>>13815925
>minivan that goes fast
How much? That sounds fucking awesome
>>13815925
Toyota brought that Camaro out to Willow Springs and tested it themselves on track against the Sienna. No surprise the Sienna "Won".
The Official Camaro 1LE Time is 1:22.70
>>13816382
hahaha damage control
>>13815925
Can't wait to see riced-out minivans appearing at stance meets
>>13816413
How on earth is that damage control?
That's like GM testing the Camaro against the 918, but bringing their own 918 and having a GM rep drivethe Porsche and saying the Camaro won despite independent runs that prove otherwise.
This Sienna run is blogstar clickbait at it's finest.
More like
>pshh nothing personnel kid
>>13815342
>that RS badge location
fucking why
>>13816539
GM are known liars, Toyota aren't. It's about credibility. GM can't be trusted, whereas Toyota can.
>>13817411
GRRRRRRR I'm a Ford/JDM fan who can't deal with a camaro handling better than my car
i'm gonna shit post on 4chan to make myself feel better
>>13815925
fixed it
>>13816201
It's a one off custom race car, its probably like 60k to build something similar
>>13817765
fixed it properly
>>13817803
>It's a one off custom race car
no it isnt
>>13817820
>no it isnt
yes it is
http://www.digitaltrends.com/cars/toyota-sienna-r-tuned-concept-news-specs-performance/#/2
>>13817989
>engine is stock
>ony has different suspension and no interior
>one off cutstom
camaro BTFO
>>13817411
Except the Camaro's 1:22 was done by Motor Trend, not General Motors... In other words: AN INDEPENDENT TESTER
>>13817998
Ok. find me that exact suspension in the Sienna's performance aftermarket support that anyone can buy.
Oh you can't? Because it was one off-suspension for the sake of marketing.
It's a one-off custom, that's slower than a Camaro
Get over yourself.
>>13818108
In other words, an American magazine that has made a living out of shilling for domestic makes for the past 30 years.
OK.
>>13818121
CAMARO BTFO
A
A
M
A
R
O
B
T
F
O
>>13818123
Motor Trend usually doesn't shill anything American. They usually go out of their way not to and shill imports
>>13818121
I doubt he can find something like that.
So instead, I'll post this. It's a stock V6 Camry beating a Camaro SS at the drag strip.
Yes, a V6 FWD grandpa sedan beat a RWD VEE ATE muscle car.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4cgK08ypy0
inb4 damage control, denial, etc.
>>13818127
>>13817998
Say it enough and it might become true
>>13818127
>Toyota uses a shit driver to get amaro slower than minivan in testing
>OUR MINIVAN'S A SPORTS CAR!
>meanwhile several other independent reviewers have gotten much faster times from the Camaro on the same track
Stop being retarded.
>>13818144
Camaro needs a driver mod
>>13815925
Man, tires make a hell of a difference.
>>13818149
butthurt camaro fangirl detected
>>13818144
Jesus christ lern2launch camaro driver
>>13818144
kek the comments, all this amerifat butthurt
> Matthew G 4 days ago
that is a v6 camaro, if they kept going the maro would easily pass the Camry, I've driven both cars and the camaro is miles ahead a better car in every aspect, the steering on the Toyota is brutal and loose it feels like it is going to oversteer itself everytime I turn, the camaro is stiff and planted like a car should be
>Camaro let off gas too. There's no way an ss camaro loses to that shit. And only ran 85mph?? Don't get happy on that win..
>Camaro couldn't get traction on the launch, camry is a front wheel drive, harder for them to spin tires. race from a roll and see what happens.
>Lmfao do you not see the wheels pin on the camaro?!?! You are a complete idiot if you think a Camry is gonna actually beat a camaro fairly!!! Hahaha like robby369 said he dumped the clutch!
>>13818171
>>13818158
>muh Camaro excuses
LOL
Toyota was probably just like "alright, let's just do this and shut these fags up once and for all".
Little did they know the ensuing butthurt would be 10 times worse than the incessant "muh V8" dickwaving.
>>13818144
>It's a stock V6 Camry beating a Camaro SS at the drag strip.
>It's a stock V6 Camry
>stock
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMO11s4ztxA
>>13818221
>Custom exhaust video posted 2 years ago
>Camry vs Camaro race posted 3 years ago
There is nothing to suggest the exhaust was modified at the time of the race. Your Camaro still got BTFO faggot, deal with it.
>>13818216
>>13818254
>>13818221
>custom exhaust
>obviously adds around 100-150hp
kek the excuses continue
also >>13818254
>>13818263
I'm sure he's got a CAI and some stickers to bump it over the 500hp mark.
>>13818260
>a literal pig with lipstick is faster
KEK!
>>13818260
hey at least their trying unlike chebby
>>13818144
that camaro launch was painful to watch. why are americans such fucking trashcan drivers
>>13818280
where's the traction control to stop wheelspin then?
don't make a shit car and then justify its failure by saying "well it doesn't have this or that or that"
give it traction control and it'll win drag races, otherwise shut the fuck up and get dusted by grandpa in his red sedan
>>13818308
It has traction control and even launch control. Most people turn that shit off at the track though
>>13818318
To their detriment, it would seem.
Case in point, they need to shut the fuck up. It's like stabbing your fucking tires and saying "well shit nigger, I had a flat it's no wonder you beat me".
>>13818335
So what you're saying is
>hey this camaro with slashed tires is slower than a camry that's on slicks
>camarofags BTFO
>>13818216
Am I really not allowed to point out that the Camaro had a shit launch?
>>13818308
Not being a retarded driver also works.
>>13818458
>>13818455
>>13818376
all this damaged butt control
>>13818550
If I made a video where a Camaro raced a fighter get and the Camaro won because the fighter jet was taxing along the runway, and someone pointed that out, would they be damage controlling? Kind of an extreme analogy but you get the point.
>>13818564
No because they were two cars sitting at a light, for the sole purpose of drag racing, in an objective atmosphere that is regulated and consistent.
And the Camaro lost. That's like saying no race/competition/war/etc. was ever won or lost because "muh variables".
It's the same rhetoric you Americans use when you lose a war, like Vietnam or Iraq. "Muh mission statement achieved", despite the entire country being a giant shithole and 10x worse than when you entered.
>>13818628
Nobody who's actually educated thinks we did anything in Vietnam or Iraq. I was just criticizing the Camaro's launch technique earlier. AKA not driving properly. Like the fighter jet would be in my hypothetical race.
>>13818681
*anything good or worthwhile
>>13818628
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong
It's not an objective regulated and consistent atmosphere. Put a racing driver in both cars and the camaro will win every time. Put a learner driver in both cars and the camry will win every time
>>13818688
Depends on how the learner drives really, if he dumps the clutch like a retard you get that, if he leaves the TCS on and uses the fancy electronic gizmos he should still go pretty fast.
>>13818688
>implying the Camaro is designed for people who know how to drive
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>>13818714
So do you like get off sexually on shitposting or what
>>13818714
>imblying the camry is
>imblying the camry isn't being driven by someone who knows how to drive more than the camarotard
Way to misrepresent my argument tho, round of applause
