[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
INTL Statistics Watchdogs, Chapwood Index, Shadowstats Inflation,
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 97
Thread images: 41
4chan should capture independent statistics to correct the hogwash from Western Governments.

Here are just two of them.

Lawrence Kotlikoff, David M. Walker, Winslow Wheeler, John Williams, V Guerrilla Economist, Martin Armstrong, Greg Hunter, Jennifer Briney, Craig Paul Roberts, Michael Hudson, William K. Black are just some voices.

There are Accounting, Budgeting, and Tax Watchdog websites to look for too.
INTL Statistics Watchdogs, Chapwood Index, Shadowstats Inflation, GDP, Unemployment
>>
We all know the Inflation is higher, the GDP lower, the Debt Higher, the Tax loopholes higher, ...

...Downward pressure on Wages and Compensation much higher ...and the Unemployment Higher.
>>
more
>>
File: US.Inflation.Summary.Mar2016.jpg (110 KB, 1386x869) Image search: [Google]
US.Inflation.Summary.Mar2016.jpg
110 KB, 1386x869
summary.

We are guided by people and organizations that follow strategies that serve careers and organizational goals and objectives... not patriots or political leaders who serve the people or the common good.

Corporate Entities are government entities.

Corporate Structures serve themselves.
>>
>>66781785
bump
>>
23.1% US unemployment -
47.1% US Inflation over last 5 year period -
7% Annual Shrinking of US GDP/Economy -
>>
>>66782776

interesting stuff anon

thank you for sharing

i can't stay and bump but this information is vital to being an informed citizen.
>>
>>66782653
We can get an idea how much foreign ownership there is in the USA too.

Treasury TIC Data posted monthly has a summary... should be like $7 Trillion in foreign ownership of US Treasuries at this time.


http://www.treasury.gov/ticdata/Publish/shl2002r.pdf
http://www.treasury.gov/ticdata/Publish/shla2013r.pdf
(http://www.treasury.gov/ticdata/Publish/mfh.txt)
http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/international/intinv/iip_glance.htm

Last Data is from December 2014.

Belgium 2002 = $10.8 B, then 2013 = $163 B, Today $335 B
Bermuda 2002 = $14 B, then 2013 = $94 B, Today ??
Cayman Islands 2002 = $10.7 B, then 2013 = $66 B, Today ??
Canada 2002 = $8.4 B, then 2013 = $46.6 B, Today $69 B
China 2002 = $95 B, then 2013 = $1,272 B, Today $1244 B
France 2002 = $11 B, then 2013 = $42.4 B, Today $79.2 B
Germany 2002 = $38 B, then 2013 = $54 B, Today $72.7 B
Hong Kong 2002 = $37 B, then 2013 = $89 B, Today $172.6 B
India 2002 = $5.2 B, then 2013 = $56.6 B, Today $83 B
Ireland 2002 = $6 B, then 2013 = $91 B, Today $138.6 B
Japan 2002 = $260 B, then 2013 = $1,023 B, Today $1231 B
Luxemburg 2002 = $20.2 B, then 2013 = $107 B, Today $172 B
Mexico 2002 = $16.7 B, then 2013 = $52.7 B, Today $84.8 B
Norway 2002 = $5 B, then 2013 = $74 B, Today $81.6 B
Philippines 2002 = $3 B, then 2013 = $36 B, Today $40.6 B
Poland 2002 = $7 B, then 2013 = $31 B, Today $27 B
Russia 2002 = $3 B, then 2013 = $138 B, Today $86 B
Singapore 2002 = 19.4 B, then 2013 = $82 B, Today $110 B
Switzerland 2002 = $28 B, then 2013 = $157 B, Today $190 B
Taiwan 2002 = $0 B, then 2013 = $183 B, Today $175 B
Turkey 2002 = $2 B, then 2013 = $18 B, Today $77 B
United Kingdom = $45.7 B, then 2013 = $130.6 B, Today $189 B

BEA Data and Federal Reserve Data show that actually foreign investment is higher than Private Domestic Investment.

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/ROWFDNQ027S ($3.3 Foreign Investment USA)
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/GPDI ($2.9 Private Domestic Investment)
>>
>>66783031
Thanks.
>>
>>66783423

more
>>
>>66782776
How have we not resorted to looting and murder?

That's some Great Depression level shit.
>>
File: US.GDP.Mar2016.jpg (45 KB, 832x606) Image search: [Google]
US.GDP.Mar2016.jpg
45 KB, 832x606
>>66783710
Real GDP as measured by FRED Charts is a little lower than regular GDP total US Growth.

Here is the Regular.

How much is Government Spending?

I used to say $4 Trillion US Dollars, ... I still say that but can't prove it except with Education Spending, Health Care Spending, Military Spending, a Federal Budget of $3.5 Trillion... and much more in state budget spending.

So... if GDP is $17 Trillion... maybe $7 Trillion is Government Spending?
>>
>>66784054
Well and not sure how to Reorganize our Corporations, governments and economy exactly.

Shifting spending and Banking Resources to fund what we want... we know we want to spend in our Economic System (Within Country) and we want people to have welfare, food stamps, disability funding, social security, and pensions.
>>
>>66784054

Automation, Computers, Robots, Outsourcing, Offshoring, Trade Agreements like GATT, WTO, Fast Track for NAFTA, CAFTA-DR,...

We know we are losing Jobs, Losing Technology, Losing R&D as Factories go offshore, Borders are opened, VISAs given to suppress wage rates and local labor, Losing Capital needed to invest in the Local, Regional, State, Economies...

So... We know we won't have full employment with education teaching non-trade oriented skills and suppressing local wages and competitiveness as labor laws are avoided.

