "liberate" will be dismissed by the media. THe media wants to sink Trump by any means necessary; they're done it to us before, dismissing anything we leak as "it came from anonmoose". If it comes from the lawyer, they can't dismiss it. It would be one thing to find it sitting on the internet on a sever he owns, verifiable; it's another thing if we "give our word" about where we found it.
Consider strongly just waiting until the clock runs out. It seems highly probably this information will come out. Think carefully before doing anything desperate, it could sink Trump's hopes. We'll never live that kind of thing down.
Decide for yourselves either way.
Good luck anons.
>>69675557
What would happen if someone were to steal it and then just release it anonymously somehow?
>>69675861
Assuming you 100% cant be tracked, you would probably get away with it crime free.
>>69675861
it has to come from a legit source. an anonimoooose basement dweller who claims to have haxx0red the server is not a legit source and it will be dismissed by the media even if it's true.
I know this should stay in-house, but with time running short, is it nearing time to enlist outside help? if so, who?
Bump goddamit!
The lawyer was paid $25 mil and the files were destroyed permanently. We'll ever know who was on that list *cough*Bill and Ted*cough*.
>>69677113
wat
>>69676537
Hackforums duh..
Nothing to see here goys
>>69673828
Bumping for support
>>69675557
Unfortunately you are right. There are some things /pol/ and 4chan in general are not equipped for. We're a blunt tool.
Nothing wrong with discussing some course of action here, but any coordinated effort really should not be conducted here at all.
>>69673828
Shut it down!
SPREAD IT AROUND LIKE WILDFIRE
To be totally honest, I don't really care if a hooker or she-pimp got suicided.
If they had some shit worth saying, they'd have said it a decade ago. But apparently whomever had the information didn't give much of a fuck about victim either.
And I don't honestly care if some representative from south dakota liked getting rimmed and pegged by hookers.
>it's about the legal coverup
Of which, I don't really care about. Show me the results, then I'll give a shit. Because unless this stuff is a matter of national security, I don't see why anyone would give a shit. OH GOD. SOME ONE CHEATED ON HIS WIFE. OH GOD. THE WORLD IS ENDING.
>>69681126
>I dont care if it did not affect me
Someone killed her to cover up something.
I know this isnt /x/ but are you not atleast curious?
>>69681126
SHILL DETECTED
>>69681126
The attorney says that it directly affects the presidential election going on. He said that if the information were not released soon it would be seen as favoring one candidate over another. Get out of here.
>>69681126
Also, if it's who I think it is (Cruz). Then this blows up his wholesome, family values, Joel Osteen schtick. We don't mind that Trump once cheated on his wife. He's a known commodity and we like it. The fact that Cruz likely has and presents himself as something other than makes him a horrible hypocrite that deserves to get BTFO.
>>69682014
>if it's who I think it is (Cruz).
Thought cruz was in Texas during that time.
>>69682224
I'm unclear on the exact timeline. We know his wife worked in DC at the time.
>>69682014
I think it's Hillary. There have been persistent dyke rumors about her for years, and she was in and out of DC at the time as a Senator.
>>69673828
CRUZ'S NUMBER ON DC MADAM PHONE RECORDS
https://themarshallreport.wordpress.com/2016/04/01/cruz-why-is-your-number-on-the-list-of-d-c-madam/
Bump. any new updates?
>>69683963
That list is really suspicious. Those calls are made from that cell phone while it was in Texas; they aren't even Texas numbers. 301 is Maryland, and 321 is Florida. The only reason Texas is highlighted is because they think it implicates Cruz when it just doesn't.
Plus... come on, OCR software doesn't switch fonts in the middle of a scan.
>>69673828
SHILLS SHILLS everywhere
please Jebus protect us from the shills
>>69673828
enjoy your suicides and accidental mysterious deaths.
>>69685580
This picture is false. Putin likes younger men.
>>69682224
He's been working in dc for ages. Made lots of trips up there
We're getting to the point where Trump's empty rhetoric now just sounds very repetitive. He's riled up the anger to a hard ceiling vote of around 30-40%/state but now is flat lining - hard. His support has stalled, his attempts at unifying have failed dismally, he's not making inroads into other demographics, in fact he is alienating them with hurtful remarks, an unwillingness to apologize and at times flat out bigotry.
