its not even a meme at this point...
>>61734375
>canadian conservatives
... why is xe wearing pajamas?
How long will it be before this becomes the new flag
place your bets
>there was a time canadians could look at their leaders for guidance
>there was a time when our government cared about canadians
>>61734418
I actually kind of like it, it's nice and colourful
>>61734375
I think it's great that Trudeau is showing solidarity with Canada's LGBT citizens.
Why are you triggered so easily?
>>61734390
i demand a source
>>61734465
source for what? they were there and it caused the liberals to whine
Isn't it illegal to modify the canadian flag?
>>61734493
but did their signs actually say "because it's the current year"? i'd like to think it's just an edit but truth is occasionally stranger than fiction
>>61734525
yea it's real
Literally every sane person is pro gay rights nowadays, what's wrong with marching with them?
>>61734525
It's real but I think they were saying it ironically, like facebook /cpcpcc/photos/10154297426314204
>>61734607
>sane
>rallying for 2 dudes to be able to marry each other
>>61734510
what?
I also thought it was just a meme until I saw this.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4CK5JGqLD0 WTF
>>61734607
Scandinavia is long gone, why not marry your dog, right?
Trudeau is a pandering fuckwit, nothing new to see here.
He would get assfucked on live TV by that gay Syrian refugee he was with if he thought it would make him look more progressive
>>61734607
there's nothing wrong with it, trudeau is a sideshow. he stands there with a gay syrian refugee with AIDS and it makes headline news in our country it's pathetic
Easter?¿
>>61734651
>>61734697
what's wrong with 2 persons of the same sex marrying each other?
>>61734664
I mean, isn't it illegal to add those shit LGBT colors in the canadian flag?
Modifying flags like that is illegal in alot of countries.
>>61734450
But in your pic he's showing care for one of the most vulnerable groups of Americans?
>>61734525
They're doing it to mock Trudeau
Right-wing politicians have begun weaponizing 4chan memes. What a strange fucking time to be alive
>>61734725
If you gotta ask, youre too far gone into the Matrix
>>61734510
>>61734730
>Mexico
>freedom
>>61734730
Nigga our flag is A FUCKING LEAF, we don't really give a shit about altered flags, why should we?
>>61734725
Every single person that came before you other than your parents and maybe your grandparents could answer that question. What does that say about your society?
>>61734779
um... ok? then explain it to me please why it's so bad that two people of the same sex get married?
>>61734730
No not really. Because once you modify it it's no longer the "Canadian flag"
There is extensive protocol for the Canadian flag though
http://canada.pch.gc.ca/eng/1444133232522
>>61734697
a dog can't consent
>>61734789
>>61734808
Like I said, if you dont know, i cant tell you.
Its lime trying to explain the color blue to a blind man. You have no capacity for underdtanding it, no means by which to process the information.
>>61734805
Homosexuality was normal once you know. I don't see anything wrong with it since it doesn't affect anyone badly. What does it say about your society that homosexuals have higher rates of suicide, mental problems, drug abuse and alcohol abuse?
>>61734837
Consent is a social construct, so is age, stop with this nonsense!
>>61734868
>omg i can't believe you have a different opinion than me
>no i won't explain why i'm right i just am because you don't understand and you are stupid bla bla bla
um... ok then...
>>61734881
Right, fet rid of them once and for all through equality!
>>61734725
You're a degenerate, no family or clan values, just an individualistic, narcissistic mop that will die alone.
>>61734375
I asked in the last thread that had Trudaeu if it was true that he was spending all your money on partying and nobody answered me, so is it?
>>61734375
sorry but im starting to like that guy
>>61734930
and you are like a leftwing when you argue. Thank you for your contribution to the discussion
>>61734881
For example the French constitution was changed from "mother and father" to "parent 1 and parent 2".
Now a child can be bought off some 3rd world woman for 2 men to raise.
Poor kids.
>>61735026
that doesn't make homosexuality wrong
>>61734805
Theres way too many people on earth.
