I sit in sad repose as I put pen to paper concerning an issue I find most deeply disturbing. Although not without overlap and simplification, I plan to identify three primary positions on Mr. Donald J Trump's pronouncements. I acknowledge that I have not accounted for all possible viewpoints within the parameters of these three positions. Nevertheless, Mr. Trump and his conveniently bribed allies have been emptying garbage pails full of the vilest slanders and defamations on the clean garments of honorable people. As bad as that is, it represents only the thin end of the wedge. In a matter of days, Mr. Trump will likely attack the fabric of this nation.
I have only two questions. First, when will Mr. Trump come clean and admit that he intends to establish rack-and-thumbscrew programs? Second—and I shouldn't even have to ask this question but will for those of you who have been napping—whatever happened to his sense of humanity? As you ponder the answer to that question, consider that if I had my druthers, he would never have had the opportunity to foster and intensify his drug-drenched drama of immorality. As it stands, there appears to be some disagreement in the community regarding the number of times that Mr. Trump has been seen purging the land of every non-lusk person, gene, idea, and influence. Some say once; some say five times; some say a dozen times or more. The point is not to quibble over numbers or anything like that but rather to clarify that I respect open discourse and robust debate and allege that society should remain open to a broad range of ideas and opinions as a way to create the best conditions for discovering the truth. That said, I do claim that as soon as the time is ripe I will defend tolerance and justice against the temptations of hatred and oppression.
http://www.pakin.org/complaint/
>>66525625
This isn't just a public-relations move. It's a real move to get people to see that it's sad how Mr. Trump has been condoning illegal activities. The silver lining around this cloud is that when you're hurt by his beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments), you learn. You put things in perspective. You pull your energies together. You change. You go forward. You observe that were he alive today, Hideki Tojo would be Mr. Trump's most trustworthy ally. I can see Tojo joining forces with Mr. Trump to help him prevent us from getting in touch with our feelings. Okay, I've vented enough frustration. So let me end by saying that I, speaking as someone who is not a pusillanimous, snippy balloon head, detest, with a detestation unutterable, all obtuse rascals who delude and often rob those rendered vulnerable and susceptible to Mr. Donald J Trump's snares because of poverty, illness, or ignorance.
/rant
>>66525625
Poo in loo Pajeet
>>66525625
>>66525651
DESIGNATED
>>66525910
>>66525868
>http://www.pakin.org/complaint/
>>66525910
People generally have strong views about Lord Faggot. Some background is in order: There is historical precedent for Faggot's campaigns of terror. Specifically, for as far back as I can remember, he has been exercising control through indirect coercion or through psychological pressure or manipulation. Given how one reprehensible activity always leads to another, it should come as no surprise that if you looked up “beggarly” in the dictionary, you'd probably see Faggot's picture.
Are you beginning to get the picture here? Faggot plans to leave a large part of this country's workforce dislocated and disillusioned. What can you do about that? Start by reading about how there's more to this letter than inflammatory rhetoric. Become informed about the deceit, lies, and propaganda surrounding his promotion of officialism. Tell everyone you know that if Faggot gets his way, we will soon be engulfed in a Dark Age of Marxism and indescribable horror. That's why I'm telling you that you don't have to say anything specifically about him for him to start attacking you. All you have to do is dare to imply that we should state publicly that he has been causing a lot of wahala by creating an atmosphere of mistrust in which speculations and rumors gain the appearance of viability and compete openly with more carefully considered theories. Finally, whatever your thoughts or feelings about Lord Faggot are, I urge you to help me exercise all of our basic rights to the maximum.
When assessing Lord Cuck's remonstrations, one need not resort to vicious name-calling or opprobrious epithets. One need only present the facts. For practical reasons, I have to confine my discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which I have something new to say. As Cuck matures emotionally he'll eventually grow out of his present way of thinking and come to realize that he decries or dismisses capitalism, technology, industrialization, and systems of government borne of Enlightenment ideas about the dignity and freedom of human beings. These are the things that Cuck fears because they are wedded to individual initiative and responsibility.
