Humanity has known about the Earth being flat for thousands of years, but in 2015 most people still believe in the Spherical Jew.
The Earth is a flat circular plane much the a dinner plate, with the North pole in it's center and Antarctica surrounding much of the edges. Governments prevent the public from viewing the edge of the Earth by restricting our access to Antarctica.
Gravity doesn't exist, the moon and the sun orbit the Earth due to electromagnetic forces. When pilots think they are flying around the world they are really just flying in a circle around the North pole at the Earth's center. Using trigonometry we can measure the Sun's distance from the Earth as being approximately 30,000 kilometers away. The reason that it can be night time in London while it is daylight in Sydney is that the Sun shines down in a beam much like a spotlight on a theater stage.
The sooner /pol/ and the general public can accept this red pill, the sooner we can expose the World Governments subjugation of mankind and begin to overthrow the current establishment.
Think about it.. Have your ever seen evidence with your own eyes to continue believing in the dis-proven Spherical Earth theory?
>>55292070
>Australian
>>55292070
I think the earth is actually just a collection of invisible lines, but then again, when I look at spheres there are just two flat circles, displace by some imaginary conception of metric.
The reptilian jews must be stopped.
Check the flag before you post
>>55292070
More like ultimate shitpost AMIRITE GUYS?
PLEASE TELL ME I'M RIGHT I NEED VALIDATON
>>55292070
Once on a commercial flight the pilot took the plane up to 45,000 feet so we could pass over a storm safely and I saw with my own eyes that earth is indeed a sphere.
If you go up high enough, it curves.
>inb4 the windows are magical NWO fisheye lenses
>>55293032
remember to sage next time
whats funny is that most of us really can't prove it one way or the other; we all rely on what is told to us.
there are ways to test, just it would take a little research
>>55292070
You should be doing your homework, not wasting time on the internet when tomorrow is a school day.
>>55292070
Lets put this to bed and mount an expedition across Antarctica.
Assuming this isn't bait, I love flat earthers, and I love playing with them.
Round 1:
OP - explain how GPS works then?
>>55293183
on a flat Earth any high powered antenna can cover the disc.
satellites were invented (by scifi writer C. Clarke) to fulfil a need specific to ball Earth. namely the rotundity of Earth.
So for any triangulation to work anywhere on Earth, all you need are three high powered antennas
>>55293048
Look at the horizon while on the ground from an airplane window
Looks curved there too, but step outside the airplane and its flat
>>55293183
Round 2
If the earth has a diameter of 25k miles and a day of 24 hours, it would be spinning in excess of 1000 miles an hour.
How come when you fire a cannon vertically the cannon ball doesnt fall west (time spent in air)*1000mph?
>>55292070
The earth is definitely flat.
I dare anyone to stand on a ball and post the results. 99.9% of the time you will end up falling. So how do you expect me to believe I am on a giant sphere, when I stand perfectly?
>>55293183
Why are planes' gps turned off during southern hemisphere flights?
>>55293048
> I saw with my own eyes that earth is indeed a sphere.
too bad you are lying
>>55293572
Because of inertia.
>>55293677
It's also really big.
Explain why we need 24 GPS satellites when a flat earth could be covered by 3 powerful antennae, as >>55293382 posted.
>>55292070
Yes, I flew from the US to Australia, We flew over the pacific.
There is no way your map could explain this with a circular flight route.
Stop trolling and go back to fapping on /d
>>55292070
You should get banned for this kind of shit
>>55293615
>Why are planes' gps turned off during southern hemisphere flights?
What in the fuck? I use GPS in aircraft daily in the southern hemisphere - want to re-articulate that question?
>>55293382
>All you need are three high powered antennas
How big is this fictional flat earth? How many km is the diameter? Even if we just assume it's say, half the circumference of the actual planet - 20,000km - that would mean an antenna would need to be 25km tall to have coverage of the whole earth - posing both a hazard to those aircraft flying near them and creating a somewhat difficult engineering challenge.
>>55293791
Damnit. You beat me to my next point, haha
>>55293677
Top pic is shopped. See how the atmospheric blur jumps up at 20% from the right?
>>55293183
Google LORAN-C. The first FEPS used land-based radio beacons. That's how your cell phone's geo-positioning works.
OP is describing this earth scenario
>>55293766
>Explain why we need 24 GPS satellites
we have some cognitive dissonance here it seems.
the "we need 24 satellites" story is what THEY claim to be True.
I have no explaining to do about this aside from just saying it is a lie, there is no satellites. Or do you want me to also explain why they lie?
