For real? This is a article right now. Sure, everyone knows WaPo's social media guy lurks /pol/, as they have linked a live thread before in a article. But really, a story on Rule 34? Come on..
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/04/06/is-rule-34-actually-true-an-investigation-into-the-internets-most-risque-law/
>>37256
leave the guy alone, he has to write crap for a living
even if he's scraping the barrel of his bottom
>>37256
someone make a porno of that blue thing and send it to the editor
>risque
>people drawing penises on the internet.
>risque.
>>37259
> new to /news/.
> see thread.
> see post.
> think "fuck it lol" and mspaint a penis and a dirty smile.
> /news/ does not allow uploading images.
Ah well.
>>37259
http://i.imgur.com/YRjZkC2.png
Now someone needs to send it
>>37256
WaPo has turned into a clickbait site since Bezos purchase.
>>37294
Except that's clearly not 'porn', is it?
Rule 34 happens all the time why is this news?
>>37258
I can see his editor trying to figure out how to tell him to work on this, squirming over the way to delicately broach the subject in a corporate worksafe professional manner...
>>37296
Go to rule34.paheal and you will see all the weird shit people fap to.
You can legit look up oranges and you will get pictures of orange people fucking.
>>37295
Yes it has. And there was even a typo in the paper this morning. It's gone downhill in more ways than one
They're trying to get young people to read
>>37256
>Robots? Aliens? Goats? Trombones?
I have forgotten that normies find this weird.
>>37461
I've personally drawn robot, alien and musical instrument porn when I was in grade school, the shit that's out there would implode these peoples minds
It's a female author.
>>37256
Ok, real question, is there Washington Post porn?
No, I don't mean what you just started drawing after seeing this thread, I'm talking about stuff that was on the internet before today.
Do we have newspaper-tans yet or are some things still sacred?
>>37504
/r/ing WaPo-tan
she could wear a pantsuit with their logo on it and have a pencil behind her ear
>Y-you're not going to line the birdcage with me, r-right? I mean I'm not... that dirty~
>>37256
click bait, is it real?
or perhaps
Journalism, is it real anymore?
>>37256
>taking internet law serious.
/d/ could give them the answer.
>>37506
>/r/ing WaPo-tan
What have I done?
>In 2005, the then “16-ish” Peter Morley-Souter had chanced upon some Calvin & Hobbes erotica and turned it into a widely circulated Web comic. “Rule 34,” the caption reads. “There is porn of it. No exceptions.”
Don't the full Rules Of The Internet precede this?
>>37705
>Don't the full Rules Of The Internet precede this?
I duuno, maybe?
I could see them taking it from him or him taking it from them.
Someone should fact check it before I grow board and do it myself.
>>37256
This article seems to focus far too much on the mainstream. You'd think that the author would mention e621, or the weird stuff that comes out of 4chan or tumblr. The kind of stuff that rule 34 has described from the beginning has never been mainstream or a part of video aggregators.
