Customize your cookie preferences

We respect your right to privacy. You can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Your cookie preferences will apply across our website.

We use cookies on our site to enhance your user experience, provide personalized content, and analyze our traffic.

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y / ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo

What the fuck Adobe.I noticed this after going through a bunch of pics. When I use


Thread replies: 37
Thread images: 12

File: what-the-shit-is-this.jpg (369KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
what-the-shit-is-this.jpg
369KB, 1920x1080px
What the fuck Adobe.

I noticed this after going through a bunch of pics. When I use the "previous conversion" option (not sure if that is what its called in english, sorry), that hideous banding shows up. Only and only when using that. If I input the same very settings manually, it doesn't happen.

Has anyone else experienced this?
>>
File: asdf.jpg (402KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
asdf.jpg
402KB, 1920x1080px
>>2714298
Forgot to mention, the banding sticks even if I zero in each slider. I have to pick "default camera settings" in order to get rid of them.

Here's the same pic with the same settings that caused the banding.
>>
>>2714300
Your shadows are blue
And your whites are yellow
Fix this
>>
>>2714303
That's what happens when you shoot shade during the afternoon.
>>
>>2714300
this is what happens when you shoot nikon
>>
>not using Lightroom
>not knowing how to set white balance
How dumb do you have to be?
>spanish origin
oh
>>
>>2714336
I despise lightroom.

You are more than welcome to try set WB on your own; let's see your mad skillz: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3hsgfJQe6qKa3hON2NyTk1yRHc/view?usp=sharing

Let me guess, you are from the US?
>>
>>2714336
it appears OP very well knows how to set the white balance, and is exactly referring to a bug that prevents him from doing it in an efficient way. If only you had the slightest reading comprehension.


>>2714298
never encountered that issue, could be due to how settings are saved maybe? are you (not) using a sidecar file for raws?
>>
>>2714298
essentially your problem is that you haven't a clue what you're doing. Always use camera calibration instead of Adobe, then learn how white balance works, then get a cheap Yongnuo for fill flash.


I mean CHRIST ALMIGHTY a wedding dress isn't supposed to be fucking blue.


fucking hell


Jesus


fuck me
like what the fuck are you doing


>those half-heads of the children


>the bride looking like she's covered in coal dust


>her father's blue hair


oh my god


this is just too much


fuck
>>
>>2714298
The bride looks a dude, man
>>
>>2714343
Thanks, I've found the problem already - although not thanks to the morons here; apparently if you set the chromabs filter too high, it can cause this in certain situations. One of the first shoots of the set was wide open and had some chromabs and that was being passed on by using the same settings.

>>2714344
Relax Billy boy. I wasn't there professionally, just as a guest.

I do know how WB works. You are more welcome to show everyone your knowledge with the raw I provided.

Although I think you are a moron, since you called me on the cut heads, without noticing I zoomed the image, buffoon.
>>
>>2714304
that's why the flash was invented
>>
>>2714348
Reading is a more important invention (^:
>>
File: DSC_4287 resize.jpg (1MB, 1406x938px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
DSC_4287 resize.jpg
1MB, 1406x938px
Here you go.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D800
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows)
PhotographerNicolas Fernandez Aguade
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern934
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width7360
Image Height4912
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2015:12:03 15:44:54
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1406
Image Height938
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>2714395
Is that done strictly with just ACR?
>>
File: fohtoh.jpg (440KB, 1000x800px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
fohtoh.jpg
440KB, 1000x800px
I think too warm is better than too cold when you have people involved but I don't really know what this picture looks like. Did it on a 1366x768 12-inch screen.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D800
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Windows)
PhotographerNicolas Fernandez Aguade
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern840
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2015:12:03 12:57:44
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>2714402
Yup, slightly yellow dress is better than blue
>>
File: DSC_4287 resize 2.jpg (1MB, 1406x938px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
DSC_4287 resize 2.jpg
1MB, 1406x938px
>>2714403
>>2714402

You're right. I agree as well.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D800
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows)
PhotographerNicolas Fernandez Aguade
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern934
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width7360
Image Height4912
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2015:12:03 17:41:58
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1406
Image Height938
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: DSC_4287.jpg (339KB, 1188x879px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
DSC_4287.jpg
339KB, 1188x879px
Here's my take on it.
Boring edit perhaps, but not pretending to be artsy with eye-stabbing grading.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D800
Camera SoftwareVer.1.10
PhotographerNicolas Fernandez Aguade
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2015-12-04T02:09:08-15:00
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Image Width1188
Image Height879
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
Don't you love it when you post a thread asking a photography related question, and all you get is a bunch of pathetic shitcunts commenting about how "terrible" the photo is, when A) He didn't ask for critique, and B) He wasn't even finished editing the photo. You're all a bunch of pathetic faggots, butthurt over the fact that OP actually has a social life and gets invited to events such as weddings, while you sit crying behind your computer screens, jealous and confused as to why no one loves you. Well done you cancerous cunts.