Cuck's apologias for warlordism fail to convince me that the purpose of education is not to produce independent thinkers but submissive state subjects. Of course, it's not quite that simple. It is no wonder that Cuck lives in monologue rather than dialogue. It may be a bit surprising, however, to learn that his negligent positions are a shout to the world that, quicker than you can double-check the spelling of “philosophicotheological”, he will silence any criticism of the brainwashing and double standards that he has increasingly been practicing. This just goes to show (to me, at least) that there is a format Cuck should follow for his next literary endeavor. It involves a topic sentence and supporting facts. To end on a more positive note: Evidence supporting the reality of the devastation caused by Lord Cuck's criticisms is overwhelming in the peer-reviewed literature on the subject.
>>66525625
My complaint with India is why you don't fucking poo in the loo Pajeet?
>>66525625
wat r u talking about gandu
sage sage sage sage sage
>>66526583
>cuss words
>>66525868
>>66525910
>>66526511
>>66526583
>>66526634
Are you all fucking blind?
Generate your own complaint here
http://www.pakin.org/complaint/
>>66526583
go away from me you fetid ape
>>66525625
POO
>>66526846
I've been hesitating to write this letter because I've been afraid that, if I did, Pajeet P Cnfjrieidhej MLA would do everything in his power to make me fall firmly into the hands of froward, small-minded tossers. But after reading about Pajeet's deceitful theatrics, I, speaking as someone who is not an uncongenial, ignominious dumbbell, could hesitate no longer. Unlike Pajeet's shabby comments, what I'm about to write is supported in scientific scholarship by overwhelming evidence. For instance, whenever anyone states the obvious—that Pajeet has been doing everything in his power to ensure that we always get the short end of the stick—discussion naturally progresses towards the question, “Does Pajeet realize he's more atrabilious than a cullionly pronk?” You see, I am not embarrassed to admit that I have neither the training, the experience, the license, nor the clinical setting necessary to properly keep the lines of communication open. Nevertheless, I unmistakably do have the will to develop an alternative community, a cohesive and comprehensive underground with a charter to sound the bugle of liberty. That's why I feel that Pajeet says that a plausible excuse is a satisfactory substitute for performance. That's a stupid thing to say. It's like saying that his plane of understanding is beyond the realm of human imagining.
>>66526926
Get ready, Mr. Britbongistan; here comes the truth train! Let me preface my discussion by quickly reasserting a familiar theme of my previous letters: What I wrote just a moment ago is not the paranoid rambling of a tyrannical, biggety wacko. It's a fact. His primary goal is to create a world without history, without philosophy, without science, without reason—a world without beauty of any kind, without art, without literature, without culture. All of his other objectives are secondary to this one supreme purpose. That's why you must always remember that if you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim of your own ignorance. To close, let me accentuate that if we invigorate the effort to reach solutions by increasing the scope of the inquiry rather than by narrowing or abandoning it we shall not only survive Mr. Britbongistan's attacks; we shall prevail.
>>66527114
Some of what I'm about to say regarding Mr. Dude WEED LMAO III's rodomontades is so childishly simple, I fear it may be patronizing to explain; I apologize in advance. Unfortunately, this letter won't be able to address all of the points I'd like to make. With all of the dishonest elisions, bombastic flourishes, and pompous posturing, I can't possibly tackle all of Dude's snappish jobations in a single go. To put it another way, we'll be covering 190-proof Dude WEED LMAO here. You don't drink it; you sip it. Let's begin our investigation with the observation that in my observations upon exclusionism, I have expressed no opinion thus far of the mode of its extinguishment or melioration. I will note, however, though I still have nothing to propose, that Dude has repeatedly threatened to make my blood curdle. Maybe that's just for maximum scaremongering effect. Or maybe it's because if we do nothing, Dude will keep on “enlightening” anyone who doesn't believe that it is patriotic to hijack our educational system and turn it into a self-cloning propaganda machine. One cannot change this all in a moment, but one can encourage students to be bold, independent, and creative thinkers. Before you read this letter, you might have thought that Mr. Dude WEED LMAO III understands the difference between civilization and savagery. Now you know that he is one of the most eccentric and dirty figures alive in the world today.
>>66527000
If you've been following the news recently, you know that Germany's a repeat offender when it comes to increasing subservience to his monolithic engine of resistentialism. However, you might not know that his predatory ventures are a blueprint for the widespread institution of escapism. For most of the facts I'm about to present, I have provided documentation and urge you to confirm these facts for yourself if you're skeptical. Despite what Germany says, he says that he is a refined gentleman with the soundest education and morals you can imagine. Such verbal gems teach us that I've observed at least one of Germany's subalterns attacking the fabric of this nation. This is absolutely indicative of the unprofessional, ungracious, and unacceptable behavior that is so endemic to Germany's den of thieves.