With Cruz results surging positively as the convention nears, it is not without precedent that he should get the nomination. The very talented and underrated megyn kelly states this has happened 7 times before, and if he can't win the simple majority then the rules state that he is not the nominee automatically, even if he has the most delegates. With the recent and damning data on Trump's likelihoods on beating Hillary combined with his tiny cross-demographic appeal, the RNC should come to their senses and nominate a true conservative like Ted Cruz to battle Shillary and begin the rise of the priesthood
>>69685789
This needs to be on the start of every thread. Lots of shills keep asking this question
>>69685789
Yeah, he was a policy advisor for Bush in 2001.
>>69685555
I'm gonna stab you with a frozen shit shiv and fuck the cunt wound while on meth
>>69685813
Okay, but totally irrelevant. Enjoy your extra (You).
>>69673828
>Alex Jones
Really?
>>69685992
Um excuse me why aren't you taking my cock?
>>69675557
Lawyer here. You are full of shit. There is little chance a chain-of-custody argument could be successfully used in this situation. Certainly not if the original information could be accessed and verified independent of what is released by hackers.
>>69683963
>https://themarshallreport.wordpress.com/2016/04/01/cruz-why-is-your-number-on-the-list-of-d-c-madam/
holy shit look at the shooping of those numbers
>>69673828
Marvelcucks on suicide watch
KEEP AT IT, BOYS!
>>69685911
Good bless America
From the domain http://sashaworkx.com/
there is http://sashaworkx.com/images/StrikingChoice.pdf In which is a character named Tim Sanders,does this mean anything? (probably not and im just autistic)
Ok I'm finally reporting it this time. Quit posting these threads. The only information we have is that there are numbers tied to TX but there are many politicians from that state.
I'm all a border the Trump TRAIN but I'm afraid we're wasting valuable time and resources on this instead of getting ready for the WI primary.
We must make more memes for kek
If Kek wills that the truth come out about this, then so be it, but forget about it until then.
>>69685813
Not nearly as repetitive as all the other candidates that have either dropped out or should have dropped out by now.
>>69688993
You post this every thread.
>>69675557
Who cares about chain of custody. The damage it would do to whoever is on the lists' reputation is what really matters.
>>69688993
You are such a fucking shill.
>>69673828
something about this doesn't make sense.
they claim there is pertinent information about this presidential election. so why wait to release the info?
if this person cares enough about the election to do this, it seems retarded to wait until half the states half voted for their party nominee.
I'm starting to think there will be nothing big in this release. How long until it gets dumped anyways?
>>69688993
We can do more than a few things at once. You should go get working on memes. DOUBLE TIME.
>>69689644
Gag order. Do some readin' up.
>>69689857
>Gag order.
Does this end in 1.5 weeks?
Bamp
I've interviewed her lawyer and am in regular contact with him. Anyone need me to ask him anything?
Also reminder the list is 815 names from Verizon Wireless.
>>69673828
No one has a list of anything, nothing is going to happen. Once again you fucking retards have taken the bait of another bullshitter. This is why everyone laughs at you.
Ok im done, you guys feel free to call me a cuck or say something about my wifes son or w/e. Its over for you guys. You lost, its over.
>>69689644
> something about this doesnt make sense
Understatement of the year
>>69690133
Yes, ask him if he'll give us his login info.
This thread is pathetic, you guys, come on.
>>69685555
>>69690708
he can't right now obviously. if you're implying I'm lying this is Cronikeys and you can check past threads or my twitter - i've really talked to the guy
>>69689979
No. He's asking the courts to lift it in 2 weeks. Did you read the article?
>>69685813
It's because Trump has been saying the same shit for his whole campaign, just with some minor changes or flipflops over time.
Meanwhile, Cruz/Kasich/Rubio/etc have all completely pulled 180s on various major issues based on what their campaigns have predicted will work, and have rewritten major policy ideas to essentially parrot Trump. Hillary has no "base" policy, and what she supports literally changes on a minute-to-minute basis depending on what people around her want to hear. Bernie has just been on a downward spiral into insanity.
>>69685555
another anti-trump get?
such coincidence.
>>69690803
Okay, I believe you. What has he said to you so far?
>>69685555
>4 bankruptcies
He has DOZENS of businesses
8 out of 10 businesses fail in the first year
I'd say that's bretty gud, well above average
>>69691099
Well, more than dozens actually. But that's not important right now
I'm interested in what's going on with this anon >>69690803
>>69690812
I'll ask the questions around here, pal.