Also note that 3 powerful antennas is the bare minimum for triangulation, I don't say they only have 3
>>55293791
>>55293846
The map shown has Africa in the middle and the poles on each end. OP's fantasy earthen disc has the north pole in the middle and antarctica as the entire rim. OP is still a cock-gobbling nigger faggot, but xir point stands in that scenario. A much more solid proof is the curvature of the earth giving the illusion that a boat sinks under the horizon, such that at a given distance near the horizon, you see the whole ass-end of the ship, while further away, at/past the horizon, only the sails are visible. On a flat earth of sufficient size that the ship becomes too small to see, the whole ship would be visible until the moment it's indistinguishable.
>>55293848
all three are made of three different consecutive pics to recreate the panorama. That change nothing, horizon is a flat line in every image.
Ok, I quit.
Cya guys, I had lot of fun but you crossed the line of stupidity.
xox -anon
can we get insta bans on flat earth threads holy shit
>>55293933
Yes OP is describing that Earth scenario
>>55292070
Wat
There is no curvature. The earth is a plane not a globe. Water always fi ds a level surface and never buldges.
GPS is landbased and uses triangulation. Mobile phone tracking is an example. Look it up.
Pilots never adjust for curvature.
Coriolis effect and wind offers contradict the atmosphere spinning with the earth.
Sun rays through clouds proove the sun is closer that 96 million miles.
NASA doesn't account for a rotating earth or moving atmosphere in their aerodynamic equations of aircraft.
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88104main_H-1391.pdf&q=nasa%20linear%20model&ved=0CBsQFjAAahUKEwjet_Dlz4LJAhVGTSYKHffuDrE&usg=AFQjCNFbe72phDGbMJ3szbcrGAW1TvMwww
>>55293791
You can fly round a circle you stupid fuck
>>55294211
>Pilots never adjust for curvature.
>What is a great circle flight route
>>55292070
But when you fly in a plane (you have done that right?) an look out in the horizon you only can see grond for a few kms, past that you will see sky in the back . Explain that ausbro.
>>55294211
>Sun rays through clouds proove the sun is closer that 96 million miles.
even NASA knows the earth is flat.
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88104main_H-1391.pdf
gravity is debunked
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIvgHNkEXas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6Osm7azX6k
>>55294058
There are several more signs of distortion, but I'll leave top pic alone. For the others, the cameraman is shifting view directly left to directly right. They could go in a complete circle like that and the horizon would be flat, but the earth it describes would have a radius of about 6-18 miles. A flat earth, again, would allow for one with a powerful enough pair of binoculars to see until antarctica, no matter what direction they looked in, unless something like a building or a mountain got in the way. Why is it, no matter how strong a telescope we aim at the horizon, we can't see more than a few miles out into the open ocean? is it possible that the ocean is higher than the continent on the other side? On a round earth, that's exactly what it is, the line drawn from the telescope to the other side of the ocean goes through quite a bit of ocean, and the ~6 feet of height at which the telescope is aimed to see the horizon will put the telescopic line into the ocean a few miles out, going out to space on the other side. The telescope holder would have to aim the the telescope further down to even get a telescopic line to the next continent over.
>>55292070
Let's see, the numerous high altitude flights that have been done.
The pictures of the earth from space and satellites.
Also and here's the best:
Time zones
The only way your spotlight theory could work would be if there was some device funneling the light into a long slit. Even then there is no map that you can produce that would account for dawn, day, night,and dusk as we see them on earth.
Finally there's the fact that I am a member of the flat earth society.
The flat earth society is a parody organization that doesn't actually believe the world is flat. Instead it takes all the arguments people make for well known conspiracies: Faked moon landing, 9/11 was an inside job, etc, and it uses the exact same reasoning to explain why the earth is flat. Showing just how ridiculous the conspiracies are.
>>55292070
>flat_earth.jpg
Fail, it is hypothesized that the earth is similar to UN's logo with Antartica encircling it.
>>55292070
I am an Engineer and I have been in the International Space Station to examine and repair equipment. I can guarantee that our planet is Oblate Spheroid.
>>55294347
When you fly a plane, pilots treat the world like it's flat because they know that. If that was not the case, maintaining a level angle of flight would mean you fly off into space after a certain distance due to the curvature of the earth.
>>55294401
here
>>55294374
also:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcHDIWpNz3E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phj7RUP9oyY
Actually, more specifically, the earth is a refracted pyramid's resultant, that is, from light. It's kind of a plane, but the space in which it is contained is not. We see "spheres" but they are not.
