http://www.futurebattles.com/
>>62201344
I determined if British,French,Korean,Italian,Spanish,Italian,rest of below us provoked us,WE LITERALLY KILL YOU HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
this list is really dumb, India and Saudi Arabia defintely do not have more force projection than UK or France. And Japan has strong local force but definitely not very strong force projection. Zero overseas infrastructure and operation for that kind of operation
>>62201588
>we
you mean us
we do your killing
you stick to the coast guard shit familia
>>62201344
>Ind"poo deck"ia
>Saudi "can't conquer Yemen" Arabia
And Russias force projection score is ludicrous, they cannot fight through their land borders, so we are we including their formidable land army in the score. It might be strong but it's not strong enough to fight through its Chinese or European borders.
>>62203021
>And Russias force projection score is ludicrous, they cannot fight through their land borders,
>>62202952
BUT WE CAN CHANGE OUR LOW FREELY
STINKY FAT MORON
I thought Brits were top 3 in military strength?
>>62203054
what did you mean by that? it really made me think...
>>62203047
An intervention entirely based on launching from already friendly airfields controlled by the Syrian government launching only air sorties to huge cost. The UK, France (and obviously) the US could have done this.
Russia cannot fight a conventional war against western Europe and win, they wouldn't make it through Poland.
>>62201344
>Australia 14
>Canada 28
Really makes you think
>>62203071
GO TO PLAY POKEMON GO,RIDE KAWASAKI AND WATCH ANIME WITH TOSHIBA TV YOU STINKY STUPID SLAVE
>>62203060
seems a little more complicated than the """factual jpg"""""" implies. Pakistan cannot project force as far as the UK, but with regards to its neighbours its a stronger force it can project. Seems distance isnt accounted.
>>62203097
>An intervention entirely based on launching from already friendly airfields controlled by the Syrian government launching only air sorties to huge cost. The UK, France (and obviously) the US could have done this.
>you have to fucking fly across the planet, build an airbase on someone's own hostile lawn, and then do 18 backflips while bombing their people to have force projection
The Russians also did not have a an airbase. They constructed one in September while under fire from rebel forces in Latakia and Palmyra.
>>62203134
rude
fake
>>62203054
what
>>62203150
they are flying from mostly regime airstrips, it's not very impressive building an airbase when operating from already friendly territory even if 'under fire'
>>62203172
>they are flying from mostly regime airstrips,
No. They built the fucking airfield themselves while flying planes from Armenia/South Russia.
They utilized the port of Tartus to drop off the trucks and BMP's that defended it.
Now go off yourself faggot.
That is force projection outside their border.
In the meantime, the SAA has enclosed Alleppo, conquered Palmyra, conquered Darya, conquered Zabadani, conquered Kuweires Air base, and cleared Latakia province of the rebels.
t. Middle East general /k/
>>62203220
Yes they built AN airfield as centre of operations, but they still fly from Syrian airbases.
>>62203294
>still fly from Syrian airbases
Maybe a few do, but almost all of their flight operations are out of Latakia air field or Palmyra. Both were constructed by Russians under fire.
One in September, and Palmyra in March.
>>62203169
translation: "i'm a lowtest beta but i can change"
>>62203493
well i doubt that last part
>>62203333
How many Army brigades do they have deployed in Syria?
>>62203493
THE,FILTHY ZAINICHI KOREAN
DO YOU LOVE JAPAN?
>>62201344
Why nobody cares and why you go bankrupt before anything happens
>>62203054