The information will automatically be released in 2 weeks regardless of the courts decision correct?
Also, what article?
>>69690834
> minor changes or flip flops over time
Ohboy.mobi
Nov cant get here soon enough that buttpain is gonna be to good on here after trump get btfo
>>69691006
Well not much more than what's released now. I broke some of the information on my Twitter after a personal conversation with him.
I can tell you it seems this information relates to Ted Cruz but he gave no such indication. He confirmed to me he has not leaked the information to that XtotheY account. He also is not tech savvy so I highly doubt it's on any personal account of his and it's more likely just a delayed email. Unless there's a way to hack Google (I think his address is publicly available which is why I say Google) then I doubt the list would be reachable.
I've learned from his former associates that he was fired during the case against the DC Madam. Some of the phone records are available, but he was part of the firm that received the restraining order by Verizon Wireless. The information, that I believe can only possible reference Bernie Sanders or Ted Cruz, would be on that list of 815 names.
A paralegal said he was bluffing but the guy also called me a cunt and bitch for voting Trump, so I don't think he's reliable. That paralegal (who worked with Sibley in 2007~) is voting for Sanders.
>>69681846
See, straight from a court document...
January 2016 - Sibley comes to believe that information contained in the
sealed-from-the-public Verizon Wireless records directly, and
upon crowd-sourced analysis would, contain information
relevant to the upcoming Presidential election. Given Sibley's
First Amendment right and duty to publish matters of public
concern singularly in his possession, Sibley determined to
exercise his right to engage in a free discussion of the
importance of the Verison Wireless records upon public events and public measures, thus discharging his right and duty to
bring the government and any person in authority to the bar of
public opinion for just criticism upon their conduct in the
exercise of the authority which the people have conferred – and
are preparing to confer – upon them.
He goes from needing to crowd-source a search because it may have implications to it has implications.
Also, dude tried a GoFundMe for $25,000 for court costs, paper filing, and legal fees. I'm as excited as anyone for whoever is guilty to be exposed, but we still may be better served matching the pictures with three other to women.
>>69685555
Uhhuh.
What else?
here's that conversation from the paralegal (not the one where he called me a cunt/bitch but the one where he says Sibley is bluffing)
>>69691268
This article: http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-31/dc-madams-attorney-says-election-bombshell-already-online
OP must've forgot to link it.
And it's not a guarantee that the info comes out in two weeks. The courts could agree to lift the gag order and then delay the process until well after the election.
>>69691377
>A paralegal said he was bluffing but the guy also called me a cunt and bitch for voting Trump, so I don't think he's reliable.
Lol well thanks for doing all that. I'm not tech savvy enough to know whether or not we would actually be able to access that info, but /g/ seemed to have been getting somewhere. Maybe you can make more of their progress than I've been able to >>>/g/53820231
What do you think?
>>69691963
here's what the guy called me a cunt over lol.. he seems less trustworthy than Sibley
I'll look into /g/. I studied Computer Engineering and am familiar with this case so maybe I can help
>>69690133
^She's legit and has been on top of this.
Ask him if he has already, positively identified the individual(s) that will be affected by the release. Does he know for certain who they are, in other words.
>>69692146
You know hes bullshitting you right cleetus?
>>69692146
I already asked him. He said he realized it in January (I think?) and that the courts have been tossing his cases which is why he's at the supreme court now. There's an exact timeline in his application to SCOTUS
It seems that the information would confirm one of the Presidential candidates as having contacted Palfrey's escort service, but it would be up to the public as to whether or not it was the candidate themselves or if there were actual scheduled sexings (ie callbacks)
If this related to Cruz, who Sibley has written birther arguments against in the past, then it would corroborate the National Enquirer story in which he had slept with a hooker.
>>69692557
alright m8 https://twitter.com/Cronikeys/status/713495197464678400
>>69691290
It makes me happy that you'll get to suffer from now until November, as you see your establishment favorite collapse. And you're the delusional one if you think that Trump won't get the nomination. I'd love to see anyone try to compare Trump's platform changes to those of the other candidates. You're a worthless shill so I won't bother arguing with you.
>>69691963
>delay the process.