The earth is flat.
Stop falling for Jew lies.
>>55294419
Where is the proofadoos?
>>55294374
>nasa has never approsimated anything ever
>the earth is small enough that its curveature would have to be accounted for on a vessel a few hundred feet long
1/10 made me Google and post this
https://youtu.be/izIClWYKK1o
Inb4 russian propaganda
>>55292070
Cool shitpost, m8
>>55294477
>didnt read and comprehend
>still posts
dumb nigger
>>55294492
looks flat to me
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwimocU0IIc
>>55292070
I was looking at a departing ship with a spyglass and it started slowly sinking.
I got onto my speedboat to try to help the survivors, but, as we approached the sinking ship, it started rising from the depths until it was the same as it was when it departed from the port.
Damn government sinking and raising ships like that just to put us into a state of ignorance.
>>55292070
I kek'd
The earth has to be flat.
Gravity doesn't work all the time. You can turn it on and off in certain areas of the world in anti-gravity chambers, yet when you do this, according to modern science you should go to space. This does not happen.
>>55292070
Still haven't heard the excuse for how you can call someone in a far away place and it will be full dark there and midday light where you are, or vice versa.
Clearly if the land is flat like a plate it would be light everywhere or nowhere. And if the response is that light decays within 10000 miles or some such, show proof or GTFO.
>>55294492
It still looks flat dumbass
>>55294569
>What is this, shitposting for ants?
>>55294523
>rigid aircraft
yes
>constant mass
no
>this linear state equation is derived from the nonlinear six-degree-of-freedom equations of motion
>this derivation of a linear model is general and makes no assumptions on either the reference (nominal) trajectory about which the model is linearized or etc.
>didn't comprehend
I didn't read just what I wanted to
>>55293933
So how can you cross the South Pole? I don't understand.
>>55294577
>>55294005
Practical demonstrations like the above posts are predicated on people actually going outside... do you see where the problem is?
if the moon affects the tides with gravity why doesn't the atmosphere and everything else get affected too, just water?
round earthers BTFO
>>55292070
Someone just watched Stefan Molyneux's flat earth "debate."
>>55293572
you're a fucking idiot
Go get a weather, tie a camera to it, and watch as your shit flat theory is debunked as the ground curves away.
I'm pretty sure there is a few towers tall enough even to see a slight curvature of the earth as well
>>55292070
Also curious about what motivation tens of thousands of scientists (at a minimum) would have for keeping a secret like this, and what the benefit is for all the conspiracy keepers. Who benefits?
>>55292549
EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
>>55294716
looks flat to me
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwimocU0IIc [Embed]
>>55294665
nice meme, but I've watched ferry boats disappear over the horizion bottom-to-top, going fully under the horizon well before becoming indistinguishable through binoculars.
>>55293677
>the earth is flat! Look at this picture from (low) earth orbit!
>meanwhile in earth L1
>>55292070
>From an Australian
Rejected, into the bin it goes, etc.
>>55292070
At the Omniplex in Oklahoma City, they have a pendulum suspended fifty feet to the ceiling, and wood blocks that are knocked over as the pendulum swings, proving the rotation of the planet.
Also, your toilet bowl flushes in the opposite direction as mine, koalanigger.
>>55292070
reminder that this is typical DIS-INFO created to discredit legitimate conspiracies and that the heads of this conspiracy are probably paid off shills
>>55294671
Actually the moon does have an effect on the atmosphere.
>>55294762
I agree with you... I'm saying the flat earth shitposters would never be outside to observe that very thing
>>55294755
You stupid cunt even in that you can see there is a curve
you're not even an aussie and you're shitposting hard
>>55294799
Which is also why earnest discourse is needed to flush these away
>>55294825
The NEET card falls both ways, bruv. I just had to cover my own ass
>Spherical Jew
Holy shit my sides
>>55294444
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcHDIWpNz3E
Except that there are so few molecules that there is a very low transference of temperature. Your video fails basic physics.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phj7RUP9oyY
You are quoting a disproved urban legend as science. It has been long understood that the direction water flows down a drain is due to the shape of the vessel and drain.
Also, explain why certain constellations are seen certain times of the year.
>>55292070
g8 b8 m80
>>55293606
absolutely underrated
>>55294763
clouds dont morph.
>believing the Coriolis-Jew
OK STUPID FLAT EARTH CUNTS
THE NORTHERN LIGHTS (AURORA BOREALIS) ARE ONLY NEAR THE TWO POLES OF THE EARTH
THEY WOULD NOT EXIST ON A FLAT EARTH
YOU ARE RETARDED
>mfw
if the earth is flat then how come i've flown to Japan from the US over the pacific and never seen an edge?
explain
Ok if the earth was flat, why hide it?
