???
- Home
- Board: /lit/ - Literature
- Reading: ???
Did Derrida fucking realize that deconstruction deconstructs itself and undermines its own "position"?
He essentially priviledges sign over being.
(ie sign/being; negative meaning/positive meaning)
Did he ever address this? Or is my reasoning faulty?
Bumpit
>the current year
>deconstruction
>>7326706
he has written philosophical literature
A Thousand Plateaus
Anti-Oedipus
etc
>>7326718
yes but you have to mention it in the OP to comply
>>7326660
He occasionally addresses this. Derrida & co don't take themselves very seriously and generally acknowledge that a mode of though called "deconstruction" has the same aporia as everything else.
>I am against systems, the most acceptable system is on principle to have none.
>>7326734
this is true you should cite the source op
otherwise we will find ourselves like this
>>>/his/138594
or like
>>7326718
>>7326718
But you aren't talking about those.
>>7326777
>Your retarded
>>7326785
Errr it was spell check...
>>7326785
>getting autistic over spelling in a Derrida thread
>>7326747
Relativists are the most cringeworthy thinkers/arguers
>>7326818
>>Relativists are the most cringeworthy thinkers/arguers
not as much as the objectivists like you
>>7326747
>>I am against systems, the most acceptable system is on principle to have none.
Now that's my kind of system.
>>7326718
>Derrida
>1000 Plateaus
>Anti-Oedipus
Nigga wat
>>7326830
According to what standard of cringe?
Most people who bitch about deconstruction hardly even know what it is.
>>7326961
>125 a.G.
>not being a groucho-marxist
>>7326961
perfect post
>>7326660
tell me New York Mets manager Terry Collins is not a dead ringer for Jacques Derrida
>>7328017
woah that's creepy
>>7327961
poper and quine typically