Sibley has insisted on a speedy hearing or he would put the information out anyway. That's how it's beeing reported in the MSN anyway.
let's get to the bottom of this and ignore any derailings from the shills
Pic related-your average autistic shill,filter and ignore
>>69692702
Is there any chance that he'll actually release those records in 2 weeks, or do you think the courts will try to delay it?
Also I'm pretty sure that other guy is a shill, just ignore him
I'm on the email list.
I'll deliver here before picking up the pen.
>>69693141
Well that's good then! I guess that's what I get for spending so much time in 4chan yesterday
>>69673828
SHE WAS MURDERED!
>>69673828
So have these details been passed on to Trump?
>>69693340
What's your connection? Are you in news industry?
Post titties, Robert
>>69692702
When you talk next, you could also ask him if any of the people affected are foreign born nationals. :)
>>69695449
Lol this
>>69694892
Negative.
>>69695692
But there's not really anything to pass on yet, either. Unless /g/ comes through with something, we might just have to wait 2 weeks
>>69695692
>>69695858
Worth doing?
>>69685555
It was a fucking steak company.
>FUCKING STEAKS.
>>69695449
I asked him as many indirect questions as I could and he said he couldn't give any hints about who the information relates to or it would be in violation of the current restraining order. I even posed hypothetical scenarios where anonymous hacked him
>Best lead so far
Best lead so far
>Best lead so far
Best lead so far
>Best link we have is a call from Harris County number (where Cruz lived and worked) 2 days before Heidi was arrested.
Still no way to get back to the number's owner though
>>69696239
>Best lead so far
Best lead so far
>Best lead so far
Best lead so far
Correction, not arrested, but a police report filed
>>69695911
Well, I don't think it is, yet. I mean, all we could really say is that this scandal involves someone who's currently running for president. There isn't a whole lot he can do to spin that in his favor, or make it hurt anyone else, it's too vague. We really need to either keep looking for a way to get at those files, or just sit tight for the next 2 weeks.
>>69689514
>Who cares about chain of custody. The damage it would do to whoever is on the lists' reputation
You completely missed the entire point I made about us ruining the evidence's CREDIBILITY by giving the media the ability to say "it's a fake made up by anonmoose", which they'll do instantly if we break the chain of custody. If we leak it first, we won't be ALLOWED to prove where it came from, because anything anon produces is automagically a "lie"; if we leak it, they get to write a story casting doubt on its origins, then we STILL have to wait for the lawyer to leak it. The only possible good that can come from that would be that we gave the lawyer some breathing room, because then he could say the information was stolen, and de can't get hammered for violating the court's gag order. I thought about that at first, and it's why I won't condemn anyone outright, but it also occurs to me that maybe it's best for the lawyer to do this on his own, since his life is probably at stake.
We're good for trending things, for protesting, for making a lot of chaos and noise; we're not good for delicate operations. That what we do in small groups or individually when we recognize the need; we break away and do whats necessary alone. As a group, we're a plague swarm, not a scalpel.
>>69681126
if it's Cruz it matters, he's a moral crusader and revealing him as a hypocrite will end him.
>>69696239
The Sibley information is from Verizon Wireless
>>69691099
He actually almost ended up filing for personal bankruptcy in the 90s.
The banks saw this as a bad thing though, because they wouldn't get any of their money back if he went bankrupt. They re-financed his loans and he made hundreds of millions of dollars in the process.
He actually has been known to do this a lot, so none of the big banks in the USA will have anything to do with him.
>>69696880
I know, but I still think he's connecTED
>>69691377
>He also is not tech savvy
Did he say that? /g/ found this in an earlier thread: http://www.civilforfeiture.com/blog/pcmag.pdf
>>69696307
oh my
Reminder that /pol/ is currently being invaded full scale. Stay strong out there. We will prevail.
>>69691586
Holy fuck, this guy is embarrassingly full of shit. Why would he, a fucking intern, be entrusted with documents potentially involving hundreds of congressmen in a sex scandal? Then he tells everyone to buy his book? What a fucking joke. What made you talk to him in the first place?
What the fuck, gang? Where'd everyone go?
>>69692969
>he would put the information out anyway
is this true?
i thought this was the entire reason this was interesting. some other anon said it's not a sure thing that the info will be released though.
Lot of people still here, still watching, still searching.