I say let the population control do its thing
>>61734954
who knows nobody cares about politics in this country, even when we have an election. we have a trust fund babie tumblr tier liberal """"leading"""" our country
>>61735069
I need to know if he is an alpha Chad bro or not, this is very important
>>61734881
Homesexuality =/= gay marriage
Homosexuality didn't even exist. These tendencies have always existed in people of course, but only in the modern world do we develop an identity from a sexual deviancy, it's no different from furries or trannys. This leads to the destruction of the family unit which then destroys the entire society.
How terrible what a fucking monster
>>61734390
Canadians are all pro-feces. They either come as "We support tumblr shit" or "We support normal mentally ill who aren't pushy about their mental illness."
>>61735197
*tips fedora*
>>61735055
My blood boils every time I hear this. Just one more excuse to neglect raising children in the west.
Think about it for a fucking second, do you think humans are evenly spread out across the world? Yes there are places that are incredibly overpopulated, there are also places that are about to fall apart from a population shortage.
Can you guess where those are?
>>61735320
You obviously disagree with my post, why don't you try making an actual response?
>>61735357
Some societies can handle different amount of people in each generation. Socialist societies will be challenged because they need a big work force to contribute to the growing older population. but that has nothing to with gays
>>61735357
Fuck children, they're annoying as fuck. Have you ever been to Costco on a Sunday?
>>61735357
>>61735383
because you're implying something totally unrealistic. that legalizing gay marriage will destroy entire societies. I can't use your postulate for anything. Denmark legalized gay marriage and that didn't happen
>>61735443
Sure I agree with that, and Scandinavia is familiar with having a low population anyways. The west is about to have a real fucking rough time if the birth rate doesn't rise though.
>>61735482
No gays marrying is not the trigger to collapse a civilization, it's the fact that it's even considered. Societal morals have disappeared, marriage obviously doesn't mean what it used to if people don't see a problem with gay marriage. It's the implications that matter.
>>61735700
>Societal morals have disappeared
So it is moral to deny a subset of the population their rights? What do you even mean by this?
>marriage obviously doesn't mean what it used to if people don't see a problem with gay marriage
So in your vision, two men marrying each other and raising a family is more degrading than a pop star marrying for fun and divorcing the next day to marry someone else?
>It's the implications that matter.
Le slippery slope of gayness
>>61734730
Is Mexico a fucking police state? wtf
>>61736035
>two men marrying each other and raising a family
Does the shit that seep out of their ass animorph into a human?
>>61736035
>So it is moral to deny a subset of the population their rights? What do you even mean by this?
Read my previous post. Homosexuals are a fabricated identity from a sexual deviancy, there is no "they" and "they" have no right to twist what marriage is.
>So in your vision, two men marrying each other and raising a family is more degrading than a pop star marrying for fun and divorcing the next day to marry someone else?
They are both degenerations
>Le slippery slope of gayness
Are you trying to argue that morals have not changed over the years? Seriously?
>>61736701
Morals have always changed though. I don't understand what your argument is supposed to be.
>>61736701
>Read my previous post. Homosexuals are a fabricated identity from a sexual deviancy, there is no "they" and "they" have no right to twist what marriage is.
But there's a they. Thanks to homophobe heterosexuals there's the flamboyant gay culture of today, it's a product of reaction. And all because the former couldn't simply accept the latter as something normal. And they do have the right to properly love their partner without the state meddling in their business.
>They are both degenerations
There's nothing wrong with raising a family as a homo couple, nobody cares about your puerile notions of what's 'degenerate'.
>Are you trying to argue that morals have not changed over the years? Seriously?
And what kind of slippery slope will we realistically face if society gives homosexuals the right to marry and adopt? No memes please.
>>61736528
Stay salty :^)
>>61736998
Yes, and are the changes arbitrary?
>>61737167
No. That's precisely why the slippery slope argument doesn't hold water.
>>61737124
>Stay salty :^)
You talk of homos raising families yet families can't come out of their asses.
>There's nothing wrong with raising a family as a homo couple
Children get messed up just being raised by straight single mothers. Kids would be better off raised by a herd of capybaras than shitpackers.
