What does /pol/ think about the US government applying the term "terrorist" so liberally?
The one on the left built the world. The on on the right tries to destroy what was built.
>>57364923
that's not the question I asked nigger.
The woman on the right probably read the book instead of just posing with it
>>57364952
you can't expect people to look at the image AND to read your post.
You can only have one.
>>57364788
The left only uses her weapon in self defense and expresses her beliefs peacefully because that's what here book tells her to do.
The right uses her weapon in offense to spread her beliefs violently because that's what her book tells her to do.
>>57364788
Left is such a fucking qt, would wife.
God dammit.
Fuck you /pol/.
Fuck you all so much.
>>57365081
well done
>>57364788
the one on the right actually have balls to go kill someone tbqh.
>>57365488
Oldfag filename
Im worried about aussies labeling 'sovereign citizens' as a potential threat. Now I hate them fucks like most people but what the fuck are you lot over there doing.
>>57364788
ter·ror·ism
ˈterəˌrizəm
noun
the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
If someone does something that fits this definition then they are a terrorist.
Muslims just happen to always do this.
>>57365644
confirmed for terrorism.
Reported to fbi. I have backtraced you.
>>57364788
Left = Defense
Right = Offense
>>57365644
Turkish "women" confirmed for men.
>>57364788
>What does /pol/ think about the US government
Corrupt kike money machine.
>>57365767
but isnt best defense is offense?!
>>57365792
>pic related is a real turkish women
thanks senpai. i dont want arabic durka durka.
>>57364788
The left makes america better. The right makes america worse.
How hard is that to see?
>>57364788
No white American woman has ever gone on a mass shooting spree with an AR-15 because of the bible. I checked.
Less than a month ago, a sand nigger woman with a gun and a bomb blew up a dog for the Koran.
>>57365803
Tactically, yes.
Morally, no.
>>57364788
Used to do the same thing with the word communist. Its just the word of the generation to ID those guys we don't like.
You fucking ADD retards didn't even read the question.
>>57365927
and i thought it was the victor who decides what is morally wrong or right.
you guys are pussies.
>>57365669
Spicy meatball.
words have meaning. terry is a non-state actor using terror to facilitate change n junk
>>57365972
Morals are relative.
The Muslim has a book that tells them to go on the offensive, so of course the Muslim is going to believe she is morally right.
I'm talking about enlightened morals however. You know, the kind of morals that shaped the modern, scientific, Western world in all its glory?
>>57364788
>Left
Lives in a country Muslims want to live in because it's not ruined by Islam.
Has responsibly used her rifle for marksmanship and maybe hunting.
>Right
Wants to ruin the West like her homeland with Islam, feels entitled to live in Western country while actively advocating violence inside it.
Probably won't use rifle, will just suicide bomb civilians in a populated area.
Boy, liberals sure got me questioning my perspective.
>explain difference between defense and attack
no
>>57366078
are you absolutely sure that western morals are on such a high ground. because last i remember, you guys were colonizing and exploiting pretty much whole world. and are still doing by poking your noses in to other countries such as recently, syria.
so this is the "enlightened morals" of the "civilized western world"?
>>57366141
wise move
>>57366161
Muslims did the same thing, the difference is they weren't as good at it. They still killed more people in the process of doing so.
>>57366161
You're confusing morals with political and business agendas.
>>57366232
>it was muslims who started 2 world wars and caused death of i dont know how many 10s of millions.
>>57365972
Your book is a lie, it was Satan that spoke to Muhammad
>>57366264
having the moral but not applying it to real life means you are doing something morally wrong.
you either have to apply the so called "moral" to your real life issues, or you dont have right to call that you have the "morals". it doesnt work like that.
muslim girls have killed 10 guys and now she is dead , American's girl just training shoot
>>57366290
>implying i even believe in islam
>>57364788
One doesn't kill and the other one does?
>>57364788
If they are concerned about the so-called terrorists that are already here, I don't see their logic in using it as an excuse to import more of them in the form of mideast refugees.
>>57366271
Muslims invaded and slaughtered whole swaths of Africa, the Middle East, and attempted to do the same to Europe with lesser success. They took the Persian empire, likely the most powerful empire of its time, and took it back to 2nd Century BC.
Besides, the World Wars weren't such a bad thing. It spelled the end of the Ottoman Empire which essentially disarmed Islam from being a unified force out to conquer the world.
Look at every Western nation in the world.
Highest standard of living.
Best human rights.
Best technology.
Best culture.
Look at every Muslim nation.
Still living in the dark ages.
Death for apostasy.
People getting beheaded is the norm.
>What does /pol/ think about the US government applying the term "terrorist" so liberally?
>What does /pol/ think about the US government applying the term "terrorist" so liberally?
>What does /pol/ think about the US government applying the term "terrorist" so liberally?
READ you morons...READ
>>57366529
>world wars wasnt such a bad thing
well dude. i didnt read the rest.
>>57365285
/thread
>>57364923
This
>>57365644
>woman
>balls
>killing someone when it's not self defense
>>57364788
The one on the left is just posing for a provocative photograph. The one on the right is actually going to explode.
