https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVqO3r3ugVo
ITS OVER THE GREATEST INTELLECTUAL OF OUR TIME DESTROYED HIM KEK
Global warming is a question of perspective, really.
>>69227631
Chomsky....the go to "intellect" of al queda and the talliban
Top kek m8
> MUH WARMING!!!
Because Hillary would totally throw Wall Street under the bus to help save the planet
The reality is that without a major population culling, there will be no solution to global warming. This is an economic arms race that cannot be stopped. No nation will willingly hobble themselves to save the planet
Death and pain incoming.
It will destroy the 3rd world. We will survive
>>69227631
Yeah, the world's greatest English teacher again making a fool of himself by trying to sound intelligent while speaking about things he knows nothing about. He has less knowledge of economics than s student who took Economics 101 in a community college. Just another empty headed liberal buffoon who is taken seriously only by people with single digit IQs.
> Finnish philosopher says oppressive and brutal government should exert “tireless control of citizens” in shocking insight into threat of eco-fascism movement – Linkola openly calls for Nazi-style mass extermination policies to “kill defectives”
Ecofashy dictatorship when??
>Linkola calls for forced abortions, while also adding that another world war would be “a happy occasion for the planet” because it would eradicate tens of millions of people. The environmentalist believes that only jackbooted tyranny can help to save mother earth from “the worst ideologies in the world” which he defines as “growth and freedom”.
>“Who misses all those who died in the Second World War? Who misses the twenty million executed by Stalin? Who misses Hitler’s six million Jews?” asks Linkola.
>“What to do, when a ship carrying a hundred passengers suddenly capsizes and only one lifeboat? When the lifeboat is full, those who hate life will try to load it with more people and sink the lot. Those who love and respect life will take the ship’s axe and sever the extra hands that cling to the sides of the boat.”
>>69227631
>GREATEST INTELLECTUAL OF OUR TIME
He's a fucking socialist leaning anarchist linguistics professor that spends his time crying about American imperialism and propaganda. Hugo Chavez was a big fan of his, like all other commies. Chomsky belongs in a ditch somewhere. If you take any of his so called intellectualism as anything other than Marxist propaganda I just feel sorry for you.
>>69228331
liberals truly are mentally ill
>>69228552
Sounds like any linguistics professor or teacher, allways injecting his political believes and making his classes not about the subject he is supossed to talk about but some marxist propaganda class or something.
>>69228552
Pretty much this.
It's nuts that people take him seriously, if a species of frog becomes extinct he'll somehow blame it on the USA.
>>69227631
The fuck is this shit?
>Start video
>starts going on about global warming and states incorrect information as fact
>Keeps banging on about it despite the initial false premise for several more minutes
>finally gets onto policy - torture, the wall, halting muslim immigration etc
>His answer is "that's frightening". Really pushing the boat out there Noam...
>talks about how America is the biggest threat to world peace at the moment. Might be true, but that's got nothing to do with Trump.
>The dispossessed are rallying behind Trump. Sly Hitler reference made.
>Having a "wildcard" in the whitehouse (aka someone who doesn't toe one of the two party lines) is again "frightening". No real arguments brought, just appeals to emotion.
>He's better than Cruz at least (Ted on suicide watch).
What is this weaksauce shit? Isn't this man supposed to be a respected intellectual?
Shouldn't he be talking about evil Americans killing Central American priests or some other Obama tier retardation.
>>69228648
> liberals
Linkola is the opposite of liberal, Achmed
>>69229025
the liberals worship this guy
doesnt matter what he says, they always flock around him and scream about how smart he is
>>69229292
from those quotes it sounds like he's a mega-liberal
>>69229363
"liberal" maybe, but only in name.
>>69227631
>THE GREATEST INTELLECTUAL OF OUR TIME DESTROYED
But that's not Jaden Smith
>>69229907
What?
>>69229966
What Americans call liberals (the name means freedom), are in actual fact not very liberal at all these days.
Is he related to Las Vegas Intellectual Chumlee?
Didnt chomsky die, like 5 years ago
>>69230165
His wife did, in 2008.
>>69230165
>>69230230
Apparently there was a hoax about it.
http://en.mediamass.net/people/noam-chomsky/deathhoax.html
>>69227631
>taking an anarchist's opinion on politics seriously
>>69229025
Literally nothing chomsky said is untrue.
Chomsky is the ultimate red pill. Notice how he sidesteps the Trump question initially (because he is just like all the other candidates) and mentions the lack of US cooperation on Global Warming agreements, since the US is one of the top polluters.
>Global Warming
case closed, even if it doesn't do anything bad in the short term, pollution, species destruction and deforestation is generational genocide.
>Immigration from South America
due to US policies from the 60s and 70s of destabilizing governments, generations grew up with poverty and corrupt dictators.
>Global opinion about America threat to world piece
They have the most nukes and are constantly in war, not particularly shocking.
>Trump as Hitler or Nuclear Destroyer
could happen, he seems to be a bit of a wild guy
>Ted Cruz MORE dangerous
obviously, Cruz is a corrupt rat
>>69230377
>this
Chomsky speaks the truth, but back in the real world, politicians do the dirty and people are cucked by propaganda. There are powerful rich people in control, and they stay in control by closely monitoring the opinion of the poor unwashed masses of gibbering idiots who might accidentally revolution.
