Should animals have rights?
the right to be tasty.
>>67658200
/thread
>>67658046
They do have rights.
They're protected by law.
Mind you, not every cunt follows the law.
Yes.
>>67658046
>>67658200
>>67658279
I love how when America is not involved, the world is barbaric as fuck.
You uncivilized swines.
>>67658200
>>67658046
I thought african americans already have rights?
>>67658360
>>67658332
I fucking love you guys.
Animals that benefit us should have rights (dogs, horses etc.)
The rest has the right to feed us
Rights can only be secured through violence or threat of violence.
They exist because we allow them to, and they die when we want them to.
Yes. But plants should also be protected.
Who the fuck is to say plants are less valuable than animals. Plants create oxygen. They might even have feelings on the spiritual plane. You don't believe in that - well stop oppressing my worldview.
>>67658430
clownpiece is literally the shittiest touhou
>>67658046
They aren't humans, so they shouldn't have human rights.
But animal cruelty is wrong.
>>67658046
Of course not, only people have rights.
>>67658465
Literally, it's a Swede, a German, an Australian, and a Canadian. Worst combo ever.
>>67658518
kay
>>67658046
They should have rights above niggers
https://soundcloud.com/couchtruthing/emperor-trump
>>67658046
humans are judged by how we treat the defenseless.
Should animals not be hunted? Of course they should, we are preditors, and its natural to do so.
Should they be eaten? See above
Should they be mistreated and abused? Of course not, only an edgelord would say they take pleasure in someone/thing else's suffering
>>67658046
If the niggers can have rights, it's only logical all the other animals do too.
ask the Nazi
>>67658046
Only dogs.
/thread
>>67658046
I love puppers, so yes, animals deserve rights.
Domesticated dogs should, but that's about it.
>>67658046
Should cars have rights? No, property is not people.
No but we should protect them from abuse
pets yes, nig-variety no.
domesticated animals should.
we shouldn't treat our food like shit either, let a pig live a pig life until we eat it, it's the least we can do.
>>67658764
Cars aren't sentient.
>>67658046
more than most humans
>>67658046
yes
not the same as humans but at least shit that keeps them from getting abused and tortured and shit by niggers and subhumans
>>67658046
Define "right."
>>67658046
Should animals pay taxes?
>>67658046
Yes.
Only animals with grace and above average intelligence should have rights. This includes dogs, dolphins, octopi, crows, and ravens. Everything else is fair play.
animals should be treated with absolute cruelty at all times. no wonder people are so soft these days 'muh animal rights' fuck you. light a goat on fire.
>>67659123
i agree, nigger rights are thing of the past.
>>67659157
autism maximus
No, they shouldn't have rights like humans. But we shouldn't treat them like shit.
Not all animals are the same.
Dogs are our greatest animal allies and should be treated with supreme respect. Horses as well deserve to be treated well.
Cattle is just cattle, it's their purpose to be eaten, so whatevs, if it helps the meat taste better than let's treat them as good as possible as well.
>>67659248
inflicting pain on lesser creatures is character building, an effeminate numale cuck like you wouldn't understand
>>67658936
This. But big business want muh profits and big idiots want muh low prices so most animals are treated like shit then killed like shit. Also fuck shit like Krufts, the people who go that shit need to be jailed.
>>67659157
Stop trying to "fit in", anon.
>>67658046
Yes you subhuman
humans are animals, you deny them rights you deny yourselves rights
check mate
>>67658046
Rights dont exist and are a fabrication for normies to swallow up their anuses.
The question is if animals should be treated at least respectfully in a human way of understanding that "respect"
The answer to that is yes, of course.
Norway recently got animal police, because the police would dismiss animal abuse cases with OVERWHELMING evidence.
About time that Ace Ventura got real.
>>67658046
Yeah, but not those ones that makes bestiality illegal. Especially goats.
>>67658046
only soulless gooks hurt animals. The noble Aryan loves and protects all of God's creatures.
>>67658613
Humans are trash buddy. Judged by who exactly? Other humans? So they judge themselves? Perfect! Just means that when most of our animal species have gone extinct we'll still be the good guise.
>>67658046
they already have rights thanks to the million ape march
>>67659711
Humans don't respect each other and are generally very terrible...so why treat animals like people? People who put sweaters on dogs are guilty of animal abuse. Dogs maul each other to establish dominance and violence to maintain homeostasis within their ranks. Also rape...very common amongst most creatures on this planet.
>>67660296
I just thought about a gang of rabid dogs going around and raping people instead of just mauling them.
Yes. Honestly people who abuse pets should be in jail a minimum of 10 years. Killers should be 20 to life. Abadoning it on the street should be 5 years. And registering a pet to an owner via some sort of chip or something must be mandatory.
It's fucking sickening to see a dead dog on the road or some stray animal with an injured leg looking for food and no one giving a shit. Animal rights are one of the few things I agree with the hippies about.
>>67660296
I'm not saying neither that you should treat animals like people nor that you should treat people respectfully always.
I'm saying you should judge each situation on its own and act accordingly, always starting respectful and then going from there.
It's interaction 101 basically.