>>57365081
Of course you can. The christians want to defend their rights and ways of life. The muslims want to conquer others.
Big difference
>>57366321
Not everyone follows morals bub.
The one on the right kills people.
![claudia7[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/ROE0tp1.jpg "claudia7[1].jpg")
>>57366753
than you cant claim that you have the morals.
>>57366271
Don't pretend the turks didn't fully participate in at least one of those wars.
The one in the left won't shoot me also Christianity and the holy bible is not only for Americans
![claudia-ochoa-felix1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/syzBXcx.jpg "claudia-ochoa-felix1[1].jpg")
Mexican Master Race
>>57364788
there is no difference, just like there is no good or bad guy, but you have to pick a side, better get on board for the big win, be greatful we have an enemy otherwise we'd turn on each other
>>57366610
Wars happen, roach. I don't blame Muslims for attempting to conquer and subjugate their neighbors, I blame them for living in the dark-ages, stopping all innovation and science and being a force for stupidity in the world.
I blame muslims for not growing up and out of this mindset of conquest and subjugation.
It would take over 5 WW1s to compare to all the people killed in slavery in Muslim slave trade. WW1 and WW2 together do not add up to this.
It's not about saying that one side has done less evil shit than the other historically. It's about the fact your people still exist in 600AD.
Didn't expect you to actually have a real argument anyway, you're writing me on a computer that wouldn't be possible if Europe were all Muslim.
>>57364788
The term itself is very broad, it basically just means 'Someone who does something to induce terror.'
I find it more annoying that media has narrowed the term down to basically mean only Islamic terrorists annoying. But this backlash "HURR WHY DONT WE CALL WHITE PEOPLE TERRORISTS!" is far more annoying.
Also liberals hijacking mental health / enforcing of current laws for MUH GUN CONTROL is equally annoying.
Expatriate btw.
>>57366780
we participated in a defensive stance tbqh
>>57366890
>wars happen
>death of 10s of millions which are mostly europeans etc. arent a bad thing.
you are just an edgy kid really.
The one on the left is a attention whore, the one on the right has probably killed a few SAA or Kurds.
>>57366702
You're not wrong, but the Maple Nigger has a point. The image is fair game. OP has to address any posts that address any content. It's written in the Constitution.
>>57364788
The image on the left expresses patriotism or love for one's country.
The image on the right expresses fanaticism or extreme, uncritical enthusiasm or zeal for a specific denomination.
>>57366979
>Get BTFO
>"Y-You're just being edgy"
Stay told and mad. Funny how you dodge around the fact that Islam killed way more than both World Wars together because it's true. Your countries still slaughter humans by the dozens just for not adapting your superstitions.
I love the smell of roasted kebabs in the morning.
>>57366271
Don't confuse western world with the "enlightened" elite.
>>57366979
>we participated in a defensive stance tbqh
This is the excuse they all used. The murder of all those Armenians was just another defensive ploy, I suppose.
The Ottoman imperialists were just a bunch of sweethearts.
>>57366161
>>57365972
>>57365803
How do you guys get so much time to shitpost on 4chan? Don't you have to pray like.. 5 times a day and fuck goats in between? I'm pretty sure if the sharia police caught you they would cut both your hands off.
>>57367133
They slaughter their own people right now for minor religious differences.
>>57364788
The one on the left will stay in it's country in defense, the one on the right will move into yours on offense.
>>57367010
This. Left is on our side and doesn't want to kill us. Right wants to kill us.
>>57367199
i didnt go to office today. and i dont pray ever.
>>57367316
>america
>minding its own business
Have you been under a rock, say, the last 200 years?
>>57365644
>im 11 and i think murder is kewl
Or you're just a Muslim, which is just a religion for 11 year olds. At last that's what your prophet was into.
>>57367536
America really only fucks with shitskin countries, which you should really be grateful for. We bomb the living fuck out of the same people who invaded you and raped your country and lineage turning you into a shitskin rape baby.
Absolutely nothing wrong with killing Muslims.
>>57364788
>explain the difference
ass and trigger discpline
>>57364788
>What does /pol/ think about the US government applying the term "terrorist" so liberally?
calling it like they see it. if you ask me, so called moderate muslims are the problem. they don't want to man up and call out their religious bros who commit acts of terror for what they are.
>What does /pol/ think about the US government applying the term "terrorist" so liberally?
Not liberally enough, IMO.
>Muh "moderate" rebels
>>57364788
>>57364788
The war on terror is pure propaganda to justify the destabilisation of the middle east and to get the oil. The USA/NATO declares who a terrorist is in order mobilise the nation against the middle east. It is fearmongering.
>>57364788
It is a sign of weakness
>>57364788
Terrorist is a crazy sandnigger with an automatic rifle because they earned that reputation.
>>57364788
>What does /pol/ think about the US government applying the term "terrorist" so liberally?
I really dislike how they use the term terrorist to describe partisans/guerrillas. They are different things, and Al Queida and ISIS in Iraq and Syria definitely aren't operating as terrorists.