>>69230640
Yes it is. He said the earth is now warmer than at any point in history. That is not correct.
>>69227631
>Ted Cruz even more dangerous
top kek
Ted Cruz would do anything for money, even ban bank regulators.
It's really that Americans want Trump because he promises to get rid of Latin plague, even if i doubt he will do it. There's really nobody else who wants to even talk about it, USA is liberal through and through, every republican is, some of them are Latino themselves.
>>69230640
You're right, earth was way hotter on the great bombardment.
>>69230377
>is a great idea
>>69230682
based post
Chomsky is the gatekeeper for left wing faggots.
>>69230682
He's a gatekeeper, he never names names, he never talks about rothchilds or the federal reserve. It's always just "rich evil white corporations"
>>69227631
>chompski
>BTFO
Pick one
Jews gonna Jew.
>>69229966
>>69230113
american use of the word liberal is an obscene perversion of the actual definition
>>69227631
>intellectual stumps trump
>liberal journalist stumps trump
>millennial poc stumps trump
>established politician stumps trump
>biased media outlet stumps trump
>foreign comedian stumps trump
Find a white, middle class, blue collar patriot to stump trump, and maybe I'll listen.
The only one who can stump trump is trump himself.
A Communist pro radical Islam Jew doesn't like Trump? How can this be?
>>69230793
[CITATION NEEDED]
>>69231186
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SewlKDMFR4
(Mentions Trilateral Commission long before the tinfoil hatters caught on)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9Z05xyGB0c
(Mentions that Left, Right paradigm is just a ruse to control people)
This is the 80s, but nobody was paying attention. He's probably only alive because of how boring his delivery is and how little influence his views have on the American public.
Remember Chomsky co-wrote Manufacturing Consent, which really dropped pants of the entire American propaganda system.
>Noah Chomsky
>THE HUMAN SPECIES IS IN TROUBLE IF TRUMP BECOMES PRESIDENT!
OP is a massive faggot, what a coincidence.
>>69230682
>Cruz is a corrupt rat
>Not the man who has ties to the mafia, who has admitted to bribery, who is serial philanderer, who is being sued for defrauding people with a fake real estate "university"
>>69230640
You honestly believe the globe is warming? You are stupid.
>>69231773
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_Warm_Period
It used to be warm enough to grow grapes in Scotland.
The "hockey stick" graph that global warming is based off of erases both the medieval warm period and the little ice age. It's complete trash and not surprisingly continues to be unable to make accurate predictions.
>>69231773
>I didn't watch the video
>"The warming of the planet...is at a level...1000 times as high in history that can be checked...nothing remotely like it
You're welcome.
>>69231804
The "tinfiol hatters" have been talking about this since the 50s. He never talks about this today, all he talks about is wahh wahh they are too rich and we are too poor this is unjust
>>69231913
>actual corruption
http://dcwhispers.com/busted-ted-cruz-super-pac-address-fiorina-campaign/
>speculation about corruption because he is rich and an easy target.
Go on.
>>69227631
If you are not with trump you are probably with satan
>Chomsky
>>69227631
>OP lays shitty bait
>doesn't post in the thread again
EVERY TIME
>>69227631
He is lying otherwise the dutch have drown first
>>69231773
Does it hurt? Being that stupid?
Liberalism truly is a disease, if I were president, I would seriously consider purging them.
>>69227631
>Chomsky
>Greatest intellectual
Mfw cucks like these post this shit yet offer no arguments to their assertions because they know they are wrong
>>69229025
first 3 points sound like people who call Trump a racist
Noam Chomsky should be jailed for denying the cambodian genocide.
>>69228015
>being this blue pilled
>chimpsky
>>69228552
I feel sorry for you that reality has a marxist bias
>>69232736
>reality has a marxist bias
So long as you never try to implement it. Then that particular attempt "wasn't real marxism" when it shits the bed and explodes...
>>69232607
[CITATION NEEDED]
>chumpsky
>a jew
>a liberal
>>69227631
>"Greatest intellectual of our time"
>not Bjarne Stroustrup
Nice try you English major.
>>69227631
Why do old liberals always have retarded hair?
>>69232207
>>69232002
We're not talking about the hockey stick. There is a consensus that anthropogenic climate change is real and has cause vast change to several of the earths ecosystems.
>Go to website
>Literally nothing but speculation about corruption corroborated by information from the national enquirer.
This bait senpai?
>Listening to a man whose first name is "Noam"
>>69232607
>>69232857
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8mP2jN6bJI
He doesn't deny it, but he definitely likes to contrast it with East Timor. He has a clear bias because he wants to attack US Foreign Policy, since he is American.
>>69233110
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/07/31/why-did-a-ted-cruz-super-pac-donate-to-carly-fiorina/?postshare=9641458877974512&tid=ss_tw-bottom
>>69232915
this. Guy is a memer. A figurehead. Almost all people, who act as prophets and try to give advice on fucking everything like ancient sages because they are "scientists" are overblown assholes and posers.
