Trump praises for Saddam Hussein's efficient killing of 'terrorists,'
>"He was a bad guy -- really bad guy. But you know what? He did well? He killed terrorists. He did that so good. They didn't read them the rights. They didn't talk. They were terrorists. Over. Today, Iraq is Harvard for terrorism," Trump said.
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politics/donald-trump-saddam-hussein-iraq-terrorism/index.html?sr=fbcnni070616donald-trump-saddam-hussein-iraq-terrorism0401AMVODtopLink&linkId=26253126
>>61753213
>the only world leader to ever use Sarin gas
yeah we should total Praise that guy
>>61753213
He is right though
Trumpdrones are literally defending Saddam Hussein
What a world
>>61753557
Assad did it too.
>>61753557
Idiot
Trump said he was a bad guy
I'd say Afghanistan is the Harvard of terrorism since all those important lads like Bin Laden, al-Zarqawi and Azzam radicalised there.
Iraq is like the Yale at best.
>>61753557
well some people praise their country for using nukes on civilians so theres that
>I know words. I have the best words.
Is trump able to speak in sentences more than 3 words or is that too complicated for him?
>>61753213
Why does Donald Trump speak in grammatically incorrect sentence fragments?
>>61753213
telling an Iraqi you like Saddam is like telling a German you like Hitler
he's really a genocidal maniac, bush not having good intentions doesn't make him a saint
>>61753773
I think he's trying to be as colloquial as possible. It makes him easier to understand and easier to quote.
>>61753773
Says more about his audience than him.
>>61753868
Kek, you should see some of the Facebook comments from "Iraqis" on the Chilcot enquiry.
>When Sadaam was the ruler the country was more or less in peace
>Free water
>Free healthcare
>Cheap petrol
>People living in peace
>Going to school college uni.
>No one shooting each other
>No one bombing each other...
>>61754119
lmao
well if those people approve of peace through exterminating anyone who isnt of his sect/ideology then hes not bad
>>61753893
But he's always like this though? Listen or read his meeting with the Washington Posts editorial board. It's really something.
>>61753696
Ouch.
>>61753557
>only
You are forgetting about a lot.
>>61753213
Trump is correct though.
>>61754279
Did he do that?
I thought he killed less people than the dudes now.
on that note:
Was Gadhafi better than how it is currently?
>He kept fugees fromdrowning at least...
>>61753557
rumsfeld sez 'its chill'
>>61753868
t. "Libya is totally better now that it's in civil war" shill
Pew Polls showed that the vast majority of Iraqis preferred Saddam to now. It also showed the same for Libyans and Gaddafi.
Why was Saddam a bad guy and various dictators funded by US not? How would a Harvard proffessor answer such question?
>>61754279
>Saddam exterminated shias
>>61754604
It's a negotiating technique I think. I can't remember it's name but he's basically trying to create a kind of false familiarity by talking in a colloquial manner.
>>61754682
yeah he did
>was Gaddafi better
we're recovering from a bloody civil war so its shittier than under gaddafi slightly but im happy with current Libya
>>61754718
link me the polls, srsly i hate polfags
>he hates dictators
>hes a shill
go suck a dick gawad
>>61754757
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Saddam_Hussein's_Iraq
>>61754745
this
USA aren't saints either
but cuz USA are shit doesn't mean the dictators they took down are saints , either
based baath knew how to deal with k*rd menace.
>>61754882
>yeah he did
Source?
>I prefer civil war
Okay.
>link me the polls
You do it yourself.
They are a google search away.
>wikipedia
Could I have a better source for genocide of shias? Because every source I see is saying that there were massacres but not a genocide.
>>61755134
>Source?
I just sourced it
>Okay.
I prefer not having to bribe a banker to get my paycheck
>You do it yourself.
I just googled and found nothing
im 100% you just made that shit up
>Could I have a better source for genocide of shias? Because every source I see is saying that there were massacres but not a genocide.
what?
>>61755209
Wikipedia is not a source.
That is a link.
>>61755298
Holy shit you're so retarded go back to your containment board
>>61755298
you seriously need to get a gun and shoot yourself
>>61755298
Wikipedia cites sources. Don't be lazy, anon.
>>61755209
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2011/12/20/393290/poll-iraq-war-iran/
Are you using LibyanGoogle search??