>>57367536
Stood outside her house in a tanktop with the inability to join combat roles in the military.
Seems pretty defensive role to me in comparison to wearing military gear.
Also, ones got a grenade.
>>57367461
By denouncing Islam you may be spared on the reconquest of Constantinople.
>>57367674
They were just selling girl scout cookies in Paris.
>>57364788
Libtards throw around the word terrorist more often, and use it to demonize their opposition even in petty disputes.
SJWs stated faGGots are worse than ISIS because they don't agree over tits in video games. Let that sink in for a bit.
>>57364788
>whats the difference?
There isn't one, we need to search every house in America top to bottom until we're sure we collected every last one ofthem then dump them in the oacean along with their korans.
>>57367589
She looks a little young to be an E9
>>57367808
i am not christian either.
>>57367542
can show you amazing 14 year old asses that d make you go pedo as well man.
The first one it's just pretending that she will kill for his religion, but its too much of a pussy
The second one its doing it right now
>>57367835
>in Iraq and Syria
Paris was a terrorist attack. But Paris isn't in Iraq or Syria.
>>57364788
The one on the right didn't cheat on her husband while he was in combat?
Twitter fame made Holly a real whore.
>>57367843
Outlawing murder and enforcing that prohibition by use of force is a "political aim?"
>>57367920
Genociding al the Christians certainly didn't terrorize anybody. I'm sure the ones that managed to convert were not induced to do so by terror.
>>57367895
Lucky for you Christians don't chop peoples heads off for not following their religion. Do what you want.
>>57368040
They are operating a guerrillas in Iraq and Syria
>>57364788
>explain the difference
One isn't planning to kill people
>>57364788
the one on the left will give you a blow job
the one on the right will blow you up
>>57366979
>implying half of the west didnt participate in defensive stance
>>57368069
>i dont know what inquisition is
>medieval dark age never happened
>crusaders dindu nuffin
k
>>57368314
Christians evolved out of the dark ages, Muslims wallow in it.
Funny how you say you aren't a Muslim but you're still a massive apologist and think they have moral high ground.
Youre best bet is to stop posting now before you look even more ignorant and stupid than your flag implies.
>>57368314
u half to go back 1000 years back to compare christianity with todaays islam xd top kek
>>57368314
crusaders killed subhumans, so yes. also, we'll take constantinople back very soon you filthy baklava.
>>57368244
Just because she's a muslim doesn't mean she will explode you
>>57368453
shhhh, you're time for talk was up two years ago.
The thing the left is doing is obliterating the term "terrorism" for all practical purposes. They are experts at such things. Obama has been labeling all acts of Muslim terrorists supported by terrorist organizations as "isolated" extremism. At the same time the left are terming perpetrators of isolated acts of violence in america as terrorists.
Terrorists are now isolated extremists and isolated extremists are terrorists.
Fucking newspeak.
I find it very sinister.
Right looks more attractive than left tbqh lads.
Just needs to lose the table cloth
>>57368117
Nothing precludes guerrillas from engaging in terrorism. In fact, that one of their favorite tactics.
>>57364788
The one on the left isn't going to go out and murder people. The one on the right is. Seems like a pretty obvious distinction.
Alright /pol/, I've been saving up for this very instance and it looks like the moment has arrived where I can't wait any longer because soon I may not be able to purchase a firearm.
I've got $7000 saved towards this but I'll up it to $9000 if you can convince me it's completely necessary. Keep in mind this money needs to be able to purchase additional equipment such as an appropriately sized locker, additional ammunition, means of target practice, and if necessary, practice lessons.
I'm going to purchase a firearm legally.
What choice is best to allow me to appropriately accomplish all of the following:
1. Defend my property from unwanted or criminal offenders.
2. Strike fear into the eyes of those that see me wielding it, should things come to that.
3. In the evnt of a government insurrection or mobilization against the citizen and his/her rights and/or freedomes, effectively allow me to do my part in the defense of keeping my state free.
>>57368747
Should I assume from a refusal to answer the question posed that you recognize how ridiculously tenuous the questioned assertion is?
>>57368778
A $9000 donation to the Bernie Sanders campaign because you won't need a firearm after you're all singing kumbaya
>>57368778
50bmg
>>57368778
A modded AR-15 might be your best option.
Though primarily an offensive weapon, it won't duck up on you in a dire situation.
It's also cheap enough that you can essentially stockpile on extra ammunition
>>57368778
Also, consider getting a carbine as opposed to an AR.
An AR will literally break your arm if you are not holding it perfectly
>>57364788
the one on the left is satire of the right one.
>>57368789
No. You should assume that the government are hypocrites and that letting a bunch of criminals tell you what's right and wrong is stupid.
>>57364788
anyone with a gun is a terrorist desu senpai
>>57369245
People like you are the reason this nation is so keked.
>>57364788
Girl on left is posing for picture and no one will die, Girl on right is taking last picture for family to remember her by as she goes to kill infidels.