>>69233110
>There is a consensus that anthropogenic climate change is real and has cause vast change to several of the earths ecosystems.
Consensus is not a valid word in science. Just because everyone believes something does not make it true.
>Go to website
>Literally nothing but speculation about corruption corroborated by information from the national enquirer.
>This bait senpai?
That wiki article I linked to you references scientific journals. I'm not your average retard and I get the feeling that a serious discussion about this is far out of your league.
>>69232512
>Does it hurt? Being that stupid?
I could ask you the same question. I'm not a liberal
>>69233320
>He has a clear bias because he wants to attack US Foreign Policy, since he is a filthy kike and a literal communist.
He also tried to deny the cultural revolution and great leap forward for reasons of "spontaneous democratic participation."
Citation: Firing Line with William F. Buckley Jr.
>>69233320
I never said there wasn't any money exchanged. It's the purpose and intent that is under speculation.
>>69233677
The green text was meant for>>69233320 and was concerning corruption.
In any case there is no substantive evidence that disproves anthropogentric climate change
>>69227631
>american intellectuals
>>69234859
>In any case there is no substantive evidence that disproves anthropogentric climate change
That's not how things work m80. You prove a hypothesis, it doesn't stand until disproven.
I have already blown a hole in their hypothesis with my link to the medieval warm period. That shows that the climate was much warmer than it is now in a time with no industrialisation at all, disproving their assertion that the climate is now much warmer than it has ever been in history as a result of human release of carbon dioxide.
Their comeback to this is that the MWP was isolated to Europe and not a global phenomenon, however this has been shown to be false as evidence for it has been found in places such as China, New Zealand and Chile.
Also the models based on the theory that exponential rise in CO2 release means a similar rise in temperature have not produced accurate results. Global temperatures have not risen in almost 2 decades now, despite still ever increasing carbon dioxide levels.
>>69227631
All political/philosophical discussions aside. Does this man cut his own hair?
>Oh shit, the linguists have figured out I was full of shit all along
>Better go fuck up another field of study
>>69227631
Know why I love Noam?
here's why
>He makes millions as a contractor to the United States Army
>His millions are heavily invested in pharmaceuticals, oil, mining, and military contracting firms
>His tax attorneys (plural) manage his irrevocable trust that owns the copyrights to his books so that he PAYS NO TAXES on his book and speaking income and is shielded from all estate taxes
>he charges universities $50,000 to tell freshmen that "Capitalism is Evil"
I mean, he's fucking BOLD!!
>>69233155
This
>>69227631
>THE GREATEST INTELLECTUAL OF OUR TIME
Then why is his universal grammar hypothesis wrong?
>>69236729
It's hilarious how it's just been picked apart piece by piece every since it was introduced, and yet somehow people think this guy is qualified to weigh in on completely unrelated subjects.
>>69233677
It isn't just any consensus though. Its a consensus by people who actually spend their lives studying the climate.
These people know more about the climate than any of us, and it just makes sense that people who study the subject would be more likely to get it right than the people who haven't studied it at all.
>>69236918
>>69236729
How has it been debunked? Im genuinely curious as Chomsky disgusts me and I always hear of Universal Grammar when people defend this rat-faced kike enabler
>>69238001
>It isn't just any consensus though. Its a consensus by people who actually spend their lives studying the climate.
Still not valid and merely an appeal to authority mixed in with an appeal to popularity. All it takes is one person with one piece of evidence to bring down the whole shooting match. He doesn't even need a piece of paper with his name on it to do this.
>anti-imperialist complaining about the candidate whose vehemently against foreign interference and nation-building
>>69238001
That's the most retarded attempt at an argument I've seen all month and I study English literature at a British University
>>69227631
Chomsky
>INTELLECTUAL
>>69235534
During the medieval warming period, there were also other areas that are cooler than today, like the tropical pacific that averages out all the warm areas.
In the end, the medieval warming period doesn't show that global temperatures are hotter than today. In fact, there is evidence that shows temperatures in the Northern hemisphere, where the warming was most visible in the medieval warming period, to be higher today.
The medieval warming period is no where near as warm as it is now.
>>69239412
>In fact, there is evidence that shows temperatures in the Northern hemisphere, where the warming was most visible in the medieval warming period, to be higher today.
>The medieval warming period is no where near as warm as it is now.
Bullshit. As I stated earlier, you used to be able to grow grapes in Scotland. You can't now because it's too cold. Greenland actually used to be green when the Vikings first colonised it.
>>69238462
I don't think you understand what an appeal to authority or popularity is.
All I'm just saying is that it is more reasonable to believe someone who spent their lives studying the subject than some random guy on an internet forum.
The better alternative would be to spend thousands of hours reading research papers, but nobody wants to do that.
>>69238461
He thinks that a specific innate part of the brain is solely responsible for language acquisition.
After extensive empirical research, it turns out that there is no such thing as a universal grammar. A UG implies that the grammar of every language in the world is kind of similar. There is no such system. Instead, babies use their ability to detect patterns in a language to acquire that language. It's something in between innate and blank slate.
>>69228015
Why do people claim he supports them? He never did.
