>ITT: Flawless discographies
I know Pram is a hard act to top, but common.
don caballero
unwound
fugazi
flaw-less
fite me for it
>>64162410
Flawless in that no release is objectively bad? Then yes.
>>64162430
that's was flawless means to me
I genuinely enjoyed Love Streams
I don't get Pram at all. It just sounds like Stereolab if they were autistic
The Avalanches
>>64162567
everyone on moo is autistic, that's like manna here
>>64162567
>every band from the same label sound the same
I never got the comparison, both are vaguely dream pop with female vocals, but the similarities end there.
c o l d
s
o
u
p
>>64162781
This is fucking garbage
>>64160679
>>64160679
My answer this time lat year wouldve been Beach House, but TYLS and DC were pretty mediocre
Slint is a given
>>64162781
how do u get off on talking about the same thing over and over again
>>64160679
What does flawless mean in this case? Is it:
a) artists with 10/10 discographies? That's extremely uncommon outside of artists with 1-2 albums.
b) artists with no bad albums?
>>64162860
>Slint is a given
Tweez is nothing special, in comparison to Spiderland it also appears even worse than it actually is. Wouldn't say it's a flawless discog.
>>64162930
>tweez as flaws
show them to me i'll fite you irl
>>64162925
Just whatever you feel fits the description, we're not making a scientific report here, anon.
>>64162944
>as
has*
>>64162944
The earphones.
>>64160679
United States of America
Windy & Carl
The Books
Swell Maps
Joanna Newsom
>>64162977
i don't understand this post
>>64163067
>being such an adamant tweez fan
>not recognizing the opening meme
>>64163100
i'm not a big fan, i just don't think they really have any flaws
and headphones being fucked up is not a flaw, it's perfect, that's a great opening 2bh
>>64163141
>still not getting the fucking joke
That flaw was the headphones being fucked up, as in, they're broken. Jesus Christ, get on that asperger medication.
>>64163245
great joke now where's my money