>>57368778
>I've got $7000 saved towards this
You can pick up a good AR-15 for $1500
You'll also want to pick up a pistol or two, and have a shotgun on hand. With $7000 and a little creative shopping, you can build a substantial arsenal and get plenty of ammunition.
>>57369099
Also this. Beretta makes the Cx4 storm, which is a 9mm carbine, and its magazines are interchangable with the 92FS (which is a pistol).
The negative about it is that it is firing pistol rounds. Even though they are pretty cheap, you've only got a certain range with them. But for home defense, it might be the long arm for you. A 9mm isn't going to punch through every wall it comes across, unlike some rifle rounds would.
>>57369291
How is Japan even keked? You don't have niggers or feminists. You don't even need guns.
Japan is one of those once in a lifetime kind of civilizations that can actually afford to not have police, and has done this before. Goes to show the power of what being far away from niggers and arabs will do.
>>57369099
>An AR will literally break your arm if you are not holding it perfectly
califag pls go.
>>57369366
>$1500
Assault Rifles are cheaper than I thought
>>57369099
>An AR will literally break your arm
Wtf are you talking about?
>noguns detected
>>57369465
You can get a good AR for $1500.
You can get an AR for $800.
>>57369516
bullshit. you can easily build a quality AR for less than 800 bucks. maybe less than 500 bucks.
problem is that if you don't know how to shoot with iron sights, you're fucking yourself on the cost of the optics.
>>57369377
>can actually afford to not have police
Yeah because they're all serving yakuza anyway
>>57369215
>No.
Then you respond to my post without addressing my post and proving that you are only posting to see yourself post on the internet than actually discussing it. Thank you for proving to me that you are closed-minded and self-entitled.
>>57369465
You can get an AK pattern rifle for $400, and if you really shop, an SKS for $300. Both are considered scary salt rifles.
You need to go delete your post about an AR breaking arms though, you know absolutely nothing about guns.
Actually leave it, it's really funny.
>>57369841
Happened to my friend in the army but ok bud
>>57366774
Of course I can.
The West has Western enlightened morals.
Not everyone chooses to follow them.
When someone like the woman with the quran in the OP kills in the name of Islam, that's perfectly "moral" in the eyes of certain Muslims.
>>57369696
That's literally what you're doing motherfucker. Noone cares about your vocabulary. Look where you are.
What do you want me to answer retard? Yeah, policing people not to murder obviously wouldn't be a negative political aim now would it? What now?
>>57369939
Shooting on full fun is different than shooting a semi-auto.
A .223 on semi auto isn't going to dislocate your shoulder like a .30-06 or 8 gauge shotgun can.
>>57364923
hahahahah you believe this
hahahahahahahaha
america poisoned, butchered, raped, stole from Muslims for years. basically they rose against them and now USA is salty. Russia has to clean up their mess.
>>57369978
>That's literally what you're doing motherfucker.
I did not address the empty post except for the image about government and force with a post about government and force in regards to murder?
I'd say don't bother answering because you sir, are either too retarded to understand when someone is talking about what you write and that would require lacking the intelligence to do much more than breath in and out let alone communicate on the internet OR you are exactly the closed-minded anon who believes he is always right regardless of reality. I'm certain you will prove me right by responding anyways without regards to anything I post.
>>57370382
Your post provided absolutely nothing. Are you autistic?
What you mentioned earlier is common sense and I didn't disagree.
>>57370554
>Your post provided absolutely nothing.
It is everyone else's job to prove your wrong, Russell? That if you claim a teapot orbits the sun behind the moon the fact that no one provided to the otherwise your post still has value? Go read the sticky about burden of proof.
>>57371108
What in the fuck are you going on about? Burden of proof for what, you retard? 2 definitions in a picture I found on the Internet? I never claimed anything.
>>57364788
left is protect your standarts,
right is ruin other people's standarts.
>>57371774
>What in the fuck are you going on about?
I'd try to explain it to you but you already failed with the simple words and I cannot speak gibberish.
>>57371898
Thank God.
>>57364788
Left one is good looking, nice firms tits
>>57371898
>I cannot speak gibberish *while sober enough to explain anything.
Why do you think I would bring up a circumstance that completely contradicts what your image expressed?
>>57371999
Which is fucking stupid because there's a bunch of other examples that support it. That's called cherry picking idiot.
>>57366836
Me gusta
>>57372136
>Which is fucking stupid because there's a bunch of other examples that support it.
Have you ever heard of the cherry-picking fallacy?
If it is not an accurate reflection of the entire truth is it still an accurate reflection of the truth?
>>57372337
>closed-minded anon who believes he is always right regardless of reality
>self-entitled
We're you describing yourself?
Also, your vocabulary comes off as tryhard, noone cares that you are drunk, and you suck at trolling.
>>57370131
Anything larger than 10 gauge is usually referred to as "bore", ie 8 bore. Also, if these dislocate your shoulder, then you are firing them wrong.