>>69228076
Nice memes
>>69239911
A doctor of physics' opinion does have more weight than some random member of the public's on physics, but it is still fallacious to say that because he believes it it is therefore true, and the same goes for if a load of physicists believe it.
A hypothesis sands or falls on the evidence, not the qualifications of the person presenting it.
>>69227631
he looks like an old granny
>>69228552
>not believing that the U.S. was imperialist in the 20th century
Also, fans do not the figure make. Stalin loved John Wayne, but nobody associates the two.
>>69239735
explain this shit then, slimy limey
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/service/global/map-percentile-mntp/201501-201512.gif
>>69239735
http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v6/n5/abs/ngeo1797.html
There's a graph for the Northern Hemisphere with temperature reconstructions.
There is zero evidence showing that global temperatures are warmer during the medieval warming than they are today.
Keep in mind that the medieval warming period was also period of higher and solar and volcanic activity. Scientists cannot attribute these same causes to today's warming.
>>69227631
>global warming
Australia is cancer
>>69228648
1. Look up "liberalism" in a dictionary.
2. Stop making ridiculous false classifications.
>political ideologies can be mental illnesses
3. Brezhnev pls go
>>69227631
How has this intellect not heard of hair cuts?
Literally bozo the clown mode
>>69228861
All evidence points to the opposite. He keeps politics far away from the classroom.
>>69227631
Not sure Trump can recover from this tbqh.
Chomsky is literally a communist.
But he does start of with a solid point. There is absolutely no reason to believe anything Trump says.
1. First of all no opinion of his is solid. He contradicts himself constantly.
2. Secondly unlike any other candidate he doesn't have any track record. We know Hillary's alliances and Cruz's alliances but not Trump's.
Plenty of it is true but thinking Trump would push the button is naive.
Trump is a rich guy with a huge ego. He's not some crusader or a madman.
I'd say he's the least dangerous candidate in this regard.
>>69231514
Yes, but Americans are the intellectual trash-heap of the "civilized" world. If a word contains more than two syllables, they won't understand it, and if a sentence does not contain the work "fuck" at least once, they won't even listen to it. You really should get the queen to do something about this.
>>69229168
Obama hasn't said much about US wrongs in Central America. Hardly anyone talks about the right wing killings of thousands of people (including Americans) in Central America.
>>69240390
Pic related. As you can see the temperature rises up until roughly the year 2000, then flattens out.
If global warming theory is to be believes, that graph should be exponential. They have chosen where to clip their data in order to produce the scariest possible result (directly after the last plateau).
>>69229307
Most liberals here don't support anarchism or his degree of libertarian socialism. American "liberals" are often on the center right.
scientist say even if man made global warming exists there isn't anything we could do to fix it. It's really just an excuse for Malthusian practices.
>>69240441
>Scientists cannot attribute these same causes to today's warming.
About that...
Pic related is a graph of sunspots over time. Notice how well they fit the temperature graph here >>69240862
>>69230682
Shhh, no truth allowed.
>>69228552
>Hugo Chavez was a big fan of his
The feeling was mutual; Chomsky was a big fan of Chavez.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fO1JkjbzvPw
Hilarious because of the similarity of "Chavismo" to Trump's populist rise. If Trump wasn't rich via industrialism I'm guessing Chomsky would love him - he wants free healthcare for all, wants to shrink NATO / stop our imperialism, is against free trade agreements, etc.
>>69240264
> but it is still fallacious to say that because he believes it it is therefore true
That's not what I'm saying. All I'm saying is that experts or scientists tend to be more right about the subject they are studying then some random guy. Its really just common sense. If you disagree with the scientists, you could also become one yourself and write research papers disproving their claims.
Nobody is saying that an expert believes it, therefore it must be true.
>>69240862
That graph is using false data. 2015 was the hottest year on record.
>>69230315
What a shame
>>69231593
He's not a communist or supporter of radical Islam. Get your head out of your ass.
>>69241056
That's funny seeing as it's using the Met Office's data...
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcrut4/
>>69230682
>species destruction and deforestation is generational genocide.
then we need to build wall, because letting low carbon people in here is most assuredly going to make even more high carbon people
>due to US policies from the 60s and 70s of destabilizing governments, generations grew up with poverty and corrupt dictators.
musta forgot there was another superpower in those days? commies backed even more bullshit than the us
>They have the most nukes and are constantly in war, not particularly shocking.
trump was against the iraq war dum dum
>>69230682
Notice how Trump is the only candidate that says that even if Global warming is man-made, it can't be stopped with China pollution?
Oh wait...
>flag
>>69232512
Pinochet pls go
>>69240990
most reddit comment of the day here
upboated
>>69241253
>pinoichets death toll
>any leftist analogues death toll
lol
No one is found anything about global warming. No one is found anything about the giant continent of plastic in the middle if the ocean that's actually dissolving and becoming part of the water, nothing's being done about all the chemicals and make up and washes we flush or wash down the showers and sinks. No one is doing anything to get China to straighten up their environmentally toxic factories. Nothing happened when Japan's power plant blew up.
Flint Michigan residents are fucked for decades to come.
Can we please stop acting like we care about the environment?