>>55294907
That gif is about 3 hours long.
The fuck do you expect to chage so drastically in 3 hours?
>>55294938
der fake too
>durr
>>55294432
Excuse my spelling mistakes before but, i have seen Mars, an Jupiter in very high detail using a powerful telescope personally, an I have studied an observed both mars and Jupiter rotating so i can confirm other planets are a spherical shape. Why do you think ours is an exception?
You should send a balloon up high enough and you'll see the Earth is curved.
>>55292070
Fuck off
>>55294982
so the jews can kek us somehow i guess
>>55294432
I fly planes and I don't know that - how have I not fallen off the edge or escaped the atmosphere?
>OH SHIT OR HAVE I?
>>55294663
Word on the street is that there is no South pole. That's why I am planning an expedition across the continent.
"Men wanted for hazardous journey. Low wages, bitter cold, long hours of complete darkness. Safe return doubtful. Honour and recognition in event of success."
Eratosthenes measure the circumference via shadows, which could only be achieved if the earth was round. His calculation was also extremely close to the actual circumference. We have known that the earth was a sphere since about 200BC.
Who would have thought that 2215 years after this discovery a shitpostin' Aussie would be denying this well known and observed fact.
>>55294763
>>55294777
>>55294791
>>55294938
If the sun was moving across the galaxy, why is it difficult to measure the parallax of the stars? we should have a different constellation over the course of 1000 years yet celestial navigation is a thing for sailors since then.
"Being very difficult to measure, only about 60 stellar parallaxes had been obtained by the end of the 19th century, mostly by use of the filar micrometer. Astrographs using astronomical photographic plates sped the process in the early 20th century. Automated plate-measuring machines[7] and more sophisticated computer technology of the 1960s allowed more efficient compilation of star catalogues. In the 1980s, charge-coupled devices (CCDs) replaced photographic plates and reduced optical uncertainties to one milliarcsecond.
Stellar parallax remains the standard for calibrating other measurement methods (see Cosmic distance ladder). Accurate calculations of distance based on stellar parallax require a measurement of the distance from Earth to the Sun, now based on radar reflection off the surfaces of planets.[8]
The angles involved in these calculations are very small and thus difficult to measure. The nearest star to the Sun (and thus the star with the largest parallax), Proxima Centauri, has a parallax of 0.7687 ± 0.0003 arcsec."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_parallax
get the astroglide ready, because you will measure my curvature.
>>55295050
I think there were numerous expeditions already, you can cross the continent very easily during the summer.
Also there is definitely a magnetic pole at the south.
On a flat disc a magnetic pole wouldnt really make sense.
>>55295066
>get the astroglide ready, because you will measure my curvature.
Mine curves slightly to the left. I'm also left handed. Do you think I did it by fapping?
>100 replies
>>55295066
>if the sun isn't stationary, why is it hard to get a measurement
This implies a stationary sun would be harder to measure parallax. Also, the sun isn't always exactly the same distance from earth.
>>55295062
>assuming the earth is round with calculations
>therefore it must be round
pic related
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNxd6a9xfRs
>>55294665
Indeed. And they go to full length to keep us in check!
We have to break the indoctrination!
>>55292070
Quite simple:
The conspiracy is too large and pointless to ever succeed.
What would anyone have to benefit for lying about this.
Second you are talking about literally tens of millions of people spread across every country on the planet being complicit. There's no way that you would have not one leak in the hundreds of years we've known it was round.
>>55295066
Because no matter where you move in a room, you can still see a lightbulb. Same for stars.
>>55295016
The convex lenses of your telescope will do that to you.
yes i have actually been on an airplane
>>55294082
They even put it on the NWO flag!
>>55295066
>we should have a different constellation over the course of 1000 years yet celestial navigation is a thing for sailors since then.
Your ignorance is showing, anon.
They have changed.
The one (more specifically "one") used for navication, the north star, is stationary by its very nature.
Want to know why it's stationary?...
It's nearly perfectly lined up with our north pole and at the same place regardless of time of day, month and even year.
Meanwhile, the constellations which astrology are based on have shifted tot he point where they are entirely wrong.
They're supposed to literally be the constellation you were born under based on the month you were born and they used to be.
2000 years ago.
Now they're a month off.
>>55294419
Your story is less believable than the flat earth theory.
