Rolling Stone gave Blackstar 4 our of 5 stars.
Is it safe to assume this means it's better than anything Springsteen and Dylan have done this decade?
Yes, but that's not a high bar.
It will be a 6/10 album, nothing that comes close to his classic releases
8.5 BNM
Is it true that this album has leaked?
>>61326426
>tfw you realise the stars down the bottom spell "BOWIE"
>>61326426
they gave one of springsteens recent albums a 5 so...
Rolling Stone gave the shitty free U2 album 5 stars. They have literally zero credibility.
>>61328403
This is the truth. And that isn't even the best example of how fucked they've become.
>>61326426
they gave Nevermind 3 stars when it released
Rolling Stone ratings are not indicative of anything
Rolling Stone was pretty much always a pile of trash. They flip flop all of the fucking time. They've dismissed albums as trash years ago only to release a new review lauding it for being innovative or ahead of its time or some shit. I understand that they have different reviewers but generally it's just to get a click for that ad money.
>>61330959
For real though, music reviews don't have any credibility. It's impossible to make a decisive decision that is objective in hindsight.
>>61331240
just fucking get off /mu/ until you know what you're talking about
>>61327687
not that i know of
>>61331268
One day winter break fag, you will see the light senpai.
Bowie defies arbitrary ratings and the true significance of this record will still be being revealed in 20+ years. Blackstar/blackstar.