>were at the same level of extinction as earth was 65 million years ago when an asteroid hit earth
Is there anyone who takes this fucking guy seriously? There's usually a mass extinction every 200 - 400 thousand years, usually caused by a super volcano. The Toba eruption 75 thousand years ago wiped out millions of species and almost wiped out early humans.
How can anyone with any knowledge of evolutionary biology or volcanology sit back and let this man outright lie about something thousands of people study for their entire lives?
>>69241160
>slimy limey
>>69240988
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009JGRD..11414101B
>"is 7 ± 1% for the 20th century and is negligible for warming since 1980."
http://www.pnas.org/content/104/10/3713.full
>"Although solar and volcanic effects appear to dominate most of the slow climate variations within the past thousand years, the impacts of greenhouse gases have dominated since the second half of the last century."
>>69227631
Chomsky is the ultimate gatekeeper, hoard the red pills away from the people.
>>69235046
>Indian toilets
>>69227631
"Trump's main competitor Ted Cruz would be more dangerous." - Noam Chomsky
Chomsky has spent years decrying the shit the US does south of the border. Maybe that stuff should have been decried, but guilty or not, I certainly do not think the US should accept the consequences as a form of justice.
Rather the US should make those we have inflicted damage on eat that damage with no recompense.
>>69241423
See how the line becomes dotted at the end there?
That means it's a "prediction", not hard data.
>>69232607
He's addressed that several times. Decades ago, he pointed out that some newspapers misquoted some primary sources and grossly exaggerated the numbers. Ever since then, right wing nutcases have screamed about how he supposedly supports Pol Pot.
>>69232838
Epic strawman meme
>>69234620
He kicked Buckley's ass in debate at least once.
>>69241598
>He expected me to treat "reality has a marxist bias" as something other than the bullshit that it is
>>69239735
Sorry, but you're wrong. Climate fluctuates, but right now we are in an unprecedented warming period that can't be explained by anything other than the greenhouse effect. It is faster than any period in recorded history and it is warmer than any period in recorded history, and it's getting faster and warmer every year.
>>69236729
He's written 100+ books. I doubt everything in them is debunked. Besides, linguistics has changed changed a lot since he first posited some theories.
>>69240381
except they were actually buddies
>>69236157
Proof?
>>69241849
No source, different color lines that have no identification, that black line that appears out of nowhere around 1850 and is an enormous outlier at 2004. Here's a (You) for trying.
>>69241757
>>69241552
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/time-series/global/globe/land_ocean/3/2/1880-2015
except that prediction turned out to be fairly accurate and the temperature anomaly continues to increase, peaking with 2015 being the hottest year on record
>Trumplets in damage control
>Trumplets think memes are facts
>Trumplets think Trump is a good candidate
LOL
I have no issue if he gets elected or not, but don't try to make him as a some sort of genius. He's a dumb faggot.
>>69241849
I don't know if anthropogenic climate change is real, but it absolutely does not matter. The human race is incapable of doing anything meaningful about it.
Therefore whether it is real or not, politically, falls squarely into the 'you should say whatever will get you elected' bucket.
>>69227631
>(((chomsky)))
>>69241023
Chomsky is still an anarchist, despite having positive views of some policies.
>>69236157
>He makes millions as a contractor to the United States Army
HAhaha
What's your source on this shit ?
>>69241423
These are anomaly charts. If you don't know what that is, they divide the world up into small squares, take the average temperature and compare it to the current temperature. To build up yearly anomaly chart, they add together all the highest temperatures either over a weakly period or add together all the highest temperatures for that year.
Global warming is real, but it's so subtle that tracking it through surface temperature anomaly charts is disingenuous when making a case for its existence.
The problem is the sun since it's the equivalent of an earthquake during an experiment to measure the vibration of a guitar sting. It's often random, extremely powerful and has a tendency to ruin any certainty for measurements beyond meteorological prediction for a 30 day period.
>>69232736
Except Marx was objectively wrong. The Socialist revolution isn't happening--the Capitalist revolution is, and it's showing no signs of stopping.
Marx's theory was that the growing inequities of Capitalism would prompt a revolution. Turns out that even an unequal Capitalist society is so objectively superior to Socialism that nobody would willingly choose the latter. The hundreds of millions uplifted from poverty and on their way towards developed nation status were brought there by Capitalism.
Retards like Chomsky bitch about inequity, but of course now that half of the planet is trying to industrialize itself, suddenly that's evil because it's killing the environment. You can spot the faggot's true nature here: He doesn't want to elevate the rest of the world, he wants the civilized world destroyed, because at least then we'd all be equal to fucking India with its shitting streets.
Also Left Liberalism doesn't exist. Leftism is inherently authoritarian because equality doesn't exist in nature. No Leftist has ever successfully argued against this point.
>>69227631
Chomsky is a liberal hack. This man also claimed that he would absolutely support Hilary Clinton if it is her vs any Republican candidate. He only thinks in terms of party politics and ideology.
>>69227631
>Chomsky
>Relevant
Pick one, you fucking backwards abboafterbirth
>>69227631
chumpsky, pls.