Boat sinking below the horizon debunked.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awCx5ob04ZY
round earthers on suicide watch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNxd6a9xfRs
>>55293078
Watch a ship sail away from you. The curve of the round planet will make the ship seem to disappear. Proof, not hard to come by. Sage this Australian shitpost
>>55295176
This. What the fuck would be the point in going through all the trouble
>>55295228
And did you fly off into space? Because if the earth was spherical and your plane kept going level you would
>>55292070
come on mang, me and my friend had fun baiting people with the concave earth theory but you don't have to put it on /pol/, go post it on /x/ you'll get more replies.
>>55292070
Yes you faggot shitposting cunt
I paid a lot of my shekels and flew in a Russian MIG to about 23km up. I could observe both the curvature of the Earth, and the gayness of OP.
Fuck off with this shit.
>>55295199
>>55295235
>not understanding perspective and observation
>believes the constellations should remain the same despite the sun moving across the galaxy and the stars moving in the same pace as the solar system to keep that.
hahahahahahahahh. we got some real dumb dumbs.
>>55295145
>not enjoying the shits and giggles
Must be white pride.
>>55295265
Boat sinking below the horizon debunked.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awCx5ob04ZY [Embed]
>>55294703
Couldnt explain it mathematically so you just lash out.
How primitive.
Try this:
Why is the earth curvature never taken into account in the construction of large appartus, like railroads and canals?
I dont actually beleive the earth is flat, but your inability to articulate your thoughts coupled with you inability to give foundation for your beliefs is hilarious.
Just thinking what your told, huh?
>>55295280
But thats not how it works.
>>55295363
yo're a fucking idiot
>>55295339
>if I just entirely ignore their posts I won't have to acknowledge that I was completely and utterly wrong!
Anon, I...
>>55295400
Just admit that you dont know. Its okay.
So......gravity is bullshit.
gravity debunked.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIvgHNkEXas
>>55294419
Gregory?
>>55295363
>Why is the earth curvature never taken into account in the construction of large appartus, like railroads and canals?
They actually do.
When they build bridges, which are much smaller they do need to calculate with the Earth's roundness.
In a case of a railroad it doesn't even matter
>>55295151
>observing natural phenomena that indicates the earth might be round
>proving it with simple geometry/trigonometry
This is science in it's most pure element, remove tin foil.
>>55293677
why is it always the french
>>55294938
This has more to do with electromagnetic static electricity than the imagined poles. What you're seeing with the so called aurora is nothing more than static discharge from one medium to another at altitude.
does kek now get corrected to kek or am I just messing up typing
>>55294395
see video here
>>55294569
flat at 110,000 feet it is.
>>55294763
I am assuming you are kidding. Your short animation is of the kind you would expect in a Hollywood product.
Also and not without irony, it exposes the staged moon landings as both pics can't exist simultaneously in the same material reality.
>>55292070
>Thinner than a dinner plate
OP go poke a stick in the ground and look in the hole for a surprising revelation
>>55295241
first video does show boat sinking. Shit camera confirming point != debunking point.
Second point seems to think the earth's atmosphere acts as a single, powerful prism at the very edge of horizon rather than a much larger prism extending from ozone layer to surface.
>>55294211
why do you think launches take place at the equator then?
>>55295480
>b..b..bridges account for curvature
>railroads do not
fucking pathetic.
>>55295594
NASA is a joke. Nothing they do is worth noting.
>>55295501
>believing there is curvature
>dispite observations and tests
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWLOT3Tqi-Q
>>55295618
Why would railroads need to calculate with the curvature of Earth?
>>55295543
>flat
actually not, but the curvature is subtle, even at 21 miles, or .25% of the diameter of the earth
>>55295241
spaceballs cultists can't into perspective.
Now that we've agreed the earth is clearly flat the real debate begins, circular or square?
>>55295618
>railroads don't just sit on the surface of the earth
>the curvature is so extreme they have to get curved rail lines
>probably curved planks, too
>>55295613
Why delete?
>>55295732
Circular :)
>>55292070
Oh man I laughed harder than I should have 20/10 shitpost. Posts like these remind me that most of the shit on pol is satire.
>>55295680
>the the curvature is subtle
If the Earth is flat, lunar eclipses are caused by the Black Sun. How cool is that!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4GmeI2omfM
>>55295543
>Also and not without irony, it exposes the staged moon landings as both pics can't exist simultaneously in the same material reality.
Just when you think they can't get any more retarded.
First, different lenses.
