Is there an alternative to Goodreads that's patrician-tier?
I don't want to see lists of "popular" books everywhere. I want taste similar to my own and that means taste which excludes Donna Tartt.
no.
>>7706518
add people wit patrician taste you dingus, like the handsome sebastian.
Every moment that you have to be near real, sexualyl active people must be a living hell.
I just created on account on this yesterday
Do you fedoralords use it?
>>7706529
it is, it is. but that doesn't make A Secret History a good book!
>>7706518
Goodreads isn't for talking to people. It's for finding books you may have never heard of and keeping track of what you've read. If you make a point of only adding things that aren't shit it'll automatically give you some recommendations that don't suck. Just ignore most of the people there because they're borderline-illiterate retards.
>>7706539
how do I find a good biography of Picasso? Or cubism in general?
>>7706536
I feel your pain, senpai. The Alchemist re commendations and Clive Cussler bum me out.
>>7706533
just to put down books I want to read. nothing else.
There are decent lists but you have to scour for them. Take any decent work and go to its less popular lists and follow the rabbit hole down. Like I could probably find something titled 'Infinity and labyrinths in literature' or 'postmodern latin lit' if I were to check lists on Borges, which would likely include interesting recs.
>>7706518
R/books
>>7706541
> Just google it <