115.6 million = Total Households
2.63 people per Household

319 Million = Total Population (FRED)
245 Million = Total Population over 16 years old (BLS)
147 Million = Total Employed (FRED & BLS)
94 Million = Total Not in Labor Force (FRED)
98 Million = Total Not in Labor Force (BLS over 16)


37% are not Employed and over 16 years old (BLS population)
40% not Employed using BLS over 16 Population minus Total Employed


- 108 Million People are on Welfare of some kind.
- So 33.9% of US Citizens are on Welfare

While I think $150 Million are getting some kind of Transfer Payment from Government.
>>
>>66783710
http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/international/intinv/iip_glance.htm ($31 Trillion foreign compared to $24 for US) (This is very interesting as Big Banks are growing strongly, but the number of total us banks is dramatically decreasing, like someone is gaming the system, Commercial Banks in the U.S. - FRED - St. Louis Fed)
>>
Basic Economic Theories were about balance of Trade with foreign countries since if wealth is extracted from either small economies, state economies, or country sized economies... there is a loss of vigor.

Money Stock Velocity
Multiplier Effect

Manufacturing or Mercantilism were said to provide the highest multiplier effects that created new businesses and helped grow local business and economy.

If you look at Quantitative Theory by Irving Fisher (I'm not an Expert)... you see a Globalized Economy, outsourced economy, or a focus on buying goods from foreign production destroys the theory of velocity of money and... conservative understanding of money, money supply, financial ratings, bank theory.

The Theory's Calculations

In its simplest form, the theory is expressed as:

MV = PT (the Fisher Equation)

Each variable denotes the following:
M = Money Supply
V = Velocity of Circulation (the number of times money changes hands)
P = Average Price Level
T = Volume of Transactions of Goods and Services

How can we allow all the money to flow out of our country and allow foreign interests to buy assets within our Economy?

The reason is we have a World Reserve Currency (Fiat).

-

Corporate Bailouts are the same sort of practice that would not be allowed by conservative understanding of banking, money, money supply, government, and trade.


https://datahub.io/dataset/fed-once-secret-loan-crisis-data-compiled-by-bloomberg-bailouts
>>
>>66786013

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/mult (Up to Date, but looks like Crap, eh?)
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/M1V (M1 seems to increase with Mortgages)
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/M2V (M2 seems to show different bubble perhaps)
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/MZMV (MZM seems to show peak in Economy 1981)

Debt

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/GFDEBTN (Total Debt)
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/GFDEGDQ188S (Total Debt as percent of GDP)
https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/TCMDO

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/CP (corporate profits, 1-1-2014)

Corporate Taxes end of 2013 = 273.5 Billion (Treasury data end of Fiscal year Sept 2013)
Corporate Profit end of 2013 = $1.9045 Trillion

$273.5/1,904,5 = 14.4% Corporate Tax

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/DIVIDEND


http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/record-94031000-americans-not-labor-force-participation-rate-stuck-38-year

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/LNU05000000 (Not in Labor Force)
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/civpart (CIVILIAN PARTICIPATION RATE)

So low velocity can mean low inflation if you believe the goverment who doesn't measure health care, energy, education, food, housing, property taxes, transportation...

But low velocity can be a sign that national currency like the US Dollar is not working in the Economy as it is hoarded, stashed offshore, stashed in investments of the wealthy, invested offshore, or... goes offshore to foreign products and services.

Low Money Velocity clearly can be a sign that trade deals and balance of trade only serve the powerful, wealthy, or those at the top of the economy.
>>
File: volcker.jpg (427 KB, 1987x1490) Image search: [Google]
volcker.jpg
427 KB, 1987x1490
>>66786976
>>66786013
>>66785199
>>66784979
>>66784371

Doing a good job.
>>
File: Fed.Funds.Rate.jpg (146 KB, 1129x629) Image search: [Google]
Fed.Funds.Rate.jpg
146 KB, 1129x629
>>66787275
Thanks, Keep me informed.

lol

I had some data for Interest Rates under Volker here some place, but never really posted them much.

Volker raised interest rates in USA to 'Tard levels at the end of the 1970s and in early 1980s where we had a recession from it.

I think the levels went above 18%... to like 20% for most people.

But ... now I wish I could be some interest on savings that I put away.

We entered an era of neoliberalism in the 1980s with the advance of CIA Director G.H.W. Bush.
>>
Hello
I don't understand economic moonspeak. So what do I invest in? Gold? Crude oil commodity stock?
With EU collapse(and banks in trouble) and US economy in trouble(and the uncertainty of the elections), will there be a world economic collapse?
>>
File: Tax.Singapore.Sling.Avoidance2.jpg (120 KB, 1376x590) Image search: [Google]
Tax.Singapore.Sling.Avoidance2.jpg
120 KB, 1376x590
>>66787275
In case we are Interested in how we will go to normal interest rates... normal banking... normal conservative banking practices... and normal federal government conservative budgeting, monetary, and fiscal policy:
Total--Interest on the Public Debt, Table 5 Monthly Treasury Report

2014 Total--Interest on the Public Debt = $429.568 Billion
2013 Total--Interest on the Public Debt = $415.670 Billion
2003 Total--Interest on the Public Debt = $318.149 Billion
2002 Total--Interest on the Public Debt = $332.537 Billion
2001 Total--Interest on the Public Debt = $359.508 Billion
2000 Total--Interest on the Public Debt = $362.118 Billion
1999 Total--Interest on the Public Debt = $353.511 Billion
1998 Total--Interest on the Public Debt = $363.824 Billion

Clearly... the Debt of $62 Trillion in the USA... has orders of magnitude of damage to the economy due to Usury (interest Rates and Fees).