As thrasonical as Germany's compatriots in blackguardism may be, they are also xenophobic chawbacons. I don't mean to throw fuel on an already considerable fire, but I'd like very much to respond to Germany's claim that representative government is an outmoded system that should be replaced by a system of overt Titoism. Unfortunately, taking into account Germany's background, education, and intelligence, I am quite sure that Germany would not be able to understand my response. Hence, let me say simply this: If you look back over some of my older letters, you'll see that I predicted that Germany would construct gas chambers, incinerators, gulags, and concentration camps. And, as I predicted, he did. But you know, that was not a difficult prediction to make. Anyone who has bothered to learn even a little about Germany could have made the same prediction. I have one final message for you before ending this letter: Germany's vituperations are as appealing as braces, acne, and a wooden leg at the senior prom.
>>66525625
A FUCKING WAGON WHEEL
>>66527304
Even as I sit here, I can't believe I'm writing this. I've never been one to voice my opinions in such a public manner. But after learning that Mr. Justin 'Cuckold" Trudeau wants to ascribe opinions to me that I don't even hold, I felt I at least had to set a few things straight. There are a number of reasons he isn't telling us as to why he wants to impose a “glass ceiling” that limits our opportunities for promotions in most jobs. In this letter, I will expose those reasons one-by-one, on the principle that he's trapped in a vicious cycle. The more opposition to his demands he faces, the more squalid he becomes. The more squalid he becomes, the more opposition to his demands he faces. I proclaim I've now told you everything you need to know about Mr. Justin 'Cuckold" Trudeau. I'll therefore end this letter with the supererogatory comment that he hides behind the carefully managed prevarication that diseases can be defeated not through standard medical research but through the creation of a new language, one that does not stigmatize certain groups and behaviors.
>>66527304
I unquestionably hope that the material I'm about to present will open some eyes and minds. I realize that some of you may not know the particular background details of the events I'm referring to. I'm not going to go into those details here, but you can read up on them elsewhere.
Canada asserts that it is a tireless protector of civil rights and civil liberties for all people. This assertion is merely a belief, a belief unsupported by anything approaching a strong, clear body of historically documented evidence. In fact, most existing evidence suggests to the contrary that Canada is not only immoral but amoral. It is not uncommon for Canada to victimize the innocent, penalize the victim for making any effort to defend himself, and then paint the whole mephitic affair as some great benefit to humanity. Identifying and naming the most pouty rabble-rousers I've ever seen is fundamentally different from using their vaporings as an instrument of rebellion. One should therefore conclude, ipso facto, that its desire to make widespread accusations and insinuations without having the facts to back them up is the chief sign that it's a self-pitying, repressive cheapskate. (The second sign is that Canada feels obliged to pour a few drops of wormwood into our general enthusiasm.) Now that you've read this letter, let me challenge you, the reader, not just to help me spread awareness of the vexatious nature of Canada's invectives, but also to educate others about what I've written.
pajeet my son
>>66527632
>toilet
>>66527632
While no statement I'm about to make should be construed as suggesting or recommending thatany person commit an illegal act of any kind, you should realize that The USA's values are so inverted, they would make Lewis Carroll blush. As I'm sure you're aware, The USA has been fighting hard to regulate hoodlumism. This letter is intended to address the issue of how most effectively to fight back. Our choice of strategy is critical because my opinion of The USA hasn't changed ever since, ages ago, I heard it say something about how some people deserve to feel safe while others do not. The point is that The USA talked nonsense then, and it talks nonsense now. The only thing that's changed is that it has been deluding people into believing that “metanarratives” are the root of tyranny, lawlessness, overpopulation, racial hatred, world hunger, disease, and rank stupidity. Don't let it delude you, too.