>>61754924
Ya know, every time people talk about the US as shits in foreign policy I am reminded of this song.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV7aM32Jur8
We prefer to fuck you over gently compared to most other assholes.
>>61755348
Here's a source proving I'm correct.
http://www.iamcorrect.com
>>61755352
Your people do that well enough already.
>>61755356
I know. But he posted a link. Not a source.
>>61755378
>Iraqi views can again be described as conflicted: 22% saying they are happy; 35% saying they are worried; and 30% saying they feel both emotions.
where does it say they love Saddam?
>>61755356
So shouldn't the Libyan link the sources?
I could post links to StormFront websites that assert Egyptians were Nordic.
But that's not a source.
>>61755447
>But he posted a link. Not a source.
>Secondary sources are not sources
Did you finish high school?
>>61755497
forgot to say
the question asked in the pol is what they feel about USA leaving Iraq
>>61755497
Where did I state "Iraqis love Saddam"?
I call you a shill because you never address the argument or provide sources. You always try using your own anecdotes or link wikipedia.
That's literally what /pol/ does in arguments.
>>61755540
Wikipedia is not a secondary source you retard.
>>61755546
Which connects directly to them removing Saddam...
We wouldn't be there if we didn't remove Saddam. Are you being purposefully obtuse?
>>61755513
He gave you a link to a source. Are you really too lazy to scroll to the bottom of the page and find the source for yourself? Think you're just being a contrarian, shit-stirring mong tbqh.
>>61755573
>Where did I state "Iraqis love Saddam"?
>>61754718
>Pew Polls showed that the vast majority of Iraqis preferred Saddam to now. It also showed the same for Libyans and Gaddafi
>I call you a shill because you never address the argument or provide sources. You always try using your own anecdotes or link wikipedia.
>That's literally what /pol/ does in arguments.
sooo wikipedia is not a valid source?
are you trolling? i'm pretty sure you're trolling
>>61753213
Oh, does he mean the Kurds that Saddam bombed indiscriminately and that we promised to protect? What a fucking retard. He keeps on saying the stupidest shit, it's like he's trying to sink his own campaign. The only thing holding him afloat is the power of retards to believe in him no matter what he says.
>>61755626
>a link to a source
No he did not. That's a link to a website. Not a source.
At least fucking greentext the area that talks about Shia genocide. Linking a website is not linking a source.
HILLARY OFFERS FREE COLLEGE TUITION
Lmfao, Trumpfags are so screwed
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/feed/how-much-would-hillary-clintons-debt-free-college-plan-save-you-even-if-youve-already-graduated/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=tw&utm_campaign=20160706feed_collegeplan
>>61755683
Wikipedia itself is the link to the source. Are you merely pretending?
>>61754604
No he isn't
Watch some of his older interviews
>>61755624
>In scholarship, a secondary source is a document or recording that relates or discusses information originally presented elsewhere.
Thats literally what Wikipedia, a history book or a dictionary does super autismo man
>>61755636
So you were incapable of showing where I stated "Iraqis loved Saddam."
Looks like that case is closed.
http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k70847&pageid=icb.page346376
Wikipedia is not a valid source.
>>61753868
No but doesn't make the good things any worse
The good things we should also do
>>61755771
>wikipedia is a link to a source
He linked www.wikipedia.org
Not sources from wikipedia.
>>61755836
So again, you're just too lazy to scroll to the bottom and find the source yourself. Playing semantics isn't making you look like any less of an idiot.
>>61753213
The thing is, sandniggers can't handle democracy.
You need an average IQ of 90+ in your population for a democracy to work. They don't have that.
Sand niggers need a brutal dictator to keep the barbarians in check otherwise they start allahu akbarring each other.
>>61755798
You seem to have trouble reading your own dictionary.
Secondary sources are interpretations of primary sources. Not interpretations of secondary sources.
Wikipedia is not a source. It's a repository for links to sources.
>>61755883
I did. There was FUCKING NOTHING on Shia genocide by Saddam.
>>61755831
>good things
such as?
>>61755805
pic related
>Proven wrong with sources at the bottom
>Instead of using the sources to show what's wrong, spergs out "WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A VALID INTERNET DEBATE SOURCE WE4RE IN HARVARD HERE EVERYONE MUST SPEND HOURS TO DO HIS RESEARCHES"
>>61755949
You have failed miserably and therefore resort to ad hominems.
Pathetic.
I used Harvard to prove Wikipedia is not a valid source.