Planning in any Enterprise would at this point will give a normal person a heart attack... State Budgets, Federal Budgets, Banking, Investors.... Manufacturers.

No wonder we don't have investors in this US Domestic Economy.

That and loopholes to go offshore!!!
>>
File: Clinton.jpg (43 KB, 400x526) Image search: [Google]
Clinton.jpg
43 KB, 400x526
>>66788664
It's a bit more complicated than that.

Keynes fucked up when he stated that all labor must inherently create supply. As a result, we assumed that if we gave free money to everyone, the supply would naturally rise to create the demand. Nope. We got stagflation, where inflation was rising, and people were too crippled to be employable.

Volcker had to clean up Keynes's misconception, and I say this as someone who understands the reality of a Liquidity Trap. Brutal interest rates taught austerity to hippie boomers, which gave rise to the current world order we know and love.

But something else happened as well...the Shareholder Revolution.

Between the 20s-70s Capitalism and Communist economic performances were neck and neck. But a guy names Jack Welch figured out the weaknesses of Capitalism (moral hazard between management and shareholders,) and taught us the concept of Shareholder Value. This pretty much gave Capitalism a 'second-life' and created the Gordon Gecko's of the world.

The US pulled ahead, because it was effectively in 'late 20th century economics' were-as the Soviets were stuck in the early 20th Century economics. Interestingly, Deng did reforms as well, but most Westerners cannot cognitively understand Chinese economics. Nevertheless, China is in 'late 20th century' economics as well.

The actual shitstorm begins in 92, when Clinton reorients the Left to become pro-business. It's obvious that we expect right-wingers to speak emphatically about business. But when Clinton took the Left, nobody 'was left in the left.' And that's when things went unleashed.

It gets more complicated after this, because the only reason why we've been here this long is because of the Religious Right's unconditional cooperation with Neoliberalism. Unfortunately, this means that Christianity is dead, because now people associate Christ with Free Market Globalism, and they hate Free Market Globalism enough to reject Christ itself.
>>
>>66788962
Hello.

No hold off on investments till you are educated on Economics, Trade, Finance, Exchange Markets.

Normal Times... maybe we would say invest a small amount like $100 per month over 30 years in an Index Fund with Low Expenses, Low Fees, Low costs....

I don't think these are normal times.

An index fund would hold many stocks, many bonds, or many of both... in order to diversify and reduce risks. In the last 15 years we see new product for investment called the ETF which can target indexes of various kinds and have the lowest costs possible for investments in paper like stocks and bonds.

But you need to read newspapers or internet news and find a mentor.

A mentor would not be a financial adviser since they have an interest in making a career (there career in financial advice).
>>
>>66789774

There isn't a straight account of this anywhere in public knowledge, because Liberals can't into history, desu.

But the problem is that in 2016, all of the programming in White Men is gone. Men like Karl Rove are useless, because the 'useful idiots' are effectively dead, and all that's left are bitter angry White Rural Voters who want to beat the fuck out of anything that reminds them of Globalism.

We are here now, not because of suffering, but because people are playing a game that's beyond their ability.
>>
>>66789774
>Keynes fucked up

Stay with me if you have time.

- Maynard Keynes
- Milton Friedman
- Adam Smith
- and all those that misquote them and their words

Then we have other topics

The US 1960s-1970s had various Crisis

- Budget Imbalance
- Vietnam War overspending and Waste
- Gold Convertability
- Nixon Shock
- European Attacks on US Dollar which was the World Reserve Currency since 1941...
- US Dollar Crisis
- Federal Interest Rate hikes in response to both Inflation and the Currency Crisis and probably the Oil Crisis/Oil Embargo
- Food prices were inflating at the same time
- Gasoline Lines were long due to fuel shortage, Transportation costs would have been high, Energy prices would cause inflation in things of all kinds like food

whew...

now let me read your post.
>>
>>66790738

To my knowledge, I'm the only person alive who has a working theory of Stagflation. But to my knowledge, the origins of Stagflation are pretty fucking terrible.

>People can be so untalented as to be unemployable. Therefore, they consume goods and services, while being incapable of producing demand.

Hence, we've never explained Stagflation, because it would mean other, horrible, conclusions. (Even for Right Wingers.)
>>
>>66791157
>while being incapable of producing supply*

This explains why Inflation and Latin America go hand and hand. Too many people who can't follow basic instructions wind up consuming without producing.
>>
>>66781342
Sorry OP, but if it's not a simplistic infographic with some out of context quote about white genocide it's not going to go very far on /pol/.
>>
File: Fed.Audit.2011.Public.Info1.jpg (620 KB, 1661x949) Image search: [Google]
Fed.Audit.2011.Public.Info1.jpg
620 KB, 1661x949
>>66789774
>Keynes

Well there is a video of Milton Freidman about Negative Welfare?

Friedman is suggesting welfare payments in a new radical light.

Milton Friedman could be associated with Maynard Keynes... as a kind of "same school of thought"... so whether you see freidman as the father of the Chicago School of Economics or the neoliberals of economics...

Friedman was very influencial and has to enter into the discussion.

Unfortunately... I can't say I can speak knowledgeably about Friedman, Adam Smith, Volcker or others.

Money could be created out of Labor.

Or Money could be created out of debt like a loan... this is the US System... and there seems no limits on this for each US Bank of any kind of size (say... over $1 Billion for commercial Bank, or say $300 Million for private shadow bank).

> I say this as someone who understands the reality of a Liquidity Trap.

I have to be careful here. I can't say I understand yet. Credit Crisis. Liquidity Crisis.

Sounds like Corporate Bailouts.

