AKG K240 and a bunch of peripherals on which someone else will school you.

best out of those is the 598. even so, the 558 has the exact same driver for less.
m50 is a meme, don't fall for it.
used to own the 7506, they're great.
>>61590019
i own these personally.

AKG 240'S.

>>61590019
>>61590054


The MKII actually any better than the 49 dollar model?

>>61590077
Doubt it.

>>61590046

What i've read on the 7506 is that it has pretty tight accuracy on sound levels and the nuances of high and low frequencies,

Does the AKG 240s or the 598/558 improve upon that?

Or is my shit still all retarded in understanding sound dynamics still?

any other votes for the AKGs or suggestions for other brands?

>>52298851
will yield better answers 2bh
(or the headphones subr*ddit)

>>61592177
fug, messed up the link
>>>/g/52298851

>>61592201

I didn't even think about /g/ for audio equipment

I just figured audio quality /mu/ might have some input.

Thanks though! I'll check it out.

>>61589993
sony mdr 7506, yeah

it's literally the headphones they use to master music anyways

cheap and neutral

I have both the 7506 and the 598, and the 598 is a good bit pricier without being appreciably better in any ways - merely different

of course, a seventy dollar difference is nothing when there are high end models with four digit msrps

I wonder if they're actually worth it

>>61592534

I think I narrowed it down to the 7506 and the AKG K 240s.

Both seem to be pretty all-purpose, and I've heard a lot on the 7506s since they're so commonly used.

>>61592534
in just bought 650s and they sound good as fuck so i can only imagine how they get from here on up

>>61592728
what does better mean in this context, out of curiosity? what other headphones have you used, for comparison?