>>57370199
>doesn't realize that all pirates were muslim
>doesn't know that they extorted money from/robbed founding fathers and their supply ships
>doesn't realize this is justified in mudslime religion
>doesn't realize the crusades were a response (not just random fucking act) to mudslimes ruining the world
>>57372608
>inb4 you correct "we're" like an autist.
>>57372337
Wow. How unexpected. You failed to address what was posted and resorted to trying to evoke an emotional response by attacking the poster's character.
I take it then that you have heard about the cherry-picking fallacy and now transiting to sour grapes. Wow. How deliciously typical of you anon.
>>57364788
i think the west is our land, go firing a gun in another mans country and you deserve what is coming to you.
>>57372623
>Also, if these dislocate your shoulder, then you are firing them wrong.
No kidding. I've never dislocated my shoulder shooting before. I learned to shoot on my 16in kiddie .22
>Anything larger than 10 gauge is usually referred to as "bore", ie 8 bore
Never heard that before in my life. The more you know.
>>57372774
This isn't your personal debate simulator champ. You have mental issues. Keep on drinking, you schizo NEET fuck. I gotta goto class.
>>57369939
Ok, army friends, he definitely did break his arm with an ar. Too dumb for the other branches of milatary, army will take you.
>>57372788
Truth is most gays don't like Islam at all. Most gay people I know are extremely conservative.
The Jews are the problem, and it is glorious wathching them cry victim when attacked by the very Muslim shitskins they imported into our countries!
I propose a deal: we give the Muslims Israel in return for leaving our nations.
>>57373091
>This isn't your
Again you avoid commenting on what was posted to comment about the poster. Are you posting merely because you have an unrestrainable (and completely immature) need to have the last word? I was very clear how I recognize you have abandoned your end of anything even loosely resembling a discussion but it seems you still want to present empty words. I am left with but one option and that is to entertain myself by making you look like an idiot.
>>57364923
the woman on the left comes from a first world country where extremist groups such as the KKK do not have a chance to grow. the woman on the right comes from a war torn country where extremist groups have an opportunity to grow.
>>57368912
If I had a bunch of money to blow on on a firearm and I lived in the US I'd get a beautiful Noveske.
>>57364788
considering they label everyone that doesn't agree with them is troubling. I have a hard time believing that veterans or Tea Party people are terrorists, but they got on the watch list.
White on vacation in Japan
Left would not kill me if she had a chance
Right would kill me if she had a chance
That is a pretty big difference to me
>>57373258
I'm not here to discuss logical fallacies with you, kid.
There never was an argument. You presented a stupid contradiction that was common sense and then wouldn't shut up about it. I still answered it and you've been bitching ever since.
KILL yourself, my man.
>>57373695
>There never was an argument.
I already notified you that I see your empty words (and that is the only apt description I can put to the content of what you just posted as it is directly contradicted by what we posted in this thread earlier like my argument that you are cherry-picking about your argument about government and force) so I am left entertaining myself proving you are an idiot. This is nearly the exact same content that was posted previously but you will still respond to it with maybe something about cherry-picking (probably denying it was brought up or that you cherry-pick) so as to justify you making another comment about the poster's character. That will prove my point for me that you are an immature idiot with an irresistible need to have the last word.
>>57364788
Terrorist is a term for people who commit terror attacks to instill fear & intimidation against the people of the attacked country/society. Since a lot of people think US is an oppressor, they commit terror attacks against the US to instill fear in the minds of Americans hence they get called terrorists
>>57373937
So you can't think of one thing the government forces upon the citizens that is wrong?
>>57374283
What does one thing have to be wrong with the government to make everything wrong with the government? Are you erecting an impossible standard of perfection?
>>57364788
Chick on the right is actually going to use her gun.
>>57374375
Is the government, by defining who is a terrorist and who isn't?
>>57374492
>Is the government, by defining who is a terrorist and who isn't?
Your question seems to be missing the object clause, ie. it makes no sense. It should be something like "Is the government, by defining who is a terrorist and who isn't, something something something?
>>57374555
Jesus christ. Is the government erecting an impossible standard of perfection by defining who is a terrorist and who isn't? You are an imbecile who js arguing for the sake of it.
>>57374690
>Is the government erecting an impossible standard of perfection by defining who is a terrorist and who isn't?
No. I don't see what this has to do with the original image that used a blanket generalization of government in an attempt to equate government as an organization of terrorism in >>57367843
>>57364788
>Explain the difference
The one on the right (facing the picture) follows a stupid and violent religion, the one on the left doesn't
>>57374785
Why is it then, that a person who does one single thing wrong (according to the government) can be labeled a terrorist (also according to the government)?
>>57375037
>Why is it then, that a person who does one single thing wrong (according to the government) can be labeled a terrorist
Because the government is the organization everyone demands defend them from attacks. To do this the government needs to define what is or is not terrorism else the government would have carte blanch to treat everyone who attacks people as terrorists rather than merely criminals.
>>57364788
Left keeps guns for self defense while right to force her world view on others
When was the last time a Christian went to a sandnigger country and went on a rampage with 10+ ppl killed?