- 1979 Chrysler bailout, Iacocca approached the United States Congress in 1979, Chrysler was required to reduce costs

- 2009 Chrysler bankruptcy, Because of the Chrysler bankruptcy, Iacocca may lose part of his pension from a supplemental executive retirement plan

- 2008 BMW Auto Bailout, CPFF
- 2008 Caterpillar Inc Bailout, CPFF
- 2008 Chrysler Financial Bailout, CPFF
- 2008 Ford Auto Bailout, CPFF
- 2008 General Electric Bailout, CPFF
- 2008 Genworth Financial Insurance, CPFF
- 2009 GM bankruptcy & Bailout
- 2008 Harley Davidson Bailout, CPFF
- 2008 Hartford Financial Insurance, CPFF
- 2008 McDonalds Bailout, CPFF
- 2008 METLIFE Bailout, CPFF
- 2008 PACCAR Bailout, CPFF
- 2008 Verizon Bailout, CPFF
- 2009 Toyota Bailout, CPFF

- 2009 Wall Street Bailout, Unlimited FED Loans, $800 Billion TARP, $4.4 Trillion QE, And 6 Years of LIRP/ZIRP


https://datahub.io/dataset/fed-once-secret-loan-crisis-data-compiled-by-bloomberg-bailouts

2007 Liquidity Problem = CPFF
>>
>>66789774
>taught us the concept of Shareholder Value.

"We are all Stakeholders" comes to mind.

-

Sorry still reading.
>>
File: Milton Friedman.jpg (64 KB, 280x396) Image search: [Google]
Milton Friedman.jpg
64 KB, 280x396
>>66792147

>"I switched our meds."
>"And none of us figured it out."

Friedman was like a doctor trying to invent a better cure for a cure that already works, because he hated the doctor. In hindsight, he has been the worst thing to the establishment since Rasputin.

Too late now though. Damage has been done.

Basic Income and 'Negative Welfare' would create Stagflation, because the supply wouldn't necessarily rise fast enough to incorporate the free money.

Your sources also suggest that the free money the rich have received may be creating inflation. But unlike 'stagflation,' we have plenty of people who could be employed, but aren't.

But there are other factors, and there are people who COULD create supply, but cannot due to lack of investment (which is the Liquidity Trap that Keynes referred to.)

>What I am sharing, btw, is so heterodox, that people will be scared if they understand what they are hearing.
>>
>>66789774
>actual shitstorm begins in 92, when Clinton reorients the Left to become pro-business.

Lots of Deregulation to consider going back to the 1970s:


1981 - Executive Order 12287, (R. Reagan, removed price controls on Petrol)
1984 - Caribbean Basin Initiative (Free Imports to USA)
1992 - Energy Policy Act (H.W. Bush)
1994 - WTO Authorization, Fast Track Authority for US President
1994 - NAFTA, Deregulation of Trade, 3 Nations (W. Clinton)
1995 - Community Reinvestment Act, the Clinton Admin urged flexibility,
1996 - Energy Deregulation (W. Clinton, followed by ENRON Scandal)
1996 - Telecommunications Act (W. Clinton, cross ownership)

1982 – Garn–St. Germain Depository Institutions Act
1999 – Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
2000 – Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000
2002 – Sarbanes–Oxley Act
2003 – Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003
2006 – Credit Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006

- Let me look for longer list.
>>
File: St Benedict.jpg (635 KB, 2024x2468) Image search: [Google]
St Benedict.jpg
635 KB, 2024x2468
>>66792618

Right. But in the 70s and 80s, men like me were in power, and kept the Deregulation from going too far, or becoming unproductive.

When Clinton (although Bill is a symbol more-so than the individual) rose to power, men like me were then kicked to the curb, and pretty much sent to Limbo (and sometimes Red-Baited.)

Because we cannot play 'red team' to deregulation, every single deregulation happened at once, which pretty much blew up the World Order into a fucking catastrophe, thus threatening everything that's been achieved from the Cold War.

Now, we are in the worst spot. The men who know what to do have no where to go, while the men who don't know what to do are telling us where to go.

>The answers to our problems, btw, don't necessarily involve regulation or more government spending; our situation is so bizarre, the best contemporary I offer is fucking St. Benedict.
>>
File: Immigration.growth.gif (21 KB, 420x540) Image search: [Google]
Immigration.growth.gif
21 KB, 420x540
>>66791157
>>People can be so untalented as to be unemployable. Therefore, they consume goods and services, while being incapable of producing demand.

I'm skimming around a little.

Credit Cards seem to originate in the 1970s for the masses.

Prior to this you probably don't see payday loans, credit cards, easy credit, and advertising that hooks people on spending money they don't have (Money Creation through Credit).

The fallacy of creating money through debt instead of labor is never addressed.

The US Economic and Cultural Paradigm Shift from working for what you want and resisting advertisements and propaganda... somehow were hidden.

Patriarchy is leadership.

Patriarchy has responsibility for Politics, Corporate Leadership, and Education... as well as the third or forth estate.

Regulations?

Wow, no word yet from FTC or Television and Radio Patriarchy.

You can see your sins on TV or Radio.

- US Consumer Economy is nothing of the kind
- US Economy is Debt Economy which historically means debt slavery and less freedom of speech and democracy

The fallacy of creating money through debt instead of labor is never addressed.

Usury as a policy is never addressed.

Leaking money from the US Economy... which could have been reinvested in the US Economy to stimulate the economy or save the Economy from Recessions/Depressions are never addressed.

Fuck.