The USA is desperate to convince us that matters of racial justice should enter a period of “benign neglect”. To achieve this goal, it has apparently decided it's more effective to “construct a counternarrative” (read: make up a story) than to look for anything resembling facts. This worries me because some people think it's a bit extreme of me to break the mold and stray from the path of conventional wisdom—a bit over the top, perhaps. Well, what I ought to remind such people is that The USA's modes of thought are eerily similar to those promoted by madmen such as Pol Pot. What's scary, though, is that their extollment of scapegoatism has been ratcheted up a few notches from anything Pol Pot ever conjured up. Let me end this letter with a call to action. Please join those of us who are examining the warp and woof of The USA's imprecations, and through your support we will address the continued social injustice shown by out-of-control, neurotic saboteurs. Together we will put an end to The USA's evildoing. Together we will serve on the side of Truth.
>>66527754
I want to share with you a very deep concern I have about The UK. The full truth of my conclusion I shall develop in the course of this letter, but the conclusion's general outline is that I will never give up. I will never stop trying. And I will use every avenue possible to shout back at its propaganda. If the human race is to survive on this planet, we will have to initiate meaningful change. Our top priority in the upcoming weeks must be to build bridges instead of walls. Look, of course that's going to be tough. Anybody who tells you it's going to be easy or that one can wave a magic wand and make it happen hasn't been paying attention to how The UK operates. Nevertheless, The UK's most steadfast claim is that wars end only when a goodhearted, newly enlightened tyrant heeds the advice of transnational peace activists. If there were any semblance of truth in this, I would be the last to say anything against it. As it stands, however, The UK would have us believe that there's no difference between normal people like you and me and the most disingenuous gutter-dwellers I've ever seen. To be honest, it has never actually said that explicitly, but if you follow its logic—what little there is—you'll see that this is its real point
>>66527828
The UK is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, its willingness to scorn and abjure reason sets a new record for brazenness. The UK is pestilential and borderline gruesome. This notion is vulnerable to cynicism but can also act as the lynchpin to great acts of solidarity. It has the potential to encourage people to push the envelope on our knowledge of the world around us. It can convince even the most tyrannous, splenetic buggers there are that The UK displays enormous arrogance, largely manifested in condescension towards the average citizen. End of story. Actually, I should add that I'd like to remind you of something. One of the great leaders of our time recently made this statement: “The UK provides simplistic answers to complex problems.” I confess to similar sentiments, but there's always the chance that the suggestion that The UK can convince criminals to fill out an application form before committing a crime is wrong, absurd, and offensive. Nevertheless, The UK's confreres like to suggest such things to distract attention from the truth, which is that the elasticity of The UK's interpretation of the Bible shields it from having to take a stand for anything morally correct yet politically (spiritually?) unpopular. There's no need here to present any evidence of that; examples can be found all over the World Wide Web. In fact, a simple search will quickly reveal that The UK plans to drain our hope and enthusiasm. It has instructed its mercenaries not to discuss this or even admit to its plan's existence. Obviously, The UK knows it has something to hide. One final point: I'm going to stick out my neck here and make the bold statement that selling wild smut peddlers on prætorianism has been a Golconda for The UK.
>>66525625
This is to voice my dissatisfaction with Mr. Poo In Loo's notions. As you read this letter, bear in mind that there are many points of general dissatisfaction and dispute that should not, on any account, be overlooked in the discussion of the subjects here presented. One of these is that Poo apparently believes that the poor, innocent, kitten-loving members of his guild are persecuted by people like you and me. You and I know better than that. You and I know that if there is any fixed star in Poo's constellation of termagant ideas, it's that no value, no belief, and no personal need or desire can be placed higher than the aspiration to get people to sign a petition to limit Poo's ability to cause trouble. I say that because Poo says that the Queen of England heads up the international drug cartel. Yet he also wants to saddle the economy with crippling debt. Am I the only one who sees the irony there? I ask because he has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform you that it's debatable whether his drug-induced ravings obfuscate any attempt to locate responsibility for the consequential decisions of those who have access to the means of power. However, no one can disagree that Poo's arguments would be a lot more effective if they were at least accurate or intelligent, not just a load of bull for the sake of being controversial. One last thing: I regret not writing this letter sooner.
>>66525625
When you learn how to shit in a toilet I'll consider listening to your opinion.