The camera on DSCOVR is designed specifically to capture a picture of earth's surface. That means earth is the main focus of the picture (hence why it takes up nearly the entire frame.)
Point B, the pictures were taken from Lagrange 1. The moon orbits at about 400,000 miles from earth while Lagrange 1 is about 1 million miles away. The moon is approximately 1/th the mass of the earth. Do the match yourself and that's the size it'll be.
Element gamma, that's not the fucking moon landing site (any of them,
The dark side of the moon is more pock marked than a teen-aged bacon lover. This is due tot he fact that it is tidally locked with earth (google it since I assume you don't know what it means) and the far side took the majoirty of impacts during earth's genisis. When the moon landing were in the absolute infancy of planning one of the first steps they took was to say "fuck the dark side. we can't land shit on that fucked up surface"
Exhibit cuatro, you're fucking retarded.
You're fucking retarded.
>>55295711
The big question is why has NASA been faking these pictures, there is not one single photo of the Earth "globe" from space that isn't a composite, a painting or a smudge.
>>55295711
All of those except 2012 are essentially the the same
>>55295711
Those are just different angles and edits on the colours. Plus, the continents DO change, there's perpetual landscape changes and froestry increases/declines. How then do you explain being able to see the international space station through a telescope? What could it possible be orbiting?
>>55294374
/Thread
>Ball earthers mind blown
>>55295801
Get a vecter of a circle, and zoom in from 100% to 40,000%, and tell me it doesn't look approximately flat. If you think it looks exactly flat, you're actively detracting from your own position. If you see a faint curvature, then my point as originally stated still stands.
>>55294419
Chris?
>>55292070
HOW THE FUCK HAS NO ONE EVER FOUND THE EDGE OF THE EARTH THEN
>>55295711
When i was a kid in elementary school, i was told that the earth, in reality has a geoid shape, those images looks like a perfect circle desu.
>>55295924
>there is not one single photo of the Earth "globe" from space that isn't a composite, a painting or a smudge.
how do you even know that? Did you check the millions of photos on the NASA website?
>>55295952
see>>55294652 and stay mad
>>55292070
You realize that in a few years commercial space flights will be available to a large section of the public and you will be able to see the oblate spheroid shape of the Earth for yourself right?
But let me guess they'll actually drug people and move them into a simulator with holograms instead of windows or some shit right?
>>55294746
"Moot"? Isn't our admin this Hiroshima guy?
>>55296012
IIRC that was showing atmospheric pressure, not actual shape.
>>55295924
control over people and power. thats it. taking god out of the system means that people will feel less guilty harming others in finance or wars.
but over, its just a power struggle and making money the motivation to keep things quiet and going.
>>55296029
>But let me guess they'll actually drug people and move them into a simulator with holograms instead of windows or some shit right?
They actually use hypnosis.
>>55292070
>When pilots think they are flying around the world they are really just flying in a circle around the North pole at the Earth's center.
kek
>>55294477
The point being this:
Airplanes can fly using models designed for a flat stationary earth.
With the speed the move and distances they cover you would think theyd have to maintain a constant downward steer to avoid flying off into space via slopes.
>>55296029
You dont need a space flight. Anyone can just buy a weather balloon and release it.
>>55295356
>just when the boat gets far enough away that you can start clearly seeing it disappear into the horizon (10-15 miles) she stops
lel
sage goes in all fields
Even the ancients knew the earth was round. There's an easy experiment to prove this. Carl Sagan explains it in the very first episode of Cosmos talking about Eraatosthenes.
http://youtu.be/B8QWuSn_Wxw
You can figure this out with 2 sticks, the Australian equivalent of a graphing calculator.
>>55294652
why would they put that there or waste their time in the first place if they knew the earth is round?
did you not read that it makes no reference in trajectory? that means it can work anywhere at anytime. no curvature is put into question. reminder that commercial flights fly at half the speed of the rotation of the earth and would have to deal with curvature, moving atmosphere, and other round earth nonsense.
>>55296123
You can't just "fly into space" m8. Gravity still works in the air, and air itself is affected by gravity. A "straight line" in air itself is curved because of this.
>>55292070
Since we're all redpilled now, let's start working out how NASA developed such convincing CGI technology
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XG90YYHCSeA
Now it looks indiscernible from reality, but we're not falling for it, I wonder if we could use this engine for gaming? Forza would look sick.
>>55296012
The shape isn't that noticeable with the naked eye but it definitely isn't a perfect sphere and the distinction is an important one to make in science.
Nobody will hate you if you call it a sphere though.
Why has no one mentioned that its on top of three elephants riding a turtle yet?