The things that benefit Facebook or Apple or Google... or Warren Buffet... are never addressed for the "Worker".
>>
File: Age of Oversupply.jpg (22 KB, 230x346) Image search: [Google]
Age of Oversupply.jpg
22 KB, 230x346
>>66793437

Yes. Since Wages were stagnant, and credit was cheap, the natural solution was to give Americans more debt to purchase goods. We continued to do so, up until the debts grew too much, leading to the 2007-8 clusterfuck.

I mean, the rabbit hole goes so deep, I keep silent about somethings, because I'll be misunderstood.

Labor doesn't create money, though, Credit creates money through fractional reserve banking.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional-reserve_banking

Like you, I'm forced to be an auto-diidact (not by choice,) but I would focus more on the fundamentals before looking at the big picture.

The big picture is much more complicated, because there are new things that are emerging that we haven't even named.
>>
>>66793437
Immigration was also supposed to improve consumer spending. But surprise, surprise, increased government costs combined with ethnic strife and low employability means that it didn't quite pan out as hoped.
>>
>>66781342

mm
>>
>>66792532
Thanks.

I don't mind Heterodox.

I am saving my posts for later study. I try not to jump to conclusions. Usually there are sources on the internet... except when events are older than the 1990s.

Friedman is controversial. They seem to say he has 'taint. 'taint this and 'taint that.

-

When we are willing to consider massive sweeping reforms... it is entering the unknown.

The new system could be conservative... or could be revolutionary.

Personally my sense of trends in that if we have high income earners in the stratosphere... that means many people won't work, won't have purpose, won't earn a living through sales.

If we can control the outsized earnings of those at the top of the economy... money can become a utility that serves all people and ... and... and serves to incentivize people to excel.

Incentives to excel is a big topic.

- power
- status
- titles
- lands (grants by the authority for lands)
- accolades (public recognition)

Seems to start a list of motivations for new citizens in a new society.

You know the powers that be... don't want to grant lands any more. People are more useful if they have no permanent title or status... if they can be smeared... if they can be brought down... if they can be subject to politics and accusations...

wow.

Magna Carte is miles away. (US Ideal, US Liberty)
>>
>>66784979
your number should be about 60 million for not in work force. you forget to exclude retired folk.
>>
File: Capitalism.jpg (105 KB, 450x441) Image search: [Google]
Capitalism.jpg
105 KB, 450x441
>>66794564
>You know the powers that be... don't want to grant lands any more.

Whether by intent or idiocy, this is a suicidal position for the wealthy.

That is, in fact, why people support Communism. It isn't inequality, but the lack of ownership, which makes people tolerate large government.

>"I could never have enough money to own any farm in the first place."
>"Therefore, if the state takes over all the farms, why should I care?"

It's absolutely fucking mindboggling why we are letting this happen. When I'm in my 40s, I'll be spending the rest of my lifetime dealing with Collectivization urges from the masses. People who own shit tend to be Right-Wing, rich or poor, while people who own nothing tend to be Left Wing.

>If only based Aquinas could explain sense into people.
>>
>>66793996

Immigration was meant to destroy the white race, it's panning out wonderful.
>>
>>66792992
>When Clinton (although Bill is a symbol more-so than the individual) rose to power, men like me were then kicked to the curb, and pretty much sent to Limbo

Well...

I am proud to have talked with you here.

I know there is a difference and a different era.

ounter-Intelligence Operations against US Citizens.


1913 Federal Reserve Act
1971 - Nixon Shock,
1974 - Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974 (R. Nixon)
1978 - Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978,
1980 - The Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act (J. Carter, followed by S&L Crisis, 5000 convictions, RTC)
1981 - Executive Order 12287, (R. Reagan, removed price controls on Petrol)
1982 - Garn-St. Germain Depository Institutions Act
1984 - Caribbean Basin Initiative (Free Imports to USA)
1992 - Energy Policy Act (H.W. Bush)
1994 - WTO Authorization, Fast Track Authority for US President
1994 - NAFTA, Deregulation of Trade, 3 Nations (W. Clinton)
1995 - Community Reinvestment Act, the Clinton Admin urged flexibility,
1995 - HUD advocated greater involvement of state and local organizations
1996 - Energy (W. Clinton, followed by ENRON Scandal)
1996 - Telecommunications Act (W. Clinton, cross ownership)
1998 - Clinton's Kosovo War (over 60 Days)
1998 - Brooksly Born Rejected on her concerns on OTC Derivatives
1998 - Derivatives expanded and were not regulated
1998 - Citicorp & Travelers Insurance Merger
1999 - Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act
1999 - bombing campaign in Kosovo (W. Clinton, over 60 days)
2000 - Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 (P. Gramm, W. Clinton, derivatives)
2002 - McCain–Feingold Act
2005 - Energy Policy Act (G.W. Bush, subsidies, excluded clean air Water acts)
2005 - Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA).
2005 - CAFTA-DR Ratified, 2006 El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Guatemala
2008 - 2014 QE & LIRP/ZIRP
2010 - Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
2011 - US combat in Libya
2014 - lift ban on crude oil exports
>>
>>66792992
Jennifer Briney seems to do a good job.

Seems to me some of us should spread the word.
>>
File: Closing of the Mind.jpg (29 KB, 226x350) Image search: [Google]
Closing of the Mind.jpg
29 KB, 226x350
>>66795105
Not even.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35317479

Everyone is absolutely fucked. The Globalists were doing maneuvers that were far beyond their brain trust, and their reign won't last too much longer in Europe.

When people do serious shit, you need serious people to get it done. We don't teach serious people anymore.

https://youtu.be/-00uQzXyujI?t=1m43s
>>
File: Stalin.jpg (210 KB, 1600x1200) Image search: [Google]
Stalin.jpg
210 KB, 1600x1200
>>66795220
Again. This is ineptitude, not malice, which drives people toward our shitstorm.