>>57375192
I don't depend on them to defend me, nor do I demand them to.
>>57375458
So if France decided to take your property from you and the US didn't do anything to stop them you'd be perfectly fine with that?
>>57364788
The difference is were not in the fucking middle east.
>>57375497
I'd defend myself and my property. Liberty = Responsibility
>>57375607
France expects that from an American and thus use a drone to deliver knock out gas. You fail to defend your property and you are still alive. You won't demand that the US do something about the theft and you'll try to do it yourself? Even though the US won't facilitate your transportation by allowing you to use any US federal regulated form of transportation (like flying and sailing) you are going to buy your own ship or plane hire/operate it yourself to get to France or just accept that others can just fuck with you whenever they want because no one else will defend you?
>>57364788
The guidance counselor and cop in my high school called me a terrorist for drawing a stick figure war picture. People are fucking dumb.
>>57375724
Are you 12?
You seem to think I'm completely anti-gov? Government has it's place, but they like to overstep their bounds in some areas.
National defense isn't the same as personal defense. I would hope they wouldn't allow France to fly drones in the country or go door to door, if they did that would make both countries terrorists.
>>57372709
>inb4 you correct "we're" like an autist.
Actually, it should be, "as an autist would".
>>57376128
>You seem to think I'm completely anti-gov?
How do you come to that conclusion? All I've done is address a retarded blanket generalization about the government.
Do you know they are called "blanket" generalizations? Because just like a blanket the generalization covers up important truths.
>National defense isn't the same as personal defense.
Are you now admitting that you WOULD demand the US government to defend you from attacks, specifically international attacks?
>>57364788
I don't like it. It's almost like "Communist" was. No one really knows what one is, but the government calls them that so they must be bad. It's like a label to slap on a person or group if they disagree with the government too much. Also, terrorism is the one crime that seems to justify stripping the rights of the people, and now more and more things are being described as terrorism.
>>57376193
Thanks.
>>57364788
explain the difference
Too broad of a term
Just call out the individuals already, they're muslim terrorists
>>57364788
Well for starters the one on the left is satirizing the one on the right.
>>57364788
the one on the left didn't blow herself up in a crowded market place to serve her 'moon dog' or whatever ragheads worship
ITT: op is a faggot
>>57373184
i can agree with this, jews and muslims are not white, they both speak the same sand nigger lingo so why not let them fend for them selves? Bringing the to countries where the life style is advanced is like shitting on a freshly made salad.
>>57376259
>You seem to think I'm completely anti-gov?
>How do you come to that conclusion? All I've done is address a retarded blanket generalization about the government.
>Do you know they are called "blanket" generalizations? Because just like a blanket the generalization covers up important truths.
What truths is it covering up? That government is to be revered even when it commits evil acts? You're being too vague. You haven't even stated your point. You posts are almost bot-like, similar to someone copy-pasting from a dictionary.
>Are you now admitting that you WOULD demand the US government to defend you from attacks, specifically international attacks? Yes, national defense (the people as a whole) is a government responsibility, but they have no business in my personal safety and I wouldn't expect nor want them to.
>>57376355
the only actual response to my post. Thanks anon
>>57376865
Woops fucked up my green text
>>57364788
Islam is the problem.
#islamkills
#endislam
>>57376419
The UCC Oregon shooter was literally motivated by atheism as well.
He was specifically looking for Christians, to send them to their god.
>>57376865
>What truths is it covering up? That government is to be revered even when it commits evil acts?
No one rational considers that is a truth about government. You've already stumbled over one truth that is covered up by that blanket generalization, the obligation of the US government to defend its people from attacks.
>You haven't even stated your point.
My points that demonstrate how the blanket generalization does not reflect the whole truth are not in themselves points that I have stated? What are they then? What is your definition of a "point?"
>>57377080
>No one rational considers that is a truth about government.
Our government hasn't committed evil acts?
>You've already stumbled over one truth that is covered up by that blanket generalization, the obligation of the US government to defend its people from attacks.
I didn't stumble across shit. That's common sense. The picture I posted is a comparison of 2 definitions which point out the hipocracy within our current administration. It is not a blanket generalization of all government. The current government DOES commit acts which one could label as being terroristic. A government is necessary for society to function, but that has nothing to do with whether they commit terrorist acts or not. The picture doesn't imply that government isn't necessary.
>My points that demonstrate how the blanket generalization does not reflect the whole truth are not in themselves points that I have stated? What are they then? What is your definition of a "point?"
You keep arguing about semantics and not the picture. You keep mentioning truths, but expect me to define them. It seems like you are a statist, but I can't tell because you are too vague in your answers. You come off as what you accused me of being earlier (a self-entitled douchebag who thinks he knows everything).
>>57364788
You're right, we should call them what them what they are, Islamic Extremists.
>>57368865
dak dak scrub
>>57364788
>explain the difference
There is no difference, both have the right to follow their religion, love their country and protect themselves.
>>57364788
Left: Killed 0 people
Right: Killed 20 people
Can you see the different now?