>>55295972
Muh ice wall
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Vf8cQm1Uz6U
>>55292070
Why is the Earth flat but the moon a sphere? According to the brilliant shading on your picture? Also if the sun is flat too, why are planets elsewhere from Earth still lit up in my telescope? Also why can I see the spherical edges of the sun through it and measure the rotation?
>>55292070
>>55296169
thats if the assumption of the earth is round. you can scale down the experiment. it works both ways.
but because its proven that the earth does not have curvature, the flat model is correct.
>>55296178
Not trying to be conspiracy tier, but why the fuck is there dust on the lens/water? Anyone know?
>>55296123
Because gravity won't account for that at all, right?
>>55296170
Did you not read "derivation" or "nonlinear six-degree-of-freedom equations"?
>>55296212
Yes and is there even the slightest trace of evidence for that?
I cannot tell anymore whether people are just baiting or are legitimate fucking idiots
I would love to know how flat earthers explain orbital physics. Or gravity. Or the correalis effect. Or the South Pole being navigable. Do they just reject all mathematics Amish style? Or do they pick and choose math that's convieniant to them?
>>55295711
Anybody can see something weird on the las two images?
>Flat earth
>Redpill
Didn't galileo disprove this like couple 100 years ago.
>>55296173
If you want to get technical then we are on a planet that orbits around a sun that orbits around the center of our galaxy that is flying through space, possibly orbiting the cebter of the universe, or possibly shooting out away from it, or going towards it
>>55296222
Why is it when cannons fire they are always the same no matter the direction. If you shoot vertically the ball will end up back where you fired it. Light will not register any sort of wobbling. And when the red bull guy jumped from outside the atmosphere he landed right where he jumped from?
>>55292070
This is borderline schizophrenia, m8.
You should go see a doctor
And if you believe doctors are evil and will try to kill you, then you are full schizo, and should be medicated accordingly (anti psychotics).
>>55296170
Also, newtonian physics are a useful approximation, even used in high-precision simulations, though are not fundamentally exact.
>>55296275
>but because its proven that the earth does not have curvature, the flat model is correct.
>because it is proven
:DD
>>55296222
Don't trip him
>>55296173
>gravity
>theory
>believes theory is fact
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JisCl6-q2fA
>>55296326
>galileo
>100 years ago
>>55296173
Well first off, we know gravity does not exist, otherwise we could not fly planes (they would just fall to the earth). We also know that planes fly at a level angle for most of their duration.
Knowing these two things can only lead you to one conclusion. The earth is flat
>>55296333
Trips replying to Trips.
>>55296275
Are you saying that the speed of light is wrong? Because I'm fairly sure it's 100% mathematically proven at this point. Meaning the sun being 8 light-minutes away proves it isn't close.
>>55292070
AHAHAHA STRAYA CUNT
LEAVE A NICE HOT STINKY TURD ON /POL/
STRAYA CUNT
>>55296280
There's still dust in space, they're in low earth orbiting, matter is scattered throughout space
>>55296361
gr8 b8 m8 l8r
>>55296329
Nothing is flying through space
Frame of reference etc.
>>55296333
The same reason you can throw a ball straight up on an airplane and it'll land in the same place.
>>55296222
even the moon doesnt behave like a sphere should when reflecting light. instead its entire face is lit up.
http://www.wildheretic.com/is-the-moon-an-optical-illusion/
>>55295677
>This ball head idiot is still posting out his ass 5 hours later
Boob earf btfo again itt AHAHHAJAAHHAH
>>55296453
No. According to you it would float
>>55296333
>And when the red bull guy jumped from outside the atmosphere he landed right where he jumped from?
He didn't. Both flat earthers and round earthrs know this, since everyone believes in the wind.
>>55296368
Lad did you feel yourself getting dumber writing that? The concept of lift isn't disputed by flat earthers I don't think
>>55292070
How do you explain the northern lights? Why aren't they everywhere?
>>55296364
>what is a couple hundreds
Holy shit, your autism is almost palpable
>>55296368
Why do things fall down then?
>>55296484
No. Learn vectors son.
>>55292070
Shut it down! The goy know!
>>55296368
Straya found a proxy. 4/10 actually jej'd at "gravity doesn't exist"
>>55296389
you know there's something called metrics and conversion right?
what makes you think mathematicians cant come up with a scaled version of that too, to have both working models, a flat earth and round earth correct?
You just choose to believe a round earth without observing the tests that disprove it.