Leaders can fucking have death camps, and yet still be loved, if they are competent.
>>
>>66793996
Not clear how to represent this in a table, chart or graph.

Any idea?

Tax Revenues for Individuals Increased after the 2008 Crisis before corporations and were stronger recovery.

Table 5, 30 September, Monthly Treasury Report


Corporate Income Taxes Receipts 1998 = $ 188.7 Billion
Corporate Income Taxes Receipts 2002 = $ 148.0 Billion (Recession)
Corporate Income Taxes Receipts 2006 = $ 353.9 Billion
Corporate Income Taxes Receipts 2007 = $ 370.2 Billion
Corporate Income Taxes Receipts 2008 = $ 304.3 Billion
Corporate Income Taxes Receipts 2009 = $ 138.2 Billion (Recession)
Corporate Income Taxes Receipts 2012 = $ 242.3 Billion
Corporate Income Taxes Receipts 2013 = $ 273.5 Billion

Individual Income Taxes Receipts 1998 = $ 828.6 Billion
Individual Income Taxes Receipts 2002 = $ 858.3 Billion (Recession)
Individual Income Taxes Receipts 2006 = $1.044 Trillion
Individual Income Taxes Receipts 2007 = $1.163 Trillion
Individual Income Taxes Receipts 2008 = $1.146 Trillion
Individual Income Taxes Receipts 2009 = $ .915.3 Trillion (Recession)
Individual Income Taxes Receipts 2012 = $1.132 Trillion
Individual Income Taxes Receipts 2013 = $1.316 Trillion

Black Market Labor and Consumption is hard to track. But I would guess that Black Market Consumption by Illegals or Legal VISA holders was good enough in all years identified.
>>
also you should be posting on biz in a MUCH better format. lots of numbers and disorganized thoughts will have everyone ignore you.
>>
>>66795709
Corporate margins hit a record high. So obviously tax shenigans.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-02-03/goldman-sachs-says-it-may-be-forced-to-fundamentally-question-how-capitalism-is-working

I gtg. As things stand, I pretty much kiss my ass in the fetal position.

>>66795807

>biz

lol. If I wanted to go on biz, I'd skip the anime bullshit and go straight to the WSJ.
>>
>>66793910
>auto-diidact

Excellent verbal skills.

You are certainly a person of learning or a person of letters.

Me... not so much. as you say I leverage info from my betters and then seem to be an autodidact.

You have credence in my mind. Well done. You have served your country. Please continue to pass education to all of us here and in other blogs.
>>
>>66795985
there are some decent posters there. myself included. don't have to pay a fee to view the forums like you do with wsj. its better, too, cause people aren't paid to attract ratings for their company. they shitpost for free. great social indicators, too.
>>
File: 1452831159430.jpg (151 KB, 767x581) Image search: [Google]
1452831159430.jpg
151 KB, 767x581
>>66793996
This is what I don't understand, the elites know the outcomes of importing third worlds into advanced stagnating socialist economies, they can just see the data of extremely high welfare dependence, and low labor force participation

They know for every immigrant that enters, the financial burden increases and the white population grows distrusting, and apathetic. national trust and pride are eroded rapidly and the financial position of the government gets really bad really fast

Jesus fucking Christ look at Brazil, that is the biggest genetic shit mixing pot in the world AND THEIR ECONOMY IS CURRENTLY IN COMPLETE FREE FALL AND THEIR ENTIRE GOVERNMENT IS FALLING APART

The US will look like Brazil in 60 years

>there has never been a "successful" long term multicultural society

SO WHY FUCKING DO IT?!?!!?!
>>
>>66781342
Do you have anything for Europe/Germany?
>>
File: David.M.Walker.GAO.Stewardship.jpg (52 KB, 649x650) Image search: [Google]
David.M.Walker.GAO.Stewardship.jpg
52 KB, 649x650
>>66794893
Thanks for the Reference, Link, Chart, Table, Graph.

What?

You don't like the Population Demographics, but... you don't have any Demographics of your own?

What?

Hey, Anon.

How about looking at Shadow Stats or Chapwood Index...

And tell us about it.

I'm just a guy that had a career, likes data enough to post stuff,... and I like to capture data.

- You ain't an expert
- I ain't an Expert
- We will argue about Experts
- What don't you understand about how the big organizations work? We always bitch about what other people say... but can we provide charts, tables, graphs, data to refute?

Got that?

I got screwed and fucked with.

You will get screwed and fucked with.

Please show data and work when you speak out... or links.
>>
>>66796950
this is how i know youre a schizo

i took the data from the st louis fred data site, just like you did.
>>
File: BellCurve.jpg (144 KB, 924x1400) Image search: [Google]
BellCurve.jpg
144 KB, 924x1400
>>66796116
>Please continue to pass education to all of us here and in other blogs.

And there's the rub. We need effort, not education. Awareness isn't even enough at this point. Wake me up when we are prepared to do what must be done.

>>66796715
Reality is too painful for our leadership. Even if I believe all men are equal under the law, not all men are crated equal. They are doing this because they deny the relevant information necessary to make immigration work. The 'globalists (for lack of a better term) don't have the stomach to bring about their society.

>When we decided that some things are too painful to know, we killed our power.
>In many ways, this book represented the death of all social science. When presented with a terrible reality, we chose instead to deny it.
>>
>>66795023
Common Law.

The First Law of the USA.

Common Law is under attack.

This is Property Law, remember 9/10ths of the law is property law?

Now, they take cash, property under confiscation law for drugs or terrorism.

This is the end.

My only Friend.

This is the end... of common law, property law, and the US Constitution.