>>66526370
POO
>>66525625
India, allow me to introduce myself. I'm one of the victims of your crime-stained press releases. As a note of explanation for other readers of this letter: India's actions are very much in line with gormless racism in that they cause an increase in disease, nonrepresentationalism, crime, and vice. Let us note first of all that if it had two brain cells to rub together, it'd realize that its compeers are too lazy to perform noble deeds. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that India and its flunkies have put in place the largest and most effective blacklist in the history of our country. The purpose of this blacklist is to rid various strategic organizations of India's castigators and any other independent-minded people who might interfere with India's designs. While such activities are merely the first step towards mulcting us out of our lives' savings, it would be great if all of us could raise several issues about India's surly jobations that are frequently missing from the drivel that masquerades for discourse on this topic. In the end, however, money talks and you-know-what walks. Perhaps that truism also explains why India's appalling misjudgment and obstinacy in imposing a “glass ceiling” that limits our opportunities for promotions in most jobs are already being discussed quite widely—so much so, in fact, that India's equally staggering misjudgments regarding neopaganism are escaping well-merited ridicule and rebuke. To rectify that pretermission, allow me to observe that the problem with India is not that it's two-faced. It's that it wants to make it impossible to disturb its cuckoo gravy train. India's the panjandrum of Bonapartism. That is why, come what may, we must put inexorable pressure on India to be a bit more careful about what it says and does.
This is fun.
>>66527800
>The USA's values are so inverted
Yes, we like to be hygienic. Go worship your blue spider god. Fuck off.
>>66525625
Too long, Pajeet
>>66528059
>>66527988
>>66527962
>>66527958
I am not writing to agree or disagree with The United States of America. What I have to say, however, regards The United States of America's conscious decision to deny citizens the ability to become informed about the destruction that it is capable of. Many of the arguments I'm about to make rest upon the rock-solid principles of freedom of thought and freedom of speech. If it weren't for these freedoms, I wouldn't be allowed to tell you that it thinks that no one is smart enough to see through its transparent lies. Of course, thinking so doesn't make it so.
>>66528304
The United States of America used to be a major proponent of obstructionism. Nowadays, it's putting all of its support behind ethnocentrism. As they say, plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. I wish I knew when The United States of America was planning on unleashing its next volley of snooty, obtrusive equivocations. Alas, I'm no Nostradamus. Nevertheless, some of my predictions have come true in spades. For instance, I predicted ages ago that The United States of America would represent a threat to all the people in the area, indeed, possibly the world, and look what happened. Even scarier, I predicted that The United States of America would put increased disruptive powers in the hands of feckless bums. Although most people doubted that prediction when I made it, they neglected to consider that The United States of America insists that it is a tireless protector of civil rights and civil liberties for all people. Naturally, it gives no evidence whatsoever to support that parti pris. Perhaps that's because there is a subtle difference between treating the disease, not the symptoms, and making plans and carrying them out. The difference lies between the objective potential and the subjective organization needed to realize that potential. In other words, The United States of America is afflicted with what I call Scapegoatism Addiction Disorder. Symptoms include loss of control, craving and withdrawal symptoms, social isolation, excessive financial debt, and an insatiable desire to humiliate, subjugate, and eventually eliminate everyone who wants to place blame where it belongs—in the hands of The United States of America and its pigheaded, selfish buddies. The only known cure is for The United States of America to admit that it has been trying hard to separate us off into various, antagonistic camps.
>>66528345
I feel we should oppose that effort by inviting all the people who have been harmed by The United States of America to continue to express and assert their concerns in a constructive and productive fashion.
I frequently talk about how The United States of America's lectures will feed us ever-larger doses of The United States of America's lies and crackpot assumptions eventually. I would drop the subject except that I feel that it has insulted everyone with even the slightest moral commitment. The United States of America obviously has none or it wouldn't control, manipulate, and harm other people.
>>66528371
Some reputed—as opposed to reputable—members of The United States of America's negativism outfit quite adamantly avouch that undiscoverable, unmeasurable, magical forces from another plane of existence have given The United States of America superhuman wisdom. I find it rather astonishing that anyone could maintain such a thing, but then again, The United States of America should definitely heed Cicero's advice, “Appetitus rationi pareat.” (For those of you who failed your introductory Latin class, that means, “Let your desires be ruled by reason.”) I want to draw two important conclusions from this. The first is that flattery will get The United States of America nowhere, and the second is that some organizations are responsible and others are not. The United States of America falls into the category of “not”. Not surprisingly, The United States of America disregards any evidence that contradicts its views. It doesn't want to discuss that, of course. It'd rather be out promoting mediocrity over merit. What this tells us is that a nation concerned about the economic, public-health, and security consequences of atmospheric pollution, climate change, sea-level rise, and diminishing supplies of fresh water can do all sorts of things to supply the missing ingredient that could stop the worldwide slide into isolationism. Alas, such efforts will be for naught without universal acknowledgment that the world is full of people who lead us into an age of shoddiness—shoddy goods, shoddy services, shoddy morals, and shoddy people. We don't need any more people like that.
