Photos with the 40mm STM pls
- Home
- Board: /p/ - Photography
- Reading: Photos with the 40mm STM pls
We respect your right to privacy. You can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Your cookie preferences will apply across our website.
/p/hotographers with the 40mm STM lens on a full frame camera. Post your pictures please, I'm thinking of buying one and Flickr is shit. Thanks
Pic unrelated
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 231 Image Height 244 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2752755
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 620 Scene Capture Type Standard
All for now. It's a good lens, the only one I have. No point getting it if you have a 35 or 50, rather buy a 40 and 105 or something.
Im off to bed, glhf
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 666 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2752755
Fuck off with your meme frog.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Digital Photo Professional Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 542 Image Height 800
>>2752755
It's designed for film shooters, hence the 52mm filter thread.
Digiplens need not apply.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Digital Photo Professional Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1205 Image Height 800
40mm stm with some super low speed kodak 2254 is sharp as fug.
Brilliant lens.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3.6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2012:11:06 20:34:44 Exposure Time 10 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 50 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance Infinity Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 40.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2754459
this is the only pic of water moving that i have liked so far. good job dude
I'll second the FUCK OFF to the lowbrow meme faggot. Fucking hate the internet.
>>2754986
This hurts my eyes. that focus is shit.
>>2755003
I've noticed that a lot of the images I resized to 1000px a few years ago seem to look like that. Maybe something about sitting on a hard drive degrades jpeg quality? I don't know. The photo was actually totally in focus and very sharp before the resize.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3.6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2012:09:01 21:47:47 Exposure Time 10 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 50 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance Infinity Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 40.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2755003
Actually, nevermind. Just adjust your browser's magnification to 100%, or view the image in its own tab. It looks fine at 100px when you don't stretch it out.
>>2755005
compression and sampling settings?
>>2755006
*at 1000px
>>2755007
It's just a resize I did for the sake of posting on /p/. Like I said, view it at 100% and it looks fine. I'm sure it was bicubic compression, but honestly I didn't really give enough of a fuck to preserve details when I did it. With people on this board, you're damned if you do and damned if you don't, but if you don't resize your images, then you are worse than Hitler.