>>61737124
>Thanks to homophobe heterosexuals there's the flamboyant gay culture of today
There's a gay culture today because there's a gay identity, and yes a big part of it is a reaction. There didn't used to be a flamboyant gay culture because there never was a gay culture.
>There's nothing wrong with raising a family as a homo couple
Well I'm sorry you see it that way
>And what kind of slippery slope will we realistically face if society gives homosexuals the right to marry and adopt? No memes please.
Gay marriage is not the root of the damn problem. I said this before, it's a symptom of the west's decline. I could give a damn what gays do, the same fate awaits a society at the end of it's life no matter what.
>>61737218
Look I'm not even arguing for slippery slope, a civilization and it's morals will naturally degenerate once it reaches a certain point. This is just the nature of human society.
>>61737339
>You talk of homos raising families yet families can't come out of their asses.
Of course, that's why you adopt children, or just keep raising the biological child of one of the fathers if it's a gay couple, or find a sperm donor if it's a lesbian couple. How can these simple actions sail over your head so easily?
>Children get messed up just being raised by straight single mothers. Kids would be better off raised by a herd of capybaras than shitpackers.
You're hilariously wrong, but please, stay mad.
>There didn't used to be a flamboyant gay culture because there never was a gay culture.
19th-early 20th century dandies were really close to what today is considered gay culture mein freund.
>Well I'm sorry you see it that way
I'm sorry that I can bend over for a cock and not bend over to be cucked out of my rights.
>I said this before, it's a symptom of the west's decline. I could give a damn what gays do, the same fate awaits a society at the end of it's life no matter what.
Decline of what? Many things in the world are now better than ever, what do you exactly mean?
>Look I'm not even arguing for slippery slope, a civilization and it's morals will naturally degenerate once it reaches a certain point. This is just the nature of human society.
And what would you consider the time when morality peaked? The 50s?
We're living in a meme world.
>>61735357
this
africans breed like rats and can't afford to feed them so they rely on western aid
meanwhile the average educated White has 1 or 2 kids. It's not us that need population control
>>61736035
Homosexuals are "a subset of the population", no more than guitarists, swingers, or banana eaters.
Why are you denying their rights to swingers? They should be able to marry 177 people simultaneously (the whole swingers' club at once).
>>61737886
Because that's not what being a swinger is you retard. Swinger means you temporarily swap the couples, that doesn't imply a lasting relationship and commitment.
>>61737124
>they do have the right to properly love their partner without the state meddling in their business
Marriage is exactly "the state meddling in your business".
And "they" don't exist, you're not a special category of the population because you love to fondle your sex on someone else's butt.
>>61737673
>Imma meme girl in a meme world...
>>61738127
>Marriage is exactly "the state meddling in your business".
By meddling I mean forbidding or harassing two consenting adults from 'formalizing' their relationship.
>And "they" don't exist, you're not a special category of the population because you love to fondle your sex on someone else's butt.
But we are, here in Colombia, even in France :^)
Also your fixation with anal sex is strange. Being gay is more than just buttfucking you know?
>>61737634
Not mad. Just trying to understand your depraved viewpoint. Colombian niggers don't have the frontal lobe to comprehend abstract moral principles and they don't care about orphaned children getting homes, those children aren't theirs. Are you a bender or some shut-in trying to get you's?
>>61738018
That's a very bigoted thing to say. Swingers love is only temporary because society give us no rights to make it permanent. If I could, I'd marry my 143 friends from the club and we'd form a wonderful, reliable family.
I think you're just a bigot.
>>61734697
I feel so horrible for you anon. You must be a decent dude. But You live in Japan. A country that's been gone for over 70 years now.
>>61734375
https://youtu.be/y7rOPSHKXVs
>implying it was ever just a meme
>>61738217
>Colombian niggers don't have the frontal lobe to comprehend abstract moral principles and they don't care about orphaned children getting homes, those children aren't theirs.