How does it work? How many combinations are there?
>>66528371
What we need are people who are willing to deal summarily with inhumane, addlepated prats. We need people who understand that The United States of America fully intends to prosecute, sentence, and label people as bellicose ranters without the benefit of any evidence whatsoever. But that's not enough, not for it. The United States of America will additionally leave a large part of this country's workforce dislocated and disillusioned, which is why I proclaim that it is driving me nuts. I can't take it anymore!
It's not just that The United States of America's publicity stunts are one of those things that will fill our children's minds with hotheaded and debasing superstitions but also that it's really not bloody-mindedness that compels me to reinforce notions of positive self-esteem. It's my sense of responsibility to you, the reader. Please keep in mind that we must face our problems realistically, get to the root of our problems, and be determined to solve them. To do anything else, and I do mean anything else, is a complete waste of time.
>>66528429
no clue
http://www.pakin.org/complaint/
>>66528443
Trying to keep The United States of America from sullying my reputation is a sucker's game. No matter how hard we try to stop it, it'll always find some new way to practice human sacrifice on a grand scale in some sort of atrabilious death cult. There's one combative dingbat I know (more on him later) who thinks that The United States of America's beliefs are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. Of course, that's not as bad as the inerudite moral weakling I ran into yesterday (more on him later as well) who was completely unable to comprehend that The United States of America, with its craftiness and temperamental contrivances, will entirely control our country's exuberant riches faster than you can say “pseudolamellibranchiate”. The United States of America will then use those riches to introduce, cultivate, and encourage moral rot. The moral of this story is that it and I are as different as chalk and cheese. The United States of America, for instance, wants to bamboozle people into believing that jaundiced gaberlunzies and obdurate, depraved sots should rule this country. I, on the other hand, want to take personal action and find new pathways out of the traps that The United States of America has laid for us. That's why I need to tell you that I sometimes ask myself whether the struggle to express my views is worth all of the potential consequences. And I consistently answer by saying that we could opt to sit back and let it impose a one-size-fits-all model on how society should function. Most people, however, would argue that the cost in people's lives and self-esteem is an extremely high price to pay for such inaction on our part.
>>66528500
If you ask The United States of America if it's true that its whinges are colored by a sycophantic adoration of nativism, you'll just get a lot of foot-shuffling and downcast eyes in response. So remember kids, if you want to silence anyone whom The United States of America considers snarky, all you have to do is agree to let The United States of America eliminate those law-enforcement officers who constitute the vital protective bulwark in the fragile balance between anarchy and tyranny. I'll admit that The United States of America's rhetoric is occasionally decorous. However, its delusions are just as ripe and far more lethal than those of the effete nabobs of Titoism who insist that merit is adequately measured by its methods and qualifications.
I certainly don't know what The United States of America's problem is, but the type of Jacobinism that it preaches is a sort of moral gonorrhea. That concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that if The United States of America believes that unholy astrologers are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive, then it's obvious why it insists that matters of racial justice should enter a period of “benign neglect”. For the record, if you think that this is humorous or exaggerated, you're wrong. The United States of America's screeds are based on a technique I'm sure you've heard of. It's called “lying”. The United States of America's methods are much subtler now than ever before. The United States of America is more adept at hidden mind control, and its techniques of social brainwash are much more appealingly streamlined and homogenized.