USA as a franchise, corporation, or sovereign nation... ended under G.H.W. Bush.
>>
>>66797159
>This is what I don't understand, the elites know the outcomes of importing third worlds into advanced stagnating socialist economies,

They didn't know the outcome, because they actively deny intelligence that could make it work. That's why we fucked up our immigration policy, and practically destroyed the EU.
>>
>>66797325
dude how fucking crazy are you
>>
>>66794893
BLS & Federal Reserve Data... account for prime working years.

If you drive truck till 55 years old you really are not in working years... since 70 years ago they really worked, they loaded, they unloaded, they handled the trucks...

The data accounts for your lack of insight or comment.
>>
>>66797411
Yeah... kind of undermines my points, doesn't it? :-)
>>
>>66797590
no, you just count people from 16 to the retirement age, you dumbfuck.
>>
>>66797647
so you're samefagging?
>>
>>66797845
No. Just using him as a soundboard, desu.
>>
>>66795985
>Immigration was also supposed to improve consumer spending. But surprise, surprise, increased government costs combined with ethnic strife and low employability means that it didn't quite pan out as hoped.

Well... I was looking back on your statement.

I assume Social Security, Hsospital Expenditures, Health Care, Welfare of Inmmigrants... is captured some place.

I just wonder if I can get access to the data.

Recently heard some guy nail the costs of Immigrants... it was like 60% of new immigrants on welfare (60%-90% maybe).
>>
>>66797149
Thanks for the Link, Data, Graph, Table, Info.

You sir are a guru.
>>
>>66798369
>hurr durr someone was trying to help me not paint a slightly incorrect picture
>hurr durr maybe that was the plan all along
>hurr durr better shitpost cause im a dumbass
>>
>>66797411
Boze Allan much?

-

So yes, you have a nice salary as military intellegence, or military contractor...

lol

So... now you want us to think you are a leader in your community... while you never spend time with your community even if you spend time yelling at your kids?

wtf?

Your heart is large as a pea.

You get that angry look, you look like you are in charge,... and you think your kids respect you? You think your kids feel you know and understand them?

Hey.

Why did we have a union movement in the UK or the USA?
Were there work place abuses by wealthy interest groups?
Were there wealthy interest groups that had captured the federal political process, the state political process, and... even the the regulation of businesses?
Heard of the Camp Town Store, Company Store?

hm...

Heard that we needed Labor Laws in the USA due to abuses?

Hm...

Did federal OSHA rules finally show the need for all states to support worker safety in the USA... even with 1000 years of worker history in Europe to show this? I mean lots of states could have passed worker safety laws and laws for child labor and laws for working hours for children... but the standard was not there.

You never had a good High School education.
>>
File: 1441075446337.jpg (15 KB, 556x561) Image search: [Google]
1441075446337.jpg
15 KB, 556x561
>>66799102
>>
>>66797763
Read

Check links faggot.

The data is not for over 55 years of age dipshit, lazy, ass, buttfucking, dipshit, mother sodomite.

You think Bankers are dumber than you.

The Federal Reserve is a private Corporation with stock holders, but it is smarter than you will ever be.

BLS is full of smart people.

You however refuse to read English.

>muh No English
>>
File: around banter choose pampers.jpg (177 KB, 800x533) Image search: [Google]
around banter choose pampers.jpg
177 KB, 800x533
>>66799431
>>
>>66796876
>bot
>>
>>66796876
tax avoidance
>>
File: Germany.Debt.by.country.jpg (165 KB, 1251x913) Image search: [Google]
Germany.Debt.by.country.jpg
165 KB, 1251x913
>>66796876
debt to foreigners
>>
File: Share.Income.Wealth6.jpg (82 KB, 620x422) Image search: [Google]
Share.Income.Wealth6.jpg
82 KB, 620x422
>>66796876
share of income
>>
>>66797411
Hello Boze Allan

or is it Boze Allen?
>>
>>66797763
Hello Boze Allan
>>
>>66799582
>>66797763
>>66797411
>>66797149
>>66794893
>>66799386

Intellectually Lazy.

Spoiled Kid.

Never Worked.

Probably doesn't have to file taxes.

Emotional and Emoting.

Has no writing skills, didn't pass high school proficiency test, can't understand a library or internet search function.

Dude.

Try and read a little.

Kill yourself.
>>
>>66801231
considering that the us had a pop of around 200m in the 70s, the chart is showing an increase in part time work from about 6% of the pop to about 9%.

3% increase of part time work when compared to total pop over 45 years.
>>
File: Share.Income.Wealth77Sep2015.png (181 KB, 545x605) Image search: [Google]
Share.Income.Wealth77Sep2015.png
181 KB, 545x605
>>66796876
Gini coefficient, before taxes and transfers[9] Country Late 2000s


Italy, 0.534
Portugal, 0.521
Germany, 0.504
Israel, 0.498
Mexico, 0.494
United States, 0.486
France, 0.483
Luxembourg, 0.482
Austria, 0.472
Poland, 0.470
Turkey, 0.470
Belgium, 0.469
Australia, 0.468
Hungary, 0.466
Finland, 0.465
Japan, 0.462
Spain, 0.461
Estonia, 0.458
United Kingdom, 0.456
New Zealand, 0.455
Czech Republic, 0.444
Canada, 0.441
Greece, 0.436
Chile, 0.426
Netherlands, 0.426
>>
File: Telesur.Interveiw.Wilkerson.jpg (46 KB, 858x601) Image search: [Google]
Telesur.Interveiw.Wilkerson.jpg
46 KB, 858x601
>>66801566
No Statement there.

No Question.

But good point I should post population chart.

https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/POPTOTUSA647NWDB

Search for your own self.

1968 - US pop rose above 200K.