Of course I love some dogs much more than some people, and I do believe they deserve more.
If they're nice to you you're nice to them, that's all I'm saying
>>67658046
I think so enough to where I threatened a couple of nogs with a gun for duct taping fire crackers on a puppy.
Then I took the puppy to the pound, waited 3 days, and when nobody claimed him, I took him home.
That's how I got Liam.
>>67660072
But animal gone extinct all the time
It depends what you mean by rights. Should animals be protected from unusually cruel punishment? I think so. I mean, I eat meat and I understand that market so I'm okay with that. But torturing animals or being cruek to them for no reason but for some twisted excitement is wrong.
>>67661635
Based anon.
Niggers are not a meme or a stereotype, they're wild humans.
>>67661635
You are a hero! I had a dog that looked just like yours but she got run over by a speeding car.(witnessed)
Our dog had unfortunately had too many rights which got her killed. She was a country-side dog and had all the rights to go whenever she wanted. She went walking alone and always came back. She never bit anyone and only barked at strangers who came to our territory.
>>67658569
Together we join to make USA
>>67659435
>inflicting pain on lesser creatures is character building
No it isn't, in fact its the hallmark of serious mental issues.
>>67661934
Not all are, but more than enough are.
>>67662021
I don't consider dogs to have all the rights that humans do, but they have the right to live without fear of harm, unless they harm first. Bite a kid in the face? Yeah, it's getting put down. But for a puppy that was barely off its mother's tit to have firecrackers duct taped to his body? I don't believe any dog deserves that.
I don't regret doing what I did, and I would have pulled the trigger on both of those nogs (and, indeed, would do it even if they were white), before I let them do what they were trying to do.
Dude's my bro, now.
>>67658457
this
>>67658586
fuck off with your sound cloud faggot
>>67658046
Why would humans extend their controlling social constructs to animals? It doesn't make sense.
>>67661106
What if it's a dog that got loose and runs off dummy. Gonna lock that person up for 5 years because their dog slipped it's collar?
The right to quick death, and not be tortured.
>>67658046
Don't we?
>>67663051
This seems quite fair.
>>67662736
Humans are sympathetic/empathetic creatures -- well, except for the edgy ones.
>>67660296
You don't have to treat an animal like people. Animals who are treated like people tend to have behavior problems.
Just treat them with the respect that they deserve.
No. Our ancestors did not evolve thousands of years, crawling to the top of the food chain in order to let Mother Nature fuck us right in the ass once we crowned ourselves kings. They are here to serve us and not the other way around. I'm telling you, this fucking "tolerance" of our enemies is what's gonna get us all killed.
>>67658046
I should fucking hope so, since we're animals too.
>>67664638
>tips fedora
>>67661490
Humans lack and will never learn the social skills of dogs, or any animals really. No matter how much you study and desperately try to implement, they're never going to accept you into their ranks. Biologically speaking you can't even compete with most animals, you have no natural defense mechanism or tool besides your mind. If they attack, you're fucked. Treat animals like animals.
>>67663465
They don't know what respect is. Animals form then maintain Patriarchy society, a few animals and insects are matriarchal. Violence is what dictated their societies, they don't consider it cruel...it's just their reality.
>>67658645
>ask the Nazi
Good point:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_welfare_in_Nazi_Germany
>Many Nazi leaders, including Hitler and Hermann Göring, were supporters of animal rights and conservation. Several Nazis were environmentalists, and species protection and animal welfare were significant issues in the Nazi regime.
>>67658046
Yeah, but not the same as people.
Treat doggos and cats with respect and thank the cow and chicken for their delicious meat.
>>67658046
Yes, animal rights.
>>67665440
>dogs don't know what respect is
>>67666879
They're dogs. They don't understand human emotions. They DO follow visual and emotion responses from their owners and act accordingly. That's instinct, not a genuine understanding of anything.
>>67658046
I think my dog should have the right to vote.
He's smarter than your average nigger.
>>67658046
If niggers have rights then why shouldn't animals, which are a higher lifeform, have rights?
>>67658046
depends on the animal.
For example dogs and cats shouldn't be abused, and should have that right, however animals like niggers should never have been given the right to vote.
>>67658046
why does he have spikes on his back? implants or something? thats sick if it is, who would get surgical implants on a dog.... doesnt even make him look scary, he looks cute.
>>67658046
Pitbulls shouldn't.
>>67658046
>controlling every single aspect of life with laws will improve the world we live in
>should a global government rule over anything this earth and life has to offer?
dont worry our future will be filled up with microchips including all your personal data, medical records credit card ID, drones with cameras flying every corner of planet the earth and a global police making sure laws are correctly followed. if you dont obey you chip will turned off and only activated if you stay in prison.
>>67667265
Is this a joke? It's his spine.
>>67658046
Sure. I mean why not, right?
>>67660022
Except for all those species we wiped out
And those we are currently wiping out
>>67658495
Plants actually do have feelings.
They're weird slow-mo plant feelings, but they're there.