>>69241435
>We use a suite of global climate model simulations for the 20th century to assess the contribution of solar forcing to the past trends in the global mean temperature.
>We used a coupled climate system model to determine whether proxy-based irradiance series are capable of inducing climatic variations that resemble variations found in climate reconstructions, and if part of the previously estimated large range of past solar irradiance changes could be excluded.
I am always sceptical of climate models. We don't know enough about the atmosphere to say if it's going to be sunny tomorrow with any kind of accuracy, never mind what the climate will be like years from now.
They say it's more than what the sun can do from 1980 onwards, the rest being CO2.
Well, why has it suddenly stopped since the turn of the millennium if that's more important than the sun here? We're pumping out CO2 faster than ever.
>inb4 we don't know
You're damn right.
>>69241339
Doesn't change the fact that Pinochet was a monster. Most American or West European mainstream leftists hate Stalin, but plenty of "moderate" conservatives love Pinochet and Suharto.
>>69242195
I don't understand why intellectuals believe in anarchy could be a realistic solution to corrupt governments; its so unrealistic people with the current societies and technologies will always want a government. Unless a huge portion of technology and society gets destroyed somehow its impossible to convince people to revert back to an anarchic state.
>>69242047
>except that prediction turned out to be fairly accurate and the temperature anomaly continues to increase, peaking with 2015 being the hottest year on record
BZZZZZZZZZZZZ WRONG.
Your error comes from where the records started. They are fairly recent on a geological time-scale and start directly following a time of unusual cold (the little ice age).
>>69242299
Actually the far left states (nasty as some of them were) of the 20th century turned many backwards, war torn, third world areas into functional, industrialized, modern states.
I don't know where you're getting that stale piece of shit argument about him wanting everybody to be India tier, but it's complete fabrication and you know it.
>>69232736
>>69242195
Well conveniently for Chomsky he doesn't have to be accountable for the results of people executing his playbooks. I'm sure Venezuela's circling the toilet was simply a botched execution.
I admire his critiques of imperialism and modern American capitalism, but I wouldn't crown him philosopher-king or let him organize society.
>>69242083
Sounds like youre just mad at the wall built around you and your mud people
>>69242462
http://www.warwickhughes.com/agri/lockwood2007.pdf
>"The observed rapid rise in global mean temperatures seen after 1985 cannot be ascribed to solar variability, whichever of the mechanism is invoked and no matter how much the solar variation is amplified."
http://climate.envsci.rutgers.edu/pdf/StottEtAl.pdf>>69242462
>increased climate model sensitivity to solar forcing and still found "most warming over the last 50 yr is likely to have been caused by increases in greenhouse gases."
>>69227631
>thinks a communist sympathizer can beat the likes of trump
>>69243850
>>"The observed rapid rise in global mean temperatures seen after 1985 cannot be ascribed to solar variability, whichever of the mechanism is invoked and no matter how much the solar variation is amplified."
So he says, but that doesn't mean that carbon god did it, especially in light of models based on the idea not being accurate, simply that we don't know.
>increased climate model sensitivity to solar forcing and still found "most warming over the last 50 yr is likely to have been caused by increases in greenhouse gases."
Again, so he says, but if that was true then observed temperature would be an exponential curve like the one for atmospheric carbon is. It isn't.
This is the point that you start to talk about it hiding in the ocean.
>>69242673
The graph I believe is from WUWT. Basically, a blogger who has zero experience with regards to climatology and has connections to the heartland institute.
>>69227631
>Chomsky
>>69240215
nice refutation
>>69244445
>a blogger who has zero experience with regards to climatology
He's a meteorologist. Not that that's relevant so much as his data and methods are.
What about those trouble you?
HOW TO TELL IF A POST ABOUT TRUMP GETTING BTFO IS REAL
Somebody claims Trump has been stumped on /pol/. Is the claim true? By carefully applying the facts and rules of logic below, you can determine whether or not the post is worth your time before clicking the link.
* Can Trump be stumped?
No, the Trump can not be stumped.
* Can Trump be BTFO?
If Trump can not be stumped, then he cannot be BTFO.
* Was Trump stumped this time?
A man who can not be stumped will not be stumped.
* What if OP said "for real"?
No.
* So was Trump stumped?
No.
* Is OP lying?
Yes.
* Is OP a faggot?
Always.
Save time. Apply the rules of logic to determine if a post about Trump being stumped is true.
>this has been a /pol/ public service announcement
I'm sure all the butt-hurt Trumpkins who claim to be smarter than Chomsky aren't professors at MIT.
Funny thing about intelligence, the dumbest people are the ones running around telling everybody how smart they are.
>>69227631
You seriously have a problem if you think this piece of trash is an intellectual, much less the greatest of our time.
>>69244815
Chomsky is literally a marxist kike. Fuck off shitposting attention whore you are pathetic
>>69244815
You wouldn't recognize intellect if I made a brick out of it and beat you with it. You just called yourself stupid, it's hilarious.
>>69244381
So he says, but that doesn't mean that carbon god did it?
Solar activity and volcanic activity has already been accounted for. What else is there? The evidence best fits with co2 being the main cause.