Legally they are in my country, even in yours actually. The kids would surely love being raised by a proper family with parents instead of being taken care of by state orphanages. You seem to be really upset. mad and impotent about this state of affairs though :(
>Are you a bender or some shut-in trying to get you's?
As backside-artist-bugger as they come lad.
>>61738234
Why don't you make a group to campaign for swinger marriage then?
>>61738196
>Being gay is more than just buttfucking you know?
Shit, really? No one told me.
>>61734390
>Because It's The Current Year
Oh dear lord
>>61734390
>because it's the current year
meme magic is real
>>61738196
>>61738407
HAHA BUTTSECKS :DDDDDDD
...on the issue.
Who cares if the fags are getting civil rights, as long as they don't deny the others' civil rights? They at least aren't like zealots, who would gladly kill everybody against their retarded myth of choice.
>>61734390
>The fall of Harper are ushered forth a new era of meme politics
THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING!
>>61738327
>As backside-artist-bugger as they come lad.
No. You're an awkward virgin roleplaying a liberal for you's.
>>61738407
Twinks sure do make that part of homosexuality harder to remember hnnng. Post more.
>awkward
yes
>virgin
nope
>roleplaying a liberal for you's.
>People that disagree with me don't exist
Not even a liberal tbqh
>>61738620
meant for >>61738571
>>61738620
don't have all that many sfw images tbqh
>>61738499
Fags are not getting rights, they are GIVING rights (although people don't want them).
You now have the dubious right to marry a faggot, and what's denied is the value of your marriage. Soon you'll marry 50 people at once, or you'll marry your parents. Twice per month. Or temporarily. It will be called "marriage", and a classic marriage will have the value of this joke. Here's the problem.
>>61738802
Somehow, I doubt that will happen. I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
>>61738802
Nobody is seriously arguing to extend marriage to more than two people commited to a relationship, cut it out.
>>61738734
thanks lad, this one for you.
>>61738802
>and what's denied is the value of your marriage
Marriage IMHO should be strictly religious; what the law should determine is a civil union between two consenting adults to raise a family. [There's a HUGE difference between both.]
>Soon you'll marry 50 people at once
Slippery slope fallacy.
>>61738802
And NO, the value of my marriage and my heterosexual civil union are untouched - I, a man, can still raise my family just fine with a woman.
>>61734390
Nothing wrong with this tbqh.
Being pro LGBT stuff doesn't make you pro Ahmed.
Gays and shit don't decide to be that way, so no point discriminating against them. Muslims acting subhumans are still gonna get shat on cause they act subhuman.
>>61734390
>Because It's The Current Year
holy kek
>>61738939
We already have such unions in Brazil, retard.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-19402508
http://elpais.com/elpais/2015/10/27/inenglish/1445948093_804967.html
>>61739076
See links above for the so-called fallacy.
>>61739144
>Being pro LGBT stuff doesn't make you pro Ahmed.
Pretty sure if anything it's the opposite?
Being anti-lgbt would make you good friends with Ahmed
>>61739283
If you read both articles, you'll realize they're CHALLENGING the law against bigamy/polygamy. The law still stands just fine.
See
http://sandrielly.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/111898879/consideracoes-acerca-do-crime-de-bigamia-ficcao-e-realidade
[Google Translator it, it's in PT]
>>61739283
>See links above for the so-called fallacy.
Check the date for the first article... 2012. Gay marriage was legalized in 2013, source
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage_in_Brazil
So one thing could only be consequence of the other if they got some fucking time machine.
>>61738978
I'm afraid all I have left that isn't porn is some Tom of Finland.
>>61734390
Gotta get them votes, mang.
>>61739387
I did not argue there was a "slippery slope". You did.
Anyway your argument is very weak since "same-sex marriage" is a consequence and not a cause of degeneracy.
>>61739357
The Colombian monkey argued:
>Nobody is seriously arguing to extend marriage to more than two people commited to a relationship
And he is wrong. People are seriously arguing (or "challenging") to extend it.
I have nothing more to say.
>>61734375
Problem?