>>69693340
If true be prepared to go rogue and release the story anyways, CRUZ MUST FALL
>>69699759
Good, making sure.
>>69692116
>>69691586
I don't know if you're looking at this guy's twitter but some of the things he's saying/implying contradict what he told you in that little interview he gave you. He's saying he has no idea if Sibley is bluffing now. Also, he's saying he was interviewed by gawker, but I can't seem to find an article about the DC Madam thing from them that isn't 3 days old. Still think he's full of shit. He also spelled the name of his book wrong in his Twitter bio. Not relevant, but kind of fun.
![1024x1024[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/4n3dTNd.jpg "1024x1024[1].jpg")
>DC Madame
She was a qt in her younger days
Update from /g/
>http://pastebin.com/SFDhJJ1v
you have 10 minutes to self-destruct
>>69696072
How/Why did you get in contact with him? Do you think he intends/hopes for someone to find the info?
>>69700320
What is this?
>>69697029
>out jewed all the jews
>waaahh the poor jews lost money
boo fucking hoo
>>69700320
My phone has cancer now. Am I hoping to prison for opening this?
>>69700847
>>69701081
literally nothing
>>69701290
Where's the proof for the Canadian gangster thing? I don't remember seeing that
>>69699998
So fucking close.
>>69701477
probably the op that made the thread
got slid hard, thought it would be relevant here
>>69701707
I've read the article and the OP.
Unless it's an Allusion to where Cruz is born I'm not making the connection
Single malts and absolute mixed is a terrible idea
>>69673828
I was reading this as the DC MADMAN... I was reading the thread thinking
"Why the fuck is nobody bringing up this madman???"
>>69691586
Another thing I'm wondering, why did he say he wouldn't release the records if he actually has them. If he's already used some of the information from them in his book, and he isn't beholden to a gag order, what's stopping him?
>>69705585
>>69691586
It actually seems pretty dangerous to broadcast to the entire world that you have these documents and there's nothing keeping you from disappearing, like Sibley's dead man switch.
>>69697029
source?
>>69697029
>4 of his businesses went bankrupt out of how many?
>wait, those 4 were only casinos in a casino crash?
>a casino crash that affected everyone in the region
>wait, a 4.5% failure rate when the average is 50%?
>wait, the businesses recovered too!
>>69706953
This. Can we stop with the Trump is a failed businessman meme?
>>69696307
I don't see how the redacted stuff could damage Cruz. Do we have a second page?
Bumping this shit.
Stop the sliding.
Holy shit
>>69707796
No, they'll never stop. Just make summary image macros with sources and spam them instead of arguing. Pic related.
3 months ago the board was non-stop shilling in favor of immigration. We got tired of arguing, so we made macros containing all the arguments, rebuttals, and sources. Suddenly, the shills stopped posting about it. The fact that I mentions this means you'll see at least one shill thread on the topic in the next 72 hours. That's how shills work. They have kind of algorithm that governs what they talk about and when.
>http://www.insanemedia.net/forum-shill-gets-busted-ats-and-glp-censor-n-7015a/2924
Evening /pol/,
How rampant are the shills today?
For Great Justice
Ok I'm finally reporting it this time. Quit posting these threads. The only information we have is that there are numbers tied to TX but there are many politicians from that state.
I'm all a border the Trump TRAIN but I'm afraid we're wasting valuable time and resources on this instead of getting ready for the WI primary.
We must make more memes for kek
If Kek wills that the truth come out about this, then so be it, but forget about it until then.
>>69712877
BTFO SHILL
>>69712877
>look ma,I posted it again!
>>69697808
He didn't say that but he had that AOL feeling to him. You know the one.
>>69698662
One of the reporters on this case directed me to him.
>>69700560
I was curious and want Trump to win. I was the first to find the connection between the lawyer and #OpCruz, so I jumped on it and gave him a call.
>>69705733
It seems like some of the lists are out there but this Verizon Wireless one with 815 names isn't and it's the one that implicates one of the candidates. Sibley's given barely any hints as to which candidate it could refer to, so I don't think this is politically motivated or a bluff.
>>69700320
>http://pastebin.com/SFDhJJ1v
WTF the page has been removed what was this?
Can anybody post it again?
>>69709068
So the prostitute in this image is probably someone from the DC Madam's ring, right? Do we have a list of prostitute identities to check?