>>66528527
We can disagree with The United States of America without being disagreeable. For instance, I would like to politely disagree with some of its recommendations by pointing out that The United States of America has asked its emissaries to dominate the whole earth and take possession of all its riches. (There's no explicit mention of spreading ruin widely through the land, but that's there too if you read between the lines.) This scares me because I find that I am embarrassed. I am embarrassed that some people just don't realize that The United States of America's association of ungracious, unscrupulous twits appears to be growing in number. I pray that this is analogous to the flare-up of a candle just before extinction, yet I keep reminding myself that The United States of America is good at one thing, and that's keeping its ulterior motives secret. Only a few initiates in the inner sanctum of its entourage know that The United States of America is planning to construct the spectre of a terrible armed threat. Even fewer of these initiates know that The United States of America keeps telling everyone within earshot that superstition is no less credible than proven scientific principles. I'm guessing that The United States of America read that on some Web site of dubious validity. More reliable sources generally indicate that if you hear it spouting off about how I'm too stuck-up to state publicly that it controls a secret underground empire, you should tell it that its guild is a wretched hive of scum and villainy. Better yet, tell it to stop getting its opinions from childish despots and start doing some research of its own.
>>66528548
The United States of America's threats are not pedantic treatises expressing theories or extravaganzas dealing in fables or fancies. They are substantial, sober outpourings from the very soul of gangsterism. If The United States of America bites me I will bite back. If you look soberly and carefully at the evidence all around you, you will clearly find that The United States of America uses obscure words like “pericardiomediastinitis” and “barothermohygrograph” to conceal its agenda to abandon the idea of universal principles and focus illegitimately on the particular. I find that having to process phrases with long words like those makes me feel hoodwinked, inferior, definitely frustrated, and angry. That's why I strive for utmost clarity whenever I explain to others that I intend to put truth to power. That's the path that I have chosen. It's undoubtedly not an easy path, but then again, The United States of America is thoroughly inconsistent in its views. On one hand, The United States of America insists that without its superior guidance, we will go nowhere. But on the other hand, it favors making us dependent on incompetent eejits for political representation, economic support, social position, and psychological approval. How much clearer do I have to explain things before you can see its hypocrisy? Now that this letter has come to an end, I honestly hope you walk away from it realizing that there are quarrelsome chuckleheads in our midst.
~fin~
>>66525625
The theme of this letter is not “Mr. Donald Trump, Jr. should clean up his act.” By now, you've already heard countless arguments running in that vein and are probably pretty sick of them. The theme of this letter is “Trump is a big fan of vigilante justice.” But before I continue, allow me to explain that there are two observations one can make here. The first is that Trump has OD'd on sectarianism. The second observation is that Trump's overblown rants have made him a larger-than-life figure in the shadowy world of paternalism. These shards of empirical evidence suggest that my stances are clearly in defense of decency and human dignity and violate nobody's rights. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that he contends that he's renowned for his racial and cultural sensitivity. This is complete—or at least, incomplete—baloney. For instance, Trump fails to mention that I have seen numerous peremptory wiseacres convert lush forests into arid deserts. What's sad is that Trump tolerates (relishes?) this flagrant violation of democratic principles and the rule of law. That just goes to show that we must renew our promise and obligation to expose injustice and puncture prejudice. I won't dwell on that except to direct your attention to the complacent manner in which he has been trying to put lazy thoughts in our children's minds.
Violence begets violence, hatred begets hatred, and egotism begets egotism. That's clear. But I despise everything about Trump. I despise Trump's attempts to set the wolf to mind the sheep. I despise how he insists that the cure for evil is more evil. Most of all, I despise his complete obliviousness to the fact that if his conclusions were intended as a joke, he forgot to include the punchline.
>>66525625
It is hardly surprising that Cuck wants to wage an odd sort of warfare upon a largely unprepared and unrecognizing public. After all, this is the same fractious goofy-type whose self-pitying prattle informed us that might makes right. Peddling Dadaism to all comers is less wise than giving free amphetamines to school children, although it's probably just as profitable for Cuck. In my opinion, grenades and flamethrowers would do less damage, though. The point is that the really interesting thing about all this is not that one loses count of the number of times Cuck has tried to increase alienation and delinquency among our young people. The interesting thing is that he accuses me of being a liar. The only proven liar around here, however, is Cuck. Only a die-hard liar like Cuck could claim that the government's policies should be at odds with the will of the people. The truth, in case you haven't already figured it out, is that sick-minded crypto-fascists subvert our country's legal system. That said, we mustn't lose sight of who the real enemy is: Cuck Panders and his intemperate pals. As a final, parting thought, I assert that we must punish those who lie or connive at half-truths. This is a long road and not one for the fainthearted, but if pursued with integrity and conviction it could lead to a world in which people are no longer afraid to prevent the “invisible hand” of loosely regulated markets from becoming an “invisible fist” that lets Pres. Cuck Panders, Esq. effortlessly pound his critics into oblivion.
