Michael Jackson stored child torture porn in his estate
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-michael-jackson-porn-neverland-20160621-snap-story.html
What's your favorite Michael Jackson album by the way?
michael jackson INNOCENT
this story has been debunked.
>>65849965
Where is your proof
>>65849965
>So was the kid he tore out of his bed.
>>65849965
by whom?
>>65849939
isnt this like the 8th thread about this today?
>>65850083
Michael Jackson's Estate
checkmate haters
>>65850069
nice
>>65850052
>>65850083
They allegedly found the porn back in '03, Michael Jackson's estate called the allegation 'tabloid-trash', very interesting that this is being presented as current news, its even trending on fb
http://hollywoodlife.com/2016/06/21/michael-jackson-estate-slams-child-porn-collection-allegations-statement/
>>65849939
Why do so many people still deny that he was a pedo? I bet those who do also think OJ is innocent.
>>65850069
appropriate get
>>65850194
because except for a whole bunch of allegations which are muddy af, the public have no reason to believe MJ was anything less than a kind natured, slightly autistic, tortured genius
>>65850153
>Michael Jackson's estate denied Michael Jackson possessed child pornography
well that settles it I guess
>>65850220
If by "tortured genius" you mean "tortured little boys with his penis"
>>65850194
Because he was acquitted of all charges?
This is a non-story. Some tabloid website obtained a tape of the 2003 raid on MJ's estate. If they found anything concrete, it would have been presented at the trial of which he was acquitted by a jury several years afterwards. Basically this is just people falling for clickb8.
>>65850247
its hard to know who to believe. Why this is current news when the images were found in 2003, is pretty fishy to me
>>65850272
scary how this can qualify as a global news headline
>>65850274
Yeah, it's not like extremely powerful and influential people like Michael Jackson can get off the hook for crazy shit like this with expensive lawyers and multimillion dollar settlements or anything
>>65850194
many reasons, mainly the children involved in the trial refused to tetify and have come out years later to say their parents made them do it to get money. also pedophelia is so prevalent in hollywood that if michael wanted children to diddle we would never know about it
>>65850321
>the children involved in the trial refused to tetify and have come out years later to say their parents made them do it to get money
source proving all the children said this pls
>pedophelia is so prevalent in hollywood that if michael wanted children to diddle we would never know about it
you're just arguing against your own point now
>>65850274
It's really not. Jacko touched kids, slept with them, spooned them, held them in his bed.
He is the US version of Jimmy Saville.
>>65850272
>Because he was acquitted of all charges?
Just like OJ was.
I don't think Jackson did it, I just think that's really fault reasoning.
>>65850298
Slow news day. They were probably sitting on this tape for a while just waiting for a slow news day to release it to maximize clicks.
>>65850317
Either way what does it fucking matter, he's dead stop trying to tarnish his name.
>>65850317
yeah and its not like extremely powerful and influential organisations can smear individuals, especially after their death.
Neither of us know, and we'll prob never know.
>>65850372
go to bed, Tito
>>65850373
actually we do know now
who has what to gain from "smearing" him after his death?
>>65850361
Except
Jimmy Saville's crimes were proven and date back 3 decades. He FUCKED kids
MJ was never charged. It seems at worst he probably slept in the same bed as them
>>65850372
This, As long as you don't get caught it's fine
We should follow in his footsteps
>>65850405
pedophiles don't show children kiddie porn and animal torture to coerce them into naptime
>>65850405
So Jacko had better people watching his back.
>>65850436
prove to me he did that and i'll agree with you.
>>65850369
>being found not-guilty by a jury of your peers is faulty reasoning
Well, I don't know what else to tell you other than these were two completely different trials. I guess you can look into the evidence of MJ's. I just watched the tape that's making headlines and there isn't anything illegal shown in it.
>>65850473
>proof
>>65850483
>denial
>>65850480
>>being found not-guilty by a jury of your peers is faulty reasoning
Yeah, it can be actually. If the courts are your default when deciding for yourself whether or not someone's innocent I don't know what to tell you. I'll admit I know little about the case.
>>65849939
I thought this was a well known thing
The rumors were rampant right up to the day he died
>>65850493
come on bro, that article isn't proof.
>>65850480
>>being found not-guilty by a jury of your peers is faulty reasoning
This is also an exact description of the OJ case, so yeah, it can be.
>>65850544
possessing pictures of kids faces superimposed on grown adults in lewd positions is proof that he raped a child?
it shows that he had issues sure
>>65850507
I just know they raided his estate on molestation suspicions back in 2003, supposedly found illegal porn that was later determined to be taken off the internet and though "unknown sources", and had a bunch of his estate's workers testify in the trail about what they knew. Jury eventually acquitted him. All this is about now is some gossip website release a video of the 2003 raid that the police taped for evidence, and all the other major news sites are picking it up because they have nothing else to report about right now.
>>65850683
there is a proven pattern of pedophiles desensitizing children to pedophilia through violent and underage pornography
live in denial all you want, but I shan't
hell be fine
>>65849939
Why didn't he just store it on 4chan like everybody else?
>>65850725
He already is fine
if you know anything about the case you'd know this was all bullshit.
janet arvizo (mother of the "victim") was a crazy fucking bitch who just wanted Jacko's money.