If a caterpillar chews on a leaf, the whole plant lights up like a submarine taking torpedo fire, on a chemical level. It doesn't like being chewed on, it squirts taste-bad chemicals into its leaves to try to stop the assault.
If you grow a bean plant (which is a creeping vine, it likes to climb tall things) ten feet away from a metal pole, it will beeline right for the pile. It doesn't thrash around randomly, it can sense its environment and knows where to go.
Plants think and perceive on a different time scale than us, and it's done on a distributed level, ie there's no command center like a brain or whatever. They can even talk to each other through the dirt, through mycorrhizal connections, and form plant alliances and share strategic resources. Like aspen and pine trees, where the aspen trees help out the pine trees in the summer by transferring sugar through root systems, and the pine trees return the favor in the winter.
I don't think plants should have rights, but they definitely feel and think in some fashion.
>>67667446
dogs spines dont stick out that far you idiot. if that were the case then I'd never pet my dog again. idk what kind of dogs youve seen but EVERY dog I've ever seen/owned has a smooth back.
fucking idiot.
>>67663245
>Humas are sympathetic/empathetic creatures
I wish you could hear how hard i'm laughing
>>67658046
Yes.
>>67658322
only in white nations they have rights. in asia they have absolutely none.
>>67663518
You know there's no top to the food chain, right? Biologists prefer the term food web these days, to emphasize the point. Worms, fungi, bacteria eat us when we die; oftentimes they're what causes us to die. In a functionally closed material and energetic system (the earth), there is no 'top' of the food web. Everything eats everything, everything recycles.
>>67658046
No, they cannot enforce those rights upon each other.
There is no concept of justice in the animal kingdom, why should we impose it upon them?
>>67658965
Cats are sentient by definition. Cats are not necessarily sapient. But you're a FUCKING LEAF, so I don't expect you to be educated on these words.
>>67661635
My hero.
Mankind is the superior form of existence.
The earth is our birthright, and the universe our children's
so no, they shouldn't
>>67668305
>cats
>cars
somebody's confused, I just don't know who
>>67658046
humans are filthy animals, still have rights, so why the dogs or cats should not?
>>67668543
Honestly in America, cars have more rights than some people and animals.
This thread makes me happy.
Everyone besides edgemasters on /pol/ seems to like and want to protect animals from psychos.
>>67668414
Realistically, our children's right to a future is inextricably tied up with all animals' right to be themselves - act out their genetic imperatives in the biome they evolved to live in. Because animals (and plants) in summary provide all the ecological services that support human society and human life. Wipe out too many species and your crops will stop growing, your water will stagnate, and your air will become unbreathable.
It's wise to take care of life on earth because it will take care of us in return. It's a free fucking service, all we have to do is not commit genocide on other species. As a species, we seem to find it hard to exercise even that little bit of restraint, for whatever reason.
>>67668089
kek
>>67658046
No. However, going vegan and stop taking part in what's a world-wide industry causing more utilitarian harm than any other institution in human history is a sign of great character and virtue, and the first step towards living a non-degenerate life.
>>67658475
Thats the same thing moron.
Yeah they should, food or not if we benefit from them in any way we should have enough decency to protect and care for them.
>>67669290
This 2bh pham
im so sick of all the bacon faggots
Vegan Master Race
Veganism makes your skin whiter too so i dont see how /pol/ could be against it
yes. the earth should have rights man. if we didn't have animals or grass, we'd suffocate and starve. animals are sentient beings with emotions.
#DogLivesMatter
>>67658046
They shouldn't have.
Humans should have a conscience.
>Is it our Right to give Animals Rights? Who the fuck do we think we are?
>>67658483
>Rights can only be secured through violence or threat of violence.
Humans can secure rights for animals with violence.
>>67669496
Vegan Master Race reporting in
Dogs are based as fuck. i fucking hate it when people abuse them. see people walking them on the hot summer tar without any dog shoes on.
dogs are much better for society than blacks
Dogs Before Nogs
>>67658046
Only the trash eating cats
>>67660072
>>67661731
Fuckers like you are reason we have almost got whales gone.
You are ever-hungry-always-muliplying insects.
>>67669777
BLESSED
L
E
S
S
E
D
>>67669708
Dogs before nogs.
Not vegan here but 100% agree with you
>>67663518
>portugal
>kings
>top
WE WUZ....
Nope, you are one tier above sandnigggers and turks....if you arent half-marocan already. Shut up roach cusin.
>>67669934
>not vegan
when are you gonna give up the Fleshy Jew?
>>67667446
dogs arent dinosaurs retard
>>67667844
I hear that there's a lot more research on this coming out very recently, but it's absolutely interesting.
Got any relevant links to learn more?
animal cruelty is for niggers and chinks
>>67658046
We gave it to niggers so why not
Animals are property.
>>67658046
Absolutely and anyone who disagrees is a backwards nigger or a dirty gook.
>>67670566
>Someone mentions not being Vegan
>instantly jumps on them
This is why
>>67658046
animals don't demand law protection. they follow natural laws. this must be also rule for humans.
>>67658046
Yes. If there is no reason to inflict pain on an animal or human, it should be illegal.
Fuck cat-torturing Chads.