>especially in light of models based on the idea not being accurate, simply that we don't know.
Where is your evidence that models in general are inaccurate?
>but if that was true then observed temperature would be an exponential curve like the one for atmospheric carbon is.
Can you prove this assertion? Maybe a research paper or two?
>>69244627
Meterologists have zero experience with regards to climatology. Why is it that you believe a blogger with no experience on the subject as opposed to scientists who spend years studying the subject? Why is it you believe methods of an internet blogger to be valid, but not of scientists?
Does the guy actually have peer reviewed research papers in journals?
Its kinda strange to me that you would rather go through reading the guy's blogs rather than the research papers I posted.
>>69238584
this
His only "arguments" are "muh poor middle easterners" and "muh poor central americans"...
he just eats whatever the media throws him about trump as any basic tard .
>>69245381
>What else is there? The evidence best fits with co2 being the main cause.
Don't know, I'm still betting on the big ball of nuclear fire in the sky but I might be wrong. If CO2 was the culprit then it would still be driving up temperature as it increases. *It isn't* and this means there's something they're missing at best, or they are completely wrong at worst.
>Where is your evidence that models in general are inaccurate?
See pic in this post >>69242673
That shows dozens of climate models' predictions compared to actual measured temperature. The models keep shooting up, but the temperature doesn't.
>Can you prove this assertion? Maybe a research paper or two?
Don't need to. It's pretty basic logic. The theory goes that as more carbon is put into the atmosphere it traps more heat due to the greenhouse effect, causing global temperatures to rise. We are still putting ever more carbon up there, but the temperature has stopped rising.
This means that "more CO2 = higher temperatures" is not all there is, and something more powerful is counteracting it. My bet being on the biggest and most powerful one of all, the sun.
>>69245940
How about you stick to the argument m8 rather than trying to sidetrack off into character assassination?
>>69245274
Physical intimidation is the tool of the Trumpkin. Especially when it's a blind & hollow threat.
chomsky is the biggest cuck in the world. never has he ever supported the majority. it's always the minority being exploited.
>>69245205
Ad hominem, tsk tsk... you'll need to better than that.
At which top-tier university are you a professor at?
You think yu would be a nice foot-soldier for the Trumpkin? Here's the thing, he's down 10-15 points under both Sanders and Clintonand the margin is growing every day.
Sorry, America doesn't share your dream.
>>69227631
>Shoam Kikesky
>great intellectual
wew lad
>>69247047
His analysis of American foreign policy is on point. But it doesn't take an intellectual to figure those things out.
>>69240512
Liberals are mentally ill.
>>69232736
>I feel sorry for you that reality has a fascist bias
Fixed that for you.
>>69246080
>Don't know, I'm still betting on the big ball of nuclear fire in the sky but I might be wrong.
Except solar activity has already been accounted for.
>That shows dozens of climate models' predictions compared to actual measured temperature. The models keep shooting up, but the temperature doesn't.
This graph only shows the reconstructions for the tropical mid-troposphere. You do realize that temperatures for measurements for land-air-sea and rising right?
>Don't need to. It's pretty basic logic. The theory goes that as more carbon is put into the atmosphere it traps more heat due to the greenhouse effect, causing global temperatures to rise. We are still putting ever more carbon up there, but the temperature has stopped rising.
that's not always how it works. Sometimes atmospheric temperatures can rise over the years and stop and then rise again rapidly.
What we do know is that if we look at the trend over the last 100 years or more, the temperature is clearly rising. Solar and volcanic activity cannot account for this.
>>69241849
if only the Earth were covered with organisms which consume CO2 and produce O2 .
So what if some coastal flooding displaces a few hundred million people... I hate winter and will be able to enjoy New Hampshire with a nicer climate.
>>69246893
and yet, EVERY SINGLE STATE that has voted so far has shown record republican turnout, and abysmal democratic showing
if cruz cannot figure it out, the dems have a real problem
>>69246359
Lol at you for getting your information from biased blogs on the internet.
>STARTS SHIT OFF ABOUT GLOBAL FUCKING WARMING
Just a jew pushing the typical marxist lies
Guarrenteed he's personally profitting from it too
>illegal immigrants are refugees & we are required to aid them
what a clown, what a jew
Conveniently glossing over the fact that they pass through mexicon on the way over
>US is the greatest threat to world peace
Might be true
But thats because of the establishment, and Trump is the only person there who is ANTI-WAR & was opposed to all the recent wars.
>>69227631
>If trump becomes president
Wait a sec. He's supposed to be the greatest intellectual of our time. He's supposed to be a linguistics philosopher allstar, yet he can't even smell what's cooking in the air.
if? IF?!
This guy is a scam or an insincere pussy.
>>69247509
>Except solar activity has already been accounted for.
Well they are missing something and it's apparently a more powerful force than both the sun and greenhouse gasses...
>This graph only shows the reconstructions for the tropical mid-troposphere. You do realize that temperatures for measurements for land-air-sea are rising right?
see this post >>69240862
That graph is constructed from data collected by the met office. It does not show a rise in temperature from ~2000 onwards. They describe it thus: "The gridded data are a blend of the CRUTEM4 land-surface air temperature dataset and the HadSST3 sea-surface temperature (SST) dataset."
