What would you consider/call/classify me as /pol/? Here are my political beliefs.
>social darwinism and spencerism are correct
>all forms of welfare should be abolished
>the economy should be as free as possible but the government should be able to raise tariffs and the like against tibial countries on a case by case basis
>government in practice should be as small as possible but should have totalitarian capability/power
>egalitarianism is a lie
>burn the gays
>ban all industries that degenerate the culture such as smoking
>anti laicism
>pro guns
>man shouldn't have to right to breed with whom he chooses nor to abort the government should be the ones deciding these via science in order to create the best stock of humans possible
>anti all forms of immigration
>completely close the borders to outsiders and try to eventually establish autarky
>autocracy is superior to democracy in all of its forms
>anti drugs for recreational use
>pro all drugs to boost worker efficiency
>anti-environmentalism in all forms
>completely nationalist
>destroy all subcultures and countercultures so that only one culture the national identity remains
>woman should only be allowed a certain range of jobs and should only be respected as mothers and nothing else
>pragmatism and traditionalism are more important than idealism
>collectivism is always superior to individualism
>ideally all races within a nation should be homogenous both racially and religiously
why do you need me to classify you? do you want me to pat your head? maybe let you taste my cock? do you want a new daddy, boy?
>the economy should be as free as possible but the government should be able to raise tariffs and the like against rival countries on a case by case basis
Fix'd
>>69279127
i'm literally hitler according to that picture
>>69279189
I think you have too much homosexuality on your mind friend.
>>69279127
Stalin? no.
How the fuck is Friedman center on anything. Stupid compass.
>>69279189
This desu
It's childish and gay to classify yourself
Also I ain't reading all that shit
I don't care about you enough for that
>>69279127
That graph is absolute shit. Free market should be far right economic and corperatism should be in the middle.
>>69279373
How so? I am against all forms of socialism and communism.
>>69279127
>Amish
>leftwing
who put this shitty jpg together?
>>69279127
>>man shouldn't have to right to breed with whom he chooses
OP these beliefs are dumber than a masters in womens studies. Go kill yourself.
>>69279922
I disagree with the government forcing every marriage on a genetic basis but I agree that arranged marriage is superior and romance is cancer and led directly to the downfall of the west
but industrialism and corporatism played a big part as well so I don't agree with OP on other issues
>>69279127
Who the fuck made that image? Laissez Faire capitalism is in the center? What the fuck?
>>69279762
Picked it out as a random image, here's what it links to.
http://www.rationalrevolution.net/articles/redefining_the_political_spectru.htm
>>69279922
He should not, the best genes should be bred to create the best stock.
Sterilize those that would degenerate the nation's gene pool.
>>69280154
and you're perfect? or would you be weeded out in your own ideal world?
>>69280078
I wouldn't be completely opposed to corporate welfare depending on certain circumstances.
In any case yes arranged marriage is superior to the romantic method.
>>69280048
Why exactly?
also
>>unrestricted corporate power and anti environmental conservation
>>good genetics
pick one. Enjoy killing the majority of the population because they're damaged by pollutants and plastics
>>69280244
Most likely weeded out as would a signification portion of the population.
Of course this is my perfect ideal world, such things aren't very pragmatic.
>>69280420
I agree but I think the parents and/or religious institutions should be the ones to make matches, not the government.
Government should just abolish public high school and companies bias hiring toward those who marry young.
>>69280449
Again, if the majority have to die for the sake of humanity and our specific nation in the long run I see no problem in this.
>>69280560
Honestly I think the government should cut the vast majority of the public sector and semi-privatize the rest even further.
So no classifications of any type?
>>69279127
>implying most political terminology isn't vague and useless
You're some kind of right wing nationalist or fascist with eugenics thrown in. Don't overthink it.
>>69281898
I don't believe fascism is this economically right wing usually, besides that I can identity as fascist.
>>69279127
Hitler is politically closest to the Pope.
Wew lad.
