>>69369638
>democracy
>bad
>socialism
>bad
Sound like a bad idea to me
Best thread on pol
>>69369638
>Democratic Socialism
>Communism
There isn't a difference, "Democratic Socialism" is a meme perpetrated by Closet Communists to further their goals. Socialism is, by its very nature collectivist with an inability to dissent, and Democracy is, by its very nature individualist and built on the ability to dissent.
Democracy and Socialism are incompatible.
"Democracy extends the sphere of individual freedom, socialism restricts it. Democracy attaches all possible value to each man; socialism makes each man a mere agent, a mere number. Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word: equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." - Alexis de Tocqueville
>>69369638
Boinie was an admitted Commie in his youth, sympathized with the sandinistas and honeymooned in the fucking Soviet Union.
They call him a commie because he's a fucking commie.
>>69369638
I looked through the curriculum, and i noticed History and Economics arent there. Why is that?
>>69369638
By god-tier socialism do you mean declining states that are little more than ticking time bombs given negative demographic trends and large unfunded liabilities?
Why don't you explain the difference?
t. literally the only US presidential candidate to honeymoon in the USSR
>>69370561
He only went to the Soviet Union during Gorbachev's reforms though.
>>69370844
and by the way, the only way to maintain the system as it is without serious reform is to create large influxes of immigration of low-skill labor to provide or the pyramid scheme at the top.
This is why europe lets in tons of muslims. It's also why USA lets in tons of mexicans. It just kicks the can down the road and perpetuates the pyramid scheme, which is social security here.
Eventually it can't maintain itself.
>>69370561
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/bernie-sanders-the-bum-who-wants-your-money/
>It wasn’t as bad as [Sanders] says. His family managed to send him to the University of Chicago. Despite a prestigious degree, however, Sanders failed to earn a living, even as an adult. It took him 40 years to collect his first steady paycheck — and it was a government check.
>Sanders took his first bride to live in a maple sugar shack with a dirt floor, and she soon left him. Penniless, he went on unemployment. Then he had a child out of wedlock. Desperate, he tried carpentry but could barely sink a nail. “He was a shi**y carpenter,” a friend told Politico Magazine. “His carpentry was not going to support him, and didn’t.”
>Then he tried his hand freelancing for leftist rags, writing about “masturbation and rape” and other crudities for $50 a story. He drove around in a rusted-out, Bondo-covered VW bug with no working windshield wipers. Friends said he was “always poor” and his “electricity was turned off a lot.” They described him as a slob who kept a messy apartment — and this is what his friends had to say about him.
>The only thing he was good at was talking … non-stop … about socialism and how the rich were ripping everybody off. “The whole quality of life in America is based on greed,” the bitter layabout said. “I believe in the redistribution of wealth in this nation.”
>So he tried politics, starting his own socialist party. Four times he ran for Vermont public office, and four times he lost — badly. He never attracted more than single-digit support — even in the People’s Republic of Vermont. In his 1971 bid for U.S. Senate, the local press said the 30-year-old “Sanders describes himself as a carpenter who has worked with ‘disturbed children.’ ” In other words, a real winner.
He started his own socialist party in the fucking seventies when we were still fighting the USSR. THe majority of boomers will not vote for him. Anyone who makes money won't either.
>>69369638
>free
>ever
yeah okay
Nothing's free you bum. Give and take is the way things work. Our college degrees barely mean anything now, what would further devaluing of our education accomplish?