>He believes the Beatles are overrated/ aren't a good band
The fact that so many books still name the Beatles "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success: the Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worth of being saved.
>>59660985
It seems every good band is either overrated or underrated/under-appreciated. The Beatles are a good band but they are very overrated.
>>59661070
beat me to it
>>59661212
those hover hands holy shit
>>59660985
>babys first psychedelic band isn't overated
>>59661212
Left or right, mu?
>>59662135
left obviously
>>59662135
Left, nose is less wide and the tits look a little bigger.
>>59662135
middle
>>59662274
this
