What does /lit/ think of Wordsworth editions of classic novels? I know the paper isn't great and the covers are usually pretty poor (pic related) but I don't think they're beatable for the price, and maybe to just try and older or more difficult novel before committing and buying a nice edition that will last longer
maybe the owner has a fetish of doing this.
just imagine all of the employees editing images as their boss just keeps muttering behind them "yes, yes, now crop that face and make it look mildly bad, but make it look like you guys are trying; hmm yes, yess, now insert some monks behind him"
We had this same exact thread last week...
>>7890729
You guys haven't changed your opinions drastically since then?
>>7890724
>>7890736
I actually unironically like this cover.
>>7890736
is this real life
>>7890724
>>7890758
i've grown to love them out of irony, desu. so bad, its good if you will.
Someone PLEASE post the gay cosplayer one.
post the fake gravity's rainbow
>>7890832
>>7890873
this is shopped. i can tell from some of the pixels.
>>7890842
loooooooooooooool
>>7890901
Holy shit, is Sherlock Holmes posting on /lit?
>>7890842
W2c?
>>7890901
that's just their style, anon. it's legit
>>7891004
*sigh* absolutely glorious
>>7890915
being this new
>>7892891
And also from seeing a lot of shops in my time.
Tbh, I haven't that phrase since '11