>>2714422
This turned out nice, obviously nothing incredible, but still a good pitcher. I guarantee it's a lot better than anything these armchair photographers can produce.
>>
itt: everyone missing the point
>>
>>2714422
>>2714395
awful
>>2714436
okay
>>2714402
best
>>
>>2714436
these are horrible. see that huge fucking shadow and see that huge source of gorgeous light behind it? Which did you happen to choose to shoot in? The kid is dark as fuck, banded shadow on the girl, nobody is looking in the right direction, looks forced af. let me guess you said "hey guys now i need you to get over in this super dark shadowy spot and run around and smile but *look natural*". you hosed this shot for sure and the rest are horrible too. but picking that huge blob of darkness to take this???
>>
>>2714511
>the rest are horrible too
Lel, there's only one shoot posted so far in the thread, you enormous faggot. Also op already stated he was a guest, not the photog paid for the gig.
>>
>>2714531
one shot with 15 shitty edits you cock gargling piece of shit. you tell me what he got right here since you're such an expert. he even started cropping the kid's head off! take your camera, wrap the neck/shoulder strap around your neck and hang yourself with it if you're defending this garbage.
>>
File: 14476528394857.png (63KB, 625x623px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
14476528394857.png
63KB, 625x623px
>>2714573
0/10.
>>
File: whatmightthisbe.png (157KB, 680x236px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
whatmightthisbe.png
157KB, 680x236px
>>2714573
>he even started cropping the kid's head off!
How many times where you dropped in the head as a kid?
>>
File: DSC_4287.jpg (763KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
DSC_4287.jpg
763KB, 1000x667px
Best I could do in two minutes. No crop is really good, but I decided to go with this one because it would have been nice without the photog in the back and no one else used it before. Could have gone with square, but imitating a 6x6 with digital always looks like shit. Not sure about the WB. My laptop is way too yellow so it might me a little on the cold side.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D800
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Windows)
PhotographerNicolas Fernandez Aguade
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern840
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2015:12:04 13:21:27
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>2714573
the other edits were from other people. He posted the raw file so other people could demonstrate that it wasn't necessary to make a wedding dress blue, even if the original shot was shit.
>>
File: 1402271107202.jpg (63KB, 788x1024px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1402271107202.jpg
63KB, 788x1024px
>this thread
saved in hologram for future-proof kekking
>>
>>2714298
>>2714395
>>2714924


How much shit did you crop out originally?

I'm almost waiting to see the next photo with a whole fucking orchestra in it.
>>
>>2714924
>>2714402

why so bright? the background glows.
>>
>>2715235
op is bad with a camera even top of the line gear that's why
>>
>>2714504

How the fuck are you gonna call >>2714402 best when the whites are blown the fuck out more than Pearl Harbor? Holy fuck how badly did you ruin this wedding?
>>
>>2715216
>How much shit did you crop out originally?
Sigh, it never ceases to amaze me the sort of retards that post on this cesspool.
>>2715312
You know, I'd rather expose for the shade in that case and recover it on post. But then again I'm sure you'll do ten times better than me.

From your basement.
>>2715403
>Holy fuck how badly did you ruin this wedding?
That wasn't me. Also, read the fucking thread.
>>
File: Unbenannt2.jpg (127KB, 1245x896px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
Unbenannt2.jpg
127KB, 1245x896px
>>2715235

Because the people are undexposed as fuck in the original. But who cares? Do you need the background? It's rather distracting anyway.

>>2715216

Not much more. There's that girl and half a dude on the right. The Dad is pretty much in the center in the original.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
PhotographerTassilo
Image-Specific Properties:
>>
>>2715460
>>2715235

To add to that, I had to add a stop of exposure on top of fiddling with the curve.

Which in numbers, would lead you to a nice sunny16 exposure for the shadows of iso100|f4|1/125s. If the OP had known anything about exposure he could have worked a little better with the colors. Especially the red on the boys pants is fucked.
Thread replies: 37
Thread images: 12
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y / ] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at imagescucc@gmail.com with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
If a post contains illegal content, please click on its [Report] button and follow the instructions.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need information for a Poster - you need to contact them.
This website shows only archived content and is not affiliated with 4chan in any way.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoin at 1XVgDnu36zCj97gLdeSwHMdiJaBkqhtMK