>>55296547
But that was my whole point. The theory of our "spinning around" like a carnival ride mysteriously has the oceans glued to the earth. Because you know. Spinning and shit. There's up. There's down.
>>55292070
I honestly don't know what to believe anymore.
I think I need a break from this place
>>55296571
>the tests that disprove it.
For example...?
>>55296333
Why should it fall anywhere but the same place?
Explain this shit.
>>55296635
Explain what, Taco?
>>55296326
It's been disproven since ancient times. Even in "the christian dark ages" the spherical earth was common knowledge.
The only people who believed in flat earth in the last millenium were the chings.
>>55296629
If we're spinning around, why are the cannonballs so predictable and nothing is influenced? Muh super atmosphere glue
>>55296539
Electromagnetism.
Same way NASA rockets take off. The rockets are themselves are magnets that repulse them from earth. If it was just they'd blow up.
>>55296389
The beauty of math is that you can scale it anyway you want. But observation and test is what proves a certain paradigm. This is how scales and metrics works. What makes you think there isnt a mathmatical proof of working flat earth models and round earth models?You just choose to believe the round earth without observing and testing anything else. You were told those facts, you didnt know it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-c9VQ-BDJI
>>55296571
Because light speed has nothing to do with the curvature of the earth. It is a constant. You can't change it. This is a dead end anon.
>>55296389
>>55296275
To scale down this experiment you can only bring the sun closer while simultaneously making it smaller.
Hydrogen would not have enough mass for fusion at this scale. Or, is that just a big bonfire in the sky?>>55296390
where is the edge of the world then
>>55296025
>>55296655
Look at the image, how can the world map(right) fit in the earth image (left).
>>55296725
Ctrl+F
>>55296623
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDaiw-G1VGE
>>55296725
Antartica surrounds the edge. It is impossible to go right to the edge though because of the Guardians.
>>55296635
>implying you won't call any explaination a cop out and had wave it
Oh well, lenses Paco.
Lenses.
>>55296690
I guess that means magnets can fly, pretty good desu senpai
>>55296667
why should the cannonball be influenced and by what?
People who believe that the Earth is flat will be the first to hang on the Day of the Rope.
>>55294746
Obviously fake, there aren't 13 months in a year.
>>55296701
im talking about the numbers you use. not the physics.
>>55296757
Well maybe not in elementary school, but in high school you'll definitely learn about projections. Hopefully, otherwise you're gonna stay retarded.
>>55296701
You can actual slow light down. Even stop it.
Thread music:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaMJCix5l3c
Thomas Dolby is too hyperactive to be blinded by science.
>>55296612
How are vectors mysterious. Addition isn't hard. The oceans and everything else are moving just as fast as the earth spins. Why would it go anywhere if there's no relative difference in speeds? Relative to the universe you're moving thousands of meters per second, but you don't notice because everything around you is moving the same speed. There is nothing complicated about it.
>>55296782
If you have a projectile or gunpowder and you're spinning around as fast as they say, wouldn't all these toilet-bowl forces and shit make certain balls disadvantaged and have vertically shot ones end up in Bolivia?
>>55296775
What are the guardians and why didn't they kill Roald Amundsen?
>>55292070
>I share a flag with you
>>55296690
The electromagnetic force is not powerful enough at a distance. Otherwise magnets would work at range. Try again. Or are you going to deny the math behind fundamental forces?
>>55296690
This is what OP is playing in the background this entire thread:
http://youtu.be/atgtJKpHkwo
>>55296853
If you twirl water in a tank or a wet tennis ball, none of this shit ever happens
>>55296893
They told him to never tell anyone what he saw or they would kill him and everyone he knew. The Guadians are very powerful. I am in contact with them.
>>55293170
You will be shot
>>55296875
Dont they teach you physics in school or something?
Seriously, if you'r actually interested and not just fishing for answers then read a fucking book on phyics, because you don't seem to have an idea what the fuck is going on,
>>55296937
Why would the tennis ball be wet?
>>55296612
A good way to visualize >>55296853 is to think about other movement situations. For example, when you are in a car, the person in the passenger seat doesn't seem to be moving, although the car is moving at many miles per hour. This happens because both you and the passenger are moving at the same speed.
>>55296957
Are they the voices in your head?
>>55296690
Okay so if there are no opposing forces (due to lack of gravity) and space flight is propelled by magnets, why do all magnets not fly off into space? What's holding them down?
What's stopping me from making my own electromagnet and fucking off tot he moon?
>>55296782
You do realise all "anti-gravity" technology that exists are just magnets even by scientists own admissions you fucking kike shapeshifter?