>>66525625
Poo
LMAO if someone posts these on /r/sandersforpresident
This is the greatest thread ever.
Good find pajeet.
My complaint about 4chan
I strive to be of a fair and judicial mind and to set forth justly, without supersession or innuendo, the divergent opinions of others. Hence, I will do my best to present evidence both for and against the claim that 4chan exhibits a malicious mean streak whenever someone states that it uses all classes of circumbagious choplogic to convince others that you and I are objects for it to use then casually throw away and forget like old newsprint that's performed its duty catching bird droppings. Here's the story: This is just simple math. That is, if A is more blinkered than B, and B is more blinkered than C, then A is more blinkered than C, right? In case you don't have the secret decoder ring, A is a prodigal sideshow barker; B is a disgraceful yutz; and C is 4chan.
>>66529512
If you observe some repetition in my statements, it is because such repetition is needed for clarity and emphasis as I solve the problems of yahooism, factionalism, economic inequality, and lack of equal opportunity. Isn't it true that 4chan wants people to be fined, exiled, or imprisoned for making snide remarks about its ipse dixits? If that's not true, tell me why not. My point may be made clearer by use of an allegorical tale. Suppose a hypothetical group of three people is standing in a room. One of those people realizes that 4chan's efforts to pit race against race, religion against religion, and country against country are the reason we have so many problems today with alienation, drug abuse, alcohol abuse, and aimlessness on the part of our young people. Another goes on and on about its brown-nosing, reckless objectives. But the third can't understand why the truth is like kryptonite to 4chan, the superhero of anti-democratic bosthoons. In this hypothetical situation, it should be obvious that 4chan says that it defends the real needs of the working class. Such verbal gems teach us that we must teach uninformed, puerile hammerheads about tolerance. If we fail then all of our sacrifices and all of the dreams and sacrifices of our ancestors will have been in vain. The key is to realize that I've heard more than one member of 4chan's sleazy brotherhood of daffy fainéants state, “4chan's conceits can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality, and therefore, trees cause more pollution than automobiles do”. In other words (to translate this linguistic mess), my dream is for tired eyes to open and see clearly, broken spirits to find new energy, and weary arms to find the strength to acknowledge the ideological forces that attempt to shape our lives.
>>66529538
It would be bad enough if 4chan's flacks were merely trying to encumber the religious idea with too many things of a purely earthly nature and thus bring religion into a totally unnecessary conflict with science. But their attempts to generate alienation and withdrawal are just plain disgusting. 4chan undeniably believes that the average working-class person can't see through its chicanery. Unfortunately for it, that's all in its imagination. 4chan needs to get out of that fictional world and get back to reality, where people can see that it fervently believes that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of discourteous stereotypes. This shows that it is not merely mistaken about one little fact among millions of facts but that 4chan has recently been going around claiming that I'm some sort of cully who can be duped into believing that it has mystical powers of divination and prophecy. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk. Stand with me, be honest with me, and help me shatter the adage that 4chan is a protective bulwark against the advancing tyranny of venal saps, and together we'll anneal discourse with honesty, clear thinking, and a sense of moral good. We'll lend a helping hand. I'm counting on you. Thanks for reading this.
>>66525625
tl;dr: POO IN LOO PAJEET
P.S.: It's either Trump or bust, there are no alternatives.
>>66532229
>not voting for cruz
It's like you're stupid.
Oh wait. You are.
Good work Pajeet. This is why we need H1b visas ,folks! We need talent in this country!
We want people like Pajeet to come into the country, and they have to do it legally!
This is a Movement folks!
Together, we can Make America Great again!
>>66534186
>not pooing in loo
Wouldnt surprise me if you ate boogers as well
>>66525625
I set in sad repose as I put pen to paper concerning an issue I found most deeply disturbing. I only have one statement. Poo in loo rajeet
>>66534186
Cruz supporters confirmed wagon wheels.
>>66525625
IN DA LOO
>>66525625
Good points all around.
Fuck Trump. Time to FEEL THE BERN!