>>57364788
honestly looks like the one on the right is more prepared to fight, while the one on the left is just posing for a picture.
>>57376419
somehow lanza always takes the cake when it comes to creepiness, he just blows the other guys out of the water
>>57364788
>Explain the difference
The one on the left probably burns/has burned coal. The one on the right keeps it in her own race
As to you post, I wish they'd actually use the term terrorist. Today it's just "lone wolves" or "workplace violence"
>>57378659
>Our government hasn't committed evil acts?
Straw man? The question was about people revering the government despite committing evil acts. That is clearly not a truth of government. Government does not exist for people to revere it in the United States. Civic Duty involves four things: Defend the Constitution if called to serve (conscription), pay your taxes, serve on the jury if called, and vote. Nowhere is there any expectation of civilians revering their government. In fact, it is argued that questioning our government is a civic duty.
>That's common sense
One so common you argued against its existence.
>You keep arguing about semantics and not the picture
I still wait for your definition of a "point."
>>57378991
The girl on the left should git gud.
>>57364788
One on the right is in full combat gear and is ready to fight
One on the left is wearing a tank top and was handed a gun by her husband and asked to pose for a photo
>>57379260
A point would be a reason for me to keep responding to you.
>>57379444
>A point would be a reason for me to keep responding to you.
Wow. What a wholly subjective and self-serving definition of a point. It gives you ever discretion to declare anything another posts is not a point regardless of its relevance or truth.
>>57379444
I mean, it isn't at all anything like a "sticking point" considered as something that needs to be addressed during a conversation as it is:
>a problem or point on which agreement cannot be reached, preventing progress from being made
You'll just expect agreement and if it is not forthcoming it would still not be a point as you'd see no reason to respond as you've already got your expectation and not getting self-validation isn't important. You are right and you know you cannot be wrong regardless of the facts.
Left: A politcal movement which happens to be Christian.
Right: A political movement married to religious texts which give it legitimacy and authority.
>>57364788
>What does /pol/ think about the US government applying the term "terrorist" so liberally?
How could the government get away with what they're doing if the people didn't run and hide under the illusion of security?
>>57364788
>What does /pol/ think about the US government applying the term "terrorist" so liberally?
>government
I think you mean the media. The government is extremely pc and wont call anything other than neo nazi skin heads wearing kkk gear terrorists.
>>57366702
So why did the US and Russia destroy muslim countries in a series of proxy wars? Muslims just want their revenge.
>>57379559
WOW YOU'RE RIGHT! Maybe it's because I'm on 4chan and could give a shit less about your opinion, to be honest! You're the one who thinks this is some kind of academic debate with your name on the line. Kek.
Why did you disregard most of what I stated in this post >>57378659 ?
>>57380098
>Maybe it's because I'm on 4chan and could give a shit less about your opinion, to be honest!
You come here looking for a hugbox like the CVCK you are. That's the only possible explanation as clearly you can't be bothered to actually think about what you are posting before you post it and then have to deal with your idiocy being pointed out to you by other posters.
>Why did you disregard most of what I stated in this post
Did I? I thought I addressed every point you raised in my response in
>>57379260
You asked a retarded question about the government not committing stupid or evil acts. I pointed out how retarded the question was as government cannot avoid it. Government is, as you yourself has argued about, is not perfect.
>That's common sense.
This was also addressed. Your attempt to marginalize a truth about government obligation as "common sense," I guess you tried because it did not come to you previously, was refuted by your own previous attempt to argue everyone demands defense and "liberty=responsibility."
>You keep arguing about semantics and not the picture.
This has also now been addressed. You have a completely self-serving definition of "points" and anything that doesn't meet your requirement as a "point" is marginalized as "semantics and not the picture."
Your best arguments has been blatant and pathetic attempts to marginalize inconvenient facts. This includes the inconvenient fact that people demand defense from the government. This includes the inconvenient fact that government needs to define terrorist to separate them from other law breakers.
But don't you mind about these inconvenient facts. Just cling to that belief that the government is an organization of terrorism just like the terrorists they profess to fight.
>>57380098
Oh, and nowhere did I expect you to define them. I expect you to acknowledge them as they are presented rather than cherry-picking among them and only giving consideration to the truths that support your position and disregard those that undermine your position.
>>57380711
Still ignoring everything else I said in that post.
>>57380937
Can you specify what part of the post was ignored?
>>57380966
>The picture I posted is a comparison of 2 definitions which point out the hipocracy within our current administration. It is not a blanket generalization of all government. The current government DOES commit acts which one could label as being terroristic. A government is necessary for society to function, but that has nothing to do with whether they commit terrorist acts or not. The picture doesn't imply that government isn't necessary.
>>57380937
While I am waiting I'll try to guess what you claim was ignored. Maybe the part about the current government does commit acts which one could label as being terroristic.
That part was addressed long before in my very first post. Using force to enforce the law against murder is not "being terroristic." Using force to enforce any law created through due process of the legslature. . .