You were incapable of showing where I supposedly claimed "Iraqis loved Saddam."
You were incapable of providing a valid source for your claims of Shia genocide by Saddam.
Pic related will soon be you.
>>61755949
Saddam? What Trump said
>>61756026
I have no idea how we got here
I'm sorry anon i love Gaddafi i'm gonna hang a green flag on my house
forgive me I have learned my mistakes
>>61755955
Well then link the valid source and not Wikipedia, fuckwit
>>61755955
Nice strawman after losing the argument.
1. Wikipedia is not a valid source.
2. Nowhere in the fucking entire Wikipedia page was there anything to do with his claimed "Shia genocide by Saddam."
3. Stop being autistic.
>>61756026
>>61755955
>I KILL YOU BCUZ YOU SANDNIGGER DURR DURR HURR BUT DONT YOU DARE CALLING ME A TROLL
>you in this thread
>>61756091
Im not trying to prove anything are you unable to understand human communications?
Im just mocking the retard you are
>>61756062
Where did I claim Gaddafi was good? I only mentioned him once in the post about polling.
>>61756097
>I'll kill you
Nope. That's the work of ISIS with Libyan militias.
Stop being autistic.
>>61753213
>Trump says something that is pretty obvious
>"OMG what a monster!"
>>61756132
Oh yes surely this post>>61755955
wasn't trying to attack my character.
What a completely pointless discussion with a bunch of autists.
>>61755948
Huh, you are actually correct. Here's a source showing genocide of Shias:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/2807821.stm
>>61756026
You're a pretty disgusting human being.
>>61756171
That's called mockery inbred redneck
>>61755710
lol she gon do it 4 sure
15$ minimum wage too
she wouldn't lie
>>61756248
Cry me a fucking river
And go back to tumblr or whatever your preferred sjw site is
>>61756359
wait a second hating dictators is sjw stuff now?
only sjws hate genocide?
what happened to this world?
>>61756359
>saying genocide is bad is now tumblr-tier
What a time to be alive.
>>61756462
>>61756464
No, he said that the murikan was a disgusting human being, and for what?
>>61756577
For mocking someone from a country in severe political turmoil, posting pictures of the recently deceased and implying that said person should join them.
>>61756680
Exactly.
Shit that happens here every day
If that makes you feel disgusted, sick and triggered, then please, fuck off back to tumblr
>>61753213
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbK_1doj_Yo
>>61756724
>bad things happen all the time so bad things are ok
You've let too much apathy into your mind, anon.
>>61756807
This is a place for "bad things"
If you don't like it, go somewhere else
>>61756856
No it isn't, it's a place for (relatively) unmoderated discussion. People here choose to be vile, it is not enforced.
>>61756954
And people on tumblr choose to get offended by everything, like you do, so why don't you go and be with your kin?
Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.
>>61756856
last i checked the description for the board was
>a board for international discussion and culture
>>61753213
So we all agree that its better to keep a dictator in charge of a country instead of removing him and thus creating a power vacuum which will be filled with unchecked extremists?
>>61757046
Your obsession with tumblr aside, words can hurt people, only the mentally ill are never hurt by what others say.
>>61757051
Meant 4chan in general
>>61757179
And it's completely normal to get upset about something an anonymous American said about some anonymous libyan?
>>61757314
I know empathy isn't very cool or edgy but it does actually exist.
>>61757472
Internet isn't all serious business lad
Phone's dying lads
>>61757522
A lot of it is though. Are you trying to imply that the post in question was some kind of joke?
>>61757619
Well I'm implying that you shouldn't take it too seriously either
And my point was and still is that if that kind of posts disgusts you maybe this isn't the right place for you
>>61757725
I've had many interesting discussions here; I'm not going to leave just because some professional apathists want to make everyone feel as miserable and hollow as they are.
>>61757536
Hook it to the charger lad
>>61757809
You know you can hide posts that make you upset?
>>61757879
I do know that.
>>61753213
>"He was a bad guy -- really bad guy. But you know what? He did well? He killed terrorists. He did that so good. They didn't read them the rights. They didn't talk. They were terrorists. Over. Today, Iraq is Harvard for terrorism," Trump said.
My god, that speech
Is Trump a 10 years old ?
>>61757929
You know
You can speak differently to make a different effect on the listeners
For instance, our retarded ex-pm always listed three things no matter what the subject was