>that's not always how it works. Sometimes atmospheric temperatures can rise over the years and stop and then rise again rapidly.
Sure, but it is pretty clear at this point that carbon dioxide is not the main cause.
>What we do know is that if we look at the trend over the last 100 years or more, the temperature is clearly rising. Solar and volcanic activity cannot account for this.
Neither can greenhouse gasses apparently. Also, as I mentioned before, the "records began" at the tail end of the little ice age. Out of context this produces a terrifying rise towards the apocalypse, when in fact in context it's more like a rise away from it.
>>69228070
>implying Zika won't achieve this
Who needs a massive culling when you can kill the next generation?
>>69247681
Is that you abandoning the argument then?
>>69236157
He is a jew after all.
>>69228552
You're literally brainwashed.
>>69241423
Nice try.
Tim Ball - The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Owm25OHGglk
Jump to 24:15 to skip the introduction
1:24:28 Tampering with station data, ice hockey stick etc.
>>69229908
top keks, maple nigger
>>69230165
then I woke up
>>69246009
More like he's a marxist who very much supports the establishment agenda, despite engaging in the charade of complaining about it.
Didn't know Donal Trump dabbled in linguistics.
>>69248523
>well they are missing something
It's up to you to prove that and you can't.
>That graph is constructed from data collected by the met office. It does not show a rise in temperature from ~2000 onwards. They describe it thus: "The gridded data are a blend of the CRUTEM4 land-surface air temperature dataset and the HadSST3 sea-surface temperature (SST) dataset."
https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch3s3-2-2.html
This shows the temperature rising for 4 different temperature sets for air,sea, and land.
>Sure, but it is pretty clear at this point that carbon dioxide is not the main cause.
If it isn't. Then what is? Magic? They have already accounted for pretty much everything.
Neither can greenhouse gasses apparently. Also, as I mentioned before, the "records began" at the tail end of the little ice age. Out of context this produces a terrifying rise towards the apocalypse, when in fact in context it's more like a rise away from it.
>Neither can greenhouse gasses apparently. Also, as I mentioned before, the "records began" at the tail end of the little ice age. Out of context this produces a terrifying rise towards the apocalypse, when in fact in context it's more like a rise away from it.
Except the rate of warming is unprecedented and solar and volcanic activity can't be accounted for.
>>69241552
That's not what it means you imbecile. If you want to create a running mean (via e.g. Savitzky-Golay or similar) to smooth the data, you need to treat the beginning and the end of your timeseries separately, as you don't have +- x years of data to smooth against. That's what the dashed line indicates (observe the dashes at the beginning as well).
>>69231804
Manufacturing Consent is a great book but /pol/ prefers hentai girls with Trump hats
>>69238584
this is a good point.
it also explain why neocons hate Trump
>>69248595
Let that sink in.
You get your science from blogs on the internet. LOL.
>>69227631
>>Implying Trump isn't smarter than Chomsky
>>Implying burgers are intellectuals
http://youtu.be/UyWHFSk5QhQ
>>69233110
>There is a consensus that anthropogenic climate change is real
No, there isn't.
>>69236157
Please give us some citation...
>>69227631
He did not say anything new or interesting.
>>global warming
>>america is to blame for making the world so terrible that they are fleeing to america because anerica is terrible so they all want to come to america
This guy is no intellectual.
>>69240390
It's explained in the Youtube link I posted >>69248863
Since the 1960s they dismantled the stations and kept only the ones in warm areas.
>>69249611
How about being a gigantic mass hurling around a fucking gargantuan flaming ball of gas in an incomprehensibly vast void?? How about that causing it!?
>>69249611
>It's up to you to prove that and you can't.
I have. Temperature is not rising while CO2 is. This means that something is missing from the equation. This isn't rocket surgery.
>https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch3s3-2-2.html
>This shows the temperature rising for 4 different temperature sets for air,sea, and land.
Look at pic related and compare it to the graph in your link. This is the same data that they are graphing (CRUTEM3). They don't match up...
>If it isn't. Then what is? Magic? They have already accounted for pretty much everything.
No idea. "I don't know" is a perfectly acceptable position and it doesn't mean carbon god did it.
>Except the rate of warming is unprecedented and solar and volcanic activity can't be accounted for.
It's not unprecedented. Just not seen "since records began" about a century or so ago. That's an eye blink on the scale that climate operates on.
>>69250780
it's not magic. I know exactly wtf is causing this.
WE ARE A GIGANTIC MASS HURLING AROUND A GARGANTUAN FUCKING FIREBALL IN AN INCOMPREHENSIBLE VOID. SORRY THE THERMOSTAT ISN'T SET TO A CONSTANT 72° EVERYBODY ALRIGHT!?
>>69246893
>...are you a professor at?
Learn to english
>>69227631
On Anarchism is by far the worst book I've ever read, it was totally incoherent and he provided no factual evidence to support any of his points.
Every time somebody calls him a genius you should bear in mind that he's a linguist and really has no idea about politics
>>69251047
YEAH THAT SHUT YOU ALL THE FUCK UP HUH?
