The 2nd Amendment is there so I can defend myself against an oppressive gov...whoops.
I love how people reply to that with 'Oh, but the military wouldn't do that against their own people', in which case you still wouldn't need the guns
>>61701953
Retard
>>61702120
>gov can only bomb you
Retard
overall 0/5 transparent bait dont expect too many (You)'s
>the us federal government will go full nazi communist at any moment and enslave and genocide us all for no reason!
>t. average ameriburger
>>61702212
>nazi communist
SHALL
>>61702343
NOT
>>61702212
>he trusts the government
>>61702389
If you don't trust it then why haven't you changed it?
>taking guns away will stop gun violence
LMAO what are you gonna do put the guns in prison
>>61702427
He can't do it alone
>>61702427
Because democracy doesn't work and even attempting to overthrow the US government with less than 100 million backing you would be suicide for every single person involved.
>>61701953
because thats worked so well in Vietnanmam i right?
>>61701953
To be fair to the 2nd ammendment, at the time it was written the most dangerous weapons around was the cannon, which is basically a big gun. It's not like they were predicting that the government would have the power to glass earth with nuclear weapons.
5th is there so you can get away with it, right?
>>61702450
>>61702721
Aren't the guns supposed to exist exactly for this kind of situation? To overthrow a government that has lost the trust of it's people?
Why isn't it working?
i kinda understand some muricans
>living on a ranch
>closest neighbour 10 km away
>some guy tells me i should give up my rifle
>mfw
