Here they are:
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

You may pepper and salt them as you please

>>7363108
>quotation marks

>>7363120
here ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

Are they needed ?

Only a man whose never read Joyce would say a thing like that.
You have read Joyce, Anon, haven't you? I mean, why would you go exploring Irish lit without having read him? It would be absurd to do so.

>>7363213
Its kind of hard to tell when someone is speaking if they are absent. Haven't struggled with it so far but I could see it becoming a problem.

>>7363245
It would be absurd to read a more accessible, less recondite Joyce who writes less esoteric material than Joyce, before Joyce? You stupid nigger, this is a lead-in to Joyce. Besides I am reading this because Silas Flannery is Flann O'brien or Brian O'nolan

>>7363103
fucking idiot. that's how a lot of European books are written, its always clear who's speaking if you can read

>>7363253
The lead-in to Joyce is the entirety of the western canon before him.

Read that, then Joyce, then you can read O'Brien.

>>7363272
Don't tell me what to do, you tremendous cocksucker

>>7363108
BASED DEXTER

B A S E D
A
S
E
D