How are such statistics ever gathered? Do they just ask 1000 dudes to get hard and measure their dick, you know, for science? Wouldn't such data always be skewered since smalldicked men simply woudn't participate?

exactly 10 cm (4")

File: europe-according-to-penis-size[2].png (95 KB, 960x640) Image search: [Google]

95 KB, 960x640

>>62244606
honestly got no idea,i hope at least they follow legit scientific methods

>>62244550
Where is Benin?

>>62244550
6.5 tickler here

>>62244606
You mean skewed.

>tfw almost twice of Thailand's average

So close.

6''

>>62244550
7 x 6. i have nice girth to it.

vietnamese here though. feels pretty good to be above average genetically.

>>62244835
>vietnamese
Are you 5' as well? That dick must look monstrous desu

>>62244855
circumference-wise. looks normal as fuck especially since i'm not circumsized and my bell-end is covered instead of looking like a disgusting mushroom.

>>62244606
There's two kinds, some do actually measure hard guys, they obviously account for selection bias as this is a scientic study. The other way is self reported studies... Most of the studies done in Africa are the latter kind and they still come up average to Europeans...

>>62244882
I was asking about your height and how your dick looks in comparison.

>>62244957
5'8. normal. i guess. but i have a wide frame/torso/shoulder so its alright.

>>62244550
These charts were made based on personal reports and nothing would sum up Hungarian culture better than lying about the size of our dicks. I'd take this with a pinch of salt.

>>62244630
know that feel brother

7x5" here, but im 6ft so it looks unremarkable

File: pepe funny frog mem.jpg (37 KB, 788x685) Image search: [Google]

37 KB, 788x685

>>62244550

>tfw below average even for red standards

nice

>>62244550
this reminds me the opening of Porky's movie

>>62244550
Im a Filipino who's 6ft and has a 6.2"x5"
What does that mean?

>>62244550
17cm / 6.7 inches

>>62248842
dont brs have huge monkey dicks