I tell you your relevant cities
>UK
London
Cardiff
Manchester
Bristol
Liverpool
Edimbourg
Glasgow
Birmingham
Belfast
>Spain
Madrid
Barcelona
Sevilla
Bilbao
Valencia
>Germany
Berlin
Munich
Hambourg
Frankfort
Cologne
>Italy
Rome
Milan
Naples
Turin
Venice
Florence
Palerme
>Russia
Moscow
Saint Petersbourg
>Poland
Varsaw
Cracow
>The Netherlands
Amsterdam
Rotterdam
>Belgium
Brussels
Anvers
>Japan
Tokyo
Kyoto
Osaka
>China
Beijing
Shanghai
Hong Kong
>India
(New) Delhi
Bombay
Calcutta
>Canada
Montreal
Toronto
Vancouver
>Australia
Sydney
Melbourne
>Brazil
Rio
Sao Paulo
>Turkey
Constantinople
Ankara
>Egypt
Alexandria
Cairo
>The USA
New York
Los Angeles
Chicago
Boston
Washington
Miami
Atlanta
New Orleans
Detroit
Dallas
Houston
San Francisco
Seattle
Las Vegas
>Cardiff
>Relevant
>Wales in general
>relevant
>Las Vegas
Nigga we made it
t. Nevadan
>no The Hague
what
>Brazil
Rio
Sao Paulo
HueLand
Spain is extremely accurate. Maybe missing Granada but fine for a french.
>>56979767
Rotterdam may be relevant, but it's still shit. (I live there myself) There is barely space left for pedestrians. If the center would change from a cluster of highways into a pedestrian zone I would be happy. Architecture is not a problem here
>>56979767
>Granada
nah, I would even say that Malaga is more relevant today
also I believe Zaragoza would be a lock for the sixth place
>>56979767
i think san sebastian is more important that bilbao.
Accurate for Canada
>>56973245
>Netherlands
>Not listing the seat of government/home of many juridical institutions
pls
>Edimbourg
What is this meme
>>56973245
>Pooland
>relevant
tfw Brazil is named but you aren't
>>56980369
absolutely not
>>56973278
Melbourne is objectively better than Sydney.
>>56979767
>Granada
>>56980536
All your cities are "literally who?" tier aside from Buenos Aires.
>>56973245
>Belfast
>Relevant
>>56973245
Aberdeen is relevant
Literally nicknamed "Oil Capital of Europe"
>>56973245
tell me