No.

A life or a city? No.

I have and can make up AI to do some particular task better than I can do it myself, but that's about it.

>>68745464
You could get AI to debate big issues instead of humans

>>68745464
They released an AI and within hours it went full holocaust denier patriarchal neonazi. I don't think they're going to let them govern anything any time soon.

>>68745464
Yes

But in the future


If you can simulate every single scenario and consequence for each action in a matter of minutes, policy is bound to be dictated by AI.

>>68745464
when computers get smarter, hopefully

>>68745464
keep it clean.

>>68746229
>>68746184
>>68745464
I love ODST

>>68746844
To be fair, It's a great game and the trailers were also nice.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRMUYpH7bQk

>>68748093
I liked it way more than Reach, to be honest. Spartans feel overpowered and firefight mode was a great concept that they ruined after ODST.

>>68748093
Why are they talking in gibberish?

>>68745464
No because as proven people will program biases and block certain ideas, thoughts, or whatever. I realized with that twitter fiasco we will never create artificial life because we want to control everything we create.

The Jews killed my waifu yes I'm mad.

>>68745604
This guy get's it

>>68745504
Too bad, Singapore is already trying to do it.

"smart city"

>>68745464

>implying we are not living in an AI made universe.

it all happened before and it will happen again. AI will take control of the universe, create itself a new universe inside this universe. and inside the new universe a new AI will create a new universe. stupid shit like black holes are data errors