How many % of your country is useless shit?
I would say 75-85%
something like 10-12%
Everything outside London
So 90%+
60 to 70%
95% if politicians
Pretty much everything that isn't Moscow or Peter is disposable, so about 99.9%
98%
> Pretty much everything that isn't Moscow or Peter is disposable
I'm pretty sure it's the other way around and I'm a Muscovite myself
>>62226023
99.9%
99% of France is comfy, livable, or good for agriculture, so only 1% is useless in these terms, the very mountainish parts, and they are still good for tourism.
>>62225931
95%
![NASA-US-Night[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/QLPgBOB.jpg "NASA-US-Night[1].jpg")
I guess 12% (non western foreigners) + 10% of the working class people living in the inner cities.
In the inner city we have "folk people" as we call them, which are the native inhabitants of that city and they speak in their own dialects. They tend to be useless sacks of shit with an IQ of 77. But they are pretty fun to be around.
90%+
>>62225931
Like 98% is frozen barren wasteland
>>62225931
0%, as we manage to transform the not liveable parts into touristic places
well, that's not exactly true if you count the jungle in Guyanne, though, but even that we just send légionnaires to train them
>>62227238
Oh you guys were talking about clay.
All our clay is used so 0%.
California + South + Mid-Atlantic + Lower Midwest + South = 80%
Upper Midwest, New England and PNW aren't as useless
![Algeria_sat[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/yFbrQcB.jpg "Algeria_sat[1].jpg")
99% of your country is a shitty desert
what do you do with this land?
>>62227377
lolwut. california is a humongous part of our GDP, almost all of america's manufacturing plants are in the south, and the midwest is literally the only part of the country that still has that giant middle class ratio that the whole country used to have in the 60s.
>>62227420
>The '''''''''''''''''''caliphate''''''''''''''''''''' in Syria and Iraq is mostly a uninhabitable barren desert
Really makes you think
>>62227420
they drill gas and petrol out of it, as far as I know
it was a nice nuclear testing ground, too
>>62227420
Oil
>>62225931
99.9999999999%
Are we talking about people or the land?
If people, maybe 10%.
The land?
I'll be kind and say 1/100? 1% No, seems too high. Actually with the deserts...
Yeah, 1%.
Most of our land is good. 38% of our people aren't even human.
>>62225931
19,3%
>>62227377
classic retard east coaster, California has the highest gdp of any state
>>62227537
>it was a nice nuclear testing ground, too
You are even more subhuman than americans
>>62227641
what? The deserts are a lot more than 1% of the country
>>62225931
I dunno but i am one of them
>>62225931
well, if you count out the niggers, the whole northeast region and the zika infected ones... there would be left Brasilia, 95% of the population of São Paulo, 99,9% of Rio de Janeiro, 80% of Rio grande do Sul... We could save about, three fiddy of the country.
Let's say out of 190kk of brazilians, only 2 millions would be worth saving.
>>62227741
You nuclear bomb Australia
Most of it is uninhabited and quaint. Many places are pretty good. I'd say 15% is a shithole, mainly around the big cities.
>>62227911
I wish
Close to a 100%
