How moral are you?
http://www.celebrity types.com/morality/6/test.php
>>55291300
Not sure why it added a space, but whatever.
http://www.celebritytypes.com/morality/6/test.php
>>55291300
Okay then.
My results:file:///home/chronos/u-9c5c3ac33d8a91f19b909b43a1924741ff7db19f/Downloads/Moral%20Foundations%20Test.mhtml
I have a lot of issues with these tests because of my interpretation of how my morals work.
Basically the way that other people operate and how I operate are different because I put myself to a greater standard.
So when the questions were posed, I viewed them as acceptable for them to do but not really for me.
Fairness master race
Did I do well?
I don't know what this means.
>In sex education class, the students are asked to inflate a condom with their mouth.
What the fuck is this retardation.
>don't tread on me intensifies
>>55293762
Why the fuck do your statistics look like mine?
>>55291300
Bleeding-heart fascist reporting in.
Does this mean im a faggot?
>>55294441
>this is what 15 years old looks like
>>55294146
Because you like freedom but understand the concepts the west was founded on are inherently white?
Looks like I too am a faggot.
p sure that most Americans are actually Libertarians but are socially engineered into factionalism.
>>55294727
holy shit, you ARE a faggot
did i do good?
>>55294727
How does it feel to be on the same board as a bunch of edgy sociopaths?
>chose neutral for most answers because I just don't care for what people do in their spare time
>don't get libertarian
So to be someone who allows people to do what they want, I have to explicitly allow it? That seems counter intuitive...
Are you judging the first part of the paragraph or the last?
Purity, Conservative.
>>55294496
I sure hope so
I am so anti-collectivism it's pretty stupid.
>>55292877
This.
I'm all for personal freedom, so shit like insulting others is acceptable, but not really appreciated.
Question 23
Who /liberty/ here?
>>55294684
>implying you have shit on me
I would let a baby drown for roads not to be built
>>55295216
Ayyyy.
Kinda expected my loyalty to be higher desu
I don't have a strongest moral, guess that means I'm the best human
>>55295216
/lib/ here
>>55291300
What sliding scale wasn't useful at all. Yes or no options would be much better.
overall happy with my graph. Glad I aint as autistic as a libertarian liberty-wise but still high.
>>55295450
Yeah tests with sliding scales are fucking stupid
>hmmm I feel only 25% right on this issue
>>55291300
Reminder that this test has been devised by two liberal Jews.
>>55291300
I take my moral stance from the only objective source, the Lord God creator of the heaven and earth.
Not Okay: Anything relating to murder or hurting others without consequence.
Not Okay: Premarital sex anything, regardless of the question.
Not Okay: Any MUH FREEDUMBS that affect others, like smoke breaks. Smokers smell terrible and its unpleasant when you're stuck next to a smoker because they're the one attending you.
Neutral - Low OK: Any question about somebody doing something with their property. It's technically okay because it belongs to them, but it's not the best thing to do.
Okay: Things that have no effect whatsover unless you're a Muslim/faggot that wants to force their views on you or else.
r8/10
A lot of the questions were just people being dickish, not really moral quandaries.
>>55295724
>Not Okay: Any MUH FREEDUMBS that affect others, like smoke breaks. Smokers smell terrible and its unpleasant when you're stuck next to a smoker because they're the one attending you.
Hang yourself paco. Mexicans smell terrible and its unpleasant when you're stuck next to a mexican because they're the one attending you, that doesn't mean I get to ban mexicans.
I disagree with my liberty score.
I should be at least on par, or very close to the libertarian bar.
Guess I should take it again.
>>55291300
>Am I mustard race?
>>55295859
Nice try, but people are not the same as smoking, and you can make them take a shower before work and be halfway presentable. Having a smoke break is like rolling in shit, objectively speaking neither is healthy or pleasant to smell, even if they want to do it in their free time they're not the only ones affected.
>>55296272
Free time equals before and after work though. WHo cares if you're rolling in shit before you take a shower, or after you're done with the day?
Smoking on breaks counts as work time though.
WHAT DOES MY TEST RESULT MEAN WHY DO I HAVE 0% PURITY AND CARE
>>55294752
They actually outright acknowledge this if you read the blurb about the test on the website.
Most americans, regardless of political leanings, favor liberty.
>>55296495
Coming to work after you rolled into shit is okay?
>>55296634
You own your own business
or
The public gives you permission to work their.
>>55296495
This guy gets it.
>>55296561
You can roll in shit or have a smoke in your house if you want, but you cannot if other people are going to have to be around you. You cannot impose your freedom onto others.
>Implying authority
Come on, I just said that it was wrong to go full MUH SOVEREIGN CITIZEN on cops. Dickbags are dickbags, regardless of the situation.
What is this text supposed to mean?
>>55296938
>No loyalty
am I cool guys?
>>55296542
It means you're a degenerate.
So am I a faggot or am I cool?
>>55296634
>an atheist owns a bakery in 2030. A Muslim comes in and asks for a wedding cake, but it has to depict Mohammed. Get head cut off or get arm cut off?
Loyal puritan reporting in.
>>55296542
Lol are you human? This is what a robot might think.
>>55295134
questions are presented in random order... but I can guess which one you're talking about.
>>55293697
I know right? What the fuck does that have to do with being inappropriate or impure?
Then there's the answers where someone is a complete ass for no reason.
> Suzy confides she dreams of being Prom Queen
> Ohh ho you fat cow, you'll never be prom queen!
> Is this okay?
Who the fuck is that kind of a raging cunt? If someone wishes they could be Indiana Jones for a day you don't need to shit on him for it, you both know that shit ain't happening.
>>55291300
A lot of these questions could swing either way for me based on the context and mindset of the individuals involved (as is usually the case with these kind of tests). On such questions I neither agreed nor disagreed. For the remainder of the questions I either strongly agreed or disagreed based on clear-cut moral violations or lack thereof.
I fear people making rash decisions about moral issue based on presuppositions rather then objective grounds (see every major story in mainstream media for an example).
Also,
>Liberals score lowest on liberty
Nothing wrong with killing dogs or being rude, morality should be about real issues like theft or violence against people.
>>55298099
>Authority and liberty both high
>>55296634
My dilemma with that one was that the Christians are stupid as hell to miss out on a money opportunity because muh religions. Alternatively, it's their business and they have the right to deny a costumer (and miss out on money) for whatever reason.
>>55291300
i don't think i have a very coherent political stance
Life, liberty and the pursuit of burger.
>>55296634
Solution: Disallow all political messages.
>>55298917
Only a German could graph like that though.
Interesting.
I Like FREEDOM!!!
>>55296185
>Fairness highest
Fair dinkum mate, strewth.
>>55298948
hahahaha
>>55293472
means your a shithead and a soft cunt m8
>>55300428
2
>>55298536
liberty for what is legal and authority for that which is immoral
Fugg. How'd I do?
>tfw neo-con
>>55302500
you did shit m8
>>55291300
strange thing 50% everywhere
>>55291300
Rate me, /pol/
Left-Liberal mustard race apparently
>scored higher for everything but 'care' than all ideologies
So, what does this tell me?
![a42579f6e8[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/lncSIoZ.png "a42579f6e8[1]")