Ah. I was right. To continue -
Using force to enforce any law created through due process of the legislature is categorically not terrorism. Citizens cannot just disregard the laws and expect there not to be punishment. In short use of force by the government on its own constituency is categorically not terrorism.
>>57381221
Ah, yes. This was back in the first period where it seemed you didn't bother to read what I wrote so it is no wonder you thought I ignored it because you were unaware I addressed it hours ago.
>>57381422
Where does it mention laws in the picture? You brought them up.
Is killing civilians terrorism?
>as implied by: >>57368747
>>57381988
>Where does it mention laws in the picture?
Let me guess. You are implying the government uses force without relations to law?
>Is killing civilians terrorism?
No. Executions carried out with due process of the law is justice not terrorism. Executions apply to the constituents of the government. Now if you are referring to civilians dying in relation to the war on terror that's a different thing entirely and on the battle field it is usually referred to as "collateral damage" not "terrorism."
>>57381988
Fucked up my quoting
>>57368747
>>57364788
Although both are retarded, the one in the left will hardly kill anyone for not believing in her shit
>>57382243
Oh, and your quote is correct. But are those innocent citizens the target or are they in the wrong place at the wrong time near a terrorist because he is hiding among the innocent?
>>57365644
>balls
Nice microagression there ISIL
>>57364788
Gladly
>>57382357
>>57382186
Yeah. That's what I thought.
>>57364788
>Explain the difference
I'd do the left one
>>57382924
Elbows are what really counts, tbн.
>>57382924
>Men and women as partners
"Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord." - Ephesians 5:22
>>57364923
Looks like all the American propaganda over the years have worked pretty well.
the left one fights for freedom the right one fights for a form totalitarianism. also white people > brown people, duhhh.
>>57365290
She's a whore who cheated on her veteran husband with some faggot zionist Southern Baptist
>>57385931
It's ok though, she asked god for forgiveness and he forgave her.
>>57368453
>have combat gear, grenades and dirqa dirqa signs all over
>""Just because she's a muslim doesn't mean she will explode you"
Whatever you say buddy.
>>57366659
Reminds me of the photo on /b/ some guy asked for photos of sexy women. Someone else posted female with suicide vest the comment said like she's about to burst out of her clothes or something. Can someone post that?
>>57366702
>>57380078
Sectarian wars existed long before American and Russian intervention.
One believes in turning the other cheek, the other believes in killing the opposition.
inb4 muh crusades
Starting the crusades wasn't mentioned in the bible, killing nonbelievers and using deception IS in the Koran.
>>57364788
Using the real terms is not PC, so we use bullshit buzzwords like 'terrorist', 'microaggressions', 'racism'.
Black criminal behaviour is because niggers are genetically predisposed to aggression. They are an aggressive race.
Muslims will support slaughter of Kaffirs because their magic book literally says it'll get them to heaven. The West's liberals constantly ram white guilt down the throats of white people and use propaganda to tell Muslims they're victims, which allows them to justify flying to Koranistan to wage murder on their host nations.
>>57368778
Get an AR. Market is saturated right now so picking one up is easy and cheap. Build you own or buy one. Daniel Defense has the best over the counter rifles for civilians. Buy one of those for immediate satisfaction, plu they look badass.
Self defense would require a red dot for close quarters. Get an Aimpoint, preferably micro, and avoid eotech. You could also get a variable power scope for distance shooting (when you need to pop those blue helmets with ease). Not so good in close quarters but 50 yards and further a 1-4/5/6 power scope will make your rifle a tool of death.
Buy ammo online and in bulk to save money. Fuck paying for lessons, just go to the range and get accurate.
>>57364952
you asked two questions dumb nigger
1 in your shitpost and 1 in your inflammatory picture, he answered your pictures question and not your shitposts questoin.
>>57370199
Muslims have been raping and butchering ever since mohammad had his spaz attacks.
Jesus had only to speak and millions flocked to his word. mohammad could only get a movement going by raising an army and doing it by the sword.
They invaded Spain, the Balkans, and for centuries we've been on the backfoot and it's been defensive war and counteroffensive ever since.
I'm so glad I live in the era where it's us raining hell down on them and their families from tens of thousands of feet in the sky.
Get fucked hajji.
>>57364788
I would walk up to the chick on the left while she was holding that rifle without batting an eye. The chick on the right is holding a firearm that was likely purchased by the US government and probably believes that I should be dead because of my religious beliefs.
The one on the left has no conviction to their cause. Show me a news story where an attractive white cunt shoots up a seafood restaurant for serving shellfish, because God hates shellfish.
I have personally gone to war where women like that strap themselves with explosives, or pick up an AK and shoot at me and my convoy who are there looking for bombs that might kill her if she is unlucky.
I have had to kill jihadi Jane but I've never had to kill little Sara-Jane Redneckson
>>57368778
In regards to practice, for a beginner I recommend Frontsight. Their horrendously irritating media campaigns aside, they offer good, solid training that is a great foundation for future learning. Helped me out a ton.
Just be prepared to get a fuckton of emails if you do sign up - the founder, Piazza, is treading a fine line between advertising and harassment with all his shit.