- What is the Monetary Leakage?
- What is the Capital Flight
- What is the Brain Drain from US Industry, the many industries like textiles or whatever
- What is the Threat to US as the world Reserve Currency... if we are not providing good stewardship... if we don't deserve the financial ratings... if we have 350% debt to GDP... if we have $62 Trillion in Debt... if we have a Quadrillion in Derivatives in US Dollar Denominations

- $500 Billion in Annual Trade Deficit... comes back in purchases of Federal and State Government Bonds... oh and purchases in property of all kinds
>>
>>66801566
This was the Chart I wanted to post.

Sorry.
>>
>>66803566
now, tell me the retired population, the increase in labor force participation rate among those who are the age to retire, and the average age for getting one's first job.
>>
>>66801566
I didn't mean to post part time way back there.

Here is some other info though.
>>
>>66803889
Good question.

I can't post the Black Market Labor Force Size by Population or Earnings ...

So... I wonder if I can isolate retired population....
>>
>>66803889
Kinda looks like start with 59 Million of the 319 Million... subtract 9 M Disabled, their Dependents 3 M + 2 M, then subtract 6.1 Survivors...

59 - 9 - 5 - 6.1 = 38.9 Million Retired who are not dependents.

I'm thinking this is a pretty good number.

38.9 Million Retired with Social Security.

But there are others who retire with private benefits, private wealth, retirement plans..

Maybe 40 Million is a conservative number of Retired including those younger than social security age.

-

Thanks.

Social Security Basic Facts (Printer Friendly Version)
October 13, 2015

In 2015, over 59 million Americans will receive almost $870 billion in Social Security benefits.
June 2015 Beneficiary Data
Retired workers 39.5 million $53 billion $1,335 average monthly benefit
dependents 3 million $ 2 billion
Disabled workers 9 million $10.5 billion $1,165 average monthly benefit
dependents 2 million $ .7 billion
Survivors 6.1 million $ 6.7 billion

https://www.ssa.gov/news/press/basicfact.html

Just subtract the Disabled Americans?

https://www.ssa.gov/news/press/basicfact.html
>>
>>66796715
Because they'll be dead before shit hits the fan and they want to be rich when they die.
>>
>>66805426
bump
>>
GODDAMNIT I JUST HAD A HUGE POST DELETED THAT SUMMED UP THIS INFORMATION IN A DIGESTIBLE WAY. FUCK

What does all of this info tell us? Are we near the end of some great exit scheme pulled by the elites of the baby boomer generation?
>>
>>66808947

they're getting ballsier

the numbers are not right

we should get mad
>>
>>66809341
What's going to happen as the rich boomers die off
>>
>>66809816

rich boomer spawn will take their place
>>
>>66796715
>Jesus fucking Christ look at Brazil, that is the biggest genetic shit mixing pot in the world AND THEIR ECONOMY IS CURRENTLY IN COMPLETE FREE FALL AND THEIR ENTIRE GOVERNMENT IS FALLING APART


Great Post in terms of bringing Anons in to discuss.

Wow.

Weirdly the Central BANKS, Bank of International Settlements, World Trade Organization, United Nations, International Monetary Fund, and World Bank...

They set the Interest Rates for Brazil and other Devloping Countries.

Plus... their bank members who loan money to the developing countries are "Extracting Wealth" or "Currency" from that developing nation...

hm...

The money needed to restart or kick start the developing economy... is extracted to Western Banks.

hm...

Like:

- Argentine
- Venezuela
- Equador
- Chile'
- Peru
- Brazil
- Whatever
>>
>>66808947
>What does all of this info tell us?

I think you get it.

We have to question the basics of all assuptions.

- Fiat Money
- World Reserve Currencies
- Debt Based Money
- Labor Based Money
- Usury across all sectors (from households, thru all corporations, thru schools and governments, to banking and federal funding)

- utility of Money
- Public versus Private Banking
- Usury Fees, Interest Rate Schemes, many kinds of Loans that are predatory
- How do we Finance Public Works, Roads, Bridges, highways, Dams, ports, Parks, Monuments, parking... utilities
- Are Utilities still best managed by Public Funding, Support, Regulation, Management, and.... what else should be managed as a Utility if that is the way to protect the commons

What are the hard issues?

- Central Banking
- Powers of TBTF Banks, Wall Street Banks,... Charters of banks, and visbility of where the most money in the economy is created... how should that power be regulated and controlled... how should the biggest power of the economy to create money be controlled, monitored, regulated, and suppressed?

What else?

How do we Control, Regulate, Monitor, and suppress the Private Central Bank Corporation who prefer bailouts to free markets and business destruction?
>>
>>66812221
Paid Crop Insurance to areas where crops can't reliably grow:

$370 Million Dollars
>>
Bumb
>>
>>66812221
Nationalize banks? Impose taxes or regulations on offshore/international lending?
>>
>>66798190
The thing is that immigration can work, quite successfully, regardless of even the "muh bell curve.' But it's a process that takes tremendous forethought and skill to implement.

Politics done Pre-45 was much more capable, because we didn't hog tie ourselves with Dawkins-style autism in our politics.

So during World War 1, when we had a massive German population, which could've complicated our war effort, we took measures to ensure that we would solve the issue.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americanization_(immigration)

We couldn't pull this off today because liberals. (To be honest.) But nevertheless, it isn't immigration, even from 'third world' nations that necessarily scares me. It's letting people immigrate into your nation who specifically refuse to renounce Sharia Law, because that's 'mean.'

Likewise, illegal immigration is also pretty terrible. Chances are that an illegal immigrant couldn't actually become a citizen for a reason.
Thread replies: 97
Thread images: 41